Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans

1273274276278279331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Vaccine.hse.ie is a cloud platform and thankfully the HSE IT systems are that disjointed that many aren't linked. Sounds like this is limited to the rotunda at the moment.

    Now if its spread then shutting down the whole system would be the first step as a pre caution. I'd be surprised if there wasn't more than 1 hospitals system impact.

    I work in IT so trying to find out a bit more from different people

    Literally just got a text from someone involved with the HSE via one of their contractors.

    It's a bad one, defence forces cyber security are involved & talk of GCHQ giving assistance

    Vaccine rollout not impacted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Thankfully not having a integrated system for everything might help with this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Thankfully not having a integrated system for everything might help with this.

    Yeah I've said for long enough that they should have one and the contractors that I know who do work for them have said the same. This time they're blessing themselves that systems are separated.

    It's still bad but could have been a hell of alot worse


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,441 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Thankfully not having a integrated system for everything might help with this.

    What generally helps is having a good backup system, and to regularly test that backup that it works. Though if the system was compromised for a long time before activated. It can be backups going back a long time.

    The problem these people are hard to catch and put in jail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Strazdas wrote: »
    But as I mentioned above, I don't think we've seen even a single vaccine related death in Ireland so far. Also, the focus seems to be far more on authorising J & J for younger people rather than AZ.

    Do we have to see a death? The sister of the first woman to have an AZ related clot described her condition and it sounds like she will have a long road to recovery. I was fairly debilitated for months last year with post-viral chest issues and I still have lingering symptoms. But that sounds like a walk in the park compared to the recovery from a stoke. I'd choose months of inflammation over a stroke, tbh, I think most people would.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Flinty997 wrote: »
    What generally helps is having a good backup system, and to regularly test that backup that it works. Though if the system was compromised for a long time before activated. It can be backups going back a long time.

    The problem these people are hard to catch and put in jail.

    Website seems to be still working. What system do they use for tracking cases I wonder?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Website seems to be still working. What system do they use for tracking cases I wonder?

    Website should be fine, assuming it's hosted externally and won't hold any data.

    Issue looks to be on its records systems more than anywhere else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,534 ✭✭✭OwlsZat


    Literally just got a text from someone involved with the HSE via one of their contractors.

    It's a bad one, defence forces cyber security are involved & talk of GCHQ giving assistance

    Vaccine rollout not impacted

    It's fairly common knowledge that we don't have a centralized hospital IT system like the NSH does or Australia, USA etc., does., St. James is the only hospital where records are digitalized. Hence all the young doctors want to work there.

    In other hospitals we pay intern and junior doctors wages to manage vast paper files; writing letters of all sorts, and sieve through paper records looking for key words or requesting files from other hospitals for senior staff.

    It's one of the biggest inefficiencies and wastes in the country. Ironically, it might help us here but it's still a shambles. Obviously, we should have a robust properly managed centralized IT system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭bodun


    OwlsZat wrote: »
    It's fairly common knowledge that we don't have a centralized hospital IT system like the NSH does or Australia, USA etc., does., St. James is the only hospital where records are digitalized. Hence all the young doctors want to work there.

    In other hospitals we pay intern and junior doctors wages to manage vast paper files; writing letters of all sorts, and sieve through paper records looking for key words or requesting files from other hospitals for senior staff.

    It's one of the biggest inefficiencies and wastes in the country. Ironically, it might help us here but it's still a shambles. Obviously, we should have a robust properly managed centralized IT system.


    Nonsense, NCHD's don't want to work in specific hospitals because of their IT systems, they want to work in the best teaching hospitals where they will work with the best superiors and see a wide variety of cases.


    NCHDS don't manage paper files of write letters either, there are admin people to do that for them.


  • Posts: 1,159 [Deleted User]


    revelman wrote: »
    Hang on. I usually agree with your posts. But there are different graphs depending on how much virus is circulating in the community. You are pointing to the scenario where there is very low exposure of risk. Compared to the U.K., we still have quite a bit of virus in the community and, with less than 40% of people with a first vaccine, this could easily spread even more with any further loosening of restrictions. If there is a medium risk of exposure to the virus, the potential benefits of AZ vaccine outweigh potential harms for all age groups. If there is a high or very high risk, then the benefits far outweigh the harms.

    Yes the risk changes depending on the level of virus spreading, but if you look at the rates each scenario is based on, we are still closest to the lowest one (which is based on 0.6 cases per day per 10,000 - we are at 0.9 per 10,000).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    OwlsZat wrote: »
    It's fairly common knowledge that we don't have a centralized hospital IT system like the NSH does or Australia, USA etc., does., St. James is the only hospital where records are digitalized. Hence all the young doctors want to work there.

    In other hospitals we pay intern and junior doctors wages to manage vast paper files; writing letters of all sorts, and sieve through paper records looking for key words or requesting files from other hospitals for senior staff.

    It's one of the biggest inefficiencies and wastes in the country. Ironically, it might help us here but it's still a shambles. Obviously, we should have a robust properly managed centralized IT system.

    I don't want to derail the thread as it's to do with vaccine rollout but that's not true at all.

    But I'll leave it there as I'm not going to bring the thread off topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    I don't want to derail the thread as it's to do with vaccine rollout but that's not true at all.

    But I'll leave it there as I'm not going to bring the thread off topic.

    It’s not the main driving force, but I’ve heard it listed as a positive several times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭Russman


    Sooo, when are we thinking the portal will open for the 40s ? Monday/Tuesday ?

    As an aside, despite all the differing views on what NIAC should or shouldn't do, you do have to wonder what exactly they've been considering for the last week or more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Russman wrote: »
    Sooo, when are we thinking the portal will open for the 40s ? Monday/Tuesday ?

    As an aside, despite all the differing views on what NIAC should or shouldn't do, you do have to wonder what exactly they've been considering for the last week or more.

    Don't think it'll be that quick to be honest. Maybe towards the end of next week.

    There's still alot of 50s to & some 60s in certain centres do before thinking about 40s. Mother is 58 and registered on the day so hopefully should hear in the next day or two with an appointment.

    I wouldn't expect 40s to be invited to register though before the next of next week


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,534 ✭✭✭OwlsZat


    I don't want to derail the thread as it's to do with vaccine rollout but that's not true at all.

    But I'll leave it there as I'm not going to bring the thread off topic.

    Why don't you enlighten me. If it's top secret information do share in PM. Love to enlighten the doctor I live with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Russman wrote: »
    Sooo, when are we thinking the portal will open for the 40s ? Monday/Tuesday ?

    As an aside, despite all the differing views on what NIAC should or shouldn't do, you do have to wonder what exactly they've been considering for the last week or more.


    The portal won't open for the 40s until NIAC decide if they are going to change the age recommendation for J&J and AZ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    josip wrote: »
    The portal won't open for the 40s until NIAC decide if they are going to change the age recommendation for J&J and AZ.
    I'd wonder whether they might pause for a bit longer than that till they clear out Group 7.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭revelman


    josip wrote: »
    The portal won't open for the 40s until NIAC decide if they are going to change the age recommendation for J&J and AZ.

    Varadkar said in the Dail yesterday that we should hear from NIAC within days but “certainly before Tuesday”. The way he singled out Tuesday suggests to me that they were planning to open registration from Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Scuid Mhór


    is_that_so wrote: »
    I'd wonder whether they might pause for a bit longer than that till they clear out Group 7.

    This to me is the optimal route for them to take.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Russman wrote: »
    Sooo, when are we thinking the portal will open for the 40s ? Monday/Tuesday ?

    .


    This attack will really delay things if HSE aren't back up and running soon, GPs cant refer to labs, tests etc. Portal will be least of their issues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Scuid Mhór


    pc7 wrote: »
    This attack will really delay things if HSE aren't back up and running soon, GPs cant refer to labs, tests etc. Portal will be least of their issues.

    Not necessarily. The vaccine related cloud software isn’t effected by the ransomware attack. There’s no reason for it not to continue as normal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭Russman


    revelman wrote: »
    Varadkar said in the Dail yesterday that we should hear from NIAC within days but “certainly before Tuesday”. The way he singled out Tuesday suggests to me that they were planning to open registration from Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.

    Yeah, that's what I was sort of thinking too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭josip


    is_that_so wrote: »
    I'd wonder whether they might pause for a bit longer than that till they clear out Group 7.

    Other posters on here earlier made the good point, that if they do decide to lower J&J and AZ for the 40s that they face a similar problem of pausing many of those 40s until the end of June in order to use the J&J when the bulk of the supply will arrive. Uncertainty of supply is the big risk with this.

    For 40s, the delay will be a couple of weeks less than would have been for the 50s, and the risk of contracting will be lower, but the principle and the dilemma remains the same.

    It's an easier sell if it's only the J&J that the 40s are on hold for, since they will end up fully vaccinated at the same time as Pfizer/Moderna 2 dosers.
    But if 40 something year olds have to wait until June for an AZ dose, that's a much harder sell politically.

    And this is no longer a medical decision, just look at the hospital case numbers.
    This is now a political decision and if they can get the country opened back up safely in time for the summer, without copping any political flak (eg blood clots) for their chosen course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    I see that https://vaccine.hse.ie/ is down

    "This service is not available right now. Please try again later."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I see that https://vaccine.hse.ie/ is down

    "This service is not available right now. Please try again later."


    When something like this happens, you'd switch off everything, even if it was no/low risk.
    You'd then identify which systems can be restarted, having done some analysis and checking.
    The HSE systems will come back up incrementally over the next few weeks I'd imagine.
    Cloud-based systems, whose security would be handled by a cloud provider and should be absolutely bullet proof, will probably come back later today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 309 ✭✭Pandiculation


    That could simply be a precaution to ensure those systems are safe.

    Unfortunately, this is the kind of world we’re living in. That attack isn’t likely to be random. It’s probably a demand for money because they know it’s life threatening and think that we’ll pay up.

    You can be sure they know they’ve hijacked a healthcare system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,381 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    OwlsZat wrote: »
    s., St. James is the only hospital where records are digitalized.

    "Common knowledge" is often incorrect knowledge, such as in this post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    To sum up this issue of IT and vaccination:
    - All maternity hospitals have digital records and the IT is hosted by the HSE on their local servers. This is where the attack is and what is impacted at the moment.

    - the vaccination platform is a completely different. It a Salesforce product hosted in the cloud so it has nothing to do with it. There might be cross points and smaller services that are hosted by the HSE but that should be minimal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    That could simply be a precaution to ensure those systems are safe.

    Unfortunately, this is the kind of world we’re living in. That attack isn’t likely to be random. It’s probably a demand for money because they know it’s life threatening and think that we’ll pay up.

    You can be sure they know they’ve hijacked a healthcare system.

    If you pay up once , they or others will just come back and do it again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    josip wrote: »
    Other posters on here earlier made the good point, that if they do decide to lower J&J and AZ for the 40s that they face a similar problem of pausing many of those 40s until the end of June in order to use the J&J when the bulk of the supply will arrive. Uncertainty of supply is the big risk with this.

    For 40s, the delay will be a couple of weeks less than would have been for the 50s, and the risk of contracting will be lower, but the principle and the dilemma remains the same.

    It's an easier sell if it's only the J&J that the 40s are on hold for, since they will end up fully vaccinated at the same time as Pfizer/Moderna 2 dosers.
    But if 40 something year olds have to wait until June for an AZ dose, that's a much harder sell politically.

    And this is no longer a medical decision, just look at the hospital case numbers.
    This is now a political decision and if they can get the country opened back up safely in time for the summer, without copping any political flak (eg blood clots) for their chosen course.

    As I said a few weeks ago with the 50's you can be sure that the government will take the easy way out and kick the hard decisions down the road. It'll be the same with the 40's. Theyll get whatever vaccine is available and the government will then hope the age can be lowered for AZ and J&J for the 30's.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement