Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Leo Varadkar story in The Village??? - Mod Notes and banned Users in OP updated 16/05
Comments
-
Marine Layer wrote: »All I said was the government were confident,,having access to those details and have moved on
Thats certainly a fact
So you don't know and it could be all bluster. Governments have blustered before and been wrong. That's a fact too.
Your're a beaten docket on this ML, just spinning the party line.0 -
no I'd say thats 1st part opinion,2nd part factFrancieBrady wrote: »So you don't know and it could be all bluster. Governments have blustered before and been wrong. That's a fact too.Your're a beaten docket on this ML, just spinning the party line.
In the above case,you're presenting your opinion of my opinion and not a fact at all
The thread of course is not about me 0 -
Marine Layer wrote: »no I'd say thats 1st part opinion,2nd part fact
In the above case,you're presenting your opinion of my opinion and not a fact at all
The thread of course is not about me
You can't back up your opinion...fact.
I can back up that governments engage in bluster and that governments have been wrong.0 -
Marine Layer wrote: »The thread of course is not about me
Going from your last 50 contributions it's now about Tom Dick and Paddy Cosgrave?Just why are Leo Varadkar’s friends abandoning him? Do they know something we don’t?
https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/arid-40278788.html
Reminiscent of the titanic rats, all doing a legger at the first whiff of weakness. I can't say I blame them.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
FrancieBrady wrote: »You can't back up your opinion...fact.
I can back up that governments engage in bluster and that governments have been wrong.
No,the bluster description would be opinion
I'd never dispute governments can be wrong
Your comments on my opinions this evening contain no facts about them,just your opinion
I've said the government are confident enough to move on because they know the documents status,they voted confidence in their Tánaiste and moved on
All fact[Deleted User] wrote: »Lot of anger here.
Ain't that a fact
0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Exactly that. To speak of an FG female candidate openly and express your opinions on them often leads to accusations of sexist or misogynistic behaviour..Seems the latest FG handbook being passed around is that it's no longer misogynistic to speak ill of a female FG regardless of their incompetence.
Pretty sure I was accused of being "misogynistic" and posting "personalized vitriol" for having the cheek to post something about Kate losing her seat in another thread......
Edit just checked...... Yep I was accused of exactly that.
A week is a short time in politics, (and what's misogynistic in fg circles)
But it's okay in this instance :rolleyes:..
It seems it's also okay to read a Gript article. I'm pretty sure somebody posted one a couple of weeks ago and had all sorts of names for the publication coming back.
Kate is just better at doing what FG do, then they are.. and it irks them that she does them so well..
Time to call her names :rolleyes: or sully her character..
Even if she was correct backing the other fella, even if she is correct in saying Leo led them to their WORST results in over ¾'s of a century.
Many other, possibly more respectable leaders would have accepted they are not the right person for the job, especially if it was often their gaffes that had the electorate against them and stepped aside once and for all. But not even temporarily, for a criminal investigation into their antics.0 -
Exactly that. To speak of an FG female candidate openly and express your opinions on them often leads to accusations of sexist or misogynistic behaviour..
But it's okay in this instance :rolleyes:..
It seems it's also okay to read a Gript article. I'm pretty sure somebody posted one a couple of weeks ago and had all sorts of names for the publication coming back.
Kate is just better at doing what FG do, then they are.. and it irks them that she does them so well..
Time to call her names :rolleyes: or sully her character..
Even if she was correct backing the other fella, even if she is correct in saying Leo led them to their WORST results in over ¾'s of a century.
Many other, possibly more respectable leaders would have accepted they are not the right person for the job, especially if it was often their gaffes that had the electorate against them and stepped aside once and for all. But not even temporarily, for a criminal investigation into their antics.
Some bizarre straw-grasping going on or strange unspoken allegations.
Maybe I missed them, but I haven't seen any misogynistic comments about Kate in the last few pages. Neither have seen any personalised insults about her. I did see a reference to Varadkar as a "spoiled little brat", which is probably the worst bit of name-calling on the thread in the last few days, but nobody responded to it.
The comment on the Gript article was mine, which was surprise at not having heard some of it before, and saying that it "seems" very accurate, which again, isn't a full endorsement of either the article or the publication.0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement