BANGERNOMICS (sub2k) of the week/day Part 6

CoBo55 wrote: »

03.

It was 02, 02-d-27598

Duke O Smiley wrote: »

It was 02, 02-d-27598

Some young lad will likely sell that on for 2-4k after it is modified. Extremely sought after by people in their early 20's.. Even with 200k miles! no joke!!

job seeker wrote: »

Some young lad will likely sell that on for 2-4k after it is modified. Extremely sought after by people in their early 20's.. Even with 200k miles! no joke!!

Be running into insurance issues at that age,

26000 Elephants wrote: »

Tidy looking Nissan Cube with NCT in the right colour for bangernomics money. If the CVT is working ok, this would be a darling. If it was in Munster, I'd be on it....

Such a unique stand out car. I see one near me in town every so often. Certainly would not have a problem finding it in the car park.

bazz26 wrote: »

Laguna II here with NCT until next February for €450:



https://www.carsireland.ie/2817111

Yeah, it's a gamble but at 450 lids...

Beautiful car. If it is still around after all these years then more than likely any problems it has had have been sorted. There were some of that generation too that had mo problems at all and were well made.

Eyes wide open with cars around that area,

Lads, it's a €450 car with 8 months NCT. Obviously would need to be given the once over by someone who knows what to look out for but at this end of the market if it drives straight, stops, isn't overheating or has any liquids leaking out of it then it's cheap motoring imo.

iwillhtfu wrote: »

It's a renault so lets not be getting overly excited about the price either.

Renault are more reliable than VW/Audi these days

punisher5112 wrote: »

Not the Mark 2 version though. They were shocking.

From 2009 then

punisher5112 wrote: »

Not the Mark 2 version though. They were shocking.

Apparently not when there's 190k miles on that one.

Comment_below wrote: »

It's got no Android Auto or Apple play so I'm out!

Lol. I think you are looking at the wrong type of cars for that.

AMKC wrote: »

Lol. I think you are looking at the wrong type of cars for that.
It was actually one of the most technological advanced cars of it's time when it came out especially compared to the crappy Mondeo that was out at the same time.
Of course the fact a lot of that technology had not been probarly tested was part of its downfall unfortunatly.

Renault were always mad for tech that didn't work, early 80s R9/11 with central locking, electric windows and electric sunroof, they always calved when the window/roof was open,

iwillhtfu wrote: »

It's a renault so lets not be getting overly excited about the price either.

It survived this long so that's a good sign. As I said originally it's a gamble but it's dirt cheap and even if it blows up 2 months down the road it's only cost you 450 and you will still get about 80 back for scrap. Your average newer car loses more than that in depreciation each month. There are no certainties with a 450 car.

wotzgoingon wrote: »

For a TDi, that mad. Has he any NCB or is it his first car. As I paid around that if not more on my first and even second car. But I did have a provisional licence though not from failing the test or anything I just drove around with the provisional as you were able to do that back then.

He's on a learner permit (which is an extreme example too). His friends who have a year or 2 NCB don't find insurance that bad at all. From what he says..

wotzgoingon wrote: »

Mods new thread needed. I just noticed it just now we are gone over 10,000 posts.

Well done all, great thread