Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stowaway [Netflix]

  • 24-03-2021 4:34pm
    #1
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    Decent cast, and an interesting - if probably belief-suspending - premise, where someone accidentally winds up on a mission to Mars, with life-support not capable of sustaining four people.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,533 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Looks great!


  • Registered Users Posts: 526 ✭✭✭corkonion


    Mr E wrote: »
    Looks great!

    It sure does


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Great cast, cracking premise... It's nice to look forward to a movie release again! It's been a while.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Yep, I'm in.

    Didn't watch the full trailer in case of spoilers.

    Good to see yer man from Lost!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Dades wrote: »
    Yep, I'm in.

    Didn't watch the full trailer in case of spoilers.

    Good to see yer man from Lost!

    I suspect the strength of this film will lie in the script, and how deftly it adds stakes without passing the Idiot Ball around. Too easy to suddenly make professionals act like morons for the sake of things going Boom.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    This dropped today, for those keeping eye / track.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    It's very good if a little simple. It's very bare bones - be warned. And yeah, the very initial premise is a little hard to believe but once you come to terms with that, you'll be grand.

    Avoids a lot of the pitfalls that other movies would have gleefully dived into which is refreshing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    It's very good if a little simple. It's very bare bones - be warned. And yeah, the very initial premise is a little hard to believe but once you come to terms with that, you'll be grand.

    Avoids a lot of the pitfalls that other movies would have gleefully dived into which is refreshing.

    Agree 100% with this. Some nice character type driven moments along the way too, which are well written.

    Still scratching my head over how he even ended up there though...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,064 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    pinksoir wrote: »

    Still scratching my head over how he even ended up there though...

    So the film could happen........

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Enjoyed it for the most part.
    The part when they had to go get the oxygen supplies was well done


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    So the film could happen........

    Touché.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    I quite enjoyed this - similar to The Martian in overall tone in that the crew are clearly individuals trained and selected for their mission, and the setting is treated with consideration rather than being an incidental backdrop. The performances are good and the central conceit is nicely simple. If I did have a complaint it would be that, at 2 hours, it's probably a bit longer than it needs to be for its very well executed concept, but not so much that I'd be looking at my watch or getting impatient.

    As someone else said, the main hurdle in terms of plausibility is the inciting incident - but to be fair, the title of the film sets you up for that and once you accept it, everything else that happens spools out plausibly and with nothing more objectionable than maybe some bad luck around timing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭feelings


    5/10 at best.

    Why did the hatch of the kingfisher fall away as it did, as if it had weight? Shouldn't it be weightless in space?


  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Didn't care about the characters at all. can't recommend it.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    feelings wrote: »
    5/10 at best.

    Why did the hatch of the kingfisher fall away as it did, as if it had weight? Shouldn't it be weightless in space?

    The ship was rotating which created artificial gravity except in the centre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


    Fysh wrote: »
    I quite enjoyed this - similar to The Martian in overall tone in that the crew are clearly individuals trained and selected for their mission, and the setting is treated with consideration rather than being an incidental backdrop. The performances are good and the central conceit is nicely simple. If I did have a complaint it would be that, at 2 hours, it's probably a bit longer than it needs to be for its very well executed concept, but not so much that I'd be looking at my watch or getting impatient.

    As someone else said, the main hurdle in terms of plausibility is the inciting incident - but to be fair, the title of the film sets you up for that and once you accept it, everything else that happens spools out plausibly and with nothing more objectionable than maybe some bad luck around timing.

    Yeh they were very vague on the details.
    He muttered something about being in the second stage and failing to strap in. Why was he strapping in at all ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,029 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Twas grand.. 2 hours flew by.

    Helps that Anna Kendrick is always watchable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 520 ✭✭✭Full_Circle_81


    Yeh they were very vague on the details.
    He muttered something about being in the second stage and failing to strap in. Why was he strapping in at all ?

    Because the details were so vague, I expected
    it to be a ruse and turn into a Dead Calm situation
    , but no. Odd that they went along with the explanation so easily.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,580 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    The ship was rotating which created artificial gravity except in the centre.

    Then the lid should have been attracted to the Kingfisher or simply floated away when pulled apart. There's no falling in space.


    Anyway, I also posted in the main thread...how did that big fella fit into the tiny space and secure it shut with screws?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    humberklog wrote: »
    Then the lid should have been attracted to the Kingfisher or simply floated away when pulled apart. There's no falling in space.

    Of course there's falling in space. That's what gravity is. In this case, the centrifugal force created by the spinning would cause the lid to fall away. The same way Kendrick slid down the cable toward the ship on the way back. Whether it falls away in the correct way, I honestly don't know. But it certainly shouldn't have floated away.


    It's not a great film. First half in particular was weak but I thought the second half was much better. That it doesn't explain
    how the film's title character ended up on the ship
    is indeed weird. However, that isn't, as some seem to be suggesting, a plot hole, it's just something that the film choses not to explain. It's the least of the film's problems tbh. It's main issue is that the story and characters aren't compelling.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,580 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    Of course there's falling in space. That's what gravity is. In this case, the centrifugal force created by the spinning would cause the lid to fall away. The same way Kendrick slid down the cable toward the ship on the way back. Whether it falls away in the correct way, I honestly don't know. But it certainly shouldn't have floated away.


    Well that would mean that the lid was under the pull of the Earth's gravity (nearest planet or the Sun?) and if it was to pull the lid away like it did it would surely pull the spaceship too?

    Ah...here...there's was enough faults with the movie without expecting them to that right : ).


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I thought the film was dead-centre fine. A much better example of the low to mid budget Netflix film that is too often abject trash. Didn't care about the manner in which the Stowaway got onboard; to the rest it was Competency Porn really; no high dramatics, no Idiot Balls passed around. The fault there obviously being the cast didn't have much to work with beyond "these are sober professionals". The finale was definitely anticlimactic, and felt like the thin script finally running out of puff, but the rest was unfussy and economic. A simple scenario played out, perhaps a touch longer than needed.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    humberklog wrote: »
    Well that would mean that the lid was under the pull of the Earth's gravity (nearest planet or the Sun?) and if it was to pull the lid away like it did it would surely pull the spaceship too?

    The lid was pulled by the centrifugal forces created by the spin, which was pulling everything outward away from the axis. Technically I think, yes, it was pulling the ship and the Kingfisher too. Not gravity strictly speaking but it created artificial gravity on their ship and also on the Kingfisher. It was why going out there was so dangerous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭gogo


    Honestly didn’t enjoy it all, couldn’t wait to get to watch it last night but felt it was a whole lot of meh..
    super premise, but the character back ground just didn’t go far enough for me, the stowaway’s own story was great and then that’s the end of that little segment, on to the next... and so on until it was over, I didn’t care about any of the characters at all, not enough to care if they all died or not, extremely anticlimactic at the end also.
    It was watchable but it could have been great!


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,140 ✭✭✭fitz


    The lid was pulled by the centrifugal forces created by the spin, which was pulling everything outward away from the axis. Technically I think, yes, it was pulling the ship and the Kingfisher too. Not gravity strictly speaking but it created artificial gravity on their ship and also on the Kingfisher. It was why going out there was so dangerous.

    The door coming away from the kingfisher set it spinning, but it didn't fall away...it's that the Kingfisher was moving away from it at speed. All a matter of perspective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    I watched this tonight, Netflix's own films are usually Dolby Vision or at least 4K but this was only HD. There was noticeable artifacting at times with darker scenes too or was that just me? I also had to turn down my surround speakers at the beginning of the film as they were way too loud and I couldn't hear the dialogue.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,716 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    A pretty weak film tbh. Whatever about the flimsy writing, I don’t think the filmmakers knew what tone they were going for? The music and moody, subdued cinematography suggest some sort of looming menace, mystery or violence...
    and there’s nothing of the sort.
    None of it settled into a grove for me, the cinematic language used to tell the story operating on a different wavelength to the story.
    I watched this tonight, Netflix's own films are usually Dolby Vision or at least 4K but this was only HD. There was noticeable artifacting at times with darker scenes too or was that just me? I also had to turn down my surround speakers at the beginning of the film as they were way too loud and I couldn't hear the dialogue.

    Yeah, it looks pretty ropey - there’s a lengthy shot of space at the end and there was just an articact-y splodge down the bottom of the screen. Sometimes Netflix don’t get Vision / 4K content when they just buy the rights to something for Europe... but yeah this one’s a wider release for them and it still looks less than optimal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I still can't get over how yer man
    ended up being screwed inside a panel on the spacecraft and survived launch without anyone missing him. Seems like very loose protocols for the ground crew.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    I still can't get over how yer man
    ended up being screwed inside a panel on the spacecraft and survived launch without anyone missing him. Seems like very loose protocols for the ground crew.
    There seemed to be some corner cutting in general. Maybe not as unlikely with commercial launches/missions as you'd think. He seems to have been
    unconscious for five hours, which is very serious and maybe speaks to a serious head injury during take-off but was maybe downplayed at little. The movie cliche of the hero giving or receiving a blow to the head and waking up half an hour later with no ill effects worse than a headache is complete nonsense. If you're unconscious for longer than a few seconds, you need medical attention.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,983 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    at the end of the film
    she should have taken a paperback out of her pocket and started reading
    , in order to complete the callback.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Thought it was.....OK. Which isn't the most scathing criticism of a movie these days, but it could've been a lot better. Putting aside the bizarre, implausible opening, it looks good and it's reasonably compelling.....until the end, when it just sort of loses its way.

    Not the worst thing you could watch on Netflix, but way down the list of worthwhile sci-fi drama.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,983 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost



    space science youtuber Scott Manley helped with the script and did a demo of the craft in 2011 Kerbal Space Program space simulation game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    mikhail wrote: »
    There seemed to be some corner cutting in general. Maybe not as unlikely with commercial launches/missions as you'd think. He seems to have been
    unconscious for five hours, which is very serious and maybe speaks to a serious head injury during take-off but was maybe downplayed at little. The movie cliche of the hero giving or receiving a blow to the head and waking up half an hour later with no ill effects worse than a headache is complete nonsense. If you're unconscious for longer than a few seconds, you need medical attention.


    Yes it is extremely unlikely.
    If the day comes that Spacex leave a member of ground crew screwed inside a panel on a Falcon/Dragon, then I'll agree.
    There are incredibly high safety standards with human spaceflight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,937 ✭✭✭De Bhál


    I watched it last night, and was a bit apprehensive after the last Netflix space movie I watched which was Midnight Sky with George Clooney. That, I thought was rubbish and this movie is better than that. Not much better but watchable.
    the idea is good but trying to figure out how yer man got stuck in that panel would hurt your brain so you'd just have to move on from that. It seemed to finish up kind of suddenly also I thought. I did wonder was there enough oxygen for all three that were left etc... but really I was just glad it was over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    De Bhál wrote: »
    I watched it last night, and was a bit apprehensive after the last Netflix space movie I watched which was Midnight Sky with George Clooney. That, I thought was rubbish and this movie is better than that. Not much better but watchable.
    the idea is good but trying to figure out how yer man got stuck in that panel would hurt your brain so you'd just have to move on from that. It seemed to finish up kind of suddenly also I thought. I did wonder was there enough oxygen for all three that were left etc... but really I was just glad it was over.


    Ya, overall it was a bit of nothing. The sequences of retrieving the oxygen cannisters were exciting. But other than that, it was basically filler. And ending was a bit of nothing. W
    hy would a lady in her prime just give up her life for a random stranger who wasn't supposed to be there in the first place.
    But at the end of the day, it is only fiction, so I guess they can play it however they want.
    Have no idea how the dude got stuck in there when that panel was subsequently bolted from the outside.

    Anyway, passed 2 hours, but I wouldn't recommend. Much better files out there to spend 2 hours of your time on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Follow this through with me.

    So, we are supposed to believe that the small tank of liquid o2 that Anna Kendrick's character returned with is supposed to be enough air for one person to survive several months.

    Okay......

    So why wouldn't a ship that size have several of those canisters in reserve just lying around? Think about it. The tank was tiny. Why wouldn't you just pack a dozen of them? Engineers are smart.

    I'm all for suspension of disbelief and plot holes don't usually bother me. Like the guy stowing away doesn't bother me. You just accept it so the film can happen. But the oxygen thing is a logical fail on so many levels and bothered me for the last 40 minutes of the film. Most of the science in this was spot on. From the method of creating gravity, to the length of time the mission would take, to using cycler's to get to mars. All great and grounded in reality. Which makes the oxygen thing all the more perplexing.

    The film itself was average enough. I saw somebody compare it to The Martian earlier in the thread and I couldn't disagree more. The Martian is leagues better than this.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    There's an offhand remark from the commander about how the original plan for the ship was for 2 crew members and how the (I assume private co. rather than govt-linked) organisation behind the launch decided to push the limits of the design late in the day and bump the mission to 3 crew. So they were probably already using some of their original contingency to allow for a 3rd crew member, then a 4th is effectively stealth-added.

    NASA would never let a mission hit these problems (they are very keen on durability of kit and also providing multiple redundancy for core systems wherever possible), hence my assumption that this is a private Virgin Galactic/SpaceX type outfit where there's more wiggle room for a senior mgmt numpty to throw a spanner in the works and make a stupid demand like "increase the crew by 50% but don't allocate any additional resources towards life support etc".

    (Since someone mentioned it - the medic choosing to give herself up rather than yer man was sketched out reasonably well, I thought. She clearly takes her role as a doctor seriously and has strong moral problems with the idea of even indirectly killing someone. So in a situation where there are no good options, she decided that the least bad option was to sacrifice herself rather than harm someone else. Bit of a problem if the mission needs a medic at any later point, but again, No Good Options and all that...)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,680 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Yeah I thought it was clearly implied that the space organisation was private and was cutting corners. I expected a third act with a Moon-esque twist regarding this but instead the film just sorted stopped like they ran out of film or something.

    TBh people are thinking about it too much. Most of the plot was fine and more solid than 90% of Hollywood plots. If the story and characters were compelling enough you wouldn't care about why they didn't pack extra canisters etc. In any case, the answer is that if they had there wouldn't have been a movie... which probably would have been for the best mind you.

    The biggest issue with the film imo was that first act. It's so weak and annoying that by the time the story starts to pick up that the audience has already decided the film sucks.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The script needed another pass. I thought the movie was fine but its problems all stemmed from its script wanting for another set of eyes to embellish some of the world-building, as well as the structure of its acts. As you guys have said, the Cost Cutting was a deliberate choice and a good potential segue but never got the kind of room it needed - especially as a way to explain the Stowaway for those requiring the mental leap. Plus with the last act, I felt like I could hear the writer just going "Uhhhhh, I dunno; just do the same set piece again I guess? Something something noble sacrifice... Let's do lunch"

    Cos to be fair, the premise was, and remains, fantastic and an easy pitch for high drama.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    I'd agree with that :)

    I thought the strengths of the film were the character performances, and it was a pleasant surprise to not have to have Bombastic Blockbuster Nonsense (The Martian and the "fly around like Iron Man" bit, I'm looking at you) in a film like this. But definitely the plot and setup could have done with at least one more round of polishing.

    On a different note - according to Wikipedia the budget was $10M, which is quite impressive I think - while the film is very theatrical in nature and is at its core about a moral dilemma, I would've guessed a higher budget.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Fysh wrote: »
    I'd agree with that :)

    I thought the strengths of the film were the character performances, and it was a pleasant surprise to not have to have Bombastic Blockbuster Nonsense (The Martian and the "fly around like Iron Man" bit, I'm looking at you) in a film like this. But definitely the plot and setup could have done with at least one more round of polishing.

    On a different note - according to Wikipedia the budget was $10M, which is quite impressive I think - while the film is very theatrical in nature and is at its core about a moral dilemma, I would've guessed a higher budget.

    On that, I had been wondering. That budget is absolutely miniscule yet the detail of the ship and equipment was most excellent (convincing too to these layman's eyes). My thoughts were if like those companies who specialise in airplane sets to rent (for the innumerous scenes on jet liners) there are modular "space station" sets you can pay access to. Configure them as needed, add some singular details for your specific feature then off you go.

    Presumably those actors worked to scale then, but even then by modern standards, 10 million is buttons.


Advertisement