Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans

1104105107109110331

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Encouraging news. In case you're wondering Covishield is the Indian name for AstraZeneca.

    https://twitter.com/3RakeshMishra/status/1385245798544207875?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,001 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Well we have a poster on the last page, saying their relatives are in that age group and got vaccinated with Pfizer, so unless they are lying, what's going on?

    High risk are being vaccinated with Pfizer.
    If GP is doing these and some doses going to be left over he may have a few people who are on his books that need vaccination but it is down to clinical judgement.
    Better somebody in their 60s than some random relative and that is acceptable and within HSE guidelines.
    Otherwise AZ for that age group, that is fact,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    A good few European countries set to hit 30 shots per 100 by the end of the weekend: Germany, Spain, Denmark, Finland, Austria, Estonia, Lithuania and Belgium. We will probably be a week later, we should get there by the 2nd of May. We are by no means the worst but we have fallen significantly behind the pack best performers in the EU.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    snotboogie wrote: »
    A good few European countries set to hit 30 shots per 100 by the end of the weekend: Germany, Spain, Denmark, Finland, Austria, Estonia, Lithuania and Belgium. We will probably be a week later, we should get there by the 2nd of May. We are by no means the worst but we have fallen significantly behind the pack best performers in the EU.


    Is that the adult population or the entire population that those numbers are for. If it the entire population we will always be a few % behind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    B2021M wrote: »
    Its questionable why we need a decision from NIAC when we already have the EMA. Im also not sure what they can add to the debate on spacing of pfizer vaccine when we have live evidence from our nearest neighbour with 13 times our population of the clear benefits of doing so.
    Our government will respond to NIAC only and whatever they say just as other EU countries have responded to their respective bodies.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,203 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Deenie78 wrote: »
    So great to see so many reports of people getting vaccines!
    My mam (75) got her second Pfizer this afternoon - that's her and my Dad (83) both done. The weight and fear that's been lifted is unreal!

    My mam got 1st dose Pfizer today, father and myself are tomorrow all from our GP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    snotboogie wrote: »
    A good few European countries set to hit 30 shots per 100 by the end of the weekend: Germany, Spain, Denmark, Finland, Austria, Estonia, Lithuania and Belgium. We will probably be a week later, we should get there by the 2nd of May. We are by no means the worst but we have fallen significantly behind the pack best performers in the EU.

    I have many friends in Berlin . Friend 71 has a date for mid of June for his first dose
    We are ahead of them for over 70,s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Our government will respond to NIAC only and whatever they say just as other EU countries have responded to their respective bodies.

    I understand that and accept it but what additional factors are NIAC taking into account that the EMA didn't? What additional knowledge do they have?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,402 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    B2021M wrote: »
    I understand that and accept it but what additional factors are NIAC taking into account that the EMA didn't? What additional knowledge do they have?

    They are free to demur from the EMA's recommendations. The EMA merely issues advice (and authorises vaccines for general usage)....Ireland is free to introduce its own guidelines for usage.

    They wouldn't necessarily be 'disagreeing' with the EMA's expertise, just taking a different course of action.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Strazdas wrote: »
    They are free to demur from the EMA's recommendations. The EMA merely issues advice (and authorises vaccines for general usage)....Ireland is free to introduce its own guidelines for usage.

    They wouldn't necessarily be 'disagreeing' with the EMA's expertise, just taking a different course of action.

    Which is fine and understandable in 'normal' times. Im not sure further delays are justified given current circumstances.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    B2021M wrote: »
    I understand that and accept it but what additional factors are NIAC taking into account that the EMA didn't? What additional knowledge do they have?
    The EMA commentary has been very general - benefits outweigh risks. I'm guessing they want to clarify if some age cohorts are disproportionately affected. So it'll either be for everyone or just the over 60s. If it's limited then that 80% by June is off the table.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    Russman wrote: »
    The report said that members of NIAC are involved in meetings with international colleagues about the vaccine and they were awaiting the outcome of these meeting before issuing their guidance. Seems eminently sensible I think, no ?

    You could just as easily replace "dynamism and urgency" with reckless abandon when it comes to the UK's approach of ignoring the manufacturer's guidelines about the Pfizer jab. They took a gamble, hopefully it works but it was still a gamble.

    What is it about us Irish that we seem compelled to sneer at the British? I am sure they are not too bothered as they continue to be miles ahead of us on the road to recovery.
    Yes, their response has been dynamic and urgent. They see this as a national emergency and have responded accordingly.
    Meanwhile we get nightly updates from committees and diktats about what freedoms we will be 'allowed'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    What is it about us Irish that we seem compelled to sneer at the British? I am sure they are not too bothered as they continue to be miles ahead of us on the road to recovery.
    Yes, their response has been dynamic and urgent. They see this as a national emergency and have responded accordingly.
    Meanwhile we get nightly updates from committees and diktats about what freedoms we will be 'allowed'.
    In vaccinations Britain has done very well, in other things very poorly. As for us it's just different strategies at work and we like glacial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Looks like the government are expecting an age 50 restriction for J&J.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    What is it about us Irish that we seem compelled to sneer at the British? I am sure they are not too bothered as they continue to be miles ahead of us on the road to recovery.
    Yes, their response has been dynamic and urgent. They see this as a national emergency and have responded accordingly.
    Meanwhile we get nightly updates from committees and diktats about what freedoms we will be 'allowed'.

    Totally agree. A country that fought two world wars will always have a better response to a crisis. They have a different psyche and approach to risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    is_that_so wrote: »
    In vaccinations Britain has done very well, in other things very poorly. As for us it's just different strategies at work and we like glacial.

    This thread is discussing vaccines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,396 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    B2021M wrote: »
    Which is fine and understandable in 'normal' times. Im not sure further delays are justified given current circumstances.


    Absolutely not. The about 1 in a million chance of getting a blood clot from this vaccine is a hell of a lot lower than the chances of getting blood clots from COVID-19. Isolating the use of this and wasting hundreds of thousands of vaccines would be absolutely ludicrous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭Str8outtaWuhan


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Looks like the government are expecting an age 50 restriction for J&J.

    How can they say Astra for >60 but j&J >50 if they use the same method of delivery and both have the same side effect, does it come down to politics??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    How can they say Astra for >60 but j&J >50 if they use the same method of delivery and both have the same side effect, does it come down to politics??

    Comes down to common sense. J&J will be useless to us if restricted to over 60


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,285 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    How can they say Astra for >60 but j&J >50 if they use the same method of delivery and both have the same side effect, does it come down to politics??

    Single dose makes risk much lower


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    This thread is discussing vaccines.
    Yeah but you can't just dismiss the other stuff. On vaccines they took a gamble which seems to have worked out very well for them. TBH I'd hold off on too much praise for anyone until we get to large numbers vaccinated, like 70%+.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Lumen wrote: »
    Single dose makes risk much lower

    That's assumimg that the risk is dose dependent which it may not be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,978 ✭✭✭Russman


    What is it about us Irish that we seem compelled to sneer at the British? I am sure they are not too bothered as they continue to be miles ahead of us on the road to recovery.
    Yes, their response has been dynamic and urgent. They see this as a national emergency and have responded accordingly.
    Meanwhile we get nightly updates from committees and diktats about what freedoms we will be 'allowed'.

    I’m not for a second sneering at the British. I honestly hope it works out for them, but at the same time really don’t give a hoot what they do one way or the other. I could just as easily ask what is about us Irish that we always have to compare ourselves to the British for ?

    I don’t think miles ahead of us either, there won’t be a whole lot in it by the time we’re all fully vaccinated, a few weeks either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭B2021M


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    Absolutely not. The about 1 in a million chance of getting a blood clot from this vaccine is a hell of a lot lower than the chances of getting blood clots from COVID-19. Isolating the use of this and wasting hundreds of thousands of vaccines would be absolutely ludicrous.

    I agree! They either need to start using it now or make a decision quickly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭PatrickDoherty


    My guess is there are purposely delaying the announcement on the J&J vaccine because it will appear that their extra thorough for pr reasons, when in reality there is only 15k doses in the country and it will have no big effect on the roll out in the near future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 503 ✭✭✭PaulJoseph22


    Has anyone had the Moderna vaccine? Is it as good as Pfizer? I know that it’s MNRA as is Pfizer. It’s rarely mentioned?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,978 ✭✭✭Russman


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Looks like the government are expecting an age 50 restriction for J&J.

    If this was the case, I wonder would they hold off doing the 50s until the J&J arrives in country, or plow on through them with the mRNA shots ? And potentially have a good portion of them done before the big deliveries of J&J arrive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,276 ✭✭✭IRISHSPORTSGUY


    My guess is there are purposely delaying the announcement on the J&J vaccine because it will appear that their extra thorough for pr reasons, when in reality there is only 15k doses in the country and it will have no big effect on the roll out in the near future.

    We'll have 40k doses of J&J in total by the week of the 26th.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 ✭✭✭FrStone


    Russman wrote: »
    I’m not for a second sneering at the British. I honestly hope it works out for them, but at the same time really don’t give a hoot what they do one way or the other. I could just as easily ask what is about us Irish that we always have to compare ourselves to the British for ?

    I don’t think miles ahead of us either, there won’t be a whole lot in it by the time we’re all fully vaccinated, a few weeks either way.

    A few weeks is huge.

    NIAC should pull the finger out and for once act with a bit of haste.

    Well done to our nearest neighbours. It's great to see them being so competent with their roll out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Looks like the government are expecting an age 50 restriction for J&J.

    Where are you seeing this ?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement