Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

1166167169171172225

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    astrofool wrote: »
    The approvals aren't temporary, the mRNA vaccines no more "program" your cells than any other vaccine type.

    Very simple to understand graphic is here to counter the misinformation above:
    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

    mRNA tech is a novel approach to vaccination which has never been used before. Do you dispute that?

    The vaccines are approved for emergency use:
    https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

    The drug companies have all liability waived too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I'm curious to see the range of age restrictions/suspensions/preferrals for AZ between the different countries.
    Are they basing it on their own individual clotting data or global data?

    UK - 30 and above
    Germany - 60 and above
    France - 55 and above
    Belgium - 56 and above
    Australia - 50 and above
    Italy - 60 and above
    Sweden - 65 and above
    Finland - 65 and above
    Iceland - 70 and above
    Canada - 56 and above


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,929 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Their own interpretation of the global data and the balance of the relative severity of the disease versus supply available of all vaccines in their respective territories, I would imagine.

    For me AZ is a bust now. I would expect refusal of it by recipients to increase rapidly over the next few weeks and for it to be discontinued soon thereafter rather than throw good money after bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    mRNA tech is a novel approach to vaccination which has never been used before. Do you dispute that?

    The vaccines are approved for emergency use:
    https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

    You said the mRNA vaccines program your cells to create antibodies, that is not true, the immune response is generated in a similar way to previous vaccines.
    The drug companies have all liability waived too.

    Again, not true, do your research(properly) man, and come back, if you come back claiming this again, everyone can laugh at you again. There is a good document you can read on conditional marketing approval and the differences to emergency approval that you can find by yourself and come back with your (no doubt misinterpreted, but that'll be a bit of fun to pull apart) findings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,438 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Their own interpretation of the global data and the balance of the relative severity of the disease versus supply available of all vaccines in their respective territories, I would imagine.
    For me AZ is a bust now. I would expect refusal of it by recipients to increase rapidly over the next few weeks and for it to be discontinued soon thereafter rather than throw good money after bad.

    Think it could play an important role for COVAX countries vaccinating over 60s.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    astrofool wrote: »
    You said the mRNA vaccines program your cells to create antibodies, that is not true, the immune response is generated in a similar way to previous vaccines.
    mRNA enters your cells and causes them to create the spike protein. Your immune system responds to this. It is gene therapy not a traditional vaccination.

    astrofool wrote: »
    Again, not true, do your research(properly) man, and come back, if you come back claiming this again, everyone can laugh at you again. There is a good document you can read on conditional marketing approval and the differences to emergency approval that you can find by yourself and come back with your (no doubt misinterpreted, but that'll be a bit of fun to pull apart) findings.

    As for liability, look up the Prep act in the US:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
    You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mRNA tech is a novel approach to vaccination which has never been used before. Do you dispute that?

    The vaccines are approved for emergency use:
    https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

    The drug companies have all liability waived too.

    Lets do nothing new anywhere ever. I for one think leeches are the solution to this.

    And its conditional marking authorisation in the EU. Which is full approval in other words


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    mRNA enters your cells and causes them to create the spike protein. Your immune system responds to this. It is gene therapy not a traditional vaccination.

    Sure, but you said program your cells to try and make it sound scary, it doesn't do that, glad you agree.

    At some point you just have to give up, here horse, this is water, read it:
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2390

    Read the section carefully about liability and the differences between approvals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    astrofool wrote: »
    Sure, but you said program your cells to try and make it sound scary, it doesn't do that, glad you agree.



    At some point you just have to give up, here horse, this is water, read it:
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2390

    Read the section carefully about liability and the differences between approvals.

    But it does enter your cells. The mRNA enters your cells causing them to create spike proteins. It is gene therapy, this is not disputed.

    I was referring to the US whilst you are talking about the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    astrofool wrote: »
    Sure, but you said program your cells to try and make it sound scary, it doesn't do that, glad you agree.



    At some point you just have to give up, here horse, this is water, read it:
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2390

    Read the section carefully about liability and the differences between approvals.

    Oh, and I advice you read up on the detail of the contract with AZ.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-vaccine-europe-commission-contract-astrazeneca-ties-hands-lawsuits/
    The EU contract also says the Commission can't sue if there are any unforeseen issues with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine, or if there are problems with the storage, transport or administration of the vaccine.

    The only exception is if AstraZeneca fails to meet "Good Manufacturing Practices," or if a claim "arises from AstraZeneca's wilful misconduct or failure to comply with EU regulatory requirement."


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,015 ✭✭✭Russman


    Not sure if this has been posted but it seems like we’ve likely had our first case. Thankfully the girl will be ok eventually it seems.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/medicines-regulator-investigates-first-irish-blood-clot-case-after-astrazeneca-jab-1.4532265


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Russman wrote: »
    Not sure if this has been posted but it seems like we’ve likely had our first case. Thankfully the girl will be ok eventually it seems.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/medicines-regulator-investigates-first-irish-blood-clot-case-after-astrazeneca-jab-1.4532265

    Oh no this is very bad. So far I’ve had no major symptoms, but I know it will be like nearly 10 days till u are out of the woods.


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Russman wrote: »
    Not sure if this has been posted but it seems like we’ve likely had our first case. Thankfully the girl will be ok eventually it seems.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/medicines-regulator-investigates-first-irish-blood-clot-case-after-astrazeneca-jab-1.4532265

    It was only a matter of time sadly. I hope she makes a full recovery.

    Up until now we were being told there were no cases in Ireland, even though this lady was admitted to hospital a week ago. We're only hearing about it because her sister contacted a newspaper.

    I really hope we'll follow the lead of most countries in Western Europe and place some age restrictions on this vaccine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    It was only a matter of time sadly. I hope she makes a full recovery.

    Up until now we were being told there were no cases in Ireland, even though this lady was admitted to hospital a week ago. We're only hearing about it because her sister contacted a newspaper.

    I really hope we'll follow the lead of most countries in Western Europe and place some age restrictions on this vaccine.


    Will we follow the UK and limit it to 30 and older, or will we follow every other country and limit it to at least 50 and older?


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    josip wrote: »
    Will we follow the UK and limit it to 30 and older, or will we follow every other country and limit it to at least 50 and older?

    I hope it's the latter, but I don't have confidence that we'll take any action at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    I hope it's the latter, but I don't have confidence that we'll take any action at all.

    It’s actually not fair to be forced into taken this vaccine . I’m early 30s and female so now very worried.


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    fin12 wrote: »
    It’s actually not fair to be forced into taken this vaccine . I’m early 30s and female so now very worried.

    Totally agree, it's ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    fin12 wrote: »
    It’s actually not fair to be forced into taken this vaccine . I’m early 30s and female so now very worried.

    Nobody has been forced.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭begbysback


    PCeeeee wrote: »
    I dispute it. Define gene therapy?

    Come in here gene, sit down there on the couch and tell me how ye are feelin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    fin12 wrote: »
    It’s actually not fair to be forced into taken this vaccine . I’m early 30s and female so now very worried.

    Nobody has been forced, you can say no.

    Sure you know this you've already said you've had your first dose.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    Nobody has been forced.

    Not forced, but being told to get to the back of the queue rather than being offered a vaccine that's not killing people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    Nobody has been forced.

    Well I feel like I was yday cause I was told u won’t be called for months again and very good chance I would be offered the same vaccine again. And ya we all are forced if u want to get back to living normally , Covid passports will be coming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool



    Again, that would only have applied if they had gone for emergency approval, under conditional marketing approval, the manufacturer takes on the liability, as outlined in the conditions for the approval, AZ, Pfizer and Moderna all had the option to go with emergency approval in the EU, but chose to go with the higher standard of CMA.

    edit: and I see you go picking and choosing sources to suit your argument again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    Not forced, but being told to get to the back of the queue rather than being offered a vaccine that's not killing people.

    Why should you be at the front of the queue for one of the other vaccines that have a restricted supply? It’s a very egocentric attitude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,361 ✭✭✭appledrop


    Fair play to her family for coming out and speaking about it.

    She is a healthy 40 year old woman.

    I'm sure we would have been waiting a while otherwise to hear about it.

    There has also been 18 other blood clots in Ireland, not this rare strain but still it's too many.

    I wouldnt take this vaccine if they paid me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    fin12 wrote: »
    Well I feel like I was yday cause I was told u won’t be called for months again and very good chance I would be offered the same vaccine again. And ya we all are forced if u want to get back to living normally , Covid passports will be coming.

    That’s not what forced means. Forced means you have no choice.

    You had a choice. You made the choice. You’re going to be fine.

    What you’re actually saying is you want special treatment. You want the vaccine that is in short supply and is being used in the over 70s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    astrofool wrote: »
    Again, that would only have applied if they had gone for emergency approval, under conditional marketing approval, the manufacturer takes on the liability, as outlined in the conditions for the approval, AZ, Pfizer and Moderna all had the option to go with emergency approval in the EU, but chose to go with the higher standard of CMA.

    That part of the contract was conditional based on the type of approval? I certainly doesn't seem that way from the article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That part of the contract was conditional based on the type of approval? I certainly doesn't seem that way from the article.

    The EMA approval process is independent of the supply contracts with the EU (hence why there is a rolling review of Sputnik which isn't part of the EU negotiated supply), keeping the regulator independent is a good way of ensuring that there is a level playing field and keeping politics out of medicine as much as possible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    That’s not what forced means. Forced means you have no choice.

    You had a choice. You made the choice. You’re going to be fine.

    What you’re actually saying is you want special treatment. You want the vaccine that is in short supply and is being used in the over 70s.

    Absolutely this.

    Well said.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    LLMMLL wrote: »
    Why should you be at the front of the queue for one of the other vaccines that have a restricted supply? It’s a very egocentric attitude.

    AZ is making up a fifth of our supply this quarter, so what are you talking about?

    I'm not asking to jump the queue, just to keep my place in the queue.

    There is a reason why so many countries are restricting it to older age groups, it's hardly an unreasonable view. No need for the insults.


Advertisement