Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

1173174176178179757

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭normakelle


    Please provide the facts that prove your claim that "without fraud biden wouldn't have won."

    It doesn't matter what I show you will say they were debunked which is incorrect


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,374 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    normakelle wrote: »
    It doesn't matter what I show you will say they were debunked which is incorrect

    That's what normally happens with bullsh1t...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,464 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    normakelle wrote: »
    It doesn't matter what I show you will say they were debunked which is incorrect

    63 lost lawsuits says you are wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭normakelle


    everlast75 wrote: »
    That's what normally happens with bullsh1t...

    Debunked by whom just because you have read it doesn't make it true. It's amazing how you can read two different articles written by let's say cnn and newsmax or fox news on the same topic but two completely different takes on it. Who is to say which it the truth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    normakelle wrote:
    Just because the new York Times writes an article it must be true. Its their interpretation of the new law. No bias whatsoever. We all know why they are lashing back at the laws because they know without fraud biden wouldn't have won. In fact Joe biden is belitting black people and insulting their intelligence.
    Wrong thread for that. There's a conspiracy theory thread for all talk about election fraud.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    normakelle wrote:
    Debunked by whom just because you have read it doesn't make it true. It's amazing how you can read two different articles written by let's say cnn and newsmax or fox news on the same topic but two completely different takes on it. Who is to say which it the truth.
    As said 63 lawsuits couldn't prove anything and many of them in front of judges appointed by the previous President.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,146 ✭✭✭uptherebels


    normakelle wrote: »
    Debunked by whom just because you have read it doesn't make it true. It's amazing how you can read two different articles written by let's say cnn and newsmax or fox news on the same topic but two completely different takes on it. Who is to say which it the truth.

    You were asked for evidence. You do know what evidence is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    normakelle wrote: »
    It doesn't matter whether it has Liberal or Conservative leanings. Facts speak for themselves

    But you just ignored a NYT piece because of bias.

    At least try to have some consistency and standards.

    You 'know' fraud was committed, but cannot provide any evidence.

    You admit that this law was passed to stop dems getting votes, yet see nothing wrong with it.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You were asked for evidence. You do know what evidence is?

    What ever the daily wire and other sh1te hawks tell them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭normakelle




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,737 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    But you just ignored a NYT piece because of bias.

    At least try to have some consistency and standards.

    You 'know' fraud was committed, but cannot provide any evidence.

    You admit that this law was passed to stop dems getting votes, yet see nothing wrong with it.

    Wasn’t the fraud committed by Republicans?


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    normakelle wrote: »

    Ah wasn't far off

    "The Gateway Pundit is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Ah wasn't far off

    "The Gateway Pundit is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories."

    It also provides no evidence of this fraud that apparently everyone knows about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,284 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    normakelle wrote: »

    even ignoring the source, what evidence of election fraud is there in that article? try to be specific.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    Norma do you know the difference between an allegation of voter fraud and evidence of voter fraud?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,464 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Smee_Again wrote: »
    Norma do you know the difference between an allegation of voter fraud and evidence of voter fraud?

    There's a lot of Trump supporters that don't seem to know the difference.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    It also provides no evidence of this fraud that apparently everyone knows about.

    Were you really expecting anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,737 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Ah wasn't far off

    "The Gateway Pundit is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories."

    If you are relying on tgp as a source of information for facts you can be dismissed immediately.
    Worse than Breitbart.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭normakelle


    If you are relying on tgp as a source of information for facts you can be dismissed immediately.
    Worse than Breitbart.

    So all right leaning news media tells lies and falsehoods while left leaning media is the virtue of truth. If you believe that then you are part of the problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,284 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    normakelle wrote: »
    So all right leaning news media tells lies and falsehoods while left leaning media is the virtue of truth. If you believe that then you are part of the problem.

    right-leaning?? if the GWP leant any further to the right it would tip over.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,129 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    normakelle wrote: »
    So all right leaning news media tells lies and falsehoods while left leaning media is the virtue of truth. If you believe that then you are part of the problem.

    You’re arguing against something nobody said. You must be able to see how ridiculous that is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,737 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    normakelle wrote: »
    So all right leaning news media tells lies and falsehoods while left leaning media is the virtue of truth. If you believe that then you are part of the problem.

    The gateway pundit is insane garbage.
    Nothing to do with right or left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,200 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    normakelle wrote: »
    So all right leaning news media tells lies and falsehoods while left leaning media is the virtue of truth. If you believe that then you are part of the problem.

    What publication on the left do you think is at the same left as bias as the GWP?

    Go ahead and do a search for that on this thread and let us know how many times they have been cited as evidence.

    I'm interested in your answer to this question even if you don't find them on thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    normakelle wrote: »

    Many of the judges were appointed by Trump himself. Yet they are cowards! Doesn't say much about Trumps judgement in selecting them.

    But one professor, with no evidence yet again, Doesn't mean its true. If we can't rely on the courts, Republican lawmakers, the constitution, the entire voting system itself, then how can we ever be sure of anything?

    Was Trumps victory a fraud, because it was such a surprise and won on such tiny margins then by your logic it must have been a fraud.

    When you said everyone knows, did you mean that the vast minority think it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭normakelle


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Many of the judges were appointed by Trump himself. Yet they are cowards! Doesn't say much about Trumps judgement in selecting them.

    But one professor, with no evidence yet again, Doesn't mean its true. If we can't rely on the courts, Republican lawmakers, the constitution, the entire voting system itself, then how can we ever be sure of anything?

    Was Trumps victory a fraud, because it was such a surprise and won on such tiny margins then by your logic it must have been a fraud.

    When you said everyone knows, did you mean that the vast minority think it?

    https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/supreme-courts-decision-not-hear-elections-cases-could-have-serious
    Why was marcopia election committee fighting tooth and nail to stop a legitimate audit and examination of dominion machines if everything was transparent and above board. Even defying a court order with bullsh##t excuses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,284 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    normakelle wrote: »

    still waiting for actual evidence of election fraud. do you have any?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    normakelle wrote: »

    An opinion piece? Really?

    Come on now. You have made some definitive statements on this thread and provided nothing to back them up save for a few opinion pieces.

    I can link you to multiple YouTube videos about Flat Earth, the Lizard People, Trump being a Russian asset. Pretty much anything.

    Doesn't prove a thing. Except, your postings proves that opinion is all that matters to you and you only care about those pieces that back up your opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,336 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    normakelle wrote: »
    https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/supreme-courts-decision-not-hear-elections-cases-could-have-serious
    Why was marcopia election committee fighting tooth and nail to stop a legitimate audit and examination of dominion machines if everything was transparent and above board. Even defying a court order with bullsh##t excuses.

    I don't know. Why?

    Now, don't tell me what you think, tell me what you can prove.

    They defied a court order and nothing was done?

    Trump raised millions from his supporters to fight the election results. Would seem awfully remiss of him to miss that.

    And why did one of his legal team recently claim in court that she never expected anyone to actually believe his statements? Is she part of the conspiracy? A plant by the Dems to put Trump off the case?


Advertisement
Advertisement