Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part X *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

15556586061325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭Russman


    JDD wrote: »
    I would say there is a large minority of people that it has impacted from a medium to severe level. And then there's the majority who are annoyed at the restrictions but not financially effected by them. Unfortunately NPHET, the government and the HSE all fall into the latter category. Until you have experienced the stress in the former category, there will be no urgency in getting us out of restrictions. That's the reality.

    I agree with the first part, and maybe I'm wrong, but I really can't buy the second bit about no urgency. Public health will never prioritise urgency over safety (what levels of safety are acceptable is open to debate I guess). Yes they presumably earn good money etc, but they're not some kind of class that are totally oblivious to what's going on. No doubt there are a few (like everything in life) but I think, especially those that are medical professionals, they do know how people are coping (or not).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    What do we think is going to be included in todays announcement then?

    County limits from the 12th of April, no enforcement of any limits from midnight tonight, golf, tennis and non-contact outdoor training is my best guess


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭cheezums


    What do we think is going to be included in todays announcement then?

    County limits from the 12th of April, no enforcement of any limits from midnight tonight, golf, tennis and non-contact outdoor training is my best guess

    nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    JDD wrote: »
    I would say there is a large minority of people that it has impacted from a medium to severe level. And then there's the majority who are annoyed at the restrictions but not financially effected by them. Unfortunately NPHET, the government and the HSE all fall into the latter category. Until you have experienced the stress in the former category, there will be no urgency in getting us out of restrictions. That's the reality.

    This bears no resemblance to reality.

    The idea that you must currently be unemployed yourself to have empathy with the unemployed is really ****ing silly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Russman wrote: »
    Fair enough, he's one of the lucky ones I guess. TBH I totally get that there's a huge difference in how people are impacted, but I just don't believe for a second that the likes of NPHET have an attitude of this suiting them just fine. IMO almost everyone wants this thing over.

    Of course NPHET want this to be over, in a sort of abstract way. But their remit is public health, and they see a risk to that in the short term. Restrictions are best for public health in the short term.

    They are not there to assess the effect on the economy, either on a macro or micro basis. So in the absence of widespread vaccinations they will always advocate restrictions, no matter the financial cost.

    Where they are not suffering any financial cost personally, it is easier to think that people can bear restrictions for longer, because they can bear restrictions for longer. There doesn't appear to be any behavioural scientists giving advice to NPHET (or if they are, they are not making their voice heard), because everyone I know is now breaching the restrictions in some way, large or small. And give it another two weeks, those breaches are going to get bigger.
    FThey're in an echo chamber now. Every time someone says "hold firm" on the radio or television I want to hit something.

    So I've decided when I'm lifting my own restrictions. F"ck 'em. If they won't release a plan, I'll make my own one. We're getting builders into our house at the end of April to put in shelving. I'm going to visit my family. I'm going to let the kids have indoor playdates. I'm going on holidays.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    What do we think is going to be included in todays announcement then?

    County limits from the 12th of April, no enforcement of any limits from midnight tonight, golf, tennis and non-contact outdoor training is my best guess

    Masks for next ten years?
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1415072/face-masks-news-coronavirus-rules-10-years-lord-sumption-boris-johnson-lockdown-ont


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭Chivito550


    I am sorry but I disagree. For example, my brother works in a Government organisation. He has not been in work for more than a year. He is 'working from home' but he doesn't even have a work computer at home. So he has literally no work to do. No commute. No early mornings. Home with the kids. Loving it. Salary comes in every month. He is hoping this keeps going as long as possible.

    So he is being paid full salary to do no work at all? If this is true, this type of thing needs to be reported in the mainstream media. That's scandalous if true. What employer would pay someone to do nothing though?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭bloopy


    What do we think is going to be included in todays announcement then?

    County limits from the 12th of April, no enforcement of any limits from midnight tonight, golf, tennis and non-contact outdoor training is my best guess

    Does it matter.
    Over the last week I have seen a lot more local people either breaking or pushing the restrictions to the limit. These are people who have diligently followed all guidelines since last March (and many who are lifelong FG, FF supporters).
    The breaking point has been reached and the moralising at, condescension to, and condemnation of the population is not going to work anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,622 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    GT89 wrote: »

    Why? Once herd immunity takes hold and boosters are given theres no need


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    bloopy wrote: »
    Does it matter.
    Over the last week I have seen a lot more local people either breaking or pushing the restrictions to the limit. These are people who have diligently followed all guidelines since last March (and many who are lifelong FG, FF supporters).
    The breaking point has been reached and the moralising at, condescension to, and condemnation of the population is not going to work anymore.

    I agree. I would consider myself as someone who completely adhered to the restrictions this far. Not only did I agree with them, but even if I didn't I am a person who believes the law is the law.

    But I won't pay a blind bit of attention to what they announce today. I know what I'll be doing over the next three months, and I'll be doing anyway, no matter what the announcement says.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    So he is being paid full salary to do no work at all? If this is true, this type of thing needs to be reported in the mainstream media. That's scandalous if true. What employer would pay someone to do nothing though?
    I totally agree, if I knew PSB/govt department I will look into it myself. There would honestly be war if this kind of carry on was happening in my org.

    His PMDs this year (which he needs to pass to get any increment) is going to be er rather light....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭A Shaved Duck?


    Sorry, but that smells of sour grapes. Don't tell me you would prefer to be in our position?

    The British have played a blinder:

    - they have maintained a careful balance between suppressing the virus and keeping the economy moving
    - their messaging has been positive and hopeful rather than pessimistic and fearful
    - they secured proper contracts from the vaccine providers and didn't sweat over cost
    - they have professionally handled the vaccine rollout with minimum fuss and maximum efficiency
    - they are now moving ahead with lifting restrictions.

    Meanwhile back in the Banana Republic '“It’s critical that we get the next few weeks right” ....(Eamon Ryan this morning)

    Dont at any stage mention that they have had around 130'000 people die from covid and have been consistently near the top of the global table for this.

    Lets ignore also that if they had remained in the EU there would be a very different picture and saying the brits played a blinder is complete nonsense.

    If its sour grapes to say that this then so be it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭11521323


    Chivito550 wrote: »
    So he is being paid full salary to do no work at all? If this is true, this type of thing needs to be reported in the mainstream media. That's scandalous if true. What employer would pay someone to do nothing though?

    Its most definitely true. When the employer is the state they can't really have you on PUP but if there's no work to do then you end up in this scenario. This whole situation is disgusting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 60 ✭✭Apoapsis Rex


    gansi wrote: »
    Can we be sure they will ease things on 12th as we were told 5th and now things pushed out again to middle of month. Could they say we partied too much at Easter etc and there’s a new variant, plus talk of big. bang.

    They've announced another increase in testing facilities. So we should see an increase in positive cases...just in time for the 16th to be cancelled.

    They will only open up private construction to put finishing touches on houses. If at all.

    I think the people who are finishing private purchases of new build houses this year are the last of their kind. The rest of new houses will be bought by the state and will only be for rent.

    They are already basically admitting purposely putting pubs out of business to replace them with working hubs.

    It seems Ireland is the WEF's test case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Anyone remember George Lee back last summer on about earthquake technology, to tell us how there was a big drop in the number of people out and about. How this technology measures the vibrations in the earth to measure people movement.

    Haven't heard a peep about it since. Just goes to show it's all bolloxology to get views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    11521323 wrote: »
    Its most definitely true. When the employer is the state they can't really have you on PUP but if there's no work to do then you end up in this scenario. This whole situation is disgusting.
    Can you tell me the departments?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Pussyhands wrote: »
    Anyone remember George Lee back last summer on about earthquake technology, to tell us how there was a big drop in the number of people out and about. How this technology measures the vibrations in the earth to measure people movement.

    Haven't heard a peep about it since. Just goes to show it's all bolloxology to get views.
    It was based on a report? So not bolloxology imo

    https://www.insn.ie/2020-covid19-low-seismic-noise/
    Similar studies have been done in other countries very interesting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    JDD wrote: »
    We're getting builders into our house at the end of April to put in shelving.

    RSJ shelving?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭11521323


    gmisk wrote: »
    Can you tell me the departments?

    No one from the public sector has been laid off, temporarily or otherwise. Now think of all the services that are reduced or stopped temporarily. It's not that difficult to make assumptions.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Pussyhands wrote: »
    Anyone remember George Lee back last summer on about earthquake technology, to tell us how there was a big drop in the number of people out and about. How this technology measures the vibrations in the earth to measure people movement.

    Haven't heard a peep about it since. Just goes to show it's all bolloxology to get views.

    Seismographs can detect traffic movement. This is the background noise on the needle. I think its more of an academic exercise rather than having practical use however, but it is real

    548675.JPG


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    gmisk wrote: »
    This is most definitely not the norm, I would love to know where he works tbh....you can drop me a pm if you like....I work in IT I know most of the POs in other orgs.

    I work in PS and in our org 800 plus people all have the ability to work from home if they are not on a work device they are on a personal device with Citrix. I am working far longer hours from home than I was in office and colleagues in my area are all the same.

    If this guys PSB/department has not given him a method to work from home and he is just sitting on his hole it is disgraceful, I would have him on a laptop within a week.

    His work involves maintenance of machinery which has been dormant since lockdown. I don't think a laptop would make any difference.
    I know of two other PS organisations similarly in hibernation at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    11521323 wrote: »
    No one from the public sector has been laid off, temporarily or otherwise. Now think of all the services that are reduced or stopped temporarily. It's not that difficult to make assumptions.
    Ah..
    You know what they say about Assume...
    Look it is entirely possible, but it's really not fair to tar all PS/CS with same brush.
    I would think it is the exception rather than rule. Again an assumption but based on actual experience in the area.

    I can say the department I am in everyone is working and I mean working from home. We have seriously invested in ICT infrastructure to allow this and it will be used going forward. Likely will be working from home if approved for set days from now on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭SnuggyBear


    His work involves maintenance of machinery which has been dormant since lockdown. I don't think a laptop would make any difference.
    I know of two other PS organisations similarly in hibernation at the moment.

    Amazing. All in it together. No one likes lockdown etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Pepsirebel


    gmisk wrote: »
    It was based on a report? So not bolloxology imo

    https://www.insn.ie/2020-covid19-low-seismic-noise/
    Similar studies have been done in other countries very interesting

    I think that it is bolloxology that we, Ireland, would possess or even know what the technology is


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    His work involves maintenance of machinery which has been dormant since lockdown. I don't think a laptop would make any difference.
    I know of two other PS organisations similarly in hibernation at the moment.
    Ah right get you.
    I would say in fairness that is pretty niche, numbers would be small, internal maintenance of machinery a lot of that would be outsourced in my experience.

    Two entire PS orgs? In hibernation with no one working from home? I really don't believe that sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,591 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Pepsirebel wrote: »
    I think that it is bolloxology that we, Ireland, would possess or even know what the technology is
    Err...ok...Why would Ireland not have it? Plenty of other countries in the world have it....it was literally linked above. There are live feeds to the data...
    Your basing the bolloxology comment on nothing I would suggest


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭FlubberJones


    RobitTV wrote: »

    This schools obsession gets on my tits, not everyone has kids that need to be schooled... I could care ****ing less about them.

    I just want to be able to travel and get out of the 5k bull**** restrictions, kids can stay at home


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    Lads we could have followed Saint Jacinda down a zero covid route - been free and not had our hospitals at breaking point.

    https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/its-crisis-overwhelmed-ed-staff-in-hospitals-often-tears-experts-say
    “We’re not sure why there’s been this incredible surge, Dunedin hospital has gone into code black, hospitals across the country are overflowing, I believe this is a crisis,” Hamilton-based Bonning said.

    “I have a national view of what’s going on, I’ve spoken to a number of people throughout the country, stories from Wellington Hospital where a 110 per cent of their capacity, patients are admitted but don’t have a ward bed to go to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    gmisk wrote: »
    Ah..
    You know what they say about Assume...
    Look it is entirely possible, but it's really not fair to tar all PS/CS with same brush.
    I would think it is the exception rather than rule. Again an assumption but based on actual experience in the area.

    I can say the department I am in everyone is working and I mean working from home. We have seriously invested in ICT infrastructure to allow this and it will be used going forward. Likely will be working from home if approved for set days from now on.

    I agree its not fair. But the original point I was making is valid. If the committee making all the decisions (NPHET) is made up 100% by people who are not financially impacted whatsoever by restrictions, then we are going to get a VERY conservative approach to lockdown.

    What we need is a more representative decision making forum - medics, epidemiologists, economists, industry reps, logistics experts, charity sector, education sector, sports and arts. Then at least we would be looking at this problem from all the perspectives required to make a balanced and informed decision about lockdowns..


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement