Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2021 Irish Property Market chat - *mod warnings post 1*

1227228230232233351

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,903 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Ush1 wrote: »
    You'd be doing well to tell the difference between an aluminum and upvc window unless you're touching the window.

    Getting wooden windows would be madness to me in what is a very damp climate we have, and I honestly don't think they look better.

    each to their own but i know what looks better to me,

    i have yet to see a decent sash window that wasnt made from wood.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    The minister for rural affairs has stated that 20% of public sector employees will be working remotely by the end of this year. Not 2022, not 2023, this year. And, she also said that that percentage will be increased every year going forward.

    Love to know who these people are.

    There are 37,500 civil servants in Ireland- of whom 22.280 are based outside of Dublin (aka a majority). Just over 15k in Dublin.

    Of the other 271,000 public sector employees - 106,000 are employed in the HSE in various roles at various locations around the country- or in Dublin. They're not easy to move around the place.

    165k other public sector employees. Of these 98k are teachers/principals in schools- bringing us down to 67k

    14,000 Gardai - now we're down to 53,000

    10,000 in Army/Naval Services etc - now we're down to 43,000

    27,000 Local Authority employees - we're down to 16,000

    13,000 in Non-Commercial State Bodies - down to 3,000


    20% of 300,000 odd is 60,000 employees- which would be the entirety of the civil service and all local authority employees- of whom over 40,000 aren't based in Dublin to begin with.

    A 20% WFH does not equate with large numbers of new people moving out of Dublin at all- in fact, I'd suggest it may have negligible to no effect whatsoever on the numbers of public sector employees in Dublin.

    Source for the above here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_service_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,903 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Love to know who these people are.

    There are 37,500 civil servants in Ireland- of whom 22.280 are based outside of Dublin (aka a majority). Just over 15k in Dublin.

    Of the other 271,000 public sector employees - 106,000 are employed in the HSE in various roles at various locations around the country- or in Dublin. They're not easy to move around the place.

    165k other public sector employees. Of these 98k are teachers/principals in schools- bringing us down to 67k

    14,000 Gardai - now we're down to 53,000

    10,000 in Army/Naval Services etc - now we're down to 43,000

    27,000 Local Authority employees - we're down to 16,000

    13,000 in Non-Commercial State Bodies - down to 3,000


    20% of 300,000 odd is 60,000 employees- which would be the entirety of the civil service and all local authority employees- of whom over 40,000 aren't based in Dublin to begin with.

    A 20% WFH does not equate with large numbers of new people moving out of Dublin at all- in fact, I'd suggest it may have negligible to no effect whatsoever on the numbers of public sector employees in Dublin.

    don't be discrediting soundbite headlines with your reasoned analysis :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    Villa05 wrote: »
    In addition
    There is an assumption that people are coupling up to buy
    Latest trends show coupling up happens much later in life. Would single people people be tempted away from Dublin rents to go for commuter ownership?

    There’s a lot to consider there - where to possibly commute from, where are friends and family based, degree of flexibility in both jobs. It would be nice for many people.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,090 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Love to know who these people are.

    There are 37,500 civil servants in Ireland- of whom 22.280 are based outside of Dublin (aka a majority). Just over 15k in Dublin.

    Of the other 271,000 public sector employees - 106,000 are employed in the HSE in various roles at various locations around the country- or in Dublin. They're not easy to move around the place.

    165k other public sector employees. Of these 98k are teachers/principals in schools- bringing us down to 67k

    14,000 Gardai - now we're down to 53,000

    10,000 in Army/Naval Services etc - now we're down to 43,000

    27,000 Local Authority employees - we're down to 16,000

    13,000 in Non-Commercial State Bodies - down to 3,000


    20% of 300,000 odd is 60,000 employees- which would be the entirety of the civil service and all local authority employees- of whom over 40,000 aren't based in Dublin to begin with.

    A 20% WFH does not equate with large numbers of new people moving out of Dublin at all- in fact, I'd suggest it may have negligible to no effect whatsoever on the numbers of public sector employees in Dublin.

    Source for the above here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_service_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland

    The minister said 20% working remotely. They can work remotely from wherever they currently are based.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,903 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    awec wrote: »
    The minister said 20% working remotely. They can work remotely from wherever they currently are based.

    its more likely they will flee dublin in their droves sending prices tumbling 75% is it not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Love to know who these people are.

    There are 37,500 civil servants in Ireland- of whom 22.280 are based outside of Dublin (aka a majority). Just over 15k in Dublin.

    Of the other 271,000 public sector employees - 106,000 are employed in the HSE in various roles at various locations around the country- or in Dublin. They're not easy to move around the place.

    165k other public sector employees. Of these 98k are teachers/principals in schools- bringing us down to 67k

    14,000 Gardai - now we're down to 53,000

    10,000 in Army/Naval Services etc - now we're down to 43,000

    27,000 Local Authority employees - we're down to 16,000

    13,000 in Non-Commercial State Bodies - down to 3,000


    20% of 300,000 odd is 60,000 employees- which would be the entirety of the civil service and all local authority employees- of whom over 40,000 aren't based in Dublin to begin with.

    A 20% WFH does not equate with large numbers of new people moving out of Dublin at all- in fact, I'd suggest it may have negligible to no effect whatsoever on the numbers of public sector employees in Dublin.

    Source for the above here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_service_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland

    I don't really see the impact this will have at all.

    If you're in the civil service in Dublin, you're not gonna move to Mayo or Carlow.

    There are public servants living in rural Ireland today. Them working at a hub isn't going to restore life to a town. So they may buy lunch or something (at most), but that's hardly revolutionary?



    I'd love to see an example of someone they think this would apply to.

    Back in my hometown in rural setting, I know civil servants. They may commute an hour or whatever to work, but they'd be getting fuel in the local filling station, buying snacks and drinks, for their journey.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    awec wrote: »
    The minister said 20% working remotely. They can work remotely from wherever they currently are based.

    The suggestion was that as a scheme it was a manner of freeing up housing in Dublin while simultaneously being a good step towards rebooting the economies of many remote towns in Ireland. My point- is that it means no such thing.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,090 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The suggestion was that as a scheme it was a manner of freeing up housing in Dublin while simultaneously being a good step towards rebooting the economies of many remote towns in Ireland. My point- is that it means no such thing.

    The Minister for Rural Affairs is playing to her audience a bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    Hubertj wrote: »
    There’s a lot to consider there - where to possibly commute from, where are friends and family based, degree of flexibility in both jobs. It would be nice for many people.

    I think the horrible rental market here could have laid the groundwork for some surprising effects on whatever the new normal will be in that regard.

    Even before Covid most of my friends live far enough away from each other (ie where they can afford) that meeting up is already something that has to be arranged in advance, and I was working with people who commuted in from Drogheda. I think we could find ourselves surprised at how many Millenials have already been living without the "perks" working in Dublin is meant to offer.

    We could find too that, post lockdown, people find the idea of their own space much more valuable than amenities they managed to live without. Wowburger is grand, but is it worth housesharing with three other people forever in Carrickmines if you could work for the exact same company in Navan, in a room you chose the paint for?

    I don't expect a mass exodus, but I do expect a slowly growing stream once things start moving and people take stock of the recent past and the future risk of similar events. I would sooner live in the Ailwee Caves than spend the next pandemic in the living situation I spent this one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Pussyhands wrote: »
    I don't really see the impact this will have at all.

    If you're in the civil service in Dublin, you're not gonna move to Mayo or Carlow.
    .

    Out of curiosity, why do you think this? I'd have thought that quality of life for a young family would be 10x higher somewhere like Waterford vs Dublin if you don't own your own home and your household income is sub €100k (maybe even higher).

    I do wonder of all the people adamant that nobody would ever want to leave Dublin, how many are paying 50%+ of their after tax income on rent with zero prospect of ever owning a home. I suspect this might change your perspective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    DataDude wrote: »
    Out of curiosity, why do you think this? I'd have thought that quality of life for a young family would be 10x higher somewhere like Waterford vs Dublin if you don't own your own home and your household income is sub €100k (maybe even higher).

    I do wonder of all the people adamant that nobody would ever want to leave Dublin, how many are paying 50%+ of their after tax income on rent with zero prospect of ever owning a home. I suspect this might change your perspective.

    Yeah. I think this thread is consistently inclined to think of this stuff in terms of "Buying in Dublin vs Buying Elsewhere" when imho many, if not most would be FTBs are more likely to be pondering this question, as you say, "Renting in Dublin vs Buying Elsewhere."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    givyjoe wrote: »
    The vast majority of people will not be fully remote. Id wager 1 day office based is also highly improbably because well, what benefit does that give. Hubs as you say are also not likely for the vast majority of businesses, for obvious reasons, namely cost and scale. What matters for the property market is decisions the majority are going to make. Anyway, the point im making is essentially the same thing, a lot of people initially foolishly made long terms decisions without knowing what long term working arrangements they were going to have. I don't think we'll see a mass exodus, even with 2/3 days WFH.

    Completely disagree with this, vast majority in IT and similar office setups will have remote working, big multinationals have already come out and said remote is the way forward and thats who the indigenous companies are competing with.

    The very least will be a blended approach 1-2 days on the office and the rest remote, if a company especially in IT wants staff in full time, prepare to lose the talent, most IT staff already have one foot out the door at the best of times, most leave after two to three years if they havent been promoted.

    Only option really is if ypu want your staff in the office full time to pay more than twitter and give better benefits, how likely is that?

    I think a bigger issue is for all the smaller companies down the country who hae decent teams, now losung staff to the multinational as they can't compete on salary or benefits.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,678 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The suggestion was that as a scheme it was a manner of freeing up housing in Dublin while simultaneously being a good step towards rebooting the economies of many remote towns in Ireland. My point- is that it means no such thing.

    I don't understand what the problem with the logic here is? This makes sense to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yeah. I think this thread is consistently inclined to think of this stuff in terms of "Buying in Dublin vs Buying Elsewhere" when imho many, if not most would be FTBs are more likely to be pondering this question, as you say, "Renting in Dublin vs Buying Elsewhere."

    Yep! We have TDs on €100k looking for pay increases due to lack of housing options. It really doesn't seem farfetched to me to think those on lower incomes might consider a move to a less expensive area.

    "A TD on a €100,000 a year cannot afford to buy a modest three-bedroomed home in many parts of Dublin, the Fine Gael parliamentary party was told last week."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/oh-councillors-will-get-their-50pc-pay-hike-all-right-40167207.html

    I think the pay of civil servants is greatly exaggerated. The job security and pensions are fantastic, but it's not like 30 somethings entering it today would have their pick of family homes in Dublin. Personally I'd be gone like a shot to any of Galway/Waterford/Wexford if in their shoes and given the choice!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,679 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    DataDude wrote: »
    Out of curiosity, why do you think this? I'd have thought that quality of life for a young family would be 10x higher somewhere like Waterford vs Dublin if you don't own your own home and your household income is sub €100k (maybe even higher).

    I do wonder of all the people adamant that nobody would ever want to leave Dublin, how many are paying 50%+ of their after tax income on rent with zero prospect of ever owning a home. I suspect this might change your perspective.

    Problem is that the lower paid workers are the ones who can't feasibly WFH on a regular basis. They're relied on in offices too much to do anything from meet with visitors to photocopying and binding and answering letters. This will be a perk for middle and upper management with the odd person at CO and EO level given it to be family friendly.

    Yes work practices could, and should, be changed but that will go at a glacial pace.

    It also shouldn't be underestimated how many are commuting from as far away as Wexford to Civil Service jobs in Dublin already. Their move to a WFH model does nothing the free up housing in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    The Spider wrote: »
    Completely disagree with this, vast majority in IT and similar office setups will have remote working, big multinationals have already come out and said remote is the way forward and thats who the indigenous companies are competing with.

    The very least will be a blended approach 1-2 days on the office and the rest remote, if a company especially in IT wants staff in full time, prepare to lose the talent, most IT staff already have one foot out the door at the best of times, most leave after two to three years if they havent been promoted.

    Only option really is if ypu want your staff in the office full time to pay more than twitter and give better benefits, how likely is that?

    I think a bigger issue is for all the smaller companies down the country who hae decent teams, now losung staff to the multinational as they can't compete on salary or benefits.

    In high demand sectors where employees can be fussy and pick and choose employers I think employers will find it difficult to use the stick of "ye're in the office full time lads just because we say so".

    I feel like employers will have to demonstrate the value of the office and what having an office presence gives them - and there is a lot of value in the office.

    But a hybrid model of 50:50 or 75:25 office and home will need some thought - there's no point bringing people into an office to go on zoom calls. Collaboration and team days will be the order of the day for sure but are you better off having those as off sites and ditching the office altogether?

    There's a demand from people I know to get back in the office but how much of this is cabin fever from being at home versus versus lockdown cabin fever because the country is closed. Work from home in an open country will be far different to the WFH we have now.

    As regards property, I find it difficult to see people making life decisions in such an uncertain climate and decamping en masse - pandemic has likely fast forwarded decisions by a few years but people decamping to belmullet with no connection to the and working in Google full time remote just seems off to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,092 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Nobody's moving anywhere atm, so I'm not sure that's a useful reflection.

    I'd love to stay living in Dublin, just can't afford to. None of the amenities are worth having to deal with landlords forever. I'd rather own a pallet floating in the middle of the Atlantic than carry on handing this much money to somebody every year for the privilege of a mouldy shoebox here.
    DataDude wrote: »
    Yep! We have TDs on €100k looking for pay increases due to lack of housing options. It really doesn't seem farfetched to me to think those on lower incomes might consider a move to a less expensive area.

    "A TD on a €100,000 a year cannot afford to buy a modest three-bedroomed home in many parts of Dublin, the Fine Gael parliamentary party was told last week."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/oh-councillors-will-get-their-50pc-pay-hike-all-right-40167207.html

    I think the pay of civil servants is greatly exaggerated. The job security and pensions are fantastic, but it's not like 30 somethings entering it today would have their pick of family homes in Dublin. Personally I'd be gone like a shot to any of Galway/Waterford/Wexford if in their shoes and given the choice!

    Well This a remarkable turn around in attitude. I suggested earlier that people who can't afford to buy in Dublin should perhaps look outside of Dublin where housing is cheaper and i had my head bitten off. Now it's a great and sensible idea. :rolleyes:

    Oh-Yeah.jpg

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=116673947&postcount=6470


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Love to know who these people are.

    There are 37,500 civil servants in Ireland- of whom 22.280 are based outside of Dublin (aka a majority). Just over 15k in Dublin.

    Of the other 271,000 public sector employees - 106,000 are employed in the HSE in various roles at various locations around the country- or in Dublin. They're not easy to move around the place.

    165k other public sector employees. Of these 98k are teachers/principals in schools- bringing us down to 67k

    14,000 Gardai - now we're down to 53,000

    10,000 in Army/Naval Services etc - now we're down to 43,000

    27,000 Local Authority employees - we're down to 16,000

    13,000 in Non-Commercial State Bodies - down to 3,000


    20% of 300,000 odd is 60,000 employees- which would be the entirety of the civil service and all local authority employees- of whom over 40,000 aren't based in Dublin to begin with.

    A 20% WFH does not equate with large numbers of new people moving out of Dublin at all- in fact, I'd suggest it may have negligible to no effect whatsoever on the numbers of public sector employees in Dublin.

    Source for the above here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_service_of_the_Republic_of_Ireland

    Actually very good points there. But look at it another way.

    If only a total of 8,000 workers between all the civil service and private companies embraced WFH to the fullest and left Dublin, that’s the equivalent of Google shutting up shop tomorrow.

    What would be the impact on the Dublin property market if Google shut down tomorrow?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,679 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    What would be the impact on the Dublin property market if Google shut down tomorrow?

    Probably about the same as AirBnB being 'banned'. i.e. a drop, albeit a fairly large one, in the ocean.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭DataDude


    cnocbui wrote: »
    Well This a remarkable turn around in attitude. I suggested earlier that people who can't afford to buy in Dublin should perhaps look outside of Dublin where housing is cheaper and i had my head bitten off. Now it's a great and sensible idea. :rolleyes:

    Oh-Yeah.jpg

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=116673947&postcount=6470

    Just to clarify - it's a great idea and sensible based on the reality on which we currently live. I don't think it's desirable that people are forced to do so, but that's the hand you've been dealt so you do what's best for your family.

    I can advise my partner to not walk the streets alone at night and yet still advocate for a world where she theoretically could if she wanted to without being a hypocrite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Probably about the same as AirBnB being 'banned'. i.e. a drop, albeit a fairly large one, in the ocean.

    The AirBnB properties didn’t re-enter the market because the state either bought or rented many of them.

    Basically Dublin City may be just one big corporation estate in a few years.

    Another reason for people to start embracing WFH outside the capital IMO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,903 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The suggestion was that as a scheme it was a manner of freeing up housing in Dublin while simultaneously being a good step towards rebooting the economies of many remote towns in Ireland. My point- is that it means no such thing.


    It's an excuse to give grants to a much favoured sector in the past
    The publicans

    I'd really question making the pub a workplace in Ireland

    There's so many things that could go wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,092 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    DataDude wrote: »
    Yep! We have TDs on €100k looking for pay increases due to lack of housing options. It really doesn't seem farfetched to me to think those on lower incomes might consider a move to a less expensive area.

    "A TD on a €100,000 a year cannot afford to buy a modest three-bedroomed home in many parts of Dublin, the Fine Gael parliamentary party was told last week."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/oh-councillors-will-get-their-50pc-pay-hike-all-right-40167207.html

    I think the pay of civil servants is greatly exaggerated. The job security and pensions are fantastic, but it's not like 30 somethings entering it today would have their pick of family homes in Dublin. Personally I'd be gone like a shot to any of Galway/Waterford/Wexford if in their shoes and given the choice!

    I don't think the pay of civil servants is exagerated. Fortunately we don't have as many proportionate to private sector workers as other places. Norway is bonkers.

    Irish-Public-service-salaries.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,679 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    That looks like Public Sector rather than Civil Service. The point being there are doctors, professors etc. in the above. You'd need to be a AP on at least LS1 to be earning that. There is not an insignificant number of them but it's tiny compared to the number of COs and EOs earning less than 50K.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭DataDude


    cnocbui wrote: »
    I don't think the pay of civil servants is exagerated. Fortunately we don't have as many proportionate to private sector workers as other places. Norway is bonkers.

    Irish-Public-service-salaries.jpg

    I should have been more specific. I whole heartedly agree with your sentiments that the Public Sector is overcompensated, were I given dictatorial powers tomorrow I'd slash their Defined Benefit pension schemes in a heartbeat and relish the interaction with their unions. I'm by no means defending the value for money they provide as a whole.

    My point in that post was more to counteract the notion that the public sector cohort of workers can easily afford to live in Dublin and therefore why would they leave. I think the average public sector wage is roughly €50k. It's good money, better than the private sector, but it doesn't go a long way in the Dublin housing market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    Browney7 wrote: »
    In high demand sectors where employees can be fussy and pick and choose employers I think employers will find it difficult to use the stick of "ye're in the office full time lads just because we say so".

    I feel like employers will have to demonstrate the value of the office and what having an office presence gives them - and there is a lot of value in the office.

    But a hybrid model of 50:50 or 75:25 office and home will need some thought - there's no point bringing people into an office to go on zoom calls. Collaboration and team days will be the order of the day for sure but are you better off having those as off sites and ditching the office altogether?

    There's a demand from people I know to get back in the office but how much of this is cabin fever from being at home versus versus lockdown cabin fever because the country is closed. Work from home in an open country will be far different to the WFH we have now.

    As regards property, I find it difficult to see people making life decisions in such an uncertain climate and decamping en masse - pandemic has likely fast forwarded decisions by a few years but people decamping to belmullet with no connection to the and working in Google full time remote just seems off to me.

    I agree with a lot of your points above, I do think cabin fever has set in and people looking for the office are looking for human contact full stop. When you can WFH and go to the local cafe for a cup of coffee, and local restaurants for lunch and the local pubs for a few pints in the evening I think it’ll be a different ballgame.

    People who aren’t from Dublin, intinctivly react against the the high prices for rent and buying property and generally would be gone in a heart beat to buy something bigger and cheaper down the country or to another city in Ireland.

    Younger people will still want the bright lights and city experience, but after a year or two of house sharing it gets old pretty quickly especially if you spent four years getting a degree, and are now sharing a house with strangers, and can’t eat your dinner in the evening because they insist on monopolising the kitchen.

    Meanwhile there’s a guy you went to school with who left when he was 15 and got a job in the local factory, he now has a decent house he’s settled down and doing adult things like going out to dinner with his wife/fiancé, he’s also started saving money and is thinking about investing in another property.

    You have a degree from trinity agood job in a multinational, you’re earning a lot more than your school mate but you can’t save, you can’t even sit down and watch what you want on tv, Dublin is sucking every penny out of your pocket.

    Those guys will be gone like a bullet after a year or two in Dublin


    On a side note I think people are getting the wrong end of the stick with the civil service going remote. When they go remote it normalises it for every other company in the private sector


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    DataDude wrote: »
    Out of curiosity, why do you think this? I'd have thought that quality of life for a young family would be 10x higher somewhere like Waterford vs Dublin if you don't own your own home and your household income is sub €100k (maybe even higher).

    I do wonder of all the people adamant that nobody would ever want to leave Dublin, how many are paying 50%+ of their after tax income on rent with zero prospect of ever owning a home. I suspect this might change your perspective.

    If you've lived all your life in Dublin then chances of moving I think are nil. Country living is a big change. Even a regular occurance like slurry spreading I think would put city dwellers off.

    Your friends are not there.

    I'm from the countryside and I don't plan on moving back. Rural Ireland everyone knows your business, terrible amount of begrudgery. Anyone with ambition is seen to have notions.

    A simple thing in Dublin like going to the airport requires way more planning and cost.

    I'm sure some people will up sticks and move, but it's a massive change of lifestyle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Actually very good points there. But look at it another way.

    If only a total of 8,000 workers between all the civil service and private companies embraced WFH to the fullest and left Dublin, that’s the equivalent of Google shutting up shop tomorrow.

    What would be the impact on the Dublin property market if Google shut down tomorrow?

    Nothing.

    Approximately 30k net migration to Ireland each year, mostly Dublin....that hasn't happened this year, and nothing's changed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,871 ✭✭✭yagan


    Pussyhands wrote: »
    If you've lived all your life in Dublin then chances of moving I think are nil. lifestyle.
    This is hilarious but not untypical of the Dublincentric view that urbanity ends outside the M50.

    The simple fact is that there's many urban centres around this country that can offer a superior quality of life even with lower than Dublin wages.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement