Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Justice League **Spoilers from post 980 onward**

1616264666781

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭splashthecash


    So I understand that Sky Cinema are going to have this available from 18th March - do we know if they are making the full 4 hour film available, or will it be broken down into 1 hour chapters?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    If Peter Bradshaw is giving this near top marks, I don't think the whole "critics don't like this kind of thing" is going to wash this time around.

    I know what I'm going to get when I watch this, the most Zack Snyder joint ever conceived. It is a known quantity, a definitive value, regardless how one feels about the work. The 2017 film was such a wet fart, a visual representation of falling between two stools, this new version can only be better. Not necessarily a better film, but a better final product.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,579 ✭✭✭techdiver


    So I understand that Sky Cinema are going to have this available from 18th March - do we know if they are making the full 4 hour film available, or will it be broken down into 1 hour chapters?

    Full 4 hour on Sky Cinema. First showing at 7am Thursday morning.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think I'm actually gonna watch this now. It's sounding okay and fair play to Snyder if he made something decent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    recyclops wrote: »
    Just watched ultimate edition on my xbox 4 quid to rent it from the store was actually impressed using the service.

    I enjoyed it much more than I thought I would, hadn't returned to BvS since initial viewing in the cinema. Now I am pumped for Thursday.

    I’m watching it again, I think it’s great and gets better on repeat viewings for me. The score is superb. Jesse grew on me as Lex, his plan aswell comes together nicely. Saw somebody say that they didn’t need Lois story on the bullet but it tied the whole
    Lex plot together.

    If JL is an extension of it I will be well pleased.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,204 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    The most interesting comment I've seen in a review is this one, from The Independent:
    Despite multiple editors, it seems at no point did anyone ask: “Why have you taken an already overstuffed plot and added multiple nods to a future sequel no one has shown any interest in making?”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,579 ✭✭✭techdiver


    Fysh wrote: »
    The most interesting comment I've seen in a review is this one, from The Independent:

    In fairness the movie and it's plot/set up for the future was completed in 2017 (apart from a few re-shoots in 2020) so it's not as if there are plot points added now. There was full intention at the time to make a sequel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭ItsHoggie


    How come this isn’t widescreen?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,613 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Fysh wrote: »
    The most interesting comment I've seen in a review is this one, from The Independent:

    C'mon now, we can do better than that outlet.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,204 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    C'mon now, we can do better than that outlet.

    UK Indo, not Irish. So.... a bit less objectionable?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,394 ✭✭✭ManOfMystery


    Fysh wrote: »
    The most interesting comment I've seen in a review is this one, from The Independent:

    There was no interest in any Director's cut of Justice League at one point, and look where we are now. If this does well, who knows?

    WB may have moved their DC universe on a bit, but from the JL roster it's almost certain that Gadot and Momoa will be back in solo movies (WW3 is in the works and Aquaman 2 shoots this summer) - Affleck is returning as Batman in the Flashpoint movie along with Ezra Miller as Flash, and whilst nothing is in the pipeline officially for Cavill there's also been no announcement that he's out or finished. The only one looking doubtful is Fisher due to the ongoing situation between him and WB over bullying claims, but if Cyborg is as big a draw in this movie as I've read, maybe they'll sort that out. So that's 4 of the 6 Snyder - JL stars returning in their roles in the very near future.

    So if there's audience hunger for more, and WB think there's money to be made, I wouldn't rule anything out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    If it's a hit on HBO Max and they see a boost in subscribers over the next month or three that's linked to this they may well make the squeals for exclusive HBO Max all these streaming services are throwing billions of dollars at making content this is one of the best IP's in the world so who knows.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,613 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Fysh wrote: »
    UK Indo, not Irish. So.... a bit less objectionable?

    UK Indo seems to be a rung below the Irish one if that's possible. Their articles are absolute bait.

    I just don't know why of all the reviews out there, ranging from the Guardian (positive) to The Hollywood Reporter (negative) that a blurb from that clickbait site would catch your attention....unless, of course, that blurb confirmed an opinion you've already formed. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    UK Indo seems to be a rung below the Irish one if that's possible. Their articles are absolute bait.
    Their articles automatically get flagged on reddit with a "users often report articles from this site for sensational or exaggerated stories" or something of the kind. I can't say I've read it to confirm, but it has a pretty terrible name at this point.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,204 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    UK Indo seems to be a rung below the Irish one if that's possible. Their articles are absolute bait.

    I just don't know why of all the reviews out there, ranging from the Guardian (positive) to The Hollywood Reporter (negative) that a blurb from that clickbait site would catch your attention....unless, of course, that blurb confirmed an opinion you've already formed. ;)

    I noticed it in passing ( UK Indo is one of few UK news sites that aren't enormously Tory and/or editorially transphobic and/or editorially anti-SNP/Scottish Independence, so is a useful counterweight) and thought it might be of interest because someone upthread had mentioned how many reviews just focused on "it's better than the theatrical release". (I'm also loving how Bradshaw's positive review is accepted at face value despite how often his reviews get cited on this forum as evidence that critics are the worst kind of pox on film because they just don't understand what audiences like :D Never found him a particularly useful critic myself so I tend not to pay him much mind either way...)

    That comment strikes me as a fair question someone might ask about a several-years-later definitive release of the film. Not necessarily something that would put off fans wanting the equivalent of an Ultimate Cut, but still relevant when assessing this version on its own merits IMO.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mikhail wrote: »
    Their articles automatically get flagged on reddit with a "users often report articles from this site for sensational or exaggerated stories" or something of the kind. I can't say I've read it to confirm, but it has a pretty terrible name at this point.

    The reviewer is the stand in for Mark Kermode on his show so I'd consider her a good reviewer as they go. Dunno why it's the part of the review that annoys people tbh. I'd suspect they're all actually intriguing people enough to give it a go. I didn't think I would but I will now, know a fair few who will too. Granted my friends aren't exactly the mainstream audience but I suspect it'll get on reasonably now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,521 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Looks like it became available a day early?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭larchielads


    Not widescreen couldn't adjust it either. Might wait til tomorrow see what links are available then


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭BrookieD


    Not widescreen couldn't adjust it either. Might wait til tomorrow see what links are available then

    It will only be in 4:3 AR not 2:35:1 or 16:9


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭larchielads


    BrookieD wrote: »
    It will only be in 4:3 AR not 2:35:1 or 16:9

    Seriously?? Ah jesus christ snyder. 4 hrs of 4:3 no thanks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,506 ✭✭✭ThePott


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    Looks like it became available a day early?
    Where has it been officially released do you know? I've seen it on the high seas alright but wondering where it came from.

    Was gonna wait till Friday to watch it but if there's a legal way of watching it now I'd go for it with the day off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,521 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Can't see any info on where it leaked from. just says it's a HDRip. no source


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Anyone know what time tomorrow will this be on Sky Cinema?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭Caegan


    First showing is 7am tomorrow on sky cinema.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,618 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'm about an hour and twenty in.

    Jesus it's tough going so far. And so much slow-mo.... Slow-mo at different speeds, slow-mo mixed with fast-motion, but just slow-mo everywhere.

    It doesn't have some of the crap the original had and things are better explained and set up, but an hour and twenty and almost nothing has happened so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Right about to sit down and watch Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition tonight.


    I was thinking of doing them back to back tomorrow but I think that might be a bit to much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,613 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Penn wrote: »
    I'm about an hour and twenty in.

    Jesus it's tough going so far. And so much slow-mo.... Slow-mo at different speeds, slow-mo mixed with fast-motion, but just slow-mo everywhere.

    It doesn't have some of the crap the original had and things are better explained and set up, but an hour and twenty and almost nothing has happened so far.

    Good to know you kept your hand in your pocket anyway, should soften the blow.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,077 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Just a note to everyone to make sure your tv doesn’t automatically it to widescreen when you sit down to watch it! It’s an odd if admirable decision from Snyder given the material, but nonetheless 4:3 has its own particular aesthetic quirks and strengths, so it’s the only way to watch it properly.

    Very rare to see a blockbuster presented with that aspect ratio (although common in the indie / arthouse space), so think there’ll be a few reports of people attempting to incorrectly adjust for widescreen!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,618 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Good to know you kept your hand in your pocket anyway, should soften the blow.

    I could have signed up to the free trial of Now TV and then cancelled it after, but what difference would that make?

    bWS9g1Eo9AWC.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,613 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    The difference would obviously be streaming views given how important that will be but how and ever.


Advertisement