Why are black people the most genetically blessed race?

Not good :


1. Office of Minority Health Resource Center. “Profile: Black/African Americans.” Black/African American - The Office of Minority Health, 22 Aug. 2019,

www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=3&lvlid=61

.

2. “African American Health.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2 May 2017,

www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aahealth/infographic.html

.

3. “African-American Health Disparities.” Cigna, Apr. 2016,

www.cigna.com/health-care-providers/resources/african-american-black-health-disparities
.

4. “African Americans and Kidney Disease.” National Kidney Foundation, 16 Feb. 2018,

www.kidney.org/news/newsroom/factsheets/African-Americans-and-CKD

.

5. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2019-2021.

Str8outtaWuhan wrote: »

up until the 1950's most sprinters were white and won alot of the time, then white ppl started getting rich and stopped using sports as a way to get to college

That and racism.

It's not the colour of their skin, it's their body structure and muscle mass.

There's also the case that black people in the US are physically stronger and larger than black people in Africa, because only the strong survived the slave ships to the Americas and tough living conditions.

I would say every race/ethnicity has it's strengths and weaknesses.



Blacks seem to all be lactose intolerant or have an allergy to dairy products. It's just evolution and environment.


You can pick a black athlete like Usain Bolt or Michael Jordan or Mohammed Ali or Pele.


But then you could pick Latino ones like Cristiano Ronaldo or Oscar Del LaHoya.


There's no real getting away from the fact that blacks excel in certain sporting disciplines because of their natural strength and speed. Take a look at black female sprinters and hurdlers. They can outrun a a greyhound. The blacks don't seem to be very good at other athletic disciplines though like pole-vaulting or high jump. Long distance / Marathon tough they excel as well (those wiry little Ethopian and Kenya lads can just run forever on autopilot....infinite stamina).


They're not great at rugby though or swimming of cycling....but then these sports aren't promoted in either black countries OR amongst the black communities of predominantly white countries.


Golf and Tennis have always been classed as snooty sports for whitey but Tiger and the Williams sisters put paid to that stereotype.


I suppose it's a combination of environment and background with a healthy dose of discrimination thrown in too. Football, Running, Boxing are working class sports so the black man/woman has more access to these than to tennis, golf, skiing, gymnastics, swimming.

badabing106 wrote: »

Clearly physicaly stronger by a large distance. Just look at sprinting in the Olympics. Has a white person ever won gold? American football. Even an elitest sport like golf(where less than 1% of pros are black) was physically dominated by Tiger woods

Their muscle mass is better. Their teeth are whiter and stronger etc. That isn't because they take care of their teeth better. Homeless black people on the streets of New York have healthy looking white teeth. Older black people have whiter and healthier teeth

And while there is no doubting that golf is a sport of extreme skill, precision (I don't play myself but the brother does) I don't think that physical attributes make much of a difference when it comes to being a champion at that sport. Tiger Woods is just brilliant because he's brilliant. Not because of his blackness. He doesn't have any physical features that allow him to hit the ball longer, higher, straighter or with lift and backspin than any other player. He's just better.

it it true that Black men have big John Thomas's ???