Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Dominance of Dublin GAA *Mod warning post#1*

1228229231233234323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    It really is very simple. I'm stating facts, you are offering an opinion. I have also said I would love to see Dublin with a state of the art county ground part funded in the way PUC was. The would negate one of the perceived advantages. Would you agree to the government/GAA funding to the sum of 50m for a capex project?

    I'll try to simply if further - Can you explain how what how your "facts" are relevant to discussion of the Dominance of Dublin GAA. The fact that you seem to be excitedly clinging onto to deflect away everything is that Croke Park is not the official home ground of Dublin GAA. Parnell Park is. I know you try your best to avoid answering direct questions - so how does the fact that Parnell Park is Dublin's official home ground have to do with the issue of the dominance of Dublin GAA - considering they play the vast majority in Croke Park - far more than any other teams. There. Cannot be simpler than that.
    To answer your question, the gov/GAA funding €50m for a stadium is fine by me. Not my money, and from what I can see doesn't lead to any inequalities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭ooter


    The vast majority of Dublin GAA games are not played in croke park, don't have the figures but I'd imagine more are played outside of croke park on a yearly basis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭mitchelsontour


    ooter wrote: »
    The vast majority of Dublin GAA games are not played in croke park, don't have the figures but I'd imagine more are played outside of croke park on a yearly basis.

    What would be the flagship team of Dublin GAA?
    Where do they play , at a guess , more than 80% of their games?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭ooter


    What would be the flagship team of Dublin GAA?
    Where do they play , at a guess , more than 80% of their games?

    Dublin senior footballers and croke park, I doubt anyone would answer that question differently.
    If the Dublin senior hurlers player more than 80% of their games in CP nobody would bat an eyelid, I wonder why..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭mitchelsontour


    ooter wrote: »
    Dublin senior footballers and croke park, I doubt anyone would answer that question differently.
    If the Dublin senior hurlers player more than 80% of their games in CP nobody would bat an eyelid, I wonder why..

    One question why did you decide to edit your initial answer to include the hurlers?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    I'll try to simply if further - Can you explain how what how your "facts" are relevant to discussion of the Dominance of Dublin GAA. The fact that you seem to be excitedly clinging onto to deflect away everything is that Croke Park is not the official home ground of Dublin GAA. Parnell Park is. I know you try your best to avoid answering direct questions - so how does the fact that Parnell Park is Dublin's official home ground have to do with the issue of the dominance of Dublin GAA - considering they play the vast majority in Croke Park - far more than any other teams. There. Cannot be simpler than that.
    To answer your question, the gov/GAA funding €50m for a stadium is fine by me. Not my money, and from what I can see doesn't lead to any inequalities.[/QUOTE

    My facts are relevant due to the constant garbage being touted that CP is Dublins HQ. I have states that I would prefer we had our own county ground which was up to the standard of PUC. I am glad you would back the building of a ground for Dublin GAA and with the financial support others have received in regards to capital projects. I have never stated that Parnell Park had anything to do with our dominant position in football at present. I have agreed that funding for games development has to be reviewed, check back in the thread.

    The big debate is how is it allocated, is it by playing numbers, or by potential playing numbers, which is what the Dublin only project was. I am completely against splitting in anyway, as are most normal members of the GAA. Splitting will only benefit a small number of teams who have gotten close to Dublin in recent years.

    It is not going to help the likes of Meath, Kildare, Laois, Westmeath or Louth. Kerry, Donegal, Mayo and Tyrone it would. The argument about population has only become an issue with success, prior to that it was used as a stick to bate Dublin with.

    So, yes funding needs to be reviewed, Dublin need a new stadium and to play games wherever is deemed home or away, and splitting should never happen. I hope that clarifies my opinion, as thats all it is and all we can offer on a chat forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    ArielAtom wrote: »

    My facts are relevant due to the constant garbage being touted that CP is Dublins HQ. I have states that I would prefer we had our own county ground which was up to the standard of PUC. I am glad you would back the building of a ground for Dublin GAA and with the financial support others have received in regards to capital projects. I have never stated that Parnell Park had anything to do with our dominant position in football at present. I have agreed that funding for games development has to be reviewed, check back in the thread.

    The big debate is how is it allocated, is it by playing numbers, or by potential playing numbers, which is what the Dublin only project was. I am completely against splitting in anyway, as are most normal members of the GAA. Splitting will only benefit a small number of teams who have gotten close to Dublin in recent years.

    It is not going to help the likes of Meath, Kildare, Laois, Westmeath or Louth. Kerry, Donegal, Mayo and Tyrone it would. The argument about population has only become an issue with success, prior to that it was used as a stick to bate Dublin with.

    So, yes funding needs to be reviewed, Dublin need a new stadium and to play games wherever is deemed home or away, and splitting should never happen. I hope that clarifies my opinion, as thats all it is and all we can offer on a chat forum.

    I dont think there is any part of this that stands up to scrutiny. If you want another county ground then go take a loan and get going, like others have. What is stopping you doing this?

    Re splitting, the reality is, if you want to be treated as a province when funds are being allocsted, as dublin have been on record in saying, then in the interest of both fairness and the sake of the flagship level of the sport, they need to be treated as a province acrossthe board. It is as clear as that. What good is dublin inc winning when it is at the expense of the game itself? I say dublin inc because the true dublin signed off the day they got backed by both the governing body and the government of the country, at the expense of everyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭ooter


    like others have.

    Who would that be?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    I dont think there is any part of this that stands up to scrutiny. If you want another county ground then go take a loan and get going, like others have. What is stopping you doing this?

    Re splitting, the reality is, if you want to be treated as a province when funds are being allocsted, as dublin have been on record in saying, then in the interest of both fairness and the sake of the flagship level of the sport, they need to be treated as a province acrossthe board. It is as clear as that. What good is dublin inc winning when it is at the expense of the game itself? I say dublin inc because the true dublin signed off the day they got backed by both the governing body and the government of the country, at the expense of everyone else.

    Again you choose not to read the full post, either that or you have comprehension issues. I have stated that a ground is required, that is to satisfy the posters on the internet that don't want Dublin to use CP. I have stated that Dublin have the land, much like Cork did, they have a piece of land they can sell to part fund the development of a new facility and that the 50M that the government and GAA would supply would enable the building of the ground, I am not suggesting that anyone should fully fund it for Dublin GAA, the sale of PP would ensure that they would not be in the debt that Cork GAA are now due to poor project and financial management of the PUC project. So fairness is achieved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    Again you choose not to read the full post, either that or you have comprehension issues. I have stated that a ground is required, that is to satisfy the posters on the internet that don't want Dublin to use CP. I have stated that Dublin have the land, much like Cork did, they have a piece of land they can sell to part fund the development of a new facility and that the 50M that the government and GAA would supply would enable the building of the ground, I am not suggesting that anyone should fully fund it for Dublin GAA, the sale of PP would ensure that they would not be in the debt that Cork GAA are now due to poor project and financial management of the PUC project. So fairness is achieved.

    I read it all and comprehend it fully - I just realise that it isnt the truth. You seem at pains to placate these people on the internet. I dont see them here, and you know that I dont share that view as I stated as much and you subsequently quoted it, so why you insist on shoehorning this view into discussions with me, I dont know.

    If dublin want to flog off PP, Id suggest their first stop should be refunding the taxpayerd of the country, followed by the extra funds the gaa has had to lump into them and away from everyone else, to make it possible for them to win something. If they were to do that then we might talk. Who knows, if they played their cards right we might not even charge them the 20 years interest


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Past30Now


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    Again you choose not to read the full post, either that or you have comprehension issues. I have stated that a ground is required, that is to satisfy the posters on the internet that don't want Dublin to use CP. I have stated that Dublin have the land, much like Cork did, they have a piece of land they can sell to part fund the development of a new facility and that the 50M that the government and GAA would supply would enable the building of the ground, I am not suggesting that anyone should fully fund it for Dublin GAA, the sale of PP would ensure that they would not be in the debt that Cork GAA are now due to poor project and financial management of the PUC project. So fairness is achieved.

    I've been following this thread for a while, and despite the fact that it can be a bit of a car crash, it is beginning to grasp some of the key issues with regard to the future of the football championship.

    IMO Dublin GAA will not build a new 30K plus seater stadium in the next 20+ years, primarily because the GAA won't want to support it. The GAA will continue to want Dublin to host most of their championship & league games in Croke Park. CP needs to be used more often, and GAA HQ are happy for Dublin GAA to continue to use CP, as that helps to pay the bills.

    I believe the argument as to whether CP or PP is the home pitch for Dublin GAA is a bit irrelevant. In practice CP is almost a home ground, except we can't train on the pitch. I say this as a Dublin season ticket holder. PP is a lovely old ground, that is great for club championship matches, but other than O'Byrne Cup matches in Jan/Feb, and hurling league matches, PP is unsuitable to host the Senior Footballers. PP remains the spiritual home of Dublin GAA.

    I'd have to concede that playing most of our games in CP is an advantage over the opposition. To counter this every second game in the Leinster Championship, bar the final, should be on a home and away basis. All Ireland Finals and Semi-Finals should always be played in CP. The change to the super 8's whereby Dublin could only play one of the three fixtures in CP seemed a reasonable compromise.

    The piece around the funding of the GPO's is very interesting. From my own perspective I have seen the impact our GPO's have had within my club over the last fifteen years. They have made a huge difference to the numbers of young children joining the club, they have provided a structure for the club nursery and summer and easter camps. They have administered the provision of coaching the coaches within the club. Primarily they have promoted the club within the area and helped it grow over that time frame.

    In terms of actual coaching, I've rarely seen any evidence of direct coaching. I've taken a team from four years of age up to adult football in that fifteen year time-frame, and I don't recall any of the GPO's over that period taking a direct session with those lads. I have seen the GPO take the odd session in the last couple of years with teams just out of nursery, to give the parents ideas in terms of how to structure a session.

    From my perspective, funding the provision of a GPO is a positive development. Rolling it out nationwide should be the next step. I understand the East Leinster Project and the Gaelfast Project are doing that in certain areas, but more is needed. I can also understand the challenges faced by placing a GPO with a series of small clubs in a rural setting, in that the impact of the GPO will be diluted in comparison to a more urban environment.

    Splitting Dublin, while revolutionary, will have no lasting impact on the destination of Sam other than taking Dublin out of the loop.

    I'm very conscious of the fact that what I love about watching sport is the unknown, going to a game hoping for a win, a knot in my stomach, nerves etc. In every league game I attend, that knot is present. It might not last the whole game, but in plenty of league games it is there for the 70 minutes. In the Leinster Championship it is gone, even against Meath. In the semi final against Cavan, it barely rippled. It remains anytime we play Mayo, Tyrone or Kerry, and was there for the whole of the final this year. I don't ever expect the feeling I had in 2011 to repeat itself, but I would like that knot back.

    If the only idea is to split Dublin into 2/4/8, then this thread is a waste. Dublin will never go for it, and with the structures currently in place, will never be forced either.

    If a series of ideas can be implemented that ensures that we all go to games with a bit of a knot in our stomachs, that there is a bit more equality right throughout the inter-county game, then I'm interested. But if the only solution on offer is to split Dublin and complain about 20 years of "financial doping" you may as well bark at the moon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Fair play to you Past30now but I don't think saying we've had use of this plan drawn up and funded for us for 20 years, now we think it's ok for the rest of you to get a go is going to cut it. Not with it having decimated the ladies and men's football championships and leaving Dublin GAA with an extraordinary level of finance available to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Past30Now


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Fair play to you Past30now but I don't think saying we've had use of this plan drawn up and funded for us for 20 years, now we think it's ok for the rest of you to get a go is going to cut it. Not with it having decimated the ladies and men's football championships and leaving Dublin GAA with an extraordinary level of finance available to them.

    Its not up to Dublin to roll out the scheme, or a variant of same, to the rest of the country, nor will Dublin apologise for a scheme that was implemented to increase participation at juvenile level. In fairness the definition/measure of success for this scheme should not be measured by success at Senior level, but by the increase in participation. DCB annual reports for the last number of years have referred to the increase in juvenile teams and games.

    The solution to restoring the competitive edge in our championships needs to be more radical. A single measure like splitting Dublin will fail. Something like the league structure becoming the primary competition with a championship structure based on where you finish in the league. I obviously don't have all the answers but a comprehensive solution is required, not a piecemeal solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    Past30Now wrote: »
    If the only idea is to split Dublin into 2/4/8, then this thread is a waste. Dublin will never go for it, and with the structures currently in place, will never be forced either.

    What if the rest of the country wont go for it staying the way it is? I dont think holding the rest of the country to ransom is the way to go. Splitting Dublin is the prevaling idea here because it is the best fit for all the issues. Your not liking it doesnt change that reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭superbluedub


    What if the rest of the country wont go for it staying the way it is? I dont think holding the rest of the country to ransom is the way to go. Splitting Dublin is the prevaling idea here because it is the best fit for all the issues. Your not liking it doesnt change that reality.


    Irish Independent survey of GAA county chairmen reveals that only 1 /5 of same believe funding to Dublin should be cut and almost none of them believe Dublin should be split into.2/4/6 etc. Full details in this weekends edition.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,653 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Irish Independent survey of GAA county chairmen reveals that only 1 /5 of same believe funding to Dublin should be cut and almost none of them believe Dublin should be split into.2/4/6 etc. Full details in this weekends edition.;)

    But sur only one in 5 said they support Dublin funding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    Irish Independent survey of GAA county chairmen reveals that only 1 /5 of same believe funding to Dublin should be cut and almost none of them believe Dublin should be split into.2/4/6 etc. Full details in this weekends edition.;)

    Were these chairmen perhaps aware that their votes would be public knowledge? Kind of undermines the thing really. Poll the gaa members, with anonymity intact, and see what they say...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭superbluedub


    Were these chairmen perhaps aware that their votes would be public knowledge? Kind of undermines the thing really. Poll the gaa members, with anonymity intact, and see what they say...

    Ok then organize that ,and share the results here :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,653 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Ok then organize that ,and share the results here :D

    I just shared them. Read through what was said, I can't understand how "yes" was included in some counties like Cavan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    JeffKenna wrote: »
    But sur only one in 5 said they support Dublin funding.

    Interesting. So 50% of those who responded were in favour of it. They chose a very strange method of communicating that fact.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,979 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Irish Independent survey of GAA county chairmen reveals that only 1 /5 of same believe funding to Dublin should be cut and almost none of them believe Dublin should be split into.2/4/6 etc. Full details in this weekends edition.;)

    If the funding model is changed away from population a lot of counties will lose out so it's not a surprise really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,653 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Interesting. So 50% of those who responded were in favour of it. They chose a very strange method of communicating that fact.

    From what I can see only 20 counties replied one way or the other. The rest refused to comment or didn't reply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭superbluedub


    JeffKenna wrote: »
    I just shared them. Read through what was said, I can't understand how "yes" was included in some counties like Cavan.



    Poll the gaa members, with anonymity intact, and see what they say.. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,653 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Poll the gaa members, with anonymity intact, and see what they say.. :rolleyes:

    The poll is there, 10 counties agree with Dublin funding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Irish Independent survey of GAA county chairmen reveals that only 1 /5 of same believe funding to Dublin should be cut and almost none of them believe Dublin should be split into.2/4/6 etc. Full details in this weekends edition.;)

    It is amazing how these myths gather pace. This has been corrected already and JeffKenna has done so again but it won't stop this being repeated. It's like the myth that the games development money was just for primary school kids. We know it wasn't just for primary school kids, we know that clubs saw the main benefit of the coaches, high ranking Dublin GAA officials have confirmed that it had a major impact on the standard of Gaelic games at elite level, yet the myth will live on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭superbluedub


    Enquiring wrote: »
    It is amazing how these myths gather pace. This has been corrected already and JeffKenna has done so again but it won't stop this being repeated. It's like the myth that the games development money was just for primary school kids. We know it wasn't just for primary school kids, we know that clubs saw the main benefit of the coaches, high ranking Dublin GAA officials have confirmed that it had a major impact on the standard of Gaelic games at elite level, yet the myth will live on.

    The myth will live on here that Dublin will be split
    Its not gonna happen anytime soon :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 346 ✭✭SheepsClothing


    The myth will live on here that Dublin will be split
    Its not gonna happen anytime soon :D

    But it will happen. The sport can't survive the level of dominance Dublin football can produce.

    My question for the naysayers is, how bad will it need to get, before you are willing to countenance a split? 10 in a row? A majority of championships every decade?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭ooter


    Imagine the fume if Dublin ever win a double.
    But that too is a myth, it will never happen, some people will trot out fake news and have you believe senior county hurling has improved in the capital but the truth is it's going backwards, they lost to laois in 2019. They're not strong/skillful/wrishty enough despite almost 20 years of targeted funding.
    One swallow doesn't make a summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    But it will happen. The sport can't survive the level of dominance Dublin football can produce.

    My question for the naysayers is, how bad will it need to get, before you are willing to countenance a split? 10 in a row? A majority of championships every decade?

    Well for 7 of the decades since the 1920’s the most successful team has been Kerry, so I think that horse has long ago bolted.

    (Won’t be long till someone comes back with the myth that everything was fine back in the good old days for...reasons...)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,979 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    But it will happen. The sport can't survive the level of dominance Dublin football can produce.

    My question for the naysayers is, how bad will it need to get, before you are willing to countenance a split? 10 in a row? A majority of championships every decade?

    The vast majority of the 33 counties involved will never win Sam so it honestly hilarious watching from the outside as the previous privileged few now bawl like babies about dominance.

    Try being a Wicklow, Limerick or Leitrim football fan and shure theres always the club championship to get excited about


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement