Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part IX *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

12223252728328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭PowerToWait


    Meanwhile in Ireland we seem to be taking the approach of implementing the same restrictions regardless of infection level. 8000 cases a day? Level 5. 5000 cases a day? Level 5. 2000 cases a day? Level 5. 1000 cases a day? Let me check there - that's level 5 as well.

    We're below 1000 cases a day now and we're taking the radical approach of staying in level 5. Oh and we might finally have proper control over people coming in from high risk countries in the next 3 or 4 weeks. Maybe. When that comes in, we might be able to move to level 5.

    It's not really 'level 5' restrictions though to be fair. It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over. Fair enough, can't get a sit down meal or a pint but other than that and the cinemas there's not that much shut. People are constantly posting on here about how they're not letting the 'restrictions' stop them doing what they want so it makes no difference in reality what 'level' we are supposedly at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    TomTomTim wrote: »
    Boggles is somewhat right for a change. I'm living in a new estate that is still being built. The amount of builders has been reduced massively, but they are still working away.

    Careful now, anecdotal evidence will be met with derision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It's not really 'level 5' restrictions though to be fair. It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over. Fair enough, can't get a sit down meal or a pint but other than that and the cinemas there's not that much shut. People are constantly posting on here about how they're not letting the 'restrictions' stop them doing what they want so it makes no difference in reality what 'level' we are supposedly at.

    How much tougher can level 5 get short of barricading people in their homes?

    The reason you think its a light touch is because people are no longer adhering to the restrictions - they wont adhere to any tougher restrictions either.
    Lockdown fatigue is real and it has kicked in a long time ago, again because of the Irish govts unique approach of using Level 5 for all scenarios.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Meanwhile in Ireland we seem to be taking the approach of implementing the same restrictions regardless of infection level. 8000 cases a day? Level 5. 5000 cases a day? Level 5. 2000 cases a day? Level 5. 1000 cases a day? Let me check there - that's level 5 as well.

    That's what happens when you start with extremely high infection rates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 219 ✭✭Corby Trouser Press


    Boggles wrote: »
    No, one is an outright falsehood, the other no one said it.

    The majority of construction workers are working.

    That is a fact.

    But I would agree the return of the rest should be expedited as soon as it is deemed safe.

    Once again for the slow learners at the back...

    Just because you are not claiming PUP it does not mean you are working full time and productively!

    Construction firms, large and small, are trying to weather the current restrictions as best they can.

    They can use EWSS to help support their PAYE workers up to a certain level.

    They can focus on putting their subbies on sites that are allowed continue.

    The bottom line is though the industry is substantially closed and to call that an outright lie is just unreal stuff.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Connavar


    Meanwhile in Ireland we seem to be taking the approach of implementing the same restrictions regardless of infection level. 8000 cases a day? Level 5. 5000 cases a day? Level 5. 2000 cases a day? Level 5. 1000 cases a day? Let me check there - that's level 5 as well.

    We're below 1000 cases a day now and we're taking the radical approach of staying in level 5. Oh and we might finally have proper control over people coming in from high risk countries in the next 3 or 4 weeks. Maybe. When that comes in, we might be able to move to level 5.


    Im not a fan of the current level 5 rules but the above isnt much of an argument.

    Level 5 is our highest level restriction.
    There is a point where they think it should be applied which we havent gotten below yet (would be nice if they would say/clear up what this point is).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    It's not really 'level 5' restrictions though to be fair. It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over. Fair enough, can't get a sit down meal or a pint but other than that and the cinemas there's not that much shut. People are constantly posting on here about how they're not letting the 'restrictions' stop them doing what they want so it makes no difference in reality what 'level' we are supposedly at.

    All retail shops that don't sell food or electronic goods are closed. Do they fall under cinemas? I walked around Dublin city centre yesterday and there was essentially nothing open on the whole of Grafton Street. This is normal? Temple Bar was like a ghost town. Must be all those cinema closures!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6 OicheMhaira


    I've just walked past a construction site and all is working well - good to see.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    batman_oh wrote: »
    All retail shops that don't sell food or electronic goods are closed. Do they fall under cinemas? I walked around Dublin city centre yesterday and there was essentially nothing open on the whole of Grafton Street. This is normal? Temple Bar was like a ghost town. Must be all those cinema closures!

    Who sad anything about normal?

    The fact that non-essential retail and hospitality are closed doesn't take away from the fact "It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Graham wrote: »
    Who sad anything about normal?

    The fact that non-essential retail and hospitality are closed doesn't take away from the fact "It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over".

    Read the post I was replying to - it might help before you go off on your usual. It said there isn't much closed outside of cinemas and bars/restaurants.
    Quoting other stuff isn't relevant, that is the part I was replying to.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Once again for the slow learners at the back...

    Just because you are not claiming PUP it does not mean you are working full time and productively!

    Construction firms, large and small, are trying to weather the current restrictions as best they can.

    They can use EWSS to help support their PAYE workers up to a certain level.

    They can focus on putting their subbies on sites that are allowed continue.

    The bottom line is though the industry is substantially closed and to call that an outright lie is just unreal stuff.

    You know what, I'm going to give you a pass, you are self building during this.

    You have the right to rant and rave IMO.

    Personally I'd hound him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Graham wrote: »
    Who sad anything about normal?

    The fact that non-essential retail and hospitality are closed doesn't take away from the fact "It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over".

    If you think current restrictions are a light touch, then what else would you advocate closing to make it a proportional response?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    timmyntc wrote: »
    If you think current restrictions are a light touch, then what else would you advocate closing to make it a proportional response?

    I didn't say the restrictions were a light touch.

    I would agree that enforcement is a light touch which is half the problem.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Surely the only relevant infection rate is the current one?

    For what it's worth I'm not at all opposed to having tighter restrictions if our case numbers starting rising again. But at the moment they're falling and have been for quite some time.

    The current one is still too high regardless of how long it's been falling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Surely the only relevant infection rate is the current one?

    For what it's worth I'm not at all opposed to having tighter restrictions if our case numbers starting rising again. But at the moment they're falling and have been for quite some time.

    Looking around some of the countries that have relaxed in the past couple of weeks, incidence rate seems to be rising.

    The problem is if you open up and have to shut down again, that will be an even bigger kick to the populous, not to mention the economic costs.

    We just got a stark example of how fast things can get out of control.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Graham wrote: »
    I didn't say the restrictions were a light touch.

    I would agree that enforcement is a light touch which is half the problem.

    Well if we could enforce everyone to obey and have 100% compliance then the virus would die out in a months time or thereabouts - we live in the real world though and you can't get much tougher compliance really.

    Gardai are already wasting their time enforcing checkpoints and making sure people dont go more than 5km beyond their home. Do you really think there is scope for more enforcement?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    batman_oh wrote: »
    Read the post I was replying to - it might help before you go off on your usual. It said there isn't much closed outside of cinemas and bars/restaurants.

    The main point appears to be adherence to restrictions and enforcement of same.

    I'm sure you knew that but just decided to nit-pick because non-essential retail was not specifically mentioned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Graham wrote: »
    The main point appears to be adherence to restrictions and enforcement of same.

    I'm sure you knew that but just decided to nit-pick because non-essential retail was not specifically mentioned.
    It's not really 'level 5' restrictions though to be fair. It's very light touch, with huge amounts of people moving all over. Fair enough, can't get a sit down meal or a pint but other than that and the cinemas there's not that much shut. People are constantly posting on here about how they're not letting the 'restrictions' stop them doing what they want so it makes no difference in reality what 'level' we are supposedly at.

    hardly nit-picking, poster said there was hardly much shut beyond cinemas and pubs which is blatantly untrue. Reality is there isnt much left to close


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Graham wrote: »
    The main point appears to be adherence to restrictions and enforcement of same.

    I'm sure you knew that but just decided to nit-pick because non-essential retail was not specifically mentioned.

    You are really a disagreeable person aren't you!
    I was replying to the post that said other than cinemas and restaurants being closed nothing is really different.
    I made the point that most of Grafton Street is closed.
    You are the one nit picking because your first reply was nonsense and now you are trying to pull some sort of moral high ground.
    Try reading things better in future.
    What I replied to was outright false. It's not nit picking to point that out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    But it's significantly lower than when we implemented the current restrictions. It's not logical to have the same level of restrictions as we had a month ago when our daily cases were an order of magnitude higher.

    There is over 3 times more in ICU then when level 5 kicked in.

    It's why public health look at numerous data points to base their decisions on.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    timmyntc wrote: »
    we live in the real world though and you can't get much tougher compliance really.

    Gardai are already wasting their time enforcing checkpoints and making sure people dont go more than 5km beyond their home. Do you really think there is scope for more enforcement?

    Enforcement is, and always has been light touch.

    Yes, enforcement could be much tougher. The fact so many in this thread delight in telling everyone they're ignoring the restrictions demonstrates that quite clearly.


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There’s a deadly disease out there at the moment. It’s killing so many people. It’s called cancer.

    Public colonoscopy waiting lists are scandalous now. CT scans are the same. We also paused cancer screenings for months last year. Breast check only ran at 30% last year.

    I had my own health scare this year. Paid 280 for CT scan and 1250 for colonoscopy. Doctors told me I could be waiting years if I didn’t go private.

    Disgraceful what we are doing in this country. Only Covid matters


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    batman_oh wrote: »
    You are really a disagreeable person aren't you!

    and yet I'm not the one getting personal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Graham wrote: »
    Enforcement is, and always has been light touch.

    Yes, enforcement could be much tougher. The fact so many in this thread delight in telling everyone they're ignoring the restrictions demonstrates that quite clearly.

    Enforcement has been mostly relying on policing by consent, because we dont have the resources to physically enforce the restrictions on everyone - especially when theres arbitrary restrictions like 5km from your home - which wastes so much of gardai time checking addresses etc, and doesnt really do much for virus rates.

    So given that we do not have the resources to enforce everything any stricter, how do you propose enforcement could be much tougher?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 219 ✭✭Corby Trouser Press


    Boggles wrote: »
    You know what, I'm going to give you a pass, you are self building during this.

    You have the right to rant and rave IMO.

    Personally I'd hound him.

    You've done your back of the envelope calculations and deemed construction to be largely open.

    Asking why we are the only country in Europe to deem house building a non-essential activity is hardly ranting and raving.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,086 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Meanwhile in Ireland we seem to be taking the approach of implementing the same restrictions regardless of infection level. 8000 cases a day? Level 4.99999999999999. 5000 cases a day? Level 4.9999999999998. 2000 cases a day? Level 4.9999999999997. 1000 cases a day? Let me check there - that's level 4.9999999999996 as well.

    We're below 1000 cases a day now and we're taking the radical approach of staying in level 5. Oh and we might finally have proper control over people coming in from high risk countries in the next 3 or 4 weeks. Maybe. When that comes in, we might be able to move to level 4.9999999999995.


    I have to correct your post here. Theyre not all level 5.
    They are within the 5 levels of Living with a useless government Covid


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Graham wrote: »
    and yet I'm not the one getting personal.

    And I'm not the one reading something that somebody else posted, completely ignoring the point and giving my own opinion and then saying the are nit picking when they don't like when it's pointed out.
    But good talk!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Graham wrote: »
    Enforcement is, and always has been light touch.

    Yes, enforcement could be much tougher. The fact so many in this thread delight in telling everyone they're ignoring the restrictions demonstrates that quite clearly.

    Enforcement of what exactly?

    More Guards on the beaches, hills, parks forests?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Boggles wrote: »
    Well you'll need to get on to the federation and tell them they are spouting lies so.

    why would i bother?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,634 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    robbiezero wrote: »
    Enforcement of what exactly?

    More Guards on the beaches, hills, parks forests?

    Peeking in your windows at dinner to ensure no household mixing going on


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement