Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Average V Median wage Ireland?

13468921

Comments

  • Posts: 17,925 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    remember now!

    The earn fnck all don't have their hand out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Augeo wrote: »
    The earn fnck all don't have their hand out?

    what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭crossman47


    Benedict wrote: »


    Incidentally, surely in order to establish the average, enough data must be available to also establish the median!


    .

    That is not true. some earnings series compiled by CSO are based on aggregate returns from employers i.e. total employees, total earnings, etc. from these you can get a mean but not a median. I think they distinguish full time so you can also get a mean for those.

    Another series that does have a median comes from tax returns for individuals but these do not distinguish full and part time. Its not as easy as you seem to think. Nobody is trying to fool anyone .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    i ll stick with respected economic commentators opinions, and the facts that are used, and the facts that i have found myself

    Micheal Hudson is a communist though. Generally not a good idea to listen to them when it comes to economics. They just want big government at any cost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭crossman47


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    i ll stick with respected economic commentators opinions, and the facts that are used, and the facts that i have found myself

    So ESRI are not respected?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Micheal Hudson is a communist though. Generally not a good idea to listen to them when it comes to economics. They just want big government at any cost.

    no hes not, he classes himself as a classical economist, and no, he doesn't advocate for big government, just a democratic one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    crossman47 wrote: »
    So ESRI are not respected?

    of course they are, but they have inbuilt biases, as do all institutions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict


    crossman47 wrote: »
    That is not true. some earnings series compiled by CSO are based on aggregate returns from employers i.e. total employees, total earnings, etc. from these you can get a mean but not a median. I think they distinguish full time so you can also get a mean for those.

    Another series that does have a median comes from tax returns for individuals but these do not distinguish full and part time. Its not as easy as you seem to think. Nobody is trying to fool anyone .


    I don't think it's "easy" but surely it's doable? Does nobody have sufficient data to establish a median wage figure for FT workers?


    To establish the average, the total wages must be known and also the number of earners. And nobody is able to calculate the median?



    Is that the same in every country I wonder? Or are we unique in not being able to calculate a median FT wage/salary?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,247 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Cyrus wrote: »
    i remember re nua ran on an economic platform advocating a flat tax, they got no traction.

    in reality it makes a lot of sense and removes the disincentive for progression that exists at the crossover between between the low and high rate.

    They got no traction because of their stance on abortion. A fiscally conservative party with a free vote on social issues is what we need, not bible thumpers with 1 good idea


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,015 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    They got no traction because of their stance on abortion. A fiscally conservative party with a free vote on social issues is what we need, not bible thumpers with 1 good idea

    abortion ref was 66/34 so technically a 3rd of people wouldnt have had an issue with their stance in that regard, so it wasn't just abortion.

    also you dont need to be a bible thumper to be anti abortion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Copied and pasted from Google some minutes ago:

    Showing results for median wage full time workers england

    Median annual earnings for full-time employees in the United Kingdom from 1999 to 2020 (in GBP)
    Average earnings in GBP
    2020 31,461
    2019 30,378
    2018 29,559
    2017 28,759
    9 more rows•
    3 Feb 2021


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,474 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    Correct.

    Income inequality has fallen in Ireland.

    Now, it is possible to debate that the measures of income inequality only measure income, and don't take a wider view, fair enough.

    Michael Taft is arguing that:

    https://notesonthefront.typepad.com/politicaleconomy/2021/02/the-gini-coefficient-and-sushi.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,474 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    crossman47 wrote: »
    That is not true. some earnings series compiled by CSO are based on aggregate returns from employers i.e. total employees, total earnings, etc. from these you can get a mean but not a median. I think they distinguish full time so you can also get a mean for those.

    Another series that does have a median comes from tax returns for individuals but these do not distinguish full and part time. Its not as easy as you seem to think. Nobody is trying to fool anyone .

    This post is helpful.

    I thought there must be a reason why median FT earnings aren't published.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote: »
    Correct.

    Income inequality has fallen in Ireland.

    Now, it is possible to debate that the measures of income inequality only measure income, and don't take a wider view, fair enough.

    Michael Taft is arguing that:

    https://notesonthefront.typepad.com/politicaleconomy/2021/02/the-gini-coefficient-and-sushi.html

    what about overall wealth inequality?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,474 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Benedict wrote: »
    I don't think it's "easy" but surely it's doable? Does nobody have sufficient data to establish a median wage figure for FT workers?


    I provided the Eurostat figures for Ireland a few pages back.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,277 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    what about overall wealth inequality?

    CSO measures it every five years. Last one was 2018 and saw wealth inequality declining:
    The Gini coefficient for net wealth in 2018 is 0.67, compared to 0.75 in 2013, indicating a reduction in wealth inequality over this five-year period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,404 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    CSO measures it every five years. Last one was 2018 and saw wealth inequality declining:

    we generally store our wealth in assets, primarily in property and land, whats currently occurring in these sectors, also baring in mind, many younger generations are also living in a low wage inflationary environment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Geuze wrote: »
    I provided the Eurostat figures for Ireland a few pages back.


    Apologies Geuze, I understood that a median on FT wages was not available - could you indulge me and repeat the figure - if you know it? Perhaps I became muddled by graphs, figures etc.



    My question is, what is the median wage for FT workers?

    UK for 2020 median FT wages are 2020 £31,461 Euro 36k approx at today's conversion rates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    Benedict wrote: »
    Apologies Geuze, I understood that a median on FT wages was not available - could you indulge me and repeat the figure - if you know it? Perhaps I became muddled by graphs, figures etc.



    My question is, what is the median wage for FT workers?

    You need to know individual salaries to calculate that.

    Revenue should have that data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict


    You need to know individual salaries to calculate that.

    Revenue should have that data.


    Should have - yes, but I can't find it - can you?


    Geuze appears to have the elusive figure. Hopefully he will tell us what it is.

    The UK have published the median FT wage as I have shown.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭crossman47


    You need to know individual salaries to calculate that.

    Revenue should have that data.

    I don't think Revenue use full/part time as a classification. I was never asked which I am and they don't ask for hours worked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭crossman47


    Benedict wrote: »
    Should have - yes, but I can't find it - can you?


    Geuze appears to have the elusive figure. Hopefully he will tell us what it is.

    The UK have published the median FT wage as I have shown.

    I think the problem is that CSO have replaced the Structure of Earnings Survey (which gave a median for 2014) with data based on administrative sources (Revenue) https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-eaads/earningsanalysisusingadministrativedatasources2018/backgroundnotes/.

    This specifically states full and part time are not distinguished. No doubt this was an attempt by CSO to use existing sources and not burden employers with further form filling.

    I did post this estimate already : In 2018 for all workers, the median was 36k when the mean was 44k. Based on that, I would think the median for full time workers must be in the region of 38 to 41K. I don't think its possible for CSO to calculate a median as they base their data on aggregate data from employers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,197 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    crossman47 wrote: »
    I think the problem is that CSO have replaced the Structure of Earnings Survey (which gave a median for 2014) with data based on administrative sources (Revenue) https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-eaads/earningsanalysisusingadministrativedatasources2018/backgroundnotes/.

    This specifically states full and part time are not distinguished. No doubt this was an attempt by CSO to use existing sources and not burden employers with further form filling.

    I did post this estimate already : In 2018 for all workers, the median was 36k when the mean was 44k. Based on that, I would think the median for full time workers must be in the region of 38 to 41K. I don't think its possible for CSO to calculate a median as they base their data on aggregate data from employers.
    The median is skewed as most large companies provide mean average salaries rather than person per person info.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,474 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Benedict wrote: »
    Apologies Geuze, I understood that a median on FT wages was not available - could you indulge me and repeat the figure - if you know it? Perhaps I became muddled by graphs, figures etc.


    See posts 106 and 107.

    Also 44, 45, 46.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭crossman47


    ELM327 wrote: »
    The median is skewed as most large companies provide mean average salaries rather than person per person info.

    My point was they provide aggregates so it is not possible to calculate a median.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict


    Geuze wrote: »
    See posts 106 and 107.

    Also 44, 45, 46.


    Look Geuze, Leo is able to give a figure and say this is the average. He doesn't present us with a litany of "income by age" "income by sex" blah blah.


    It's a single figure just below 49k


    The UK median wages for FT workers is a single figure - not a plethora of graphs and a litany of qualifications.


    As far as you are aware:


    (a) is there a figure for a median salary/wages for FT worker?
    (b) do you know what it is?
    (c) If you know, can you just say what it is ple-e-ease?
    (d) If you don't know, then thanks anyway - but please say so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    Benedict wrote: »
    Look Geuze, Leo is able to give a figure and say this is the average. He doesn't present us with a litany of "income by age" "income by sex" blah blah.


    It's a single figure just below 49k


    The UK median wages for FT workers is a single figure - not a plethora of graphs and a litany of qualifications.


    As far as you are aware:


    (a) is there a figure for a median salary/wages for FT worker?
    (b) do you know what it is?
    (c) If you know, can you just say what it is ple-e-ease?
    (d) If you don't know, then thanks anyway - but please say so.

    https://data.gov.ie/dataset/bution-of-income-tax-by-type-of-gross-income-range-of-gross-income-marital-status-year-and-statistic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Benedict




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭con___manx1


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    If that's what you really believe, that the particulars of jobs employers can't quickly fill, are an accurate portrayal of employment and salaries in Ireland, then I don't know where to begin with explaining how stupid your outlook is.

    Do you have any concept of the number of jobs and sectors that never get near being advertised and the salaries that accompany them?

    Good lord.

    Legally company's have to advertise any positions that become available even if the job is already stitched up. My brother was offered a job and it was still advertised. People went for interviews that were just pointless. I seen a similar situation happen in my company.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭stefanovich


    Benedict wrote: »
    Still don't see any figure for median wage for FT workers?
    You can figure it out approximately.

    What stood out in the figures for 2018 in bold below. Why so many in the 100 -> 150 range? Seems anomalous. Public sector management?

    <10K 423,603
    10 - 12K 82,422
    12 - 15K. 127,400
    15 - 17K 86,951
    17 - 20K 131,840
    20 - 25K 217,946
    25 - 27K 87,782
    27 - 30K 124,223
    30 - 35K 190,572
    35 - 40K 166,339
    40 - 50K 237,937
    50 - 60K 169,338
    60 - 70K 122,512
    70 - 75K 48,838
    75 - 80K 41,232
    80 - 90K 64,390
    90 - 100K 47,650
    100 - 150K 107,186
    150 - 200K 30,096
    200 - 275K 15,520
    >275K 15,054


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement