Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Terminator Werewolf - Game thread

1…3435373940…118

Comments

  • #1082
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Conor had it. what exactly is your point caller?

    My point is, she could have asked Conor, Babs, Nigel etc what are the mechanics of bullets, do they have to be fired, can there be placeholders, can they be changed etc. There was zero need for the high level response when you consider her own well thought out response to it yesterday


  • #1083
    Gertrude WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,365 ✭✭✭Gertrude WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    I am not liking Eva, Babs OR Nigel right now.


    I would have thought the kill order could go in anytime up until tonight. You could have something on and scared to lose it.

    Unless I'm told differently, I would be of the understanding that the order can go in anytime, but can be changed right up until 10am, and only locked at 10 am, to be actioned at 11am tomorrow morning. Thats pretty standard for a night action, which the midday beaker post said they were.
    beakerjoe wrote: »
    The bullets must be used tonight and the kill will be announced tomorrow morning.

    Conor will be able to verify, as it is the exact same wording as yesterday, and I believe he was "The Player who won the loot yesterday"


  • #1084
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Eva WW wrote: »
    Sorry Emily, im only catching up. Why does someone say stuff about a gun? It provokes a reaction, waving guns around before has caught wolves out and is not in itself a bad tactic. If a bullet actually landed on someone I'd be all over Babs, as would everyone unless it was a wolf she hit. Its purely a reaction tool and its garnered a lot of reaction.

    My response to Conor yesterday literally said give me a bullet, nothing better than waving a gun about. And its true, it illicits responses.



    This was your own response yesterday when talking about a wolf potentially winning the prizes or getting bullets.

    Same applies today as yesterday so that's why I didnt like your response

    The problem isn’t with waving around a gun, that’s fine. The problem is using that bullet immediately with no obvious village consensus or obvious target.
    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I've already pulled the trigger.


    What I don’t understand is how confident you are that Barbara is playing some village ruse role. Yes, she may be a villager doing it or maybe not. Why would a wolf get so involved in arguing with Barbabra about this? She seems loose canon enough to shoot me just for arguing with her. If you were betting , am I more likely a concerned villager or a wolf digging a big hole for myself?

    I’ve been lynched for less then the antics Barbara (poems and all) has been doing. Doesn’t imply she’s bad but she’s a person of interest at the very least. I’ve spent the last hour and a half trying to get her comments clarified. How has me having to ask the same question over and over again helped the village?


  • #1085
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Wolf lean on Derry and Phil.
    They both got angry about me revealing that T-1000 will be outed after lynch.
    Who would be angry with that info being released- wolves. It is in their interest to keep it unknown.


  • #1086
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Gertrude WW wrote: »
    Unless I'm told differently, I would be of the understanding that the order can go in anytime, but can be changed right up until 10am, and only locked at 10 am, to be actioned at 11am tomorrow morning. Thats pretty standard for a night action, which the midday beaker post said they were.

    Conor will be able to verify, as it is the exact same wording as yesterday, and I believe he was "The Player who won the loot yesterday"

    I can confirm all of that is correct.


  • Advertisement
  • #1087
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    The problem isn’t with waving around a gun, that’s fine. The problem is using that bullet immediately with no obvious village consensus or obvious target.




    What I don’t understand is how confident you are that Barbara is playing some village ruse role. Yes, she may be a villager doing it or maybe not. Why would a wolf get so involved in arguing with Barbabra about this? She seems loose canon enough to shoot me just for arguing with her. If you were betting , am I more likely a concerned villager or a wolf digging a big hole for myself?

    I’ve been lynched for less then the antics Barbara (poems and all) has been doing. Doesn’t imply she’s bad but she’s a person of interest at the very least. I’ve spent the last hour and a half trying to get her comments clarified. How has me having to ask the same question over and over again helped the village?

    But she didn't/can't use the bullet. I dont use the waving around of the gun or the semantics of her saying i pulled the trigger as being villagery or wolfy. The poems maybe and her general bravado (outside of the gun) i wouldn't be a fan off.

    Why do I think you'd get so involved? Cause you seemed to panic when she talked about firing.

    I quoted your own response to bullet talk yesterday and you were very measured but not today.


  • #1088
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I can confirm all of that is correct.

    But if the shooter dies at lynch then regardless of whether they’d said who they were shooting that kill wouldn’t happen as it’s a night action and they are no longer in the game come night time?


  • #1089
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    The problem isn’t with waving around a gun, that’s fine. The problem is using that bullet immediately with no obvious village consensus or obvious target.




    What I don’t understand is how confident you are that Barbara is playing some village ruse role. Yes, she may be a villager doing it or maybe not. Why would a wolf get so involved in arguing with Barbabra about this? She seems loose canon enough to shoot me just for arguing with her. If you were betting , am I more likely a concerned villager or a wolf digging a big hole for myself?

    I’ve been lynched for less then the antics Barbara (poems and all) has been doing. Doesn’t imply she’s bad but she’s a person of interest at the very least. I’ve spent the last hour and a half trying to get her comments clarified. How has me having to ask the same question over and over again helped the village?

    Would you ever behave.


  • #1090
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Eva WW wrote: »
    My point is, she could have asked Conor, Babs, Nigel etc what are the mechanics of bullets, do they have to be fired, can there be placeholders, can they be changed etc. There was zero need for the high level response when you consider her own well thought out response to it yesterday

    Are you still defending Barbara? The Barbara whisperer :pac:

    I take on board your sentiment but Fuppin hell, I hope there’s somebody around here like you to give me a dig out to explain any of my potential erratic behavior. I’m as suspect as that as I am Barbara’s play. An unconfirmed villager acting like Barbara deserves to be questioned and probed by the village, especially making quite dramatic claims. Easiest thing right now for wolves is to sit back and watch the village tear itself apart, so again I will try to take a breather.


  • #1091
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    I am not a loose canon, I am methodical.


  • Advertisement
  • #1092
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    But if the shooter dies at lynch then regardless of whether they’d said who they were shooting that kill wouldn’t happen as it’s a night action and they are no longer in the game come night time?

    I would assume so, but lynch Babz and if she's revealed as a villager you'd have to think the people pushing for her death were wolves trying to off one of the gun holders before the morning....


  • #1093
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Eva WW wrote: »
    But she didn't/can't use the bullet. I dont use the waving around of the gun or the semantics of her saying i pulled the trigger as being villagery or wolfy. The poems maybe and her general bravado (outside of the gun) i wouldn't be a fan off.

    Why do I think you'd get so involved? Cause you seemed to panic when she talked about firing.

    I quoted your own response to bullet talk yesterday and you were very measured but not today.

    Panicked? So I am panicked, but Barbara is being responsibly dramatic? How are you so sure of Barbara’s motives?


  • #1094
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Not happy about Barbara having access to a gun. I actually don't believe she's already put in the order, but I do believe she's likely to fire without any consensus from the village. Putting Nigel in my good pile for the moment. If I was a wolf and won 3 bullets there's no way I'd say it on thread. Chance to kill 3 villagers tonight, plus a munch, is worth far more than the village points, in my opinion. Then again, as previously stated, I do love a killing spree, so maybe not everyone thinks the same way.


  • #1095
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I am not a loose canon, I am methodical.

    Like a robot you could say?


  • #1096
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Panicked? So I am panicked, but Barbara is being responsibly dramatic? How are you so sure of Barbara’s motives?

    How am I being dramatic?


    I simply let everyone know that I've pulled the trigger. You're the one whingeing enough to fill your local swimming pool.


  • #1097
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    I would like to hear current wolf leans from the three gun owners please- just to have it on record.


  • #1098
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I would assume so, but lynch Babz and if she's revealed as a villager you'd have to think the people pushing for her death were wolves trying to off one of the gun holders before the morning....

    There has been plenty of people questioning babs before the gun was even issued though


  • #1099
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Oh and BTW I do actually think Barbara is village. The nutters more often than not turn out to be village. I've still not worked out what benefit they think they are being to the village though. So while not happy that she has a gun, she is actually a village lean for me


  • #1100
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    How am I being dramatic?


    I simply let everyone know that I've pulled the trigger. You're the one whingeing enough to fill your local swimming pool.

    Do you have a reason for pulling now, rather than have a discussion around it?


  • #1101
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I would assume so, but lynch Babz and if she's revealed as a villager you'd have to think the people pushing for her death were wolves trying to off one of the gun holders before the morning....

    A babz lynch has some merit in it tbf


  • Advertisement
  • #1102
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    There has been plenty of people questioning babs before the gun was even issued though

    I received zero votes last night.


    ZERO


  • #1103
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    I would assume so, but lynch Babz and if she's revealed as a villager you'd have to think the people pushing for her death were wolves trying to off one of the gun holders before the morning....

    I agree.

    Now I’m off to evaluate ALL of yesterday’s 2pm till lynch posts. I’ll be a while.


  • #1104
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    Do you have a reason for pulling now, rather than have a discussion around it?

    Speaking on discussion, we should come to a village consensus how many bullets if any we should use and who to target.


  • #1105
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Eva WW wrote: »
    A babz lynch has some merit in it tbf

    How so?


  • #1106
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I received zero votes last night.


    ZERO

    I've just put a vote in for you there so give us a smile there love.


  • #1107
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Speaking on discussion, we should come to a village consensus how many bullets if any we should use and who to target.
    Who's your furry fave atm Nigel?


  • #1108
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Panicked? So I am panicked, but Barbara is being responsibly dramatic? How are you so sure of Barbara’s motives?

    Barbara has been consistently erratic. You were level headed yesterday and panicked today!

    I'm not sure of Barbara's motives as I already said above however your reaction was very notable.


  • #1109
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,991 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    Wolf lean on Derry and Phil.
    They both got angry about me revealing that T-1000 will be outed after lynch.
    Who would be angry with that info being released- wolves. It is in their interest to keep it unknown.


    You sir, talk utter tripe.


    If you think that is anger? more like bafflement as I can't see the logic on not asking such a question on thread.


    No one said keep the info unknown. Just the method you found it out.


  • #1110
    Angus WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Angus WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I received zero votes last night.


    ZERO

    Zero votes does not mean you have not been questioned or looked at on thread.

    you were in multiple FFA's


  • Advertisement
  • #1111
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    You sir, talk utter tripe.


    If you think that is anger? more like bafflement as I can't see the logic on not asking such a question on thread.


    No one said keep the info unknown. Just the method you found it out.
    Method aside, a villager would just be glad to get the info. You sir were anything but glad.

    You are still a bit steamy now btw :D


Advertisement