Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Trump v Biden 2020,The insurrection (pt 6) Read OP

1196197199201202309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭one armed dwarf


    ****ing devolver digital. Not only do they make ****e games but they're also funding the anti tifa, bastards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Looks like Parler is dead!
    The big tech companies pulled support for the “free speech” social network, all but killing the service just as many conservatives are seeking alternatives to Facebook and Twitter.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/technology/apple-google-parler.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,848 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    biko wrote: »
    Yes, I read Pelosi is apparently looking impeach again.

    Trump said the demonstrators should “walk down to the Capitol” to protest the outcome of the election.
    Although that was a stupid thing to say and was allegedly the spark to the breach of the Capitolium I don't think that is an impeachable offence.
    Protestors weren't using guns which I would assume is how you take and hold a building if you truly intend to overthrow the government.

    On its own, it's not, but when you look at the rest of his actions, calling the georgia governor, trying to get him to overturn the election results, telling his supporters to not be weak, refusing to defend the capitol building before the protest with an adequate security detail, refusing to allow the national guard to be called, even when the capitol was already breached, telling the protestors that their cause was just even during the insurrection, telling them that he loved them and they are all good people, and that the senators who vote to confirm Biden are weak and essentially traitors for voting for a stolen election

    You can spin the facts to make Trump's guilt look ambiguous but you cannot spin it to make him look impartial or innocent of sedition (sedition is inciting an insurrection, you don't need to directly order it to be guilty of inciting something)

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,848 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Amazon
    Microsoft
    Tinder
    Devolver Digital
    Dropbox
    AirBnB
    Warner Records

    The list goes on but I'd be here all day.

    Then resources like bricks left for rioters (with Bill Gates having financial connections) and buses driven around to resupply antifa terrorists. Not a peep about that on the news.

    Thats because it's bullsh1t

    BTW, if the news didn't report any of it, how do you know?

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    biko wrote: »
    A protestor was shot dead. That's not kid gloves.
    Actually all of the protestors, their families, friends and supporters on line being killed or jailed would not be "kid gloves". Attempted overthrow of the state to install a dictator and having only one person shot while police are dead/dying and fellow insurrectionists are installing bombs and figuring out how to murder a couple of hundred people a few metres away is - I'm sure you'll agree- "kid gloves".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,554 ✭✭✭positron


    Then resources like bricks left for rioters (with Bill Gates having financial connections) and buses driven around to resupply antifa terrorists. Not a peep about that on the news.


    ROLF :D

    Sometimes I am just amazed how human beings managed to out-evolve all other species on this planet.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,462 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Amazon
    Microsoft
    Tinder
    Devolver Digital
    Dropbox
    AirBnB
    Warner Records

    The list goes on but I'd be here all day.

    Then resources like bricks left for rioters (with Bill Gates having financial connections) and buses driven around to resupply antifa terrorists. Not a peep about that on the news.


    Mod:

    Conspiracy Theory Forum
    >

    Please stay on topic within the bounds of actual logic, thanks.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    biko wrote: »
    Yes, I read Pelosi is apparently looking impeach again.

    Trump said the demonstrators should “walk down to the Capitol” to protest the outcome of the election.
    Although that was a stupid thing to say and was allegedly the spark to the breach of the Capitolium I don't think that is an impeachable offence.
    Protestors weren't using guns which I would assume is how you take and hold a building if you truly intend to overthrow the government.

    Weird, you're ignoring the multiple explosive devices found. The people who had tasers and cable ties to hold politicians hostage. The multiple resignations because of the response.. Do you think they're terrorists out of interest?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    So this line of guys turn out to be the Oathkeepers -

    https://twitter.com/jsrailton/status/1348115530654347266

    Oathkeepers are a far right group which recruits primarily from ex military and police. The name comes from their idea that they're holding true to the concept of their oaths, in a way serving soldiers and cops aren't by taking orders from the government (or rather, the people in government they don't like).

    It's a neat little trick in that it lets them off the hook for turning traitor and it renders soldiers and cops who stand in their way, like the cop killed, fair game.

    Their founder had openly encouraged violence against the election result to "prevent a bloodier civil war later".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,602 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    So this line of guys turn out to be the Oathkeepers -

    https://twitter.com/jsrailton/status/1348115530654347266

    Oathkeepers are a far right group which recruits primarily from ex military and police. The name comes from their idea that they're holding true to the concept of their oaths, in a way serving soldiers and cops aren't by taking orders from the government (or rather, the people government they don't like).

    It's a neat little trick in that it lets them off the hook for turning traitor and it renders soldiers and cops who stand in their way, like the cop killed, fair game.

    I think a lot of the American myth about "military = hero" has been unravelling recently.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    biko wrote: »
    A protestor was shot dead. That's not kid gloves.

    Someone climbing through a window towards a secret service officer there to protect the VP whilst they have their gun drawn and pointed at you and telling you not to climb through the window or you'll be shot is not a protestor. They are someone with a death wish, or if being generous just fupping stupid.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Probably because a lot of them work and served.

    So did the police officer that they murdered, but ye like to ignore that fact and that he actually upheld the oath he took.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,811 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    It's quite amazing that some people justify the shooting and/or killing of a black person by what they were doing (however minor), what they did in the past, what they may have been thinking of doing, what the shooter thought they were thinking of doing or what the person they were with was doing (and so forth).
    Yet when a white person gets shot after invading government buildings with an armed mob having threatened to capture and/or murder members of the government and trying to climb through a window with armed guards on the other side protecting the area where these government members under threat were located, all of a sudden it "could have been handled better".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    It's quite amazing that some people justify the shooting and/or killing of a black person by what they were doing (however minor), what they did in the past, what they may have been thinking of doing, what the shooter thought they were thinking of doing or what the person they were with was doing (and so forth).
    Yet when a white person gets shot after invading government buildings with an armed mob having threatened to capture and/or murder members of the government and trying to climb through a window with armed guards on the other side protecting the area where these government members under threat were located, all of a sudden it "could have been handled better".
    43gv7a.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭MeMen2_MoRi_


    Bellingcat trying to piece together the timeline to the murder of the police officer..

    https://twitter.com/bellingcat/status/1348248594227351553?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Carfacemandog


    Weird, you're ignoring the multiple explosive devices found. The people who had tasers and cable ties to hold politicians hostage. The multiple resignations because of the response.. Do you think they're terrorists out of interest?
    Also ignoring multiple guns found, and either ignoring or unaware of the fact that Trumps. Secretary of defense was refusing to send the national guard or any assistance) verified by the giver or of Maryland) while trump was at the same time delighted about all of this and calling senators inside trying to pressure them to put him back in as president (as per republican Ben sasse who was in the white house at the time).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


    biko wrote: »
    Yes, I read Pelosi is apparently looking impeach again.

    Trump said the demonstrators should “walk down to the Capitol” to protest the outcome of the election.
    Although that was a stupid thing to say and was allegedly the spark to the breach of the Capitolium I don't think that is an impeachable offence.
    Protestors weren't using guns which I would assume is how you take and hold a building if you truly intend to overthrow the government.
    . it was more than merely suggesting they walk or casually stroll in the general direction of the capitol to marvel at the wonders of US democracy. It was clear that Trump was requesting the mob to ensure by any *violent* means necessary that those in the Capitol ensured the continuation of the Trump regime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    pjohnson wrote: »
    I think a lot of the American myth about "military = hero" has been unravelling recently.

    The thing is, in the US, policing is a relatively easy route to prestige and power with little accountability. It's not like here where you have to write a thesis and all kinds of stuff to qualify, as bad as the Guards are, it's not very selective, so if you have a taste for playing strongman and didn't do great in school, it's perfect. It means that along with genuinely dedicated cops - that young fella caught in the doors - you have a lot of school bully types who now get to carry weapons and are almost immune from consequences. A friend of mine once told me to bear in mind that every traffic stop meant the chance of having the dumbest jerk you went to school with walking up to you with a gun on his hip while he stands up and you sit down.

    The military has a little less leeway in what people can get away with at home, but abroad is another matter, and it needs so many bodies all the time it can't always afford to be picky.

    In both cases, very easy and likely for white supremacists to infiltrate, both because it suits their goals (inside men) and because it scratches their angry powertrip arsehole urges. We know white supremacist groups encourage their members to sign up for reason 1 and that the FBI was raising the alarm about this for years.

    There is an interesting flipside to the military stuff though - because for a lot of PoCs or young poor Americans the military can be the only chance for college or a trade, the ex military demo be a lot more diverse politically overall than people think. It's just that people who got into the military for crackpot reasons will take those crackpot reasons back out with them afterwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    maebee wrote: »
    Her whiney voice alone is justification for what happened to her.

    No, don't agree with that. Trying to breach the inner sanctum of the Capitol building despite being warned is that justification.

    She sounds insane in that clip, though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭rosser44


    All these guys banging on about "BLM this.... BLM that.." - Do you know what BLM are not doing?

    They're not on the same side as the Nazis. How that is not all people need to know is beyond me.

    If you are on the same side as the Nazis, then you are on the wrong side.


    These people who attacked democracy, their grand parents and great grandparents knew how to deal with Nazis.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,358 ✭✭✭Kaybaykwah


    rosser44 wrote: »
    All these guys banging on about "BLM this.... BLM that.." - Do you know what BLM are not doing?

    They're not on the same side as the Nazis. How that is not all people need to know is beyond me.

    If you are on the same side as the Nazis, then you are on the wrong side.


    These people who attacked democracy, their grand parents and great grandparents knew how to deal with Nazis.


    For a lot of their forebears though, Black Lives Matter meant they had to be mindful of protecting their chattel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Nice video of the peaceful protests here

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Nice video of the peaceful protests here

    .
    They just wanted to have a cup of tea and a chat iirc


  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    rosser44 wrote: »
    All these guys banging on about "BLM this.... BLM that.." - Do you know what BLM are not doing?

    They're not on the same side as the Nazis. How that is not all people need to know is beyond me.

    If you are on the same side as the Nazis, then you are on the wrong side.


    These people who attacked democracy, their grand parents and great grandparents knew how to deal with Nazis.

    This is where holocaust denial then comes in.... it's all one big giant conspiracy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,878 ✭✭✭Robert ninja


    rosser44 wrote: »
    They're not on the same side as the Nazis.
    Is that so... because I saw a videos of them arguing which one is more black than the other and justifying violence based on which race the victim was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Carfacemandog


    Transcript of Hitler's 1923 Beer Hall Pitsch speech

    Some very familiar themes in there.

    Note how Hitler never outright tells them to commit violence, and instead just uses a lot of violent rhetoric. These same people 98 years ago would be using the same defense that this was all being twisted against Hitler by the media and politicians of the time.

    Of course the beer hall putch failed, and many of those same people claiming this wasn't a big deal, 98 years ago would have also taken this proof that everyone was overreacting, creating a mountain out a molehill, and trying to vilify his supporters who were only interested in ha ing their voices heard.

    One key difference of course, is that Hitler partook in the Putsch while Trump only told his supporters he would do the same... before waddling back go the White House to try and use the situation to force the senators who were in fear for their lives, to switch their vote. Had that succeeded, it would have been a relatively bloodless coup (e.g. Not hundreds/thousands dead) similar to Mussolini March on Rome (which Mussolini also did not join).

    Beer Hall Putsch, for anyone unfamiliar.

    March on Rome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,427 ✭✭✭yagan


    rosser44 wrote: »

    These people who attacked democracy, their grand parents and great grandparents knew how to deal with Nazis.
    At the same time back in WWII that German POWs and GIs were served by black soldiers confined to kitchen duties and separate eating and sleeping quarters.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm pretty sure some posters would be claiming the Nazis weren't actual Nazis at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    rosser44 wrote: »
    All these guys banging on about "BLM this.... BLM that.." - Do you know what BLM are not doing?

    They're not on the same side as the Nazis. How that is not all people need to know is beyond me.

    If you are on the same side as the Nazis, then you are on the wrong side.


    These people who attacked democracy, their grand parents and great grandparents knew how to deal with Nazis.

    They know that. In the same way nobody really believed Obama was born in Kenya. They're just inviting you to waste time pointing out they're talking bollocks instead of the fact a load of Nazis tried to take Congress hostage and likely massacre them with the approval of the outgoing president.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,248 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    pjohnson wrote: »
    And as for "only wanting to talk" her new group (that she was loyal to, not America) bludgeoned a police officer (who would have sworn to protect) to death.

    ABC News is reporting that authorities believe the officers death was driven by a medical condition. That reports of an attack on police officer haven't been confirmed and they are seeking video or imagery that might support that claim.

    At the same time his family made a statement: "Many details regarding Wednesday's events and the direct causes of Brian's injuries remain unknown and our family asks the public and the press to respect our wishes in not making Brian's passing a political issue".

    I think people should tone down the claims until the cause of death, and indeed the events leading up to it, are clarified.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement