Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

The Vaccine

1333436383991

Comments

  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    How does that fit in with the conspiracy?
    Are you now just parroting back the questions you can't answer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,962 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    How does that fit in with the conspiracy?

    For us to know that you would have to tell us what the conspiracy is, seeing as you refuse to elaborate in what the alleged conspiracy is sure it it doesn't really matter does it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    Not the same thing. Have an open disagreement with them in class and see where it gets you. I had a mate who told a lecturer that there werent 27 different genders. He switched subjects fast enough.

    I'm not saying to have a disagreement with him. I'm saying if you more information on therragrippers or anything else related to what's possible and what's not when it comes to vaccines then maybe ask your lecturer as he may know something about it which will stop you spreading false information and embarrassing yourself.

    I don't blame the lecturer for changing subjects fast. The chances of offending your mate with any answer he provided might be high enough. It's beyond ridiculous to say something like that in a class.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ahem on what course? I had some fairly mad ideas on GcMAF and David Noakes.They like to be asked questions not to have their subject questioned , big difference.

    They really do if you are open to having a discussion. If you're gonna make claims based on questionable sources rather than peer reviewed research then you might not get a lot of time. But general questions that go against grain are happily discussed. Say this based on a degree and masters in two different disciplines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    How does that fit in with the conspiracy?

    Is that really your level of contribution to this thread?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,041 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    aido79 wrote: »
    That's what I always thought. I was told by a lecturer many years ago that most of what we learned in college would be obsolete(electronics) in a few years but the whole point of college was to get us into a way of thinking.

    wait until 30 years have passed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭skooterblue2


    aido79 wrote: »
    I'm not saying to have a disagreement with him. I'm saying if you more information on therragrippers or anything else related to what's possible and what's not when it comes to vaccines then maybe ask your lecturer as he may know something about it which will stop you spreading false information and embarrassing yourself.

    I don't blame the lecturer for changing subjects fast. The chances of offending your mate with any answer he provided might be high enough. It's beyond ridiculous to say something like that in a class.

    Do you believe there are 27 different genders? The Lecturer stood his ground(in fairness he was a bit of nut job). My friends mistake was telling the lecturer he was wrong in class. My friend didnt tell me that story, someone else did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    aido79 wrote: »
    Is that really your level of contribution to this thread?

    I have many levels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    wait until 30 years have passed.

    Might not be the best place to bring that up. Heads will spin at the wonders of how the technology will track them in the future.


  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    I have many levels
    Yet, so far we've only seen evasive, dishonest and ill informed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    Do you believe there are 27 different genders? The Lecturer stood his ground(in fairness he was a bit of nut job). My friends mistake was telling the lecturer he was wrong in class. My friend didnt tell me that story, someone else did.

    No but if you believe there is then start a new thread on it because it doesn't belong in this thread unless it's part of the vaccine conspiracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,041 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    King Mob wrote: »
    Yet, so far we've only seen evasive, dishonest and ill informed.

    you forgot vague


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭skooterblue2


    aido79 wrote: »
    I'm not saying to have a disagreement with him. I'm saying if you more information on therragrippers or anything else related to what's possible and what's not when it comes to vaccines then maybe ask your lecturer as he may know something about it which will stop you spreading false information and embarrassing yourself.

    I don't blame the lecturer for changing subjects fast. The chances of offending your mate with any answer he provided might be high enough. It's beyond ridiculous to say something like that in a class.

    You would not be worried about machines at nano level size being installed into you? He didnt change subjects fast it was after a lecture and we were both onto different lectures afterwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    aido79 wrote: »
    No but if you believe there is then start a new thread on it because it doesn't belong in this thread unless it's part of the vaccine conspiracy.

    Speaking of which..

    Doesn't seem like we're making much headway. Appears to be the usual mealy-mouthed assault on science/reason/common sense masquerading as presenting conspiracy theories.

    All we've had so far is a wonky one on HCQ which was debunked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭skooterblue2


    aido79 wrote: »
    No but if you believe there is then start a new thread on it because it doesn't belong in this thread unless it's part of the vaccine conspiracy.

    I dont believe it either but I believe it is linked to something else. What we are witnessing is part of a larger plan that falls into a pattern.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    You would not be worried about machines at nano level size being installed into you? He didnt change subjects fast it was after a lecture and we were both onto different lectures afterwards.

    As I asked already if the vaccine to be rolled out in Ireland contains 5 doses per vial then how do you ensure that everyone gets a chip?
    To answer your question I am not even the slightest bit worried that there are machines ar nano level sizing contained in the vaccine so no I'm not worried about it.

    It's already been done to death that this nanotechnology requires external power so it's not really going to do what you seem to think it might.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    I dont believe it either but I believe it is linked to something else. What we are witnessing is part of a larger plan that falls into a pattern.

    Which is the conspiracy? Are we eventually making progress here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭skooterblue2


    aido79 wrote: »
    As I asked already if the vaccine to be rolled out in Ireland contains 5 doses per vial then how do you ensure that everyone gets a chip?
    To answer your question I am not even the slightest bit worried that there are machines ar nano level sizing contained in the vaccine so no I'm not worried about it.

    It's already been done to death that this nanotechnology requires external power so it's not really going to do what you seem to think it might.

    Well we cleared that one up fairly fast. You arent studying maths or science if you dont know what size Nano is. There is no chip, its nano machines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Well we cleared that one up fairly fast. You arent studying maths or science if you dont know what size Nano is. There is no chip, its nano machines.

    In the Covid vaccines?


  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well we cleared that one up fairly fast. You arent studying maths or science if you dont know what size Nano is. There is no chip, its nano machines.
    Ok. What nano machines do you believe are in the vaccine? What do they do? How do you know they are there and not a figment of your imagination?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,775 ✭✭✭circadian


    Cool, when do I get my Iron Man Mark LXXXV armour then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    Well we cleared that one up fairly fast. You arent studying maths or science if you dont know what size Nano is. There is no chip, its nano machines.

    You'll get more respect if you stop dodging questions. I study electrical and electronic engineering. It's my second degree in the area so I'm fairly sure I understand what nano means. I have no idea what a nano machine is and I doubt you do either. Can you explain what it is and how it is powered? That's the strange thing about all these nano devices...they all need to be powered so the idea of putting a nano chip or a nano machine into someone's body without their knowledge is ludicrous and to base a conspiracy on it foolish....to believe that the conspiracy exists is astonishing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    aido79 wrote: »
    It's already been done to death that this nanotechnology requires external power

    that was only you who though this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    that was only you who though this

    Do you really want to go back over this again? I thought it, explained it to you and you disagreed and proceeded to provide a link which showed that an external reader was needed to provide power for the nano RFID as it didn't have it's own power source.
    Turns out we're not making progress. One step forward, two maybe 3 steps backwards.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You would not be worried about machines at nano level size being installed into you? He didnt change subjects fast it was after a lecture and we were both onto different lectures afterwards.

    Eventually, such treatments will be a thing and I'm pretty fine with that. I have a chronic illness that requires me to get cocktails of high tech medications as is. I'd be pretty delighted if more targeted and effective treatments become available. They will face stringent regulations and are a pretty logical progression.

    Pretty much any medical treatment we use now would have looked strange and intimidating a generation or two ago. Eg a large proportion of endoscopies have been replaced by swallowing capsule cameras. I'd choose that any day over shoving a long camera wire down a person's neck. You could easily paint it as an ominous change but overall it's a big improvement.

    Also nanotechnology machines etc has nothing to do with the vaccine..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    aido79 wrote: »
    That's the strange thing about all these nano devices...they all need to be powered

    not all...!!!

    it already has been established that passive RFID tags do not require an internal power source
    They mainly operate by receiving radio waves to their antenna from an RFID reader, which then gives them power to transmit the information back to the reader

    Passive RFID tags can be manufactured to sizes most people would not see with the naked eye


  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    not all...!!!

    it already has been established that passive RFID tags do not require an internal power source
    They mainly operate by receiving radio waves to their antenna from an RFID reader, which then gives them power to transmit the information back to the reader

    Passive RFID tags can be manufactured to sizes most people would not see with the naked eye
    Ok. So is this what you believe is in the vaccine?
    Evidence please.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lex Luthor wrote: »
    not all...!!!

    it already has been established that passive RFID tags do not require an internal power source
    They mainly operate by receiving radio waves to their antenna from an RFID reader, which then gives them power to transmit the information back to the reader

    Passive RFID tags can be manufactured to sizes most people would not see with the naked eye

    And this seems to amount to the quantum tattoo conspiracy except it's injected directly into a person's body. It would be incapable of carrying much data with a range of a few millimetres. Sounding pretty useless plus you'd have to cover up the existence of the nano tech in the vaccine... Also why exactly couldn't this have been put in the multiple other vaccines that people get from birth to death? Seems a bit silly to do it in this way. There's zero logic to the theory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    aido79 wrote: »
    Do you really want to go back over this again? I thought it, explained it to you and you disagreed and proceeded to provide a link which showed that an external reader was needed to provide power for the nano RFID as it didn't have it's own power source.
    Turns out we're not making progress. One step forward, two maybe 3 steps backwards.

    By saying something is powered, one needs to clarify if that is done externally or internally

    if you are saying that one of these devices can operate without having its own internal power source and can operate from an external source such as an RFID reader providing RF waves then we have agreed

    if you are saying that one of these devices cannot operate without the need for having its own internal power source, ie. battery, then we'll have to agree to disagree


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    It would be incapable of carrying much data with a range of a few millimetres.

    not much data needed and a few mm is sufficient for any RFID reader to pick up a signal


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement