Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

Samsonsmasher wrote: »

https://youtu.be/VBgw-eEK30w

Listen to Fareed Zakaria of CNN and read his op ed based on his take in the Washington Post:

"If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas."
Or if you prefer "If my Grandmother had wheels she would have been a bike"

You can come up with all the theories you like, but that doesn't make this likely.
This will be worked out in the courts, but so far the courts overwhelmingly agree that the vote was legit.

hey guys! :pac:

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

Still finding the thread amusing that the trumpdroids are still hard at it, and the new wach a moles are popping up with their "new" angles of things..

The thread is lasting way beyond what I was expecting, the syndrome is very very strong..

It lays into what I said, that POS should be used to its full extent as to what NOT to do with regards draining swamps.

If that cnut is the fore barore to draining swamps, I pity the cnuts that are having to clear things up after that. I've just witnessed a cnut turn "his" people against his own people because they didn't agree with him..

His words when he trollied himself out and about with covid-19 was the people out on the streets greeting him were "true Americans" or words to that effect.. he has been the most divisive POTUS that could be imagined, I hope the last that I witness in my life time.. a seriously dangerous cnut imo.

i'm confused. you want trump gone but have replaced by someone who has made 10's millions of dollars from being a senator.

biden is on record as saying he is against gay marriage. that should be a red line.

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i'm confused. you want trump gone but have replaced by someone who has made 10's millions of dollars from being a senator.

biden is on record as saying he is against gay marriage. that should be a red line.

Was that before or after he went on NBC's Meet the Press in 2012 and declared publicly that he supported gay marriage, forcing then President Obama to declare the same shortly afterwards (and making Obama the first president to do so)?

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

i'm confused. you want trump gone but have replaced by someone who has made 10's millions of dollars from being a senator.

Presumably, you got your talking point from the latest gop online strategy, deployed here by Ted Cruz.

Note the devastating counter...

https://twitter.com/VisibleSoul/status/1332849014065287172?s=19

It is truly glorious to watch them eat their own...


https://twitter.com/DJJudd/status/1332727859614535680?s=20

everlast75 wrote: »

Yes, he is a one term president.

Yes, he was impeached in his first term.

Yes, he lost the popular vote the first time he ran.

Yes, he lost the popular vote by twice that margin the second time he ran.

BUT........

It turns out that Trump has delivered on being the "biggest and best and unprecedented" in one particular category...


In the entire history of U.S. Presidents, he is the one that lost the presidency the most amount of times..

https://twitter.com/jeremyrroebuck/status/1332823813248200704?s=20

Trump and friends are now 1-39 for legal challenges, also i don't believe any as of yet have met the requirements for heading to superior courts beyond appealing dismissals which just end up back in the lower courts and tossed again

VinLieger wrote: »

Trump and friends are now 1-39 for legal challenges, also i don't believe any as of yet have met the requirements for heading to superior courts beyond appealing dismissals which just end up back in the lower courts and tossed again

AFAIK, that's entirey correct.

Their "hail mary" is to get it to the SCOTUS and look for a Trump special, aka a quid pro quo from one of his appointed judges. It's not gonna get there.

The other is to stop the casting of the electoral votes and that's not happening either.

Without either of these two, the writing is on the wall and Twittler's days are numbered.

I sincerely hope he ends up financially ruined and in jail.

And before anyone runs in here like Maude Flanders, clutching their pearls, I do not give two jots what kind of person that makes me in their eyes.

This guy has been a bully, a grossly incompetent "leader", a fraud, a grifter, a nasty and despicable reprobate who has shown no empathy for others and has gone further to actually revel in their misery. It will entirely be appropriate, nay necessary, that he will be remembered as a sh1t stain on the legacy of all Presidents.

Leroy42 wrote: »

They, the senior Trump supporters, know full well this isn't going anywhere near SCOTUS.

But that is the point. They can then claim that they were denied access to SCOTUS, which of course they would have won. Everything is always 'we would have only for X'.

One of the key achievements touted for Trump was his massive appointment of Judges across all levels. But seemingly now those very same judges are all actually DEM plants and part of the conspiracy.

Don't forget the grift! While secretly acknowledging their cases are going nowhere, they are raising funds off their existence.*


*for those unable to compare and contrast- Trump is "bringing" knowingly spurious cases to try and subvert and election and raising money off doing so, whereas Biden is "defending" the election as a matter of necessity and not out of choice.

Patrick2010 wrote: »

Trumps legacy is that he has normalized lying, he lies, Kayleigh lies, his legal team lies and his supporters here lie.

In 30 odd years of following politics I've never seen anything like it. Weaponized falsehoods and baseless conspiracies attacking everything from democracy to science to law, it's incredible.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

In 30 odd years of following politics I've never seen anything like it. Weaponized falsehoods and baseless conspiracies attacking everything from democracy to science to law, it's incredible.

Using the word "falsehood" instead of lie

everlast75 wrote: »

AFAIK, that's entirey correct.

Their "hail mary" is to get it to the SCOTUS and look for a Trump special, aka a quid pro quo from one of his appointed judges. It's not gonna get there.

The other is to stop the casting of the electoral votes and that's not happening either.

Without either of these two, the writing is on the wall and Twittler's days are numbered.

I sincerely hope he ends up financially ruined and in jail.

And before anyone runs in here like Maude Flanders, clutching their pearls, I do not give two jots what kind of person that makes me in their eyes.

This guy has been a bully, a grossly incompetent "leader", a fraud, a grifter, a nasty and despicable reprobate who has shown no empathy for others and has gone further to actually revel in their misery. It will entirely be appropriate, nay necessary, that he will be remembered as a sh1t stain on the legacy of all Presidents.

Excellent post !
He's a lumbering oaf with no imagination - it's an affront to humanity that he could ever rise to the top ???