Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXVIII- 71,942 ROI(2,050 deaths) 51,824 NI (983 deaths) (28/11) Read OP

1253254256258259328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    It wasn't falling.

    We were averaging a 1000+ cases per day.
    Level 5 began the day before the mid term break.

    Let's stick to the facts and not stuff you've made up in your head.

    Right so the 7 day positivity rate was 7.3% on the 17th, when the schools closed on the 23rd it was 6.6%, hence it was already falling before schools closed and continued to fall all the way to the 14th of November until it rose for the next few days.

    Now that lines up with something happening at the end of midterm break. Its reduced since with schools open.

    So theres the facts, I can point you to the data showing this if you want so that you know its not made up, quite far from made up.

    Oh and cases were already dropping before the schools closed, the week before they closed 1k plus per day, in the days after they were going down, schools closing wouldn't have impact that so soon. Easy to look it up.

    But sure you'll probably say its all made up because the numbers don't actually agree with your opinion.

    Level 3 and household restrictions we're feeding into the numbers when the schools closed.

    Heres the cold hard data, check it out for yourself

    [Url] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1107064/coronavirus-cases-development-ireland/ [/url]

    [Url] https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/f6d6332820ca466999dbd852f6ad4d5a_0/data?page=25 [/url]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭BringBackMick


    "It's no use having a good Christmas if you're burying friends and relations in the new year."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    That is a typical attitude that's out there unfortunately

    You could just as easily be burying friends and relations in the new year after not seeing them for the last Christmas you get a chance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Crude way of saying it, but not terrible advice - that is, don't go mad, don't pretend that covid doesn't matter. See your friends and family but do so responsibly and with the pandemic in mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    Right so the 7 day positivity rate was 7.3% on the 17th, when the schools closed on the 23rd it was 6.6%, hence it was already falling before schools closed and continued to fall all the way to the 14th of November until it rose for the next few days.

    Now that lines up with something happening at the end of midterm break. Its reduced since with schools open.

    So theres the facts, I can point you to the data showing this if you want so that you know its not made up, quite far from made up.

    Oh and cases were already dropping before the schools closed, the week before they closed 1k plus per day. Easy to look it up.


    Schools closed on Friday 23rd October.

    Ireland's 14 day average number of cases in the week leading up to 23rd October:

    Saturday 17th October: 791.86 cases per day
    Sunday 18th October: 857.50 cases per day
    Monday 19th October: 894.14 cases per day
    Tuesday 20th October: 953.93 cases per day
    Wednesday 21st October: 993.64 cases per day
    Thursday 22nd October: 1033.64 cases per day [Day Level 5 started]
    Friday 23rd October: 1045.07 cases per day

    So cases were not dropping.
    In fact they were rising.

    But, of course, you're not interested in the facts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭GeorgeBailey


    big syke wrote: »
    A few posters have been pretty quiet about this.

    I wonder what spin they put on it?

    I was absolutely convinced that the schools just HAD to be adding to numbers. Right now though it looks like kids being in school is actually helping drive the numbers down (given that the Halloween break seems to have added a bump in numbers). More than happy to be wrong and delighted my 2 kids can continue going to school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    "It's no use having a good Christmas if you're burying friends and relations in the new year."

    That's pretty blunt. Was this in a radio/tv interview or a publication?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Something the lines of 'Is it worth meeting up with your relatives for Christmas if you're going to be burying them in the new year'

    What Triple H's missus says to him every year...






    (Hopefully someone gets it)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭miece16


    "It's no use having a good Christmas if you're burying friends and relations in the new year."

    jesus christ, that's seriously out of order if he said that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭jobeenfitz


    miece16 wrote: »
    jesus christ, that's seriously out of order if he said that

    Bit like de old Catholic Church guilt. It doesn't bother me as I don't listen to anything they say.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Schools closed on Friday 23rd October.

    Ireland's 14 day average number of cases in the week leading up to 23rd October:

    Saturday 17th October: 791.86 cases per day
    Sunday 18th October: 857.50 cases per day
    Monday 19th October: 894.14 cases per day
    Tuesday 20th October: 953.93 cases per day
    Wednesday 21st October: 993.64 cases per day
    Thursday 22nd October: 1033.64 cases per day [Day Level 5 started]
    Friday 23rd October: 1045.07 cases per day

    So cases were not dropping.
    In fact they were rising.

    But, of course, you're not interested in the facts.

    I've just given you the facts and the links, I suggest reading them, key metrics were already reducing and case numbers followed soon after.

    The schools closing had no impact on case numbers in the days around and after they closed.

    The positivity rate was already reducing.

    7 day positivity began reducing on 21st October, before schools closed.

    You wouldn't have seen an impact of L5 until about 10 days later, so why from the 26th did case numbers themselves start coming down ?? Nothing to do with schools, cases announced would already have been seeded prior to them closing on 23rd.

    There's absolutely no point in trying to have a rational discussion on this because you seem to want to throw some personal digs. I've given you the links, they show positivity reducing before schools closed, your argument hence isn't accurate that closing the schools caused the reduction.

    The increase in positivity ties in with cases actually seeded over midterm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    School rise the R rate by 0.3. Its acknowledged in every country. To say that they have not made this lockdown more of a challenge would be a very naive way of looking at it. We are still in quite a precarious position with this virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    I've just given you the facts and the links

    You gave made up facts and you gave no links.

    The likes of you are the worst of posters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    You gave made up facts and you gave no links.

    The likes of you are the worst of posters.

    If you go back and see my reply to you you'll see the links there infront of you.

    But to save you the hassle here they are again, look at the dates there and see when the positivity rate started dropping, hint it was before schools closed, cases followed suit. Closing the schools on the 23rd wouldn't have had an impact to the numbers seen on the 27th and 28th for example

    Good man keep up the personal digs

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/f6d6332820ca466999dbd852f6ad4d5a_0/data?page=22

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1107064/coronavirus-cases-development-ireland/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,582 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I study exponential growth, so very much know, cheers for that thought though.

    I don't believe you and it's based on your previous postings where you were so wrong so many times about numbrsd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,582 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    big syke wrote: »
    Ah get off the stage.

    For months you have been banging the school spreading the virus drum.

    You even said case numbers were dropping while schools were closed. You nailed your colours to the mast at least have the self respect to stick to your guns or admit schools may not be spreading the virus the way you think.
    If it becomes clear that schools aren't an issue I'll be the first man to admit I got it wrong. I have no issue with admitting I'm wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    If you go back and see my reply to you you'll see the links there infront of you.

    But to save you the hassle here they are again, look at the dates there and see when the positivity rate started dropping.

    Good man keep up the personal digs

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/f6d6332820ca466999dbd852f6ad4d5a_0/data?page=22

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1107064/coronavirus-cases-development-ireland/

    So you copied and pasted two websites.

    Do you know how to even reference a link?

    The "positivity rate" is utterly irrelevant if more people are going for tests and being diagnosed negative. This is a good thing as people were doing as they were required.....taking a test (many working in schools) if they had any symptoms. I took a test myself in October as a precaution so as to prevent myself from infecting others if I had the virus.

    The real issue is the number of positive tests as declared and issued by NPHET on the gov.ie website.

    I have provided those stats as have kept a close eye on those figures daily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Personally, I think that the Christmas Season will cause a surge in cases and in turn hospitalizations which will lead to another Level 5 in mid to late January until they manage to roll out the Vaccine.

    Just my opinion.

    That's exactly what I think. Restrictions reduced maybe for a 6-8 week period in Dec-Jan. By the time restrictions are increased again more information will be available re vaccine and hopefully at worst we will be looking at another 6-8 week lockdown with April being our target of where we will hopefully begin to winddown the most prohibitive lockdowns for good. I think that is as optimistic on a realistic level anybody could be , given what we know. If things workout better then this , excellent.

    Between now and April, the government will have to balance science with population (popular) sentiments. Be interesting to see what wins out.

    I said it in the August:

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=114283541&postcount=694
    If I owned a pub , I’d be starting to look at next April as a potential opening time. Plan for the worst and hope for the best but I don’t see pubs opening for a long long time if numbers increase in sept and remain at a decent level to October. You don’t then add another risk variable that could increase that number when there might be a seasonal jump.

    Nothing that's happened the last 3 months should surprise anybody. This is a virus. It doesn't care about COVID fatigue or certain companies/industries being kept open for economic reasons. The virus will spread regardless of what sentiments people have or what they want to be the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    So you copied and pasted two websites.

    Do you know how to even reference a link?

    I inserted a link into a reply directing you to a website that shows statistics. Not my fault if you missed them.

    The links back up the viewpoint.

    How else do you want me to give you a link to a website by carrier pigeon??

    Either way your original argument that the schools dropped cases wouldn't have been possible given they dropped literally a few days after schools closed.

    Anyway I'll take the decision to leave you at it now and won't bother engaging any further, your clearly not interested in any sort of discussion simply trying to throw enough manure in the hope of it sticking


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,182 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    They're paving the way for restrictions already next year https://twitter.com/MichealLehane/status/1331287725916483584?s=19


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    Gotten very hostile in here on the last page or so

    Tony's worry index will be going through the roof :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,187 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Eod100 wrote: »
    They're paving the way for restrictions already next year https://twitter.com/MichealLehane/status/1331287725916483584?s=19

    Not surprising. Everyone fully expects a spike after Christmas celebrations. Hopefully next lockdown will be the last if they get their act together with the vaccine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Eod100 wrote: »
    They're paving the way for restrictions already next year https://twitter.com/MichealLehane/status/1331287725916483584?s=19

    No shock there, probably need one for a few weeks while trying to roll out a vaccine to at risk groups


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    I inserted a link into a reply directing you to a website that shows statistics. Not my fault if you missed them.

    The links back up the viewpoint.

    How else do you want me to give you a link to a website by carrier pigeon??

    Anyway I'll take the decision to leave you at it now and won't bother engaging any further, your clearly not interested in any sort of discussion simply trying to throw enough manure in the hope of it sticking

    Your links back up nothing which you claim.

    Your modus operandi is to reach a conclusion and then try and fit your "facts" around that conclusion.

    Positivity rate is irrelevant and that has been the basis of your claims on schools.

    The facts clearly show that cases were rising in the lead up to the mid term break. We didn't enact level 5 because cases were falling. Furthermore as we reached level 5 schools were closed in Greece, Italy, Czech Republic, Spain, many populous US states with Dr. Anthony Fauci stating that Ireland should close schools if we moved to level 5.

    Today I've worked with teachers and students who caught the virus in their schools but you know better typing away from your sitting room at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Eod100 wrote: »
    They're paving the way for restrictions already next year https://twitter.com/MichealLehane/status/1331287725916483584?s=19

    I'd love to know Leo's definition of a 'short period'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,379 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    I'd love to know Leo's definition of a 'short period'?

    The next week is critical...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,473 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Eod100 wrote: »
    They're paving the way for restrictions already next year https://twitter.com/MichealLehane/status/1331287725916483584?s=19

    To be honest the whole winter has been very predictable.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,182 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    No shock there, probably need one for a few weeks while trying to roll out a vaccine to at risk groups

    Not hugely surprising alright but maybe bit sooner than people expected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Drumpot wrote: »
    By the time restrictions are increased again more information will be available re vaccine and hopefully at worst we will be looking at another 6-8 week lockdown with April being our target of where we will hopefully begin to winddown the most prohibitive lockdowns for good.
    I'm hoping it doesn't go on that long, but I agree it's going to be into 2021. The vaccines are coming, and hopefully they will make a big impact - it'll just take a bit of time.

    We're again having what I consider to be daft discussions about opening pubs and so on. It's not going to happen, and dangling reopening in front of businesses knowing full well they will probably have to shut again is completely unfair. But this will be the third time we've done this so clearly the politicians never learn. The pubs now want a guarantee that if they reopen they will not have to close - perfectly fair request, impossible for the government to give and they should be saying that now.

    If I was a business owner in indoor hospitality, I'd be all over my industry body to get compensation from the government to allow them remain closed until perhaps March 2021, and only plan to possibly reopen from that point with progressive lifting of restrictions as the vaccines arrive and are deployed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,757 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    So you copied and pasted two websites.

    Do you know how to even reference a link?

    The "positivity rate" is utterly irrelevant if more people are going for tests and being diagnosed negative. This is a good thing as people were doing as they were required.....taking a test (many working in schools) if they had any symptoms. I took a test myself in October as a precaution so as to prevent myself from infecting others if I had the virus.

    The real issue is the number of positive tests as declared and issued by NPHET on the gov.ie website.

    I have provided those stats as have kept a close eye on those figures daily.
    The fact you just said the positivity rate is irrelevant shows you know absolutely nothing about what you're talking about.
    Positivity rate is an indicator of spread and volume of disease in the community.
    Decreasing positivity rate = decreasing volume in the community.
    Maybe read up on it?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement