Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

miss.paula wrote: »

All i can see here is willful ignorance of the voter fraud that has occurred.
Follow the money as they say, if Biden was the winner why have the Bookies not closed the book on a Trump win?

You answered that yourself.

Follow the money

plenty of money to be made on people making silly bets out of willful ignorance of the results that they will obviously never have to pay out.

miss.paula wrote: »

All i can see here is willful ignorance of the voter fraud that has occurred.
Follow the money as they say, if Biden was the winner why have the Bookies not closed the book on a Trump win?

Because it is guaranteed money from the bets that are already placed as the bookies know the betters can't win. Its also a second stream of revenue for the people who have been massively misinformed and with that bet on Trump with the bookies knowing its a guaranteed loser for the better I. E revenue for them.

Another reason is free publicity in major. Worldwide and nationwide media outlets. If it was closed they wouldn't get publicity.

Another reason, is if there was even the slightest miniscule atom sized possibility that Trump could win, they would not pay out on any Biden winners as they are not entitled to that money back and would be a double loss. Just to note the vat majority of odds makers have paid out on Biden, a fact, yes a fact, appears to be at best unknown to the post, at middle didn't understand the relevance and at worst said something knowing the other is true. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.racingpost.com/sport/us-presidential-election-2020-bookmakers-pay-out-on-biden-as-winner/458470/amp

In conclusion, if your whole thesis is based on the.badus not closing the book on a Trump win then its much easier to prove the fraud as all that is required is show open odds.

It mightnt have appeared important to you but your lack of kwledge of gambling, open books and risk makes it difficult for you to see that what you think it means is the opposite.

Finally if it was widespread voterfraud then a new election would likely to be called as difficult to absolutely to link it to Biden. All votes either transfer (see paid out Biden) therefore odds makes little difference.

Is the evidence that you are relying upon in all your posts for vote fraud the open odds. If so then you may require different evidence. If you. Have any, (. Other than the absolute zero by Trump so far).

It's all over folks.
OANN reports that Trump won 410 - 128.

Mods, i think it's safe to say you can close this thread now!



USA .... USA .... USA .... USA !!!!!

Can anyone help me because it's got to the stage no one can tell with anything.

Are the two posts above mine one quoting a oann report giving trump vicprt, And another that we are going to get 4 years of trump, sarcasm.

Not going to bother showinf why its fake and baseless but will link the fact check that showz it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3767048001

This is a fantastic factual front page

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1330209363550728192?s=09

Patrick2010 wrote: »

Trump is getting yet another recount in Georgia because the last recount margin was less than 0.5%, how many times can he do this?

until they give in, and allow him back into the big white house for ice cream

valoren wrote: »

Blatant fraud? Get onto Giuliani with the details so.

The delights of post-truth politics. Whatever I believe, regardless of facts and evidence, is the truth.

Is almost as if the tweet you quoted was out of the mouth of kelli-ann Conway

miss.paula wrote: »

If you believe CNN

Rudy is that you? Is this Rudy’s drag name I wonder.
Maybe we can all replace any reference of Rudy Giuliani with Miss Paula.

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

False.
Trump will do everything within the law to disqualify any and all "non-legal ballots", There is no way to disqualify legal ballots, That is BS. What Trumps legal team are doing is finding irregularities, Ballots that were missing important information like date, signature and so on that would normally disqualify them but it seems that they might have been counted.

Maybe you didn't see the question, but I asked you on the day that Trump put pressure on electors not to certify the result in Detroit if you had seen anything to change your mind on the above.

Today Trump's legal team tried to invalidate every single vote in Pennsylvania. Thankfully the Republican judge threw out the case in no uncertain terms, but do you stand by the above? Do you still believe this is simply about making sure that this is only about disqualifying "non-legal ballots"?

Quote from the Judge on the case:

“At bottom, you’re asking this court to invalidate some 6.8 million votes thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth,” Brann said. “Can you tell me how this result could possibly be justified?”

https://www.inquirer.com/news/trump-pennsylvania-lawsuit-election-results-rudy-giuliani-hearing-case-williamsport-20201117.html

Zubeneschamali wrote: »

This one is the funniest. It turns out that the idiot who made this claim (who is from Texas) was comparing the vote in the numbered districts of Michigan with the population of the numbered districts in Minnesota, presumably because they both begin with MI.

A lot more people will read the original "mistake" than will read the correction. It's very much a calculated tactic.

duploelabs wrote: »

It's gas logging on on a Sunday morning to read the trumpet karens have been at the sherry overnight

The updated talking points were downloaded overnight. Amazingly the Trumpbots are still spouting on about conspiracies that have already been thrown out of court.

To all those who put a bet on Trump, it's safe to say that if Trump were a racehorse, he'd probably be looking forward to a future as Tesco burger meat.

Looks like a few of the pro Trump supporters have lost some serious money at the bookies betting on a Trump win. No wonder they are desperate for the result to be overturned....it all makes sense now.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Yet again, a simple Google search can answer your questions

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.racingpost.com/sport/us-presidential-election-2020-bookmakers-pay-out-on-biden-as-winner/458470/amp

If Trump supporters were capable of finding the answers to simple questions then Trump wouldn’t be nearly as popular as he is.