Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXVIII- 71,942 ROI(2,050 deaths) 51,824 NI (983 deaths) (28/11) Read OP

1190191193195196328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭BringBackMick


    Yeah fair enough Mick I'm not sure it is unworkable in Ireland. Who's youse? I'd love to sucker punch it. I'm sorry but I don't have the authority to close the schools.

    You sound better when you aren't throwing out BS vids, god bless and good night


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    You sound better when you aren't throwing out BS vids, god bless and good night

    You too Mick. Great that we are tolerant of differing views to what is a very tricky problem. Stay safe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 232 ✭✭AssetBacked2


    Renjit wrote: »

    Presumably the little teenage rodents who live in places along the red line as the Gardai have appealed for witnesses but give no descriptions!

    I am not sure why you're getting such a kick out of this article, maybe you can explain?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    That would be kind of the point...

    They would just stay at 5


  • Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The analytical sensitivity is the ability of a test to detect the target antigen at the minimum detectable concentration i.e. how good the test is at detecting low levels of the virus.

    If that particular test has a sensitivity of 80% it means in 20% of cases it wont produce a positive result when it should.

    Why don't you mail the highly respected Robert Koch Institute and accuse them of propagating fake news.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Renjit wrote: »

    Why is this on the news? Fairly standard behaviour on the red line


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,881 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    They would just stay at 5

    Would be a typical FF stroke to tell people they are 'easing the restrictions' but just about stay onside with NPHET by going down to level 4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Intersting point but they would never be able to sell that one

    Level 3 is restrictive enough especially in relation to travel

    They need retail open for December


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,231 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    The analytical sensitivity is the ability of a test to detect the target antigen at the minimum detectable concentration i.e. how good the test is at detecting low levels of the virus.

    If that particular test has a sensitivity of 80% it means in 20% of cases it wont produce a positive result when it should.

    Yeah but 80% of the positives are detected when they otherwise wouldn’t be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Blanco100


    Surely its soon to be game over for this virus. Vaccines all but confirmed


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭BringBackMick


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    Surely its soon to be game over for this virus. Vaccines all but confirmed
    Can you imagine a week in the sun at the beach
    2 euro pints ,

    a coffee and croissant in the morning,

    lunch , dinner

    feeling like a king

    and returning to your room and see youve spent 50 euro

    Yes, i look forward to returning to the continent!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,209 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Europe today as bleak as it was yesterday. But in the United States deaths are really climbing now.

    2,000 so far yesterday.

    Up from 1,658 on Tuesday.

    Hospitals are under serious pressure.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/nov/19/coronavirus-live-news-us-hospitals-stretched-to-limits-pfizer-seeks-vaccine-approval-in-days

    States are rushing to implement new restrictions or lock down measures although certain republican governors still believe that Jesus is first port of call rather than science even on basic stuff like masks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    Europe today as bleak as it was yesterday. But in the United States deaths are really climbing now.

    2,000 so far yesterday.

    Up from 1,658 on Tuesday.

    Hospitals are under serious pressure.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/nov/19/coronavirus-live-news-us-hospitals-stretched-to-limits-pfizer-seeks-vaccine-approval-in-days

    States are rushing to implement new restrictions or lock down measures although certain republican governors still believe that Jesus is first port of call rather than science even on basic stuff like masks.

    Define bleak?

    I also love how you didn’t quote the subheading “ New data shows treatment more efficient than thought.” Wouldn’t be convenient for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,209 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Eivor wrote: »
    Define bleak?

    Sure, well "bleak" is an adjective used in a variable way depending on the subject matter.
    -bare, desolate, and often windswept:
    a bleak plain.
    -cold and piercing; raw:
    a bleak wind.
    -without hope or encouragement; depressing; dreary:
    a bleak future.

    Hope that helps. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    Sure, well "bleak" is an adjective used in a variable way depending on the subject matter.



    Hope that helps. :)

    Very helpful, thank you! Gives an insight to your outlook more so than the actual situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,209 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Eivor wrote: »
    Very helpful, thank you!

    No problem! :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    No problem! :cool:

    Wow I love the blue face with the glasses! Looks great, how do you do that?

    What about the other heading within that article, “ Pfizer seeks vaccine approval 'in days'”?

    Care to comment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Infografik_Antigentest_PDF.pdf;jsessionid=A1D785311330BF507400D8E08B1E5F5C.internet101?__blob=publicationFile
    German report on the effectiveness of antigen tests from Robert Koch Institute who inform the German Government and on which German policy is based.

    If mass testing is done using Antigen then when testing a group of 10,000 people en-masse with 5 people infected in that group of 10,000 then 1 person will slip through and 4 caught. 200 will test false-positive and need to go for PCR test.

    mass testing rather than focused tested is what is required to allow people travel home for Christmas.

    NPHET don't want even one person slipping in so 9999 people must not book a flight to travel home and see their families this Christmas.

    In the real world Slovakia engaged in mass testing, the idea behind it was catch all positives so those who test negative could go on with life. They only picked up 0.6% and still have woeful case numbers +1200 and even tho the numbers are coming down it’s more to do with the lockdown they implemented than actually isolating the infectious.

    Antigen tests will work if you repeatedly take them everyday, but they don’t replace social distancing and personnel restrictions or testing in one off situations.

    The whole problem with these antigen tests are all the positive cases they miss. You have to have a significant viral load present to get a positive result.

    The disparity between symptomatic, pre-symptomatic and asymptotic seems to influence Antigen tests... I’m not saying antigen tests are bad just I think it’s these issues that are holding up the regulators.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Eivor wrote: »
    Wow I love the blue face with the glasses! Looks great, how do you do that?

    What about the other heading within that article, “ Pfizer seeks vaccine approval 'in days'”?

    Care to comment?

    We still have many months to go through yet before we can expect widespread vaccination, or at least enough to drastically change the situation.

    It's very encouraging that there's been positive news on potential treatments - it's a step in the right direction and we'll get there in time - but there are many hurdles yet. Amazing work is being done, but people need to be realistic in their expectations.

    Things are not going to fundamentally change over the Winter. In the short to medium term the outlook for many countries still does look, for want of a more appropriate word, bleak.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    Arghus wrote: »
    We still have many months to go through yet before we can expect widespread vaccination, or at least enough to drastically change the situation.

    It's very encouraging that there's been positive news on potential treatments - it's a step in the right direction and we'll get there in time - but there are many hurdles yet.

    Things are not going to fundamentally change over the Winter. In the short to medium term the outlook for many countries still does look, for want of a more appropriate word, bleak.

    My point is that that poster cherry picked the negative from the article.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Eivor wrote: »
    My point is that that poster cherry picked the negative from the article.

    Well, that is Kermit's style and while he mightn't actively accentuate the positive, oh, just about ever - there isn't much that he posts that isn't factually correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    Arghus wrote: »
    Well, that is Kermit's style and while he mightn't actively accentuate the positive, oh, just about ever - there isn't much that he posts that isn't factually correct.

    Calling the situation in Europe “bleak” is not factually correct. It’s personal opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,215 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Eivor wrote: »
    Calling the situation in Europe “bleak” is not factually correct. It’s personal opinion.

    How else would you describe it in all honesty?

    This is the shíttiest period of time practically all of us have ever lived through. And, you know, I do believe I'm factually correct in saying that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Yeah but 80% of the positives are detected when they otherwise wouldn’t be.

    In a perfect world, which none of us live in.

    80% of those who would test positive under optimum conditions, you could repeatedly test someone who is infected 10 times and that person could test negative 10 times but then next day repeat the same exercise and 8 of the 10 test positive. It’s still 80% accurate but it depends on day and the patient.

    PCR can be like this too, but luckily it’s so sensitive that if you take maybe 3 swabs at least one will show at least a very weak positive early on in the infection...it’s all patient dependent as well.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 105 ✭✭lemonTrees


    Eivor wrote: »
    Calling the situation in Europe “bleak” is not factually correct. It’s personal opinion.

    No it is bleak. Millions are suffering. Pretending that everything is fine is just pure immature tbh.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 105 ✭✭lemonTrees


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    Surely its soon to be game over for this virus. Vaccines all but confirmed

    Widespread rollout is months away. Hopefully by the end of the summer we can see a return to some sort of normality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 177 ✭✭Westernworld.


    Eivor wrote: »
    Let’s all relax for a minute. We have 2 weeks of level 5 restrictions and then (I’m guessing) another 2 weeks of level 4. Numbers still have a long time to come down even further than they already have

    Is there much difference between the levels now

    Seems all the same in practice with a few tweaks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,251 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    appledrop wrote: »
    Your spot on. It will be 10 weeks since we could go to local restaurant or leave Dublin by Dec.

    Might not seem like a big deal but people have had enough.

    Level 3 is useless of its one we have had in Dublin.

    Let's just open things up, put in safety measures + get on with it.

    Sure if the schools are such safe places + we can seat within 1 m why is a restaurant or hotel any different?

    I agree to a point. Get on with it until such a time as the cases profile looks to be reaching a point where agin the virus is getting into the elderly sectors of society or increasing load on limited hospital reaources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭Mark1916


    https://t.co/XsgTrU6LNW

    Oxford coronavirus vaccine shows "encouraging" immune response from people in their 60s and 70s in trial results, raising hopes it can protect those most at risk of illness from virus


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,117 ✭✭✭prunudo


    My current feeling is nphet will want no change to the levels on Dec 1st but given the disquiet from government they'll push for some form of easing. Possibly only opening of retail, hairdressing though. Also ditching the 5km rule for stay within county and maybe 1 other houshold allowed visit. Dont think we'll get dining or pubs with the initial reopening. Not sure what level they would all technically fall into.
    Then we might see some sort of relaxation again around the 14th or over the festive period itself.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement