Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

has the don conceded? i think its time for him to accept defeat.

robinph wrote: »

Twitter have said that after the 20th January Trumps account won't be considered protected due to being a "person of interest" and will just be dealt with as a normal person. So rather than the warnings about him lying on the posts they will just delete them as his words are no longer needing to be recorded due to him being president. Piss twitter off enough and they will just delete him.

We will see.. doesn't matter, they have made a fortune out if this sh!t already. They will continue to do so.

sabat wrote: »

That's profoundly undemocratic and I'm sure there must be some law against it. To utilise mob power in order to prevent your opponent exercising his legal rights is criminal behaviour.

He nearly accidentally conceded but caught himself in time.

That doc is very boring.

The doc subtly telling everyone this progress has nothing to do with the Trump administration and Trump's body language is like a bold child.

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

If trump can describe his victory in 2016 as a landslide then biden can call his victory an even bigger landslide

robinph wrote: »

The definition of landslide being as set by Trump in 2016 when he decided that his losing the popular vote to Clinton was a landslide. If losing but still winning is a landslide then winning and winning is an avalanche.

Eh, Trump's a blowhard who laughably over-exaggerates all that which could possibly make him look good. I don't think we should be taking Trump's definition of anything on board. Trump did not win 2016 by a landslide at all. Losing the popular vote and winning by tight margins in some states does not sound like a landslide. Looked good enough in terms of electoral college votes, which is the main thing, but if 2016 taught anything it was drill down into the numbers.

It was a good and welcome win for Biden, but landslide has connotations that the election represented a strong repudiation of Trump, even though he increased his vote number by 10 million. That base doesn't look to be going anywhere, so the narrative of 'Joe Biden beat Trump by a landslide and Trump was never heard from again' isn't really a goer. Vigilance will be needed to maintain a lead over Trump in 4 years or whoever is running on the Trumpist platform by then.

Maybe he’s thinking about his legacy now. Still lied multiple times mind you.

Interesting, in the press conference he had to bite his tongue from finishing the sentence that "his
administration will not go into a lock down, but the next administration could go into a lock down". Delusion level certainly has come down

briany wrote: »

Eh, Trump's a blowhard who laughably over-exaggerates all that which could possibly make him look good. I don't think we should be taking Trump's definition of anything on board. Trump did not win 2016 by a landslide at all. Losing the popular vote and winning by tight margins in some states does not sound like a landslide. Looked good enough in terms of electoral college votes, which is the main thing, but if 2016 taught anything it was drill down into the numbers.

It was a good and welcome win for Biden, but landslide has connotations that the election represented a strong repudiation of Trump, even though he increased his vote number by 10 million. That base doesn't look to be going anywhere, so the narrative of 'Joe Biden beat Trump by a landslide and Trump was never heard from again' isn't really a goer. Vigilance will be needed to maintain a lead over Trump in 4 years or whoever is running on the Trumpist platform by then.

Using someone own words against them is tried and tested satire.

Its funny.

This press conference is quite the ego massage. I hope there are questions.

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Looks like Trump wants to set up his own half-assed provisional government.

https://twitter.com/msnireland/status/1327359642691805185

I’d like to think she’s finished but I’m sure she’ll get picked up by the likes of newsmax or oann etc.

drogon. wrote: »

Interesting, in the press conference he had to bite his tongue from finishing the sentence that "his
administration will not go into a lock down, but the next administration could go into a lock down". Delusion level certainly has come down

I read it as him trying to say, "Joe Biden would impose a lockdown if the transition takes place, so maybe let me continue being president?"