Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

froog · 08-11-2020 12:02AM

combat14 wrote: »

can trump win in the courts? any chance?

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47r307tdf9tb3kzh1bw4gfkvbw06d00v59uvco4puc&rid=giphy.gif

Guy:Incognito · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

thecretinhop wrote: »

https://youtu.be/748_YY0TB6E

a Serbian view. a racist obv.

But Trump didnt succeed in stealing the election, so it's all good.

y0ssar1an22 · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

combat14 wrote: »

can trump win in the courts? any chance?

he would need solid evidence of something.

if he has 1 example is that enough? no idea.

would doubt it TBH.

but yes, he could win in the courts if he can present evidence of some sort of a fraud. not really win is my understanding; but null and void the election.

in this hypothetical, what happens then does anyone know?

08-11-2020 12:04AM

paleoperson wrote: »

It is, it is very sad how unreliable elections in modern western "democracies" have become.

Still more reliable than Russian ones.

froog · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

looking forward to biden's speech. it will be epic. a real president speaks.

ohnonotgmail · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

combat14 wrote: »

can trump win in the courts?
any chance? what do ppl think?!

No. He hasn't presented any evidence and the few court cases he has already taken were thrown out for lack of evidence.

eeepaulo · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

threeball wrote: »

None, less than zero.

A non positive number?

timsey tiger · 08-11-2020 12:04AM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

alot of people on here think trump supporters are zealots, fanatics. how does biden ripping the piss out of trump help that situation?

So to be clear you were perfectly happy for Trump to tear the country appart for four years and supported him for 4 more years, but now you are complaining about a simple joke.

Biden has been very restrained, you are complaining about a hat, when Trump isn't conceeding and is actively undermining the electorial prosesss.

Inciting the "zealots" and "fanatics" to even post nonsense about mammies committing voter fraud up and down the country.

AdrianBalboa · 08-11-2020 12:05AM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

he would need solid evidence of something.

if he has 1 example is that enough? no idea.

would doubt it TBH.

but yes, he could win in the courts if he can present evidence of some sort of a fraud. not really win is my understanding; but null and void the election.

in this hypothetical, what happens then does anyone know?

It’s not gonna happen. Trump lost because he is a loser and his supporters fell for his con. They were conned by a loser.

km991148 · 08-11-2020 12:05AM

I can't get this out if my head tho..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVwLhV1oY1c

Piss taking is allowed if the song is decent, no?

08-11-2020 12:05AM

froog wrote: »

It's nice that gifs are there for those incapable of making a cogent comment

combat14 · 08-11-2020 12:05AM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

he would need solid evidence of something.

if he has 1 example is that enough? no idea.

would doubt it TBH.

but yes, he could win in the courts if he can present evidence of some sort of a fraud. not really win is my understanding; but null and void the election.

in this hypothetical, what happens then does anyone know?

interesting read

Can Trump take election result directly to Supreme Court? No, but he could win if it gets there: legal expert

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5789345

py2006 · 08-11-2020 12:05AM

When is Biden due to address the nation?

Guy:Incognito · 08-11-2020 12:06AM

Deleted User wrote: »

**** has to be paid for. There will be no new drugs if big pharmas make no profit. Do you expect the world to be policed for free?

Yeah, the poor Pharma companies operating at a loss everywhere other than the US. :rolleyes:

Oscar Bravo · 08-11-2020 12:06AM

py2006 wrote: »

When is Biden due to address the nation?

1am irish time

Guy:Incognito · 08-11-2020 12:06AM

newboard wrote: »

Where can you watch CNN live? Can't seem to get it via YouTube..

On my sky box.

eeepaulo · 08-11-2020 12:06AM

Could we all start referring to him as President elect please

timsey tiger · 08-11-2020 12:07AM

combat14 wrote: »

can trump win in the courts?
any chance? what do ppl think?!

He definately has a non non zero chance of winning.

DeanAustin · 08-11-2020 12:07AM

km991148 wrote: »

Not a chance. It's laughable and massively disrespectful to all those involved in the election process.

It's also completely naive to think such carry on can happen.

All that will happen is some lawyers will get a nice bonus and taxpayer will get shafted once again - financially as well as with the small case of continuing to ignore COVID while he goes off on this oddysey to massage his broken ego.

He thinks this election can be overcome like a business problem. “People will bow down to me and do what I say and believe my version of the truth because I’m the boss.”

When confronted with a problem that can’t be solved like that, business people call in the lawyers.

Neither tactic works in a democratic election. I’m not sure Donald has worked that out yet.

briany · 08-11-2020 12:07AM

Deleted User wrote: »

**** has to be paid for. There will be no new drugs if big pharmas make no profit. Do you expect the world to be policed for free?

It does have to be paid for, and it is. There's a difference between making a nice profit and charging as much as you humanly can. America does not police the world for free - there is significant advantage in helping maintain western hegemony, but if they weren't so beholden to the military-industrial complex, they could have a strong military presence in the world and still have money left over to help its own citizens directly without even needing tax hikes.

robinph · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

y0ssar1an22 wrote: »

he would need solid evidence of something.

if he has 1 example is that enough? no idea.

would doubt it TBH.

but yes, he could win in the courts if he can present evidence of some sort of a fraud. not really win is my understanding; but null and void the election.

in this hypothetical, what happens then does anyone know?

If hes got one example he might get a couple of votes cancelled or a recount called at most.

But not enough to reverse the result in any of the states as the margins are too great, even in Georgia...but he'd need to get the results reversed in 4 different states. One of which they were calling for the counting to stop and another they were calling for the counting to continue.

Any judge will just tell them to feck off out of their court.

08-11-2020 12:09AM

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Yeah, the poor Pharma companies operating at a loss everywhere other than the US. :rolleyes:

You may not agree with my post, but at least it said something. Yours is an empty glib comment

Call Me Jimmy · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

It does happen you just dont understand it.

Oh, I was under impression the signatures don't have to match. What actually happens?

Guy:Incognito · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

paleoperson wrote: »

lol, the entire security world has admitted there is no way to verify electronic votes. Electronic money is different to a paper trail in voting. People can watch electronic money and make sure it's in the right place - you can't do the same thing with voting because people can be corrupt at any stage. Also if you're missing money you're going to cry afoul, but you can't know when your vote is "missing" or hasn't been counted. If you're so confident then why did they stop using it? Why do they say security won't allow it?

Read up on it, I find it confusing and non-intuitive myself but security experts all agree that electronic voting is not possible. You can't trust your first instincts on it which is what people did for electronic machine and/or online voting. They tried online voting in Japan and it doesn't work either and was abandoned.

Mail in voting was always supposed to be for a small fraction of people who couldn't leave their home but desperately wanted to vote. It was meant to be a nice gesture more than anything else. A small fraction of votes that could be properly looked after. Not this endless masses and masses of mail in votes that nobody could keep track of and take days to even count properly.

So who did all the cheating? The Trump supporters that turned up and voted on the untraceable electronic voting machines or the Biden ones that stayed home in a pandemic and voted by traceable paper ballots?

Zak Flaps · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

Funkfield wrote: »

https://twitter.com/alphaisvibin/status/1325201722244034560?s=20

This exact tweet seems to be being tweeted a lot in reply to lots of accounts. All bots?

Yes. I've seen tons of these.

Funkfield · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

actually, reading some of his other tweets he was taking the piss with that tweet as he has noticed the same thing posted by loads of other accounts.

https://twitter.com/alphaisvibin/status/1325198741306040320

Posted every few seconds/minutes from a new account.

Is it a meme so? Or are they all bots?

Professor Moriarty · 08-11-2020 12:09AM

combat14 wrote: »

interesting read

Can Trump take election result directly to Supreme Court? No, but he could win if it gets there: legal expert

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5789345

That article is completely out of date. Plus you answered your own question. It won't make the SC.

BorneTobyWilde · 08-11-2020 12:11AM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

if mom can forge the signatures of 4 other people then fair play to her. Every system of voting has inherent flaws.

The whole forged signature is a problem when a stranger gets his hand on a 100 ballots and forges them with signatures of names he finds somewhere, people he knows, phonebook ect. They would hopefully never be counted as the signature would be wrong.

In a home a person would have many many documents with signatures from people in the home, or can simply ask them to sign.
Big difference, one is fraud, the others is '' oh well it's Covid Time, what can you do, it's acceptable this time round''

A Sister asking her brother, Uncle Bob who lives in the basement for a signature while he is drunk watching tv is a genuine vote his time round.

Mr. Karate · 08-11-2020 12:11AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

He could have done all that without being a dickhead though, couldn't he?

It was never about what he achieved, it was about HIM. Idiot Almighty.

Yes, look at what voting for all the smooth talkers has gotten us. Trillions in debt, God knows how many wars.

Yes lets vote for more debt and more wars because Trump can be a dick. The "peace loving" Lefties really showed him.

BTW. You vote for polices. Not personality. Try it here one time. Ireland might not be so ****ed.

circadian · 08-11-2020 12:12AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

It's nice that gifs are there for those incapable of making a cogent comment

I hope the irony in this statement isn't lost on you.

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

Comments