Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, And the winner is.......... (pt 4) Read OP

1…209210212214215…325

Comments

  • #6332
    Doctors room ghost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Doctors room ghost


    Snake Plisken wrote: »
    Looks like Democrats are trying to hide something they should be delighted in having observers if they are confident Biden has the votes! Believe Biden is so popular dead people are voting from the grave for him!





    John McCain is anyway


  • #6333
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,044 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Graham wrote: »
    50401 votes, assuming they all go to Biden/Trump

    2436015 +36% 18144 2454159
    2422467 +64% 32257 2454724 +565

    There another one on Donnies Nuke list if that happens....


  • #6334
    y0ssar1an22
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,983 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That's 3 losses to 1 "massive" win so far!

    what was the win?


  • #6335
    ChikiChiki
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    drogon. wrote: »
    Looks like a lot of accusation without any proof.

    https://twitter.com/elistokols/status/1324397101216862209?s=21

    They have no evidence. The goal is clearly to stoke tensions. This is turning closer towards a really dangerous scenario.


  • #6336
    kilns
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    They have no evidence. The goal is clearly to stoke tensions. This is turning closer towards a really dangerous scenario.

    Yes this is total House of Cards stuff


  • Advertisement
  • #6337
    Penn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    that aint on really. censoring! are we in 1984?

    what did he say?

    It's not censoring. It's adding a warning to his tweets which contain false information about the election where you have to click View to read the tweet.


  • #6338
    robinph
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    that aint on really. censoring! are we in 1984?

    what did he say?

    Lies basically.


  • #6339
    Call Me Jimmy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    They aren't, they are fighting against the GOP having literally hundreds of "observers" who were shouting and disrupting things left and right.

    From what I understand between all candidates they were allowed 131 observers (no idea why such an odd number) but literally hundreds of people on the GOP side turned up demanding entrance.

    They were all refused and then they all starting trying to video in the windows etc. - Which is an offence , only the official people are allowed be there and see stuff.

    So the election staff blocked the windows.

    The GOP are now saying that they are "hiding" stuff.. even though they have dozens of staff inside already.

    It's flinging turds in all directions to stir things up and cause trouble so that some Judge will eventually just go "ah lads , this is getting silly , let's just go with the result we have"

    Think Brooks Brother riot on Social Media.

    The order has nothing to do with who is an observer or allowed to observe, it is simply about how close observers can get.


  • #6340
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1324420177983873027


  • #6341
    y0ssar1an22
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,983 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    They have no evidence. The goal is clearly to stoke tensions. This is turning closer towards a really dangerous scenario.

    i will preface this by saying i dont know.

    but if the republicans haven't been allowed to observe the votes, its near impossible to prove anything.

    so the question is really, have all voting processes been followed correctly?

    if yes, no problem.
    if no, a problem.


  • Advertisement
  • #6342
    is_that_so
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    what was the win?
    That nonsense about the observers in PA, being appealed according to a poster upthread.


  • #6343
    Padre_Pio
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    that aint on really. censoring! are we in 1984?

    what did he say?

    I don't think 1984 had factcheck warnings like Twitter.

    It had doublespeak, like Donny and the Reps are masters of though.


  • #6344
    y0ssar1an22
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,983 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    robinph wrote: »
    Lies basically.

    do twitter censor lies?


  • #6345
    Kermit.de.frog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    EmFIanNVgAEdzNN?format=jpg&name=small


  • #6346
    Call Me Jimmy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    do twitter censor lies?

    Apparently they censor things that are disputed


  • #6347
    Penn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,623 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    i will preface this by saying i dont know.

    but if the republicans haven't been allowed to observe the votes, its near impossible to prove anything.

    so the question is really, have all voting processes been followed correctly?

    if yes, no problem.
    if no, a problem.

    They have been allowed, and in accordance with the proper processes set in place before the election.

    What Trump has gone to court for was for observers to be allowed to go closer to the counters. That's in excess of the proper process, but has been allowed. Dems are challenging that, but regardless, it's not a case of impropriety or anything being done wrong.


  • #6348
    Panrich
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,974 ✭✭✭Panrich


    It's surely time now for Republicans to cut Trump loose and disown this dangerous talk and legal actions. I know that they want to hold on to the presidency if they can but in reality, the tail has been wagging the dog for the past 4 years anyway.


  • #6349
    kilns
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    Kermit.de.frog wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1324420177983873027

    She also added that the issue that the Trump Campaign has been going to the supreme court over is quite insignificant, there are hardly any late ballots received


  • #6350
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    do twitter censor lies?

    When it is coming from the President in the middle of an election they certainly need to add warnings about what he is saying when it is evidently false and lies.


  • #6351
    Phoebas
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    kilns wrote: »
    Yes this is total House of Cards stuff

    You'd really have to hope that it isn't.

    If its House of Cards stuff, then Trump's ranting is softening the ground for something else much bigger.
    Hopefully it's all just Trump having one of his tantrums.


  • Advertisement
  • #6352
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Call Me Jimmy wrote: »
    Apparently they censor things that are disputed

    They're adding disclaimers to tweets that are trying to undermine a fair election..


  • #6353
    Triangle
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Triangle


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That nonsense about the observers in PA, being appealed according to a poster upthread.

    According to the secretary of PA, it was about the distance the observers (both sides) had to be from the staff.
    It's not a republican only change, its both sides.


  • #6354
    sheeplover55
    Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭sheeplover55


    Hurry up Nevada end this thing


  • #6355
    Padre_Pio
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    do twitter censor lies?

    They factcheck tweets relating to sensitive topics like elections, and add warnings if there's no proof.

    Most of Trumps tweets have a warning on them.


  • #6356
    listermint
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,379 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    y0ssar1an22 wrote: »
    i will preface this by saying i dont know.

    but if the republicans haven't been allowed to observe the votes, its near impossible to prove anything.

    so the question is really, have all voting processes been followed correctly?

    if yes, no problem.
    if no, a problem.

    They have been allowed. You know they've been allowed. They are creating misdirection and misinformation. You should feel angry that they think you are that stupid to swallow this nonsense.


  • #6357
    Dressoutlet
    Closed Accounts Posts: 309 ✭✭Dressoutlet


    So I'm seeing comments from Irish Trump supporters, saying no don't follow that news outlet, check out Fox, you will get the real news. Then when pointed out Trump now hates Fox, they say oh yeah Fox went like the rest. This is within seconds
    I'm honest to god worried for our own country with these idiots, who let's be honest, mostly vote for Sinn Fein, the polar opposite to DT.
    We've gone from The Twilight Zone to One flew over the Cuckoo's nest


  • #6358
    Call Me Jimmy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Deleted User wrote: »
    They're adding disclaimers to tweets that are trying to undermine a fair election..

    Yea I don't have a problem with it in this case, I'm not sure how much good it does for the potential of abuse it entails


  • #6359
    funnydoggy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    Dressoutlet wrote: »
    So I'm seeing comments from Irish Trump supporters, saying no don't follow that news outlet, check out Fox, you will get the real news. Then when pointed out Trump now hates Fox, they say oh yeah Fox went like the rest. This is within seconds
    I'm honest to god worried for our own country with these idiots, who let's be honest, mostly vote for Sinn Fein, the polar opposite to DT.
    We've gone from The Twilight Zone to One flew over the Cuckoo's nest




    I just had this with my brother :pac:


  • #6360
    Triangle
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Triangle


    sheeplover55 wrote: »
    Hurry up Nevada end this thing

    Clark County, Nevada don't expect their final numbers until saturday/Sunday unfortunately.


  • Advertisement
  • #6361
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Call Me Jimmy wrote: »
    Apparently they censor things that are disputed

    Baseless falsehoods don't dispute anything but the truth.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement