Trump vs Biden 2020, And the winner is.......... (pt 4) Read OP

hmmm wrote: »

Pennsylvania is heading in Biden's direction.

py2006 wrote: »

is it?

Overheal wrote: »

Yes. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-pennsylvania-president.html

py2006 wrote: »

is it?

Biden, his speech was a signal. Notice, as soon as it looked like the key states wouldn't be going his way, suddenly vote counting just stops in key cities in those states. Why? Why are only key, Democratic cities in these states having issues counting early votes? And why is it only these states? Why is it ok that they all just slowed down to a standstill or stopped counting at all last night? Take NC for example, they can count from 0-93% no problem, but then all of a sudden there are these critical, impossible difficulties and they can't handle the last 7%?

This is why the Democrats weren't worried. It doesn't matter that there was no blue wave. It doesn't matter that it wasn't an early night. The backup plan was always to stall on election night and drag it as long as possible into the next day or beyond. If you stop counting on election night, you know exactly how much they need to make up the difference and how many magical "early ballots" they need to invent to get over the finish line. This is a swindle by the Democratic Party and will lead to open civil war.

Hot take: Democratic, leftist domination is inevitable in the long run given the current parameters and trends or the electorate, barring civil war. Should that happen, I expect 2-3 countries out of the breakup of the US within the next century...OR a change to the voting franchise along the lines of what Robert Heinlein suggested. But neither occurs without civil war, and that's inevitable given the differences in the country. I have almost no faith that dialogue will ever bridge the gap. Balkanization is coming, but who knows, maybe it will be a bloodless separation into different countries.

It's very simple to see why - Reds don't want to move to Blue states, because they largely suck regarding taxation and other policies. People aren't flocking in droves to move to Blue states.Texas is a great example. People flock there because of policies and an environment fostered by Reds. So Blue states always stay Blue because Reds don't move there, except for very niche reasons - aka moving to California to be an actor (but are we really under the illusion that most of Hollywood is anything but Democratic?).

Meanwhile, Blues trickle into Reds more and more and more each year. It's an organized plan. Democrats know what they are doing. They are highly intelligent in that regard, sneaky and coordinated. They turn them to their side piece by piece, percentage by percentage every year. It's why they love illegal immigration so much. It isn't about "social justice," it isn't about "racial justice," it isn't about "respect" or "love." It's about methodically doing everything possible to change the electorate bit by bit and unlock the possiblity of finally implementing sweeping changes to America.

Deleted User wrote: »

Get ready for 2024: "Take America Back Again To Make it Better Than It Was When They Made It All F*cked Up And This Probably Won't Fit On A Hat So You'll Probably Need To Buy A T-Shirt Or A Jacket At The Very Least To Fit All This In So Probably a Jacket And I think Deutsche Are Giving Some Money Away If You Need To Buy These Best Jackets Let's Take Back The Stock Market And America."

froog wrote: »

so outside of florida which was always a tossup, and texas which was always going red, the much maligned pollsters weren't too far wrong.

eagle eye wrote: »

How far off is an update from Nevada? Maybe 5 Pacific?