Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US Presidential Election 2020 Thread II - Judgement Day(s)

17879818384239

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,689 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Unsubstantiated claims of illegal activity intended to discredit a result one does not like is trolling. Post and response deleted.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Graham wrote: »
    You're right, sorry Faugheen. I am agreeing.

    Haha. No worries. I’m sleep deprived too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,766 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    seamus wrote: »
    PA could become the kingmaker here.

    Nevada is very tight. If it was to swing back to Trump, PA stayed with Trump and no other states flipped, then Trump has it.

    The confidence of Biden's team (and noise from Trump's) suggests that their accountants don't see Nevada going with Trump.

    Nevada, Wisconsin and Michigan are really going his way and that gets Biden to 270.

    PA would be an absoute bonus that would make limit Trump's legal options. I think Biden has a huge chance there.

    Also, I wouldn't rule out Georgia either as Democrat hubs are still to return votes there too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    SNIP. Take it to the gambling forum please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,950 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    This at least explains whats happening in Arizona in the different data that is being shown


    https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1324011428030771200


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    VinLieger wrote: »
    This at least explains whats happening in Arizona in the different data that is being shown


    https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1324011428030771200

    Still doesn’t make Trumps ‘predictions’ any more logical based on data


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    murpho999 wrote: »

    Why is he now surprised that postal votes are going against him?

    He's not surprised. It was the plan all along.

    If anything this is one moment of Trump actually showing some level of forethought and planning in anything that hes ever done. Sow distrust of the mail in system, know that states will count in person votes first, encourage republicans to vote in person, then when the early votes show red but then switch to blue as the mail votes start to get counted declare cheating.

    It was all by design.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,074 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    El_EDJBXIAEFJWW?format=jpg&name=small

    Trump going mad at this, 128k votes added for Biden, 0 for everyone else.

    I am guessing this is just a case of the spreadsheet being updated on a cell by cell basis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Georgia seems to just be Atlanta left.. Biden would need a huge surge to turn it

    By far the most populous counties in the state though, similar to the Pennsylvania situation. If it was easily callable either way those prices would not be available, these are multi million euro markets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,407 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    El_EDJBXIAEFJWW?format=jpg&name=small

    Trump going mad at this, 128k votes added for Biden, 0 for everyone else.

    I am guessing this is just a case of the spreadsheet being updated on a cell by cell basis?

    Of course. I'm sure similar swings happened in Texas at various stages when Biden was ahead.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Georgia seems to just be Atlanta left.. Biden would need a huge surge to turn it

    He needs 62.6 percent of the outstanding vote. He should get that.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Why would there be a casting vote if one candidate has more electoral college votes from their 25 states?

    We're discussing the scenario of a 269-269 draw leading to a House vote on the President , which is on a State by State basis.

    It is possible for the House to be drawn 25-25 in the State head to head , hence the need for a casting vote.

    It's a highly unlikely scenario given the state of play right now , but just musing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,602 ✭✭✭valoren


    The fraud nonsense again. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. My guess is that after a cursory inquiry is done for show, while Trump holds office, nothing will be uncovered. Remember how Trump actually won the election last time and still touted there was fraud afoot because his ego couldn't deal with Clinton winning the popular vote? Broken record time again. You can have the likes of Farage joining Andrew Neil to deliver the opposite view point for some sense of balance, he can prattle on about electoral fraud. While Neil can obviously challenge it the problem becomes that despite having zero evidence to say such a thing, his mere presence on the show lends a small semblance of credibility and all in the notion of providing balance. He gets a platform to spout lies and it takes hold as a narrative. Thus we see electoral fraud touting specific numbers creeping into the discourse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 332 ✭✭deathbomber


    murpho999 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1324007806694023169

    This is hilarious from the Donald, even by his standard.

    He called postal voting open to fraud and encouraged Republicans not to use it and vote in person which his supporters followed.

    States counted in person votes first thus giving him good numbers.

    Postal votes after which are still ongoing and showing huge numbers for Democrats who followed advice and use the system rather than risk Covid at polling stations.

    Why is he now surprised that postal votes are going against him?

    Farage came out a couple of hours ago stating the Postal voting system is fraudulent. Thick as thieves :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    Crazy story that USPS failed to deliver 27% of mail in ballots in South Florida

    You wont hear Trump mentioning that

    String in bow of Dems if Trumps goes legal as they may be allowed to count these votes and as evidence has proved the majority of mail in ballots are democrats and that would flip Florida


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    valoren wrote: »
    The fraud nonsense again. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. My guess is that after a cursory inquiry is done for show, while Trump holds office, nothing will be uncovered. Remember how Trump actually won the election last time and still touted there was fraud afoot because his ego couldn't deal with Clinton winning the popular vote? Broken record time again. You can have the likes of Farage joining Andrew Neil to deliver the opposite view point for some sense of balance, he can prattle on about electoral fraud. While Neil can obviously challenge it the problem becomes that despite having zero evidence to say such a thing, his mere presence on the show lends a small semblance of credibility and all in the notion of providing balance. He gets a platform to spout lies and it takes hold as a narrative. Thus we see electoral fraud touting specific numbers creeping into the discourse.

    Major problem for the media to contend with in the coming years. Allowing people to spout things that are demonstrably false is not fair or balanced, it only lends undue credibility to liars. As you say extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,774 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Farage came out a couple of hours ago stating the Postal voting system is fraudulent. Thick as thieves :D

    Aye well Brexit is intertwined with who wins the Presidential race quite tightly, Farage would be pooping himself if Biden wins!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 107 ✭✭UpBack1234


    Inquitus wrote: »
    Aye well Brexit is intertwined with who wins the Presidential race quite tightly, Farage would be pooping himself if Biden wins!

    There's also the small matter of the the 10,000 quid he put on a Trump win. He wishes there was fraud!:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭Dillonb3


    Farage came out a couple of hours ago stating the Postal voting system is fraudulent. Thick as thieves :D

    Andrew Neil interviewed and pulled him up over it.
    https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1323938999468175367


    Worrying about Arizona and hard to know where the votes are coming in from. Conservatives on twitter are claiming they're in Trump's favor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,243 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    John King is back!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,507 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    valoren wrote: »
    The fraud nonsense again. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. My guess is that after a cursory inquiry is done for show, while Trump holds office, nothing will be uncovered. Remember how Trump actually won the election last time and still touted there was fraud afoot because his ego couldn't deal with Clinton winning the popular vote? Broken record time again. You can have the likes of Farage joining Andrew Neil to deliver the opposite view point for some sense of balance, he can prattle on about electoral fraud. While Neil can obviously challenge it the problem becomes that despite having zero evidence to say such a thing, his mere presence on the show lends a small semblance of credibility and all in the notion of providing balance. He gets a platform to spout lies and it takes hold as a narrative. Thus we see electoral fraud touting specific numbers creeping into the discourse.
    The latest study for fraud in voting in the US puts it at 0.0009% in 2017; with a record 160 million voters we're talking about 1440 cases in all of USA. For Wisconsin; well good luck (Scott was the republican governor for Wisconsin 2011-2019)...

    https://twitter.com/ScottWalker/status/1324002777597677569


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,456 ✭✭✭circadian


    John King is back!




    The only redeeming thing about CNN. I don't mind Anderson or Don Lemon too much but the likes of Jake Tapper et al are just eughh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    Dillonb3 wrote: »
    Andrew Neil interviewed and pulled him up over it.
    https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1323938999468175367


    Worrying about Arizona and hard to know where the votes are coming in from. Conservatives on twitter are claiming they're in Trump's favor

    Majority of votes in arizona to be counted are Phoenix and Tucson

    Hasn't a hope


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Biden stretches his lead in Michigan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Fox's dials have Biden with a 95% chance in Michigan, 93% in Wisconsin and 70% in Nevada


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    John King has jumped from Clare County to Roscommon County in Michigan Here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,774 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Fox's dials have Biden with a 95% chance in Michigan, 93% in Wisconsin and 70% in Nevada

    Nevada is vitally important, if PA doesn't narrow!


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Fox's dials have Biden with a 95% chance in Michigan, 93% in Wisconsin and 70% in Nevada

    I see that - Also they have Georgia , North Carolina and Pennsylvania blank.

    Have they stopped counting there or something, is that why they are blank?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭Roanmore


    Don’t have access to Fox. What is the general tone to their coverage?
    I know Hannity will be shouting fraud but what about the others?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3 Clareemigrant


    Must be first time ever that a Mayo team snatch victory from the jaws of defeat


Advertisement