bennyl10 wrote: » Georgia seems to just be Atlanta left.. Biden would need a huge surge to turn it
Francie Barrett wrote: » Trump going mad at this, 128k votes added for Biden, 0 for everyone else. I am guessing this is just a case of the spreadsheet being updated on a cell by cell basis?
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » Why would there be a casting vote if one candidate has more electoral college votes from their 25 states?
murpho999 wrote: » https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1324007806694023169 This is hilarious from the Donald, even by his standard. He called postal voting open to fraud and encouraged Republicans not to use it and vote in person which his supporters followed. States counted in person votes first thus giving him good numbers. Postal votes after which are still ongoing and showing huge numbers for Democrats who followed advice and use the system rather than risk Covid at polling stations. Why is he now surprised that postal votes are going against him?
valoren wrote: » The fraud nonsense again. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. My guess is that after a cursory inquiry is done for show, while Trump holds office, nothing will be uncovered. Remember how Trump actually won the election last time and still touted there was fraud afoot because his ego couldn't deal with Clinton winning the popular vote? Broken record time again. You can have the likes of Farage joining Andrew Neil to deliver the opposite view point for some sense of balance, he can prattle on about electoral fraud. While Neil can obviously challenge it the problem becomes that despite having zero evidence to say such a thing, his mere presence on the show lends a small semblance of credibility and all in the notion of providing balance. He gets a platform to spout lies and it takes hold as a narrative. Thus we see electoral fraud touting specific numbers creeping into the discourse.
deathbomber wrote: » Farage came out a couple of hours ago stating the Postal voting system is fraudulent. Thick as thieves
Inquitus wrote: » Aye well Brexit is intertwined with who wins the Presidential race quite tightly, Farage would be pooping himself if Biden wins!
extra gravy wrote: » John King is back!
Dillonb3 wrote: » Andrew Neil interviewed and pulled him up over it.https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1323938999468175367 Worrying about Arizona and hard to know where the votes are coming in from. Conservatives on twitter are claiming they're in Trump's favor
alchemist33 wrote: » Fox's dials have Biden with a 95% chance in Michigan, 93% in Wisconsin and 70% in Nevada
Roanmore wrote: » Don’t have access to Fox. What is the general tone to their coverage? I know Hannity will be shouting fraud but what about the others?
kilns wrote: » Crazy story that USPS failed to deliver 27% of mail in ballots in South Florida You wont hear Trump mentioning that String in bow of Dems if Trumps goes legal as they may be allowed to count these votes and as evidence has proved the majority of mail in ballots are democrats and that would flip Florida
Quin_Dub wrote: » We're discussing the scenario of a 269-269 draw leading to a House vote on the President , which is on a State by State basis. It is possible for the House to be drawn 25-25 in the State head to head , hence the need for a casting vote. It's a highly unlikely scenario given the state of play right now , but just musing.
spacecoyote wrote: » Is there a source for that?
The order came after the Postal Service filed data in court Tuesday that showed about 300,000 ballots nationwide that haven’t been scanned to confirm they were delivered, even though USPS says they were processed. USPS also shared data that revealed low on-time delivery scores of completed ballots, including about 74% in South Florida.
sheeplover55 wrote: » Calm and neutral. Brett Baier and McMallum hosting with Juan Williams, Chris Wallace among others on the panel.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eaabbaf8a16773590ee22dd6c15f1d68.svg)
