Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part V - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1310311313315316329

Comments

  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    And you wonder why only Noxx shares your point of view?

    And the majority of people in the country too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    And the majority of people in the country too.

    Shh, they think this thread reflects reality


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    Why are they leaking their plans to the press before consulting with the government?? I'd consider that extremely malicious, and no way to conduct business.

    Yeah, that's pretty unprofessional.

    However, I am discussing their overall decisions, the ones that matter - aren't you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Didn't see any dissections or crushings tbh, certainly not with any factual basis anyway. Just a load of pile ons and a wiki page with some unverifiable spiel about cushy numbers.

    That's what happens when you try argue with an echo chamber I guess.


    Keep talking about Belarus there sure :confused:

    Look. 4 people died with positive PCR test in August in a country of 4,900,000.

    34 people died with positive PCR test in September in a country of 4,900,000.

    Now, on average over the last 2 months (and I am sure if July is added this wont change that much at all) 0.0003% of our population died with positive PCR test.

    And you want hundreds of thousands to go on PUP, schools to shut down as teachers are pushing for (who ironically enough come across quite uneducated to be able to calculate or interpret risk) and hundreds of thousands confined to their homes because of these cushy numbers?

    You might not want that. But NPHET think thats an adequate response. And you are eager to defend NPHET. so please, based on factual numbers outlined above, tell us why should we put 1 single 20 year old working in a corner coffee shop on PUP for minimum of 3 weeks, let alone 100,000+?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Yeah, that's pretty unprofessional.

    However, I am discussing their overall decisions, the ones that matter - aren't you?

    Do you think its possible that NPHET are doing other things quite unprofessionally also? Or thats their only short coming?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 982 ✭✭✭Rrrrrr2


    Didn't see any dissections or crushings tbh, certainly not with any factual basis anyway. Just a load of pile ons and a wiki page with some unverifiable spiel about cushy numbers.

    That's what happens when you try argue with an echo chamber I guess.



    Keep talking about Belarus there sure :confused:

    Of course you didn’t because you appear like the kind of person that doesn’t enjoying listening to other people.
    I’m not sure what your confusion with the Belarus comparison is- it’s an autocracy where one opinion is allowed. Your constant dismissals mirror that kind of thinking


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    And the majority of people in the country too.

    Do you honestly believe that the majority are in favour of measures that would see hundreds of thousands out of work, struggling to pay rent and bills on 300 a week, and the inevitable rise in homelessness, failed business and mental health issues that will come along with it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    How so?

    A tiny bit of power and they want to close the country down.

    We know the mortality rate for Covid is 0.3%. We know it generally only effects those over 65 with chronic underlying conditions, bar a miniscule amount of outliers. Lockdown is a nuke to break open a peanut. Most people who get it won't ever know they had it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,199 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Whens the meeting of the legion of doom ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Do you honestly believe that the majority are in favour of measures that would see hundreds of thousands out of work, struggling to pay rent and bills on 300 a week, and the inevitable rise in homelessness, failed business and mental health issues that will come along with it?

    There is another thread on boards where 47% of respondents (over 220 people) think NPHET should be disbanded.

    With the other 53% (Nox has voted here I assume) are in favour of keeping them.

    Let alone tolerating more crazy restrictions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,551 ✭✭✭RoryMac


    Yeah, that's pretty unprofessional.

    However, I am discussing their overall decisions, the ones that matter - aren't you?

    What would you call NPHET's handling of crisis in regards to nursing & care homes at the start of the pandemic? Making statements that the nursing homes restricting visitors wasn't something they would recommend?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    rusty cole wrote: »

    Professor Sam McConkey has warned that we could see curfews under a Level Six lockdown.


    :rolleyes:

    Sam McConkey must be Gerry Killeens brother.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Shh, they think this thread reflects reality

    I listened to a vox Pop on Radio 1 earlier. It appears based on a sample you and nox are wrong about the majority claim .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    There is another thread on boards where 47% of respondents (over 220 people) think NPHET should be disbanded.

    With the other 53% (Nox has voted here I assume) are in favour of keeping them.

    Let alone tolerating more crazy restrictions.

    I don't want NPHET disbanded, their job is to focus solely on the medical side of things.

    I'm not in favor of the government blindly taking their advice without having a shred of a workable plan, and then encouraging people to kick down on each other, while spouting ****e about "in this together"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,293 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Professor Sam McConkey has warned that we could see curfews under a Level Six lockdown.:rolleyes:
    Sam McConkey must be Gerry Killeens brother.

    I wish they'd stop giving McConkey airtime! He's pursuing a zero covid strategy that just isn't workable for Ireland... I always put him on mute if I see him on TV..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    I don't want NPHET disbanded, their job is to focus solely on the medical side of things.

    I'm not in favor of the government blindly taking their advice without having a shred of a workable plan, and then encouraging people to kick down on each other, while spouting ****e about "in this together"

    In theory yes. In practice they are national public health emergency team.

    Until there is an emergency, they really shouldnt be in existence. Waste of tax payers money.

    Instead of focusing on medical side of things they should focus on how to improve our healthcare system


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,378 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    There is another thread on boards where 47% of respondents (over 220 people) think NPHET should be disbanded.

    With the other 53% (Nox has voted here I assume) are in favour of keeping them.

    Let alone tolerating more crazy restrictions.
    Boards.ie does not reflect real-life.....

    If it did the president of ireland would be Peter Casey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    Look. 4 people died with positive PCR test in August in a country of 4,900,000.

    34 people died with positive PCR test in September in a country of 4,900,000.

    Now, on average over the last 2 months (and I am sure if July is added this wont change that much at all) 0.0003% of our population died with positive PCR test.

    And you want hundreds of thousands to go on PUP, schools to shut down as teachers are pushing for (who ironically enough come across quite uneducated to be able to calculate or interpret risk) and hundreds of thousands confined to their homes because of these cushy numbers?

    You might not want that. But NPHET think thats an adequate response. And you are eager to defend NPHET. so please, based on factual numbers outlined above, tell us why should we put 1 single 20 year old working in a corner coffee shop on PUP for minimum of 3 weeks, let alone 100,000+?



    Before I say anything - I don't want any of it to be honest, none of it! I want normality, Im sure you do too but unfortunately that's not an option.


    They are taking more into account than the ratio of deaths to overall population to be fair. What exactly they take into account is probably out there to be viewed in the form of meeting minutes. I am concerned from watching the trend in other countries where cases spike and the people go scrambling afterward. One thing I know of and that does worry me is - hospital staff levels - never been more absent staff in recent memory - mostly due to either waiting for tests, waiting for results, positive tests, close contacts etc. This massively affects the ability of the health service to function whether on covid or other diseases.

    I am not arguing for level 5 restrictions or any level in particular, I am arguing against the vitriol NPHET are receiving.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    I listened to a vox Pop on Radio 1 earlier. It appears based on a sample you and nox are wrong about the majority claim .

    Was it newstalk by chance?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭ThewhiteJesus


    they can bring level 5 in all they like it won't be obeyed.
    In fact it could start a riot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    they can bring level 5 in all they like it won't be obeyed.
    In fact it could start a riot

    Unfortunately, we don't do revolution very well in our country.......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Tacitus Kilgore


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Unfortunately, we don't do revolution very well in our country.......

    :pac:


    No history of rebellion whatsoever sure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,227 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Why are they leaking their plans to the press before consulting with the government?? I'd consider that extremely malicious, and no way to conduct business.

    Glynn and Nolan have been doing this for a few weeks now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    they can bring level 5 in all they like it won't be obeyed.
    In fact it could start a riot

    You lads are seriously underestimating the docile nature of the Irish. People will bitch and moan online and at home, but little will happen. This would need to go on for years before the Irish would even consider a proper revolt.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    :pac:


    No history of rebellion whatsoever sure


    I didn't say we don't do it, I said we don't do it well.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭dubdaymo


    I am not arguing for level 5 restrictions or any level in particular, I am arguing against the vitriol NPHET are receiving.
    They're receiving because they deserve it although it's probably not their fault. It's clear the whole business has blown their minds. Their intellect is paralysed, unable to think straight or with any common sense. They've been thinking Covid, Covid, Covid for month after month 24/7. They need to go away (or be sent) somewhere quiet and relaxing with appropriate medication to assist in their recovery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭Jizique


    Professor Sam McConkey has warned that we could see curfews under a Level Six lockdown.


    :rolleyes:

    Sam McConkey must be Gerry Killeens brother.

    He wasn’t like that at the start but has definitely taken the cool-aid


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    TomTomTim wrote: »
    You lads are seriously underestimating the docile nature of the Irish. People will bitch and moan online and at home, but little will happen. This would need to go on for years before the Irish would even consider a proper revolt.

    Maybe.

    But maybe those thousand people blocking Grafton street is a sign of things to come. You have to remember that mortgage breaks have expired just over 5 days ago. PUP has been reduced to 300 eurs just like 2 weeks ago or something recent? Give it time. A month or two, and that 15% of unemployed crowd (excludes Noxx as he has a job) will start getting agitated.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement