2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:02AM

pjohnson wrote: »

I assume you also criticise Melania?

24 years between her and Trumpy Wumpy.

And Macron should be denounced too

pjohnson · 01-10-2020 09:04AM

duploelabs wrote: »

And Macron should be denounced too

Trumpy Pumpys favourite pornstar is a decade younger than Melania.

But its the womans fault of course :pac:

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:06AM

pjohnson wrote:

I assume you also criticise Melania?
24 years between her and Trumpy Wumpy.

Has she ran for office? I do not look at people who don't run for office unless I'd like them to run, like Michele Obama. And before you think I'm saying anything about Michele Obama I'm not, she is a great woman imo. I would have liked her to get involved in this race, she would have been a great vp pick if she was interested but even just being involved in the campaign would have brought a bit of calmness and respect to it.
But back to Melania, Trump is a disgusting human being. I'd be of the default position, without any information, that she followed the money because I don't think it's possible for anybody to love or want to spend their life with that man.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:07AM

duploelabs wrote:

It's an ignorant, basic, misogynistic viewpoint to say that a woman should sleep with a certain person who fits with your ideas

It's not when the basis for it is that it was not only a man 32 years her senior but also her boss.

sydthebeat · 01-10-2020 09:07AM

eagle eye wrote: »

It's not sexist to be suspicious of a good looking young woman sleeping with her boss who was over double her age at 60.

Its actually basic human biology for a woman of child bearing age to be attracted to an older man in a position of power who can easily provide. A man who was a senior in her field of career.

There is nothing suspicious at all in this, and it actually speaks more about your views that you think this is a big issue.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:08AM

eagle eye wrote: »

It's not when the basis for it is that it was not only a man 32 years her senior but also her boss.

But your default viewpoint is that a woman can only get to a position of power is by sleeping with her boss, not by virtue of her own abilities.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:09AM

sydthebeat wrote:

Its actually basic human biology for a woman of child bearing age to be attracted to an older man in a position of power who can easily provide. A man who was a senior in her field of career.

So you are saying here that she slept her way to two promotions?
Because that's exactly what this sounds like.

Deshawn · 01-10-2020 09:09AM

duploelabs wrote: »

And Macron should be denounced too

Macron is a strange one. Normally we see powerful and wealthy(usually men) people who have a younger spouse. I believe Emmanuel is with his lady a long long time. Must be true love.
Macron is doing his damnedest to turn France around from being a welfare state. I applaud him for this but don't share his particular taste in women.
As long as he is happy

Hoop66 · 01-10-2020 09:09AM

hynesie08 wrote: »

They're a misogynistic hate group who are a rally away from being a militia. They're also heavily armed because seemingly they can't win a one on one fight.

They're an incel hell's angels without the street cred, and they just got called to arms by trump.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:10AM

duploelabs wrote:

But your default viewpoint is that a woman can only get to a position of power is by sleeping with her boss, not by virtue of her own abilities.

Amazing how you missed the Tara Reade comments and my Michele Obama piece and post this.

gmisk · 01-10-2020 09:13AM

duploelabs wrote: »

It's an ignorant, basic, misogynistic viewpoint to say that a woman should sleep with a certain person who fits with your ideas

Exactly the fact the only thing some people can find to criticise her is a consensual relationship she had 25+ years ago shows how little dirt they have on her.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:14AM

duploelabs wrote:

But your default viewpoint is that a woman can only get to a position of power is by sleeping with her boss, not by virtue of her own abilities.

How many women have you ever seen me say that about?
That's a disgusting accusation to make over comments about one woman.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:15AM

gmisk wrote:

Exactly the fact the only thing some people can find to criticise her is a consensual relationship she had 25+ years ago shows how little dirt they have on her.

Again it's not exactly the fact
I've never said that about any other woman before. My comments are based on the mathematics if the situation.

salmocab · 01-10-2020 09:16AM

eagle eye wrote: »

A couple of months ago I found it shocking that people were coming on here with no information and posting links from agenda driven democrat supporters who were adamant that Tara Meade was lying despite not having any information about the alleged incident.
I never too sides on that as there are only two people who really know what, if anything, happened.

Is that not exactly what your doing here? They are the only people that know how their relationship was but your now happy to suggest she did it to get a promotion.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:19AM

eagle eye wrote: »

Again it's not exactly the fact
I've never said that about any other woman before. My comments are based on the mathematics if the situation.

Feign outrage, there goes the bingo ding ding.

You made that conclusion, wrote it, and yet naively are outraged that your comments are seen as misogynistic. Well colour me shocked

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:21AM

salmocab wrote:

Is that not exactly what your doing here? They are the only people that know how their relationship was but your now happy to suggest she did it to get a promotion.

I'm saying that it has a look about it.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:22AM

eagle eye wrote: »

I'm saying that it has a look about it.

And your default position, without any other justification, is to come to that conclusion

ohnonotgmail · 01-10-2020 09:22AM

eagle eye wrote: »

I'm saying that it has a look about it.

and your comments have the look of misogyny

sydthebeat · 01-10-2020 09:24AM

eagle eye wrote: »

So you are saying here that she slept her way to two promotions?
Because that's exactly what this sounds like.

I'm saying what I said.

Its not at difficult to comprehend.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:24AM

duploelabs wrote:

Feign outrage, there goes the bingo ding ding.
You made that conclusion, wrote it, and yet naively are outraged that your comments are seen as misogynistic. Well colour me shocked

It's not worth conversing with you if you are going to jump to accusations so quickly despite me posting about Reade and Michele Obama which shows I don't hold that position..

It appears you are just a goggled supporter of the Democrats willing to make any accusation necessary to stand on the side of all democrats.

I'm a democrat supporter but I don't wear goggles.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:25AM

ohnonotgmail wrote:

and your comments have the look of misogyny

What's your opinion in Tara Reade and Melania Trump?

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:26AM

eagle eye wrote: »

It's not worth conversing with you if you are going to jump to accusations so quickly despite me posting about Reade and Michele Obama which shows I don't hold that position..

It appears you are just a goggled supporter of the Democrats willing to make any accusation necessary to stand on the side of all democrats.

I'm a democrat supporter but I don't wear goggles.

I'm not the one jumping to conclusions, you made the misogynistic assumptions all on your own, posted it, and now are outrage that the other posters and I have read that post and l, collectively, called you out on your sexism.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:27AM

sydthebeat wrote:

I'm saying what I said.

What's your opinion on Tara Reade and Melania Trump?

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:28AM

duploelabs wrote:

I'm not the one jumping to conclusions, you made the misogynistic assumptions all on your own, posted it, and now are outrage that the other posters and I have read that post and l, collectively, called you out on your sexism.

What's your opinion in Tara Reade?

ohnonotgmail · 01-10-2020 09:28AM

eagle eye wrote: »

What's your opinion in Tara Reade and Melania Trump?

whatabout whatabout. let us stick to your misgynystic comments.

sydthebeat · 01-10-2020 09:28AM

eagle eye wrote: »

What's your opinion on Tara Reade and Melania Trump?

I thought we were taking about kamala harris?

I'll give my opinion on both those other women if the discussion goes that direction

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:29AM

eagle eye wrote: »

What's your opinion in Tara Reade?

In what context? We're discussing Kamala Harris

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:31AM

duploelabs wrote:

In what context? We're discussing Kamala Harris

As far as her allegation is concerned.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 09:32AM

ohnonotgmail wrote:

whatabout whatabout. let us stick to your misgynystic comments.

Here we get, I brought up Tara Reade a couple of posts back and how she was treated.
I'd like to hear your opinion, you that's suggesting I'm a misogynist based in my opinion of one woman.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 09:34AM

eagle eye wrote: »

As far as her allegation is concerned.

I don't believe her story has any context in your default misogynistic comments, unless you'd care to frame it for us

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Comments