Lost Werewolf - GAME THREAD

Nigel WW wrote: »

Fiona - was dying to get her go at inputting the numbers, first with the rota and then going on a solo. I thought her fake peek created more confusion around Angus than anything. Village lean on the basis that she's TWTBAW

Thats a fair comment Nigel. But I feel thats not a bad thing if we are wrong about Angus.

Oisin WW wrote: »

And neither do I Fiona.

In other news. I will most definitely not be voting for Angus this evening

I beg to differ. Youve spend a good few posts trying to say "would a villager do this".

I think you are trying to hard to appear good.

Orla WW wrote: »

How on earth is that a good point?

A poster who has said nothing can't give you a read. They should be neutral by default.

Orla WW wrote: »

Like Senan?

You had zero basis besides (hes a low poster) to accuses him.

Orla WW wrote: »

Like Senan?

Senan was a blind luck shot in the dark no matter what way you spin it. 99/100 they don't work.

Vernon WW wrote: »

Senan was a blind luck shot in the dark no matter what way you spin it. 99/100 they don't work.

Orla WW wrote: »

Nonsense.

Go into low posters you're working with a far better than 99/100 rate.

If it was a pure shot in the dark then it was a 1 in 19 shot Vern.

Add in the low poster element and those odds only decrease

There is also the fact with Senan being such a low poster - had he checked into the back room at that stage

Vernon WW wrote: »

Hi Gerty



But Gerty Never did.



A feeling on Emily but nothing solid.



Re: Emily & Fiona.



Mechanics discussion



The voice of Jacob first appears.



Interest in Emily & Fiona appears consistent. Interested in Angus survival, but then we all are.



Pushing back on Orla, makes a good point.



Fluff



Asking pointed questions.



Catching up...



Still suspect on Fiona. Consistent.



More catching up



This is to Fiona, again pushing a link with Emily.



More questions for Angus.

Not much to go on. Neutral read so far. The Emily/Fiona link as remained after the brain transplant. Nothing concrete backing it up though, but she is at least being direct. The jacob thing doesnt seem to mean anything apart from fluff.

You had your mind made up before you did this analysis.

My read on those posts is they are not super substantial in conten, but then the sub is probably trying to find their feet. Im going with leaving Gertie alone to see what they do for the day. In the meantime we have a host of other posters with more road under their wheels.

Oisin WW wrote: »

And neither do I Fiona.

In other news. I will most definitely not be voting for Angus this evening

Why do you say this?

Conor WW wrote: »

@Oisin can i have the tracker back please.

Not sure if its attached here

Conor WW wrote: »

@Oisin can i have the tracker back please.

Also just a note. There were a few judgement calls made. For example if there was no quote but the post was clearly directed at someone then I included it.

There was only a handful of them

Right so, Jacob has given me some fre time to answer a few things:


First, why Emily as a vote last night.

Emily WW wrote: »

Yeah no offence, if you've nothing to lose then grand but id rather you don't go first particularly as you generated the list of people who pick

Emily WW wrote: »

Mildly wolfy suggestion here, id say have two or three people on to beat her if required but if loads of us enter we are effectively locking out multiple people. Potential disaster later

Posts like the above in the early part of yesterday interest me because they're sort of shady without pushing anything too hard

then you've stuff like this:

Emily WW wrote: »

100%, im off the board for 4 phases anyway, Angus stinks

The Angus wagon felt pretty convenient yesterday - not saying Angus can't be a wolf but the momentum was scary how fast it built. Posts like the above try to push that wagon, but again, not too hard... At a minimum I'd be seeing one (and only one) wolf in Emily and Angus



Now Id like to talk about Fiona a bit

Fiona is interested in me but tbh it feels a bit of a contrived one - hit on a low poster, fine a reason, stick there. Theres lots of posters active on thread but...

Fiona WW wrote: »

Conor, whats your thoughts on Gerty. Shes my top pick thus far today?

Not pushing tooo hard mind, just enough to put things in peoples minds. For example

Fiona WW wrote: »

Orla waiting for Gertrude's explanation:

Just keeps it there without implicating Fiona when it doesnt work out-very subtle


What interests me in Fiona and Emily is they seem to be very close though - happy to speak up in favour of each other shall we say. It could be they just have strong village leans on each other biut its unsettling. I'm just not sure if the dynamic has a pocketted villager in there yet. Possibly the detective posts could hint at a clue though.


Lets finally touch on one really obvious thing:

Fiona WW wrote: »

Vote in as a placeholder for Gerty.

Her vote last night seemed off. Popping in outta no where to vote for Emily here are her reasons last night.



Very thin if you ask me. Seems like a common throw away vote by a wolf looking to vote anywhere.

So this morning I ask her, what her reasons were:



Here she tries to deflect. Im curious as to her reasons. Like I can explain my reasons for voting Angus, She says Emily is wolfy....OK then, show me where?



My vote stands on her until she further explains

Necro wrote: »

Game Mod:


Substitutions occurred on the Gertrude WW, Vernon WW and Barbara WW accounts overnight. Let's play nice with them ok?

Oh, what was that? The answer was on thread all along but someone ignored it to stir some ****? Surely not

Jacob says I should feel very cross about it!

Orla WW wrote: »

I think I'll be throwing a vote in on Gertrude.

Not sure how much I'll be around this evening.

And let’s have some reasons while you’re still here and before you disappear for the evening

Gerty how are you?

That Fiona point may be obvious but I doubt a wolf would make a mistake that is so easily verified. I would think that Fiona missed Necros post.

Similarly this Jacob thing is very unusual. I don't see a wolf doing something so bizarre to attract that much attention

Oisin WW wrote: »

Gerty how are you?

That Fiona point may be obvious but I doubt a wolf would make a mistake that is so easily verified. I would think that Fiona missed Necros post.

Similarly this Jacob thing is very unusual. I don't see a wolf doing something so bizarre to attract that much attention

I didnt miss it, but Its unclear exactly when the gerty account was subbed in. Overnight isnt clear. It was dark here since 730pm yesterday.