Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Lost Werewolf - GAME THREAD

1…1415171920…84

Comments

  • #482
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Youre not exactly filling me with confidence Orla. Youre play isnt exactly making sense

    Couldn't care less. You're a big boy/girl and you know where the lynch thread is.


  • #483
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    Couldn't care less. You're a big boy/girl and you know where the lynch thread is.

    But see if you are village you should be playing in the villages best interests.

    Lazily voting for the lowest poster isnt really playing the game.


  • #484
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    It seems from Conor's post that Phil was just saying that D1 votes are a crapshoot which is fair enough.

    I've no idea what your second sentence is about though. If Phil were being serious then it clearly wouldn't be a good way to decide on who to vote for

    look, its fairly easy to see how Phil is choosing his vote targets. He explains it and all. You don't need to take Conor's word for it, just read Phil's post.

    You saying that the roles were handed out before any posts were made make no sense to me, so that is the nonsencical thing.

    if numbers were 1 2 3 and 4, the targets would be stu, stu, stu and necro.

    What difference does it make that the roles were handed out before the posts were made.


  • #485
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    But see if you are village you should be playing in the villages best interests.

    Lazily voting for the lowest poster isnt really playing the game.

    How on earth is voting for the least helpful player not playing the game?

    I'm trying to get rid of the fodder.

    Nobody has a clue who is where. Voting for lowest poster is as good as any other. Stop pretending you're some sage. You're as clueless as everyone else.


  • #486
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Angus WW wrote: »
    It’s funny when you write “no response to this” when you haven’t asked a question. I’m adding you to my own list because you composed this rubbish.

    FFA#1
    Orla
    Emily
    Tbc

    Cool, good come back!

    Why did you say Fiona picked me to go first? (She didnt)

    Why have you created narratives that I bullied Fiona into going first? (I Didn't)

    Why have you been overly defensive first with Fiona, then with me?

    Why didn't you input the numbers like you said you would? (You didn't)

    Why did I go from not being trusted, to you only worrying that Orla would get in there first?


  • Advertisement
  • #487
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Post Counts FWIW:
    Abigail WW |23
    Angus WW |34
    Barbara WW |1
    Brendan WW |15
    Conor WW |35
    Derry WW |34
    Emily WW |23
    Fiona WW |104
    Frank WW |13
    Gertrude WW |2
    Henry WW |2
    Isla WW |7
    Mary WW |8
    Nigel WW |9
    Oisin WW |24
    Orla WW |51
    Patrick WW |14
    Phil WW |24
    Senan WW |1
    Steve WW |14
    Tegan WW |2
    Vernon WW |6
    Wendy WW |16


  • #488
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    look, its fairly easy to see how Phil is choosing his vote targets. He explains it and all. You don't need to take Conor's word for it, just read Phil's post.

    You saying that the roles were handed out before any posts were made make no sense to me, so that is the nonsencical thing.

    if numbers were 1 2 3 and 4, the targets would be stu, stu, stu and necro.

    What difference does it make that the roles were handed out before the posts were made.

    Its nonsensical really!

    Also Phil seemed to forget he was one of the 6 posters he identified


  • #489
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    look, its fairly easy to see how Phil is choosing his vote targets. He explains it and all. You don't need to take Conor's word for it, just read Phil's post.

    You saying that the roles were handed out before any posts were made make no sense to me, so that is the nonsencical thing.

    if numbers were 1 2 3 and 4, the targets would be stu, stu, stu and necro.

    What difference does it make that the roles were handed out before the posts were made.

    Okay, so if Phil is serious about choosing his targets in that way, I presume it's because he thinks that the numbers/code is some sort of clue about who the wolves are.

    It's not possible for there to be a relationship between the numbers/code and the order in which players posted because the mods handed out the roles and created the numbers/code before anyone posted.


  • #490
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    How on earth is voting for the least helpful player not playing the game?

    I'm trying to get rid of the fodder.

    Nobody has a clue who is where. Voting for lowest poster is as good as any other. Stop pretending you're some sage. You're as clueless as everyone else.

    By the same token, I could vote for you as your fodder, your lazily voting for folks.

    I may not know whos wolfy but I at least try play this game. I try read people bases off their play.

    You cant read Senan as hes done nothing.

    Its lazy play.


  • #491
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    look, its fairly easy to see how Phil is choosing his vote targets. He explains it and all. You don't need to take Conor's word for it, just read Phil's post.

    You saying that the roles were handed out before any posts were made make no sense to me, so that is the nonsencical thing.

    if numbers were 1 2 3 and 4, the targets would be stu, stu, stu and necro.

    What difference does it make that the roles were handed out before the posts were made.

    This has to be the most stupid meta conversation on ww. (not ww meta, general meta).

    "roles were handed out before any posts were made" makes perfect sense. Phil choosing randomly by applying the 'numbers' to the post list which is random in itself doesnt make sense. If Phil is saying there is method to his madness, there isnt. He is choosing randomly. If he says he is choosing randomly then....well i dont think its a good approach but fair enough; at least its not nonsense.


  • Advertisement
  • #492
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    By the same token, I could vote for you as your fodder, your lazily voting for folks.

    I may not know whos wolfy but I at least try play this game. I try read people bases off their play.

    You cant read Senan as hes done nothing.

    Its lazy play.

    You content now?


  • #493
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Its getting late in the day, so my FFA is

    London 'I am a wolf' Derry
    Bren 'I like to let the match burn down to my fingertips' dan
    TBC - will update later if someone strikes me as wolfie.


  • #494
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    You content now?

    Youve proved my point. Lazy ass player.

    Village or wolf, its lazy.


  • #495
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Wendy WW wrote: »
    First :D
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Ok,

    Im am volunteering myself to be the first to enter the numbers.

    Ive the least to lose and I am willing to go first, the canary in the mine so to speak.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    How could you possibly know that? Even if you’re NRV you are not the only one so why should it be you?
    Derry WW wrote: »
    And go.

    I love these massive aggressive posts. Can you not just take what's said at face value
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    I could but I don’t want to
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Yea you are reading it right, thread will probably be posted when the first phase officially kicks off
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Ok, maybe I am not the one with 'the least' but I have nothing to lose.

    My offer stands.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Morning all, where does one get breakfast around here?
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    I don’t know the theme, can someone explain the black smoke stuff Necro is posting.
    Frank WW wrote: »
    Does anyone really know the theme. The black smoke changed meanings as the show went on, what it was originally intended for changed as the new set of writers got their go at writing an episode.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_in_Black_(Lost)
    Steve WW wrote: »
    If you are say Mr Eko... I'd be worried
    ekownd.gif
    Frank WW wrote: »
    The smoke monster was a character referred to as the man in black. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_in_Black_(Lost)

    I don't pretend to understand the character, but it doesn't sound like something that was controlled in the series, but more as a different physical representation of a character which would appear later in the show in human form.
    Derry WW wrote: »
    An SK would make sense with that as a theory
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    But as pointed out earlier there is no SK in the win conditions
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    It doesnt mean there isnt an SK yet though. Mod secrets and reveals n all that.

    But I agree, no reason to think an SK exists for sure.
    Phil WW wrote: »
    So what’s our plan with the code. Do we need to make a rota or what?
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    I don’t think there is any harm having a rota.
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Im happy to go with a rota. Again I dont mind being the proverbial canary
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    I’m happy to be included too, day phase suits me better
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Anyone oppsed to me going first and Wendy second?
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Morning all.

    I’m ok with the roster being randomised, happy to go in any day phase required
    Oisin WW wrote: »
    So Frank and Emily have the numbers done. That wasn't so hard now was it.

    Too bad Tegan. I'd say they were hoping for a roled goodie laying low.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    No Emily has them done, Frank got locked out for posting too early. Numbers need to be posted again after 11
    Emily WW wrote: »
    I got a prize for entering the numbers, its not a peek unfortunately or a bullet
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Can you say what it is? Does it help the village?
    Emily WW wrote: »
    I can! Its for use at lynch time! It affects the lynch votes, might leave it there for the moment though
    Isla WW wrote: »
    what sort of prize would be detrimental to village if Abi is village? surely only detrimental to village if Abi is wolf
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    I think Conor meant unless it was detrimental to the village to announce what the prize was, not that the prize would be detrimental
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Ok so we can put the numbers aside now until later on and no more can be entered until night phase
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Yes.

    Im surprised more folk didnt attempt to input the numbers. Wolves potentially playing it safe or they have already won a prize themselves.

    Or Abi was a wolf.
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Whats even odder is that Orla didnt try make a play for the numbers today.

    Again, not saying its wolfy just odd.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Would a Wolf draw so much attention to themselves though?
    Fiona WW wrote: »
    I cant imagine they would.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    Interesting that both prizes are the same.

    Wonder if that means for each phase, the two players will receive the same consequence
    Phil WW wrote: »
    Henry - 4th post
    Derry - 8th post
    Wendy - 15th post
    Orla - 16th post
    Fiona - 23rd post
    Holly - 42nd post

    #FFA1
    Henry
    Wendy
    Holly

    Why those 3? Well they’re posts line up with the code and I wouldn’t be happy voting for the other three right now.

    Let’s get the ball rolling and have a chat :)

    Wendy has been watching all day and her posts are in response to someone who posted not long before her. I post an FFA and now there’s silence.
    Gonna read over all these posts again now they’re in one place.


  • #496
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Okay, so if Phil is serious about choosing his targets in that way, I presume it's because he thinks that the numbers/code is some sort of clue about who the wolves are.

    It's not possible for there to be a relationship between the numbers/code and the order in which players posted because the mods handed out the roles and created the numbers/code before anyone posted.

    okay, now i get were you are coming from.

    You are pointing out the plainly obvious and calling it nonsensical, in that phils method is probably no better than rand. Its obvious he is just picking some arbitrary way of choosing people, with no expectation that it would be better or worse than rand.


  • #497
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Just flick through the low posters while on the laptop
    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Ahoy hoy. Barb in the house
    One post from Barbs, Nada
    Tegan WW wrote: »
    Has anyone seen my luggage?
    Tegan WW wrote: »
    Things are getting interesting early on. 3 wolves on 23 players isn’t enough so I don’t think it will stay that way. No mention of an sk in the wincon so for no I’m assuming it’s a random mod driven event. The series arc would say smokey is a bit more than that though so I’m guessing there are a few mod surprises coming over the next few days

    (Well, Necros involved so of course there are mod surprises....)
    Tegan dead, no idea why unless her 3 wolves with possible conversion insinuation landed on something
    Gertrude WW wrote: »
    morning folks
    Gertie, loads of craic
    Henry WW wrote: »
    Good evening fellow survivors. That was one mighty bumpy landing. I shall be sending a strongly worded email as soon as I get signal!
    Henry WW wrote: »
    Trying to be helpful? Or trying to make it look like you're trying to be helpful?
    Henry, nothing interesting at all
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    I’m lost.
    First post
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    4 8 15 16 23 42 - You should embed this sequence of numbers into your minds, survivors.

    The sequence must be entered TWICE per phase, starting on Day 1. Each input of the sequence must be carried out by a single person. There will be a 60 minute lockout between each input of the sequence where any other inputs will not be recognised. Once a player enters the sequence, that same player cannot do so again for the next 4 inputs.

    Phases are defined as the following...

    Day Phase: 10am to 8.59pm
    Night Phase: 9pm to 9.59am

    Failure to input the numbers twice in each phase as directed above will result in SYSTEM FAILURE. This would have a devastating outcome for all sides.

    Ok, am I reading this right?

    One person has to type in that number twice between 10-8.59 or 9pm-9.59am or something funky might happen? So if a person does it on Monday they can’t do another code until weds night?

    thread.

    ***ONLY USE THE NUMBERS THREAD FOR ENTERING NUMBERS, ANY MISPOSTS INTENDED FOR THE GAME THREAD OR LYNCH THREAD WILL RESULT IN THE OFFENDER BEING LOCKED OUT FOR THE PROCEEDING 4 INPUTS***

    Does this mean there should be a number thread to enter the numbers?
    mechanics
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    51867871.jpg

    Fair warning: It says There will be a 60 minute lockout between each input of the sequence where any other inputs will not be recognised. . That may mean you need to wait an hour to input again.
    Mechanics
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    Morning all, sorry I haven’t been around, only just getting up as I don’t feel great.

    Will try and catch up and get more involved as the day progresses.
    Will try be around more
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    I was thinking this, what would happen if more then one person enters the numbers. Does anybody want to find out?
    Reply to me about mechanics
    Vernon WW wrote: »
    tenor.gif

    And a gif!

    Vernon with nonsense posting here for the sake of it really


  • #498
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Youve proved my point. Lazy ass player.

    Village or wolf, its lazy.


    Contrary ass player.


  • #499
    Necro
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 57,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    XTgq.gif

    Moderator: Current Affairs/IMHO, Soccer, Pro Wrestling, State Benefits



  • #500
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Post Counts FWIW:
    Abigail WW |23
    Angus WW |34
    Barbara WW |1
    Brendan WW |15
    Conor WW |35
    Derry WW |34
    Emily WW |23
    Fiona WW |104
    Frank WW |13
    Gertrude WW |2
    Henry WW |2
    Isla WW |7
    Mary WW |8
    Nigel WW |9
    Oisin WW |24
    Orla WW |51
    Patrick WW |14
    Phil WW |24
    Senan WW |1
    Steve WW |14
    Tegan WW |2
    Vernon WW |6
    Wendy WW |16

    Is this post count correct? I can find a senan post or am I going mad


  • #501
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,864 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    okay, now i get were you are coming from.

    You are pointing out the plainly obvious and calling it nonsensical, in that phils method is probably no better than rand. Its obvious he is just picking some arbitrary way of choosing people, with no expectation that it would be better or worse than rand.

    So plainly obvious it had to be explained to you twice!!! :D


  • Advertisement
  • #502
    Necro
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 57,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    tenor.gif?itemid=10544055

    Moderator: Current Affairs/IMHO, Soccer, Pro Wrestling, State Benefits



  • #503
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Is this post count correct? I can find a senan post or am I going mad

    Ok it says Senan has one post but I cant find it? Deleted?


  • #504
    Necro
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 57,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Moderator: Current Affairs/IMHO, Soccer, Pro Wrestling, State Benefits



  • #505
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fare thee well.


  • #506
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Not loving the fact I have post twice directly after that black smoke thing :o


  • #507
    Fiona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,745 ✭✭✭Fiona WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    Contrary ass player.

    Im done with this. Ive proved my point. Instead of argueing, grandstanding and counter voting, do some detective work.


  • #508
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Ok it says Senan has one post but I cant find it? Deleted?

    Anon accounts cannot delete posts.


  • #509
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Orla WW wrote: »
    Anon accounts cannot delete posts.

    So boards is just taking the piss so! Nothing unusual there


  • #510
    Orla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Fiona WW wrote: »
    Im done with this. Ive proved my point. Instead of argueing, grandstanding and counter voting, do some detective work.

    I would if you left me alone. I've spent the last several hours responding to your gripes and complaints.

    If I hadn't responded to you you'd be still whingeing.


  • Advertisement
  • #511
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    So plainly obvious it had to be explained to you twice!!! :D

    It was plainly obvious to me that the method had nothing to do with when roles were handed out. That was a red herring thrown into the mix by you, for no reason at all.


Advertisement