Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1141142144146147324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,596 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Will the shops have trained staff to mind shoppers kids outside these alcohol areas?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,214 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Will the shops have trained staff to mind shoppers kids outside these alcohol areas?

    Why would they? Do pubs have trained staff to look after kids? Do other paces have trained staff to look after kids; dentist, doctor etc.

    Kids are allowed into the alcohol sections, just not buy the product.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,610 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I'm just glad I live very close to the border


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    Home entertaining isn't going away. No matter what stunts the publican lobby pull, they will have to address what an exorbitant cost they - and to be fair, the main culprits which are the handful of monopoly brewers here - charge.

    When the traditional pubs open, it'll be interesting to see how many people have got used to staying at home in terms of convenience, choice and cost, even with MUP pricing which will still be far cheaper than paying through the nose for beer in pubs.


  • Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 6,071 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quackster


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.
    I'm just glad I live very close to the border
    It'll be interesting to see what happens come January 1st as from then on you're technically limited to duty-free allowances and to cross the border with more than the applicable limits would constitute smuggling.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,357 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    I'm just glad I live very close to the border
    Oh you sweet summer child.

    This only works if both sides of the border implement similar schemes. It would be an example of cross border cooperation because both sides know exactly what would happen otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,761 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    You cannot make laws, or not make them, on the basis that it might be difficult for some people.

    If it is the right thing to do (which of course is very questionable) then whether some shops will struggle is not really an issue.

    Just like cigarette sales, smoking areas in pubs and drink driving laws, people will find a way to adapt to the new laws.

    *cough*Legalise cannabis*cough*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    You cannot make laws, or not make them, on the basis that it might be difficult for some people.

    If it is the right thing to do (which of course is very questionable) then whether some shops will struggle is not really an issue.

    Just like cigarette sales, smoking areas in pubs and drink driving laws, people will find a way to adapt to the new laws.
    But isn't that kinda how most laws are made or broken?
    When something (apart from murder or beating, rape, torture etc.) isn't deemed acceptable by some people, and if they make enough noise....
    Cannabis will likely be legalised here before 2030, just a matter of figuring out who is going to profit from it and how to appoint said people. Nothing to do with the people who are against it at this stage.
    Everything is harmful if abused.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Suckit wrote: »
    Everything is harmful if abused.

    Especially power.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    My local shop was refurbished last year and they moved the drinks section from close to where you queue up for the tills to down a special section at the back of the shop.

    The also put huge, obvious, in your face neon sinage saying "Off License" on it.

    You can't miss it.

    But what I've noticed of my own shopping habits is that previously I'd find myself browsing the drinks section and picking up something on impulse when it was close to the tills, but now I only buy alcohol when I specifically plan on doing so.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This thread has always been about politicians looking after the pub trade, and doing their buddies in the pub trade a favour at the expense of you and I the casual off license customer.

    Can someone explain how they are doing that after twice cancelling the planned reopening of pubs (and likely to do so again) and at the same time reducing the vat on booze ?

    You'd think that if they were as much in the back pocket of publicans as people here make out, that they would have found a way to reopen the majority of pubs regardless of the COVID 19 trends ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,413 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    This thread has always been about politicians looking after the pub trade, and doing their buddies in the pub trade a favour at the expense of you and I the casual off license customer.
    Can someone explain how they are doing that after twice cancelling the planned reopening of pubs (and likely to do so again) and at the same time reducing the vat on booze ?
    You'd think that if they were as much in the back pocket of publicans as people here make out, that they would have found a way to reopen the majority of pubs regardless of the COVID 19 trends ?

    It didn't get over the line just cos of those publican politicians.
    There was also support from certain drinks retailers (indie off licences) and 'cover' for it from a public health angle.
    It's a coalition.

    And by contrast big covid-19 decisions are subject to intense coverage in the media.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 11,642 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My local shop was refurbished last year and they moved the drinks section from close to where you queue up for the tills to down a special section at the back of the shop.

    The also put huge, obvious, in your face neon sinage saying "Off License" on it.

    You can't miss it.

    But what I've noticed of my own shopping habits is that previously I'd find myself browsing the drinks section and picking up something on impulse when it was close to the tills, but now I only buy alcohol when I specifically plan on doing so.

    So because your local shop is alright, then its grand.

    You should change your name to Fr "I'm alright" Jack.

    Considering shops are already under pressure due to Covid-19, is it really prudent to make things more difficult for them by bringing in this pointless legislation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,214 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So because your local shop is alright, then its grand.

    You should change your name to Fr "I'm alright" Jack.

    Considering shops are already under pressure due to Covid-19, is it really prudent to make things more difficult for them by bringing in this pointless legislation.

    Their point was that is was possible that that shop adjusted.

    Again, just because something is hard or an inconvenience doesn't mean it shouldn't be done. We hear this everytime new legislation is tried.

    Smoking ban was going cause the destruction of the pub trade, Every tightening of the drink driving limit was the signal for the end of social life. Cigarettes behind the counter meant the end of small shops.

    Humans are nothing if not creative, if there is money to be made people will find a way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Their point was that is was possible that that shop adjusted.

    Again, just because something is hard or an inconvenience doesn't mean it shouldn't be done. We hear this everytime new legislation is tried.

    Smoking ban was going cause the destruction of the pub trade, Every tightening of the drink driving limit was the signal for the end of social life. Cigarettes behind the counter meant the end of small shops.

    Humans are nothing if not creative, if there is money to be made people will find a way

    that is fine if there is a point to what is being done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,144 ✭✭✭amadangomor


    *cough*Legalise cannabis*cough*

    Watch that stoner's cough dude :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,214 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    that is fine if there is a point to what is being done.

    Totally agree, which I stated in my earlier post.

    But the post I was responding to was waking the point that shops would struggle. Not that the law would be unwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,413 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Their point was that is was possible that that shop adjusted. Again, just because something is hard or an inconvenience doesn't mean it shouldn't be done. We hear this everytime new legislation is tried.
    Smoking ban was going cause the destruction of the pub trade, Every tightening of the drink driving limit was the signal for the end of social life. Cigarettes behind the counter meant the end of small shops.
    Humans are nothing if not creative, if there is money to be made people will find a way

    Yes it can be overplayed but there's a limit to how much costs you can load onto small businesses before they go under. And people wonder what happened their local X and they have to go to Tesco now for anything.
    It can be very hard to say which straw broke the camel's back.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Totally agree, which I stated in my earlier post.

    But the post I was responding to was waking the point that shops would struggle. Not that the law would be unwise.

    shops will struggle. especially smaller ones. and all for no good reason.


  • Posts: 11,642 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Totally agree, which I stated in my earlier post.

    But the post I was responding to was waking the point that shops would struggle. Not that the law would be unwise.

    The example given which I replied to was a shop which underwent a refurbishment, something which presumeably they had been saving up for and had the funds to do it.

    That won't be the case for most shops. This is an additional cost at a time when many are already struggling.

    I also think the law is completely pointless and will achieve nothing whatsoever.

    I'm off now to buy some alcohol, and even if I had to go down 2 flights of stairs to the basement where it's now being sold, I'd still be going to buy it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,261 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/fatal-flaw-in-minimum-alcohol-pricing-1.4335130

    A letter in yesterday's Irish Times in which Sean Barrett of TCD outlines the case against MUP from an economic and taxation viewpoint.

    Worth remembering that as a Senator he was the only member of the Oireachtas to raise his voice against MUP.

    The rest of them swallowed it whole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Last Saturday's Irish TImes had a front page ad saying "alcohol is too cheap". Whatever group is behind it is too cowardly to give their name, but no prizes for guessing :rolleyes:


    This is the article Barrett was responding to:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/alcohol-selling-for-pocket-money-prices-says-lobby-group-1.4334312
    “Throughout the Covid-19 crisis we have witnessed a significant shift in alcohol use, with hyper-competitive pricing fuelling a massive surge in off-trade sales and an increase in domestic drinking,” said Dr Joe Barry, adjunct professor of public health medicine at Trinity College Dublin.

    Two outright lies in that little paragraph. Everybody could see that there were fewer and less attractive supermarket alcohol offers during lockdown, it was a captive market. And he implies that people were drinking more - yes they were drinking more at home, but nothing in restaurants and pubs.

    Overall alcohol consumption went down.

    Disgraceful that they can spout stuff like this and the media just parrot it and never challenge it.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,413 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Last Saturday's Irish TImes had a front page ad saying "alcohol is too cheap". Whatever group is behind it is too cowardly to give their name, but no prizes for guessing :rolleyes:

    Thread here discussing it querying some of the ABVs and bottle sizes... one blatant mistake:
    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2058106285/1

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,413 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Geuze wrote: »
    Ireland is in second place.[/url]

    Lies, damn lies.

    Drink must be cheap. Everyone with an agenda or who has never bought a drink anywhere else in the EU says so.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,214 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Is that graph relative to average wages or similar benchmark or just a flat price comparison?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,131 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    People really are conned into thinking there's such thing as cheap in Ireland. Even the UK is so much cheaper. I remember when living in London I could just drop into a corner shop (at any time of the day or night) and buy a can of Zywiec or Tyskie for 1 pound, or cheaper stuff for 80p. This is almost half the price of what you pay here.
    It's not just off licences. In most restaurants here you're lucky to get the cheapest bottle of wine for less than 25 euros, you could nearly always get a 9.99 bottle in London.
    We are already ripped off in this kip but we seem to have a large loud cohort of Holy Joe Nanny State **** who think they know what's best for us, and the media give them plenty of time on the airwaves.
    No person on the street is in favour of MUP, but it's going to happen anyway - that sounds like a dictatorship to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,519 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    If they're so concerned give cards to social welfare recipients and have it it can only pay for essential items, basically anything but drink or smokes.... Simples.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,782 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Is that graph relative to average wages or similar benchmark or just a flat price comparison?

    Relative to EU27 average.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    Way too much inertia on this topic. The Adam Smith Institute had some interviews on Irish TV against MUP. I am sure they are will to do criticisms for the Irish press if they were encouraged.


Advertisement