Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1125126128130131334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭awsah


    Aoibhin511 wrote: »
    I have my tabs colour coded by topic or group of topics that are likely to be mixed. For example EVerything institutions related it pink, Direct Effect and MS liability are yellow and Goods is green.
    I did the same with company when I did it and it worked grand.

    Great, thank you, that's a great help!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭lawgrad15


    awsah wrote: »
    Great, thank you, that's a great help!

    Definitely tab and highlight as much as you can. It will take you some time to do but is absolutely worth it in the exam. Also as suggested earlier, it's a really good idea to use different colours, both tabs and highlighters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭Law101


    TORT

    Would I get away with not covering product liability and limitations? I’ve covered everything else. Burnt out at this stage and can’t be arsed!! Still have to do Eu this week and next, more revision though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Law101 wrote: »
    TORT

    Would I get away with not covering product liability and limitations? I’ve covered everything else. Burnt out at this stage and can’t be arsed!! Still have to do Eu this week and next, more revision though.

    Products came up last paper so you might so safe there, personally I am covering Limitations, I think it's due up but the paper is impossible to predict so it easily could no come up. That said if you are covering everything else even if they did come up you would still have 5+ questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭Lallers96


    Tort is very hard predict. I think it was defamation that came up 5 sittings in a row.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭lawgrad15


    From Law Society FB page: "If you are sitting FE-1 examinations in August, please complete this self-declaration form by Monday 3 August: http://ow.ly/Ltxv30r19kA"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭Healyjhow


    Thanks so much
    awsah wrote: »
    I do not have the paper but an older post gave these as the question topics:
    1. Essay: General Principles of Eu Law
    2. Essay: Institutions and Types of Legislation
    3. Problem Question: Direct and Indirect Effect and MS Liability
    4. Essay: Judicial Review
    5. Problem Question: Goods Article 34-3
    6. Problem Question: Citizenship and Workers
    7. Case Note
    8. Essay: Competition Law (State Aid- Art 106)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Bask453


    Does anyone recommend any specific brand of nutshells for EU? Looking to buy one that will hopefully help with condensing/cramming in these last few weeks

    Mod
    Sorry, no such recommendations allowed on this forum


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 MrAlex123


    awsah wrote: »
    I do not have the paper but an older post gave these as the question topics:
    1. Essay: General Principles of Eu Law
    2. Essay: Institutions and Types of Legislation
    3. Problem Question: Direct and Indirect Effect and MS Liability
    4. Essay: Judicial Review
    5. Problem Question: Goods Article 34-3
    6. Problem Question: Citizenship and Workers
    7. Case Note
    8. Essay: Competition Law (State Aid- Art 106)

    I sat EU in March and there were a couple of 'predictions' which didn't materialise - IMO worth while covering them for the repeat;

    FMOG A30 / A110 is due a run.
    Institution Q w/focus on the courts - he's been hinting at this.
    Citizenship & equality


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    FYI for Nuisance, the Supreme Court decision for UCC v ESB was delivered by the SC in July of this year.

    Obviously this won't influence the paper as it would have been set well before this, so Nuisance may not come up but if it does this could be essential to have. SC found for UCC, overturning the CoA so pretty big deal.

    https://www.irishlegal.com/article/supreme-court-esb-found-negligent-for-ucc-flood-damage

    "The court said that the ESB had a “special level of control over a danger”, (from Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] AC 736), and found that the case was one of the limited situations where the law imposes a duty to confer a benefit. This duty of care arises on the basis that the ESB had a “special and substantial level of control which would enable it to prevent or reduce harm arising from a flood danger”, and that the duty concerned could be specified with reasonable clarity so as not to impose an impermissibly vague obligation on the ESB."


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭Debarramike137


    Hi guys, anyone have update grid for Constitutional please?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    MrAlex123 wrote: »
    I sat EU in March and there were a couple of 'predictions' which didn't materialise - IMO worth while covering them for the repeat;

    FMOG A30 / A110 is due a run.
    Institution Q w/focus on the courts - he's been hinting at this.
    Citizenship & equality

    Any idea what kind of question could be asked about the courts? Don't have access to past papers so not sure if it has come up before


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    I have not come across any judicial angle either, except its struture ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭lawgrad49


    I have not come across any judicial angle either, except its struture ...

    Yeah same. Only other angle I could think of would be if there was a question on the role & function of the CJEU and you could tie in the concept of Judicial Activism, e.g. it was the courts through Direct Effect and Supremacy which altered the EU Legal order significantly... but I doubt you'd get a full Question on that. Perhaps it'd part of a wider Q. on discussing the major roles of each institution?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Yeah i have half a page under the institutionl structure question (oct 19 question 1) on the courts structure and jurisdiction, but very brief.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 lawd20


    Fishing for your thoughts on this 2018 Tort Q:
    "the imposition of vicarious liability requires that the act in question falls within the scope of employment but in highly skilled professions it is often difficult to delineate what that means."

    Not exactly sure how to address the "highly skilled" element of it. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 LJones18


    Any Sample Answers for Tort or EU Law?

    Would be very grateful!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 MrAlex123


    I have not come across any judicial angle either, except its struture ...

    Yup, there's more than enough in the manuals for a full question on the role of the courts / Lisbon changes, and judging by how easy the last paper was, he'd be within his right include one!

    Q1 March 2019: he included the courts as part of the institution question for the first time. He did the same with FMOS - included it as a part of a FMOG Q - then included a full FMOS question in Q6 Oct 2018.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 Booker4


    lawd20 wrote: »
    Fishing for your thoughts on this 2018 Tort Q:



    Not exactly sure how to address the "highly skilled" element of it. Thanks.

    I didn't have any specific authority for this either. I just mentioned that as low skilled workers are often given clear instructions it is easily to determine what actions qualify as the scope of employment. While highly skilled workers are usually given more responsibility and freedom. Various Claimants v Barclay's Bank might be worth a mention here too. I then tied in the case law on sexual assault with highly skilled workers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭Healyjhow


    I have tort if this is any good to you! Still trying to source EU myself
    LJones18 wrote: »
    Any Sample Answers for Tort or EU Law?

    Would be very grateful!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bozzer198


    sunnylegal wrote: »
    EU law - goods question

    What’s the difference between Comm v Greece (luxury cars) and Humblot?

    Not sure about comm v greece
    but humblot is on indirect discrimination,french tax on engine capacity, with the result that imported cars had to pay a higher tax, which didnt really effect french cars ,although the tax imposed was not based on the origin of the goods, it was still discriminatory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 lawd20


    Booker4 wrote: »
    I didn't have any specific authority for this either. I just mentioned that as low skilled workers are often given clear instructions it is easily to determine what actions qualify as the scope of employment. While highly skilled workers are usually given more responsibility and freedom. Various Claimants v Barclay's Bank might be worth a mention here too. I then tied in the case law on sexual assault with highly skilled workers.

    Yeah I was thinking along the same lines regarding freedom and independence at work, but the highly skilled threw me nonetheless. Best of luck with the exam!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 CSC1997


    Apologies, dont mean to take away from Tort and EU but if anybody has an up to date grid for Contract and Property could you DM me please? Thank you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Coopie


    What is essential to cover for EU? Thanks! Any recommendations/predictions much appreciated!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    MrAlex123 wrote: »
    Yup, there's more than enough in the manuals for a full question on the role of the courts / Lisbon changes, and judging by how easy the last paper was, he'd be within his right include one!

    Q1 March 2019: he included the courts as part of the institution question for the first time. He did the same with FMOS - included it as a part of a FMOG Q - then included a full FMOS question in Q6 Oct 2018.

    Would you be able to send me in that question that includes the courts... don’t seem to have that sitting for some reason!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Q1 Outline and discuss....most significant changes that were made by the Lisbon Treaty amendments to the internal organizations of the EU institutions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 HU123


    Aoibhin511 wrote: »
    I have my tabs colour coded by topic or group of topics that are likely to be mixed. For example EVerything institutions related it pink, Direct Effect and MS liability are yellow and Goods is green.
    I did the same with company when I did it and it worked grand.
    just want to confirm are you able to highlight as well as tab the legislation ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Aoibhin511


    HU123 wrote: »
    just want to confirm are you able to highlight as well as tab the legislation ?

    Yeah you can highight and tab but you can't write anything at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭Healyjhow


    Would anyone have sample answers for tort 2019 papers ! Could swap for other tort materials and EU materials


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Because I ran out of colors pretty quickly with EU I have used symbols on some tabs so for example I have used a pink tab for all the institutions. Plain pink for the parliament and then a pink tab with zig zag for the commission and a pink tab with horizontal lines for the courts etc.... I hope this is ok ??


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement