Madeleine McCann

SusieBlue · 15-07-2020 11:54PM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

With due respect to the disappeared child, we are just shooting the breeze here now 13 years later.

No one knows what happened, do you?

And yet that didn’t stop you from supposing that they covered up her accidental death because they were afraid of losing their medical licenses, or because they were afraid they’d be caught for leaving the kids unsupervised the night before.
Perhaps you should take your own advice.

Spanish Eyes · 15-07-2020 11:54PM

So there is no German abductor. That is amazing.

Back to the parents so.

splinter65 · 15-07-2020 11:54PM

Rock77 wrote: »

There is absolutely no way he will take it from there.......

I know. I listen to the silence.

Plumbthedepths · 15-07-2020 11:56PM

SusieBlue wrote: »

And yet that didn’t stop you from supposing that they covered up her accidental death because they were afraid of losing their medical licenses, or because they were afraid they’d be caught for leaving the kids unsupervised the night before.
Perhaps you should take your own advice.

It's a discussion forum, are you suggesting people only post what you find acceptable?

splinter65 · 15-07-2020 11:59PM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

Isn't it weird how some posters spend time discussing other posters instead of what is posted, do you find that strange? Stuck me earlier how odd that actually is, I don't think I have ever seen a thread where that behaviour is so rampant.

What’s weird is not knowing what happened in a baffling missing person case, not being able to proffer any sensible reasonable believable suggestion as to what possibly could have happened, when, where, why, how but insisting that the parents of the missing child are nonetheless responsible for covering up her death hiding her body and possibly killing her. That’s what’s weird.

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:00AM

SusieBlue wrote: »

It’s literally the only point you have. Every post you have made on every thread across this forum has been about their neglect. There is absolutely no need to continue repeating yourself ad nauseam.

And still no timeline offered up. You’d be forgiven for thinking some people here are only interested in abusing Madeleine’s parents and not in the case details.

I don't really care what you think of me. I post what I wish and if a moderator decides it it not good, well s/he can knock me out of the thread. Not up to you.

Any chance you could tell us all that the parents were great going on the lash every night leaving their precious kids alone? Nah didn't think so, they were grand eating and drinking away.

Sorry not meaning to be personal, but get a grip and think about how parents operate on holiday.

SusieBlue · 16-07-2020 12:00AM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

It's a discussion forum, are you suggesting people only post what you find acceptable?

Did you miss the post I was replying to or are you being deliberately obtuse?

What would you call it when someone repeatedly makes far fetched, unfounded claims, and then when these are rebutted they pull out the ‘well no one knows what happened’ card?
As if that gives them free reign to speculate all sorts of nonsense without having to explain how they came to their bizarre conclusions?

splinter65 · 16-07-2020 12:01AM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

It's a discussion forum, are you suggesting people only post what you find acceptable?

Accusing real live people of unspeakable crimes when you have no evidence to back up the accusations is totally unacceptable.

Plumbthedepths · 16-07-2020 12:01AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

So there is no German abductor. That is amazing.

Back to the parents so.

Said it many pages back another false dawn, someone seeking funding.

Plumbthedepths · 16-07-2020 12:04AM

splinter65 wrote: »

Accusing real live people of unspeakable crimes when you have no evidence to back up the accusations is totally unacceptable.

I didn't accuse them of an unspeakable crime so less of the hyperbolic rubbish.
Unacceptable? You really are far too invested in this.

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:06AM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

Said it many pages back another false dawn, someone seeking funding.

Could be, since most of the fund has been spent on dodgy detectives and court cases, all for Madeleine of course.

dark crystal · 16-07-2020 12:07AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

I don't really care what you think of me. I post what I wish and if a moderator decides it it not good, well s/he can knock me out of the thread. Not up to you.

Any chance you could tell us all that the parents were great going on the lash every night leaving their precious kids alone? Nah didn't think so, they were grand eating and drinking away.

Sorry not meaning to be personal, but get a grip and think about how parents operate on holiday.

Sure, repeat it there again for the thousandth time and we might finally get the point. Let me take a wild stab...you think the parents were neglectful, is it?

Still no credible theories to offer up on how the crime was committed, is it?

Plumbthedepths · 16-07-2020 12:08AM

SusieBlue wrote: »

Did you miss the post I was replying to or are you being deliberately obtuse?

What would you call it when someone repeatedly makes far fetched, unfounded claims, and then when these are rebutted they pull out the ‘well no one knows what happened’ card?
As if that gives them free reign to speculate all sorts of nonsense without having to explain how they came to their bizarre conclusions?

Its a discussion forum you and several others seem to wish to control what is said many times making your responses personal instead of dealing with the comment.
Saying you don't know what happened is a valid response to you ,as you know no more than anyone else unless you are arrogant enough to believe you do.

SusieBlue · 16-07-2020 12:10AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

I don't really care what you think of me. I post what I wish and if a moderator decides it it not good, well s/he can knock me out of the thread. Not up to you.

Any chance you could tell us all that the parents were great going on the lash every night leaving their precious kids alone? Nah didn't think so, they were grand eating and drinking away.

Sorry not meaning to be personal, but get a grip and think about how parents operate on holiday.

Yeah, again, we know. You post about it constantly.
You think they were wrong to leave the children and 99.9% of people on this thread agree with you, myself included.
The fact that you repeatedly post this over and over again umpteen times leads me to believe you actually have no interest in discussing the case, we were discussing timelines and now we’ve gone back to talking about neglect for the thousandth time.
Round and round we go.

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:12AM

dark crystal wrote: »

Sure, repeat it there again for the thousandth time and we might finally get the point. Let me take a wild stab...you think the parents were neglectful, is it?

Still no credible theories to offer up on how the crime was committed, is it?

Cannot get over the obsession with either castigating posters or having a go.

I have nothing personal against you, but honestly you have nothing much to say really. The German guy is gone now. Remember?

SusieBlue · 16-07-2020 12:14AM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

Its a discussion forum you and several others seem to wish to control what is said many times making your responses personal instead of dealing with the comment.
Saying you don't know what happened is a valid response to you ,as you know no more than anyone else unless you are arrogant enough to believe you do.

Saying no one knows what happened is perfectly reasonable.
Saying ‘you don’t know what happened’ in response to being called out for making wild unfounded allegations is quite different, and that’s what actually happened.

Perhaps we should all remember that ‘we don’t know what happened’ next time certain people make disgusting claims about Madeleines parents selling her to pedophiles or Kate murdering Madeleine in a blind rage.
I notice you don’t take issue with those posts, though.

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:14AM

SusieBlue wrote: »

Yeah, again, we know. You post about it constantly.
You think they were wrong to leave the children and 99.9% of people on this thread agree with you, myself included.
The fact that you repeatedly post this over and over again umpteen times leads me to believe you actually have no interest in discussing the case, we were discussing timelines and now we’ve gone back to talking about neglect for the thousandth time.
Round and round we go.

I don't really care much, just shooting the breeze and all that.

It is what a discussion board is about.

dark crystal · 16-07-2020 12:17AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

Cannot get over the obsession with either castigating posters or having a go.

I have nothing personal against you, but honestly you have nothing much to say really. The German guy is gone now. Remember?

Ah, the obsession card! Knew that one would be pulled out soon enough

Nothing much to say? Hmmm..people in glasses houses and all that

Oh, and for the record, where has it been stated that the German guy is 'gone'?

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:21AM

dark crystal wrote: »

Ah, the obsession card! Knew that one would be pulled out soon enough

Nothing much to say? Hmmm..people in glasses houses and all that

Oh, and for the record, where has it been stated that the German guy is 'gone'?

You will be grand it will be alright, guarantee it.

Loving the angst, although I shouldn't really.

SusieBlue · 16-07-2020 12:23AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

You will be grand it will be alright, guarantee it.

Loving the angst, although I shouldn't really.

I hope you’re aware that it’s quite clear to everyone that you’re only looking for a rise and that you’re being deliberately provocative to get a reaction, and that everyone can see that for what it is.

dark crystal · 16-07-2020 12:23AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

You will be grand it will be alright, guarantee it.

Loving the angst, although I shouldn't really.

No angst on my part Spanish Eyes, just shooting the breeze!

Everyone's just shooting the breeze here, right?

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:27AM

SusieBlue wrote: »

I hope you’re aware that it’s quite clear to everyone that you’re only looking for a rise and that you’re being deliberately provocative to get a reaction, and that everyone can see that for what it is.

Who cares Geronimo?

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:28AM

dark crystal wrote: »

No angst on my part Spanish Eyes, just shooting the breeze!

Everyone's just shooting the breeze here, right?

Fair play, thanks,

SusieBlue · 16-07-2020 12:32AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

Who cares Geronimo?

Just shooting the breeze

Spanish Eyes · 16-07-2020 12:33AM

SusieBlue wrote: »

Just shooting the breeze

Thats the spirit thanks!

nc6000 · 16-07-2020 12:36AM

splinter65 wrote: »

Maddie has an accident and dies....take it from there. Let’s hear it.

I'd also like to hear the theory behind this, what was the accident and if she did die accidentally then what happened to her body?

limnam · 16-07-2020 02:14AM

happyoutscan wrote: »

Any chance the Met decided not to investigate the McCanns as they realised it would be a ridiculously stupid waste of time?

That would make sense.

If Colin said. I'll take the case, As long as I don't have to investigate the McCanns as it's a stupid waste of time.

But that's not what he said was it.

splinter65 · 16-07-2020 06:13AM

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

You will be grand it will be alright, guarantee it.

Loving the angst, although I shouldn't really.

Why do you think the German guy is “gone”? Gone where?

Day Lewin · 16-07-2020 08:27AM

There's no question though that there ARE paedophiles, (sadly) and there were some of those around in Praia at the time.

Like nasty old CB, for instance, man with a long rap sheet for crimes against kids; others too, no doubt.

If it wasn't him, well --- then who?

The parents being parties to paedophila of their cherished little girl just doesn't seem to me like a convincing case. They raised the alarm, they searched, they never gave up searching.

If it looks like a duck and it quacks - most likely a duck

happyoutscan · 16-07-2020 09:31AM

Banana Republic. wrote: »

Whoa, wow, I do recall the talk of what Kate said but haven’t heard that in a long long time. That is very very weird language for any parent to use. Added the Gaspirs (deffo spelt it wrong) had made suggestions that Payne n Gerry talked in a disgusting manner about Madeleine. If true then the suspicion grows massively.

Gaspars statement, scroll down it’s not far down snot the incident at the table, if this is true then it shows Gerry and Payne in a very different light.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm

And ppl wonder why the Portuguese had suspicions about The Mc Canns involvement, that would snap any police force into this thinking.

At the bottom of the link you provided:

'At the time I did not feel the gesture was referring to Madeleine.'

But you can see whatever you want to see.

More ****ing nonsense.

Madeleine McCann

Comments