Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Madeleine McCann

16061636566170

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Newspaper reports today are saying this new suspect wasn't even in Portugal when Madeline disappeared

    Surprise . How many times will people fall for all this new suspect . New info stuff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,640 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Newspaper reports today are saying this new suspect wasn't even in Portugal when Madeline disappeared

    Surprise . How many times will people fall for all this new suspect . New info stuff

    Can't seem to find anything on that, can you link please?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭Rock77


    limnam wrote: »
    AFAIK she originally refused to have them tested. Then they were tested months later.

    Obviously there's no way to know if Madeleine was drugged.

    If she did refuse to have them tested. Very bizzare.

    The answer you’re looking for is no.

    There was never any evidence they drugged their kids, it’s just something somebody made up one day.

    Of course they could have drugged them, but there was never any evidence to support this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Can't seem to find anything on that, can you link please?

    Here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    Here

    That's great reporting there. The headline and the article itself says that he left days after her disappearance and the line under the photo says he left days before, genius stuff.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11890671/madeleine-mccann-suspect-christian-b-left-portugal-days-before-her-disappearance-to-set-up-drugs-network/


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I always leaned towards the McCanns probably been involved but I hope this latest development leads to something.
    It certainly doesn't appear to be your standard new person of interest.
    They are saying they have concrete evidence that she is dead. And this guy is a convicted criminal / pedo that lived in the area at the time.

    At this moment in time we don't know what the evidence is or how it connects to the suspect. Hopefully the full story will come out some day. Preferably sooner than later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭MonsterCookie


    it's painful to read all the squabbling on this thread.

    a few posters have stated what they perceive to be facts, and said 'we can all agree on'...when in fact it's obvious that we don't all agree on many aspects of the case.

    but what is common ground?

    let me try to summarise in the interests of moving the discussion forward on a more positive note:
    • everyone wants to see this case solved
    • nobody disputes that the parents should not have left the kids alone like that; the emphasis one puts on this depends greatly on the individual and their empathy (yes, Madeleine is the primary victim)
    • nobody really knows wtf happened, however:
    1. many posters have read a lot of information over the last 13 years - some of it conflicting and confusing, and none of it really conclusive
    2. some posters are not as well read and dare i say it, this doesn't stop them being judgemental of others and when cornered they shift the goalposts (this happens regardless of aforementioned predisposition)
    3. we're feeding off scraps of information coming from the tabloid media (and i include Sky in that) - BBC and RTE for example are much more reserved in what they report.
    4. the latest suspect seems to be promising on the basis of what the german prosecutor has said, and seems to be a nasty piece of work whether guilty of Madeleine's abduction and or murder or not.
    5. it could take a long time before this line of enquiry concludes so we need to be patient and keep an open mind
    6. meantime, we should all be civil to each other - otherwise it becomes very unhealthy
    have i missed anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka



    [/INDENT]
    have i missed anything?

    I agree with you. I'm mainly trying to just ignore the posts that keep going around in circles as it's been happening for 13 years now. I'm just focusing on the current and trying to keep to recent updates, the rest is insanity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    it's painful to read all the squabbling on this thread.

    a few posters have stated what they perceive to be facts, and said 'we can all agree on'...when in fact it's obvious that we don't all agree on many aspects of the case.

    but what is common ground?

    let me try to summarise in the interests of moving the discussion forward on a more positive note:
    • everyone wants to see this case solved
    • nobody disputes that the parents should not have left the kids alone like that; the emphasis one puts on this depends greatly on the individual and their empathy (yes, Madeleine is the primary victim)
    • nobody really knows wtf happened, however:
    1. many posters have read a lot of information over the last 13 years - some of it conflicting and confusing, and none of it really conclusive
    2. some posters are not as well read and dare i say it, this doesn't stop them being judgemental of others and when cornered they shift the goalposts (this happens regardless of aforementioned predisposition)
    3. we're feeding off scraps of information coming from the tabloid media (and i include Sky in that) - BBC and RTE for example are much more reserved in what they report.
    4. the latest suspect seems to be promising on the basis of what the german prosecutor has said, and seems to be a nasty piece of work whether guilty of Madeleine's abduction and or murder or not.
    5. it could take a long time before this line of enquiry concludes so we need to be patient and keep an open mind
    6. meantime, we should all be civil to each other - otherwise it becomes very unhealthy
    have i missed anything?

    7. There is as much proof the parents did it than didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭MonsterCookie


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    7. There is as much proof the parents did it than didn't.

    but what proof is there that the parents did it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭tigger123


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    7. There is as much proof the parents did it than didn't.

    There's as much proof Donald Trump did it, than didnt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Rock77 wrote: »
    The answer you’re looking for is no.

    There was never any evidence they drugged their kids, it’s just something somebody made up one day.

    Of course they could have drugged them, but there was never any evidence to support this.

    Actually the drugs thing is a deliberate slur cooked up by the Praia Da Luz Policia - probably by Amaral himself - and leaked to the press.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    7. There is as much proof the parents did it than didn't.

    You don't even understand the meaning of the word 'proof' let alone have the ability to make sense of anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    but what proof is there that the parents did it?

    What proof is they didnt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    tigger123 wrote: »
    There's as much proof Donald Trump did it, than didnt.

    Your right


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    No one can prove they didnt do it. No one can prove they did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    cnocbui wrote: »
    You don't even understand the meaning of the word 'proof' let alone have the ability to make sense of anything.

    Da dikchunairy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭MoonUnit75


    cnocbui wrote: »
    Actually the drugs thing is a deliberate slur cooked up by the Praia Da Luz Policia - probably by Amaral himself - and leaked to the press.

    The suspicion of drug use came from witness statements from the taps friends that the twins never woke up despite all the noise and commotion and being brought out into the open to go to another apartment. Plus the statement from one of the tapas friends to the police that Kate kept checking the twins were breathing and it seemed unusual at the time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    MoonUnit75 wrote: »
    The suspicion of drug use came from witness statements from the taps friends that the twins never woke up despite all the noise and commotion and being brought out into the open to go to another apartment. Plus the statement from one of the tapas friends to the police that Kate kept checking the twins were breathing and it seemed unusual at the time.

    I've raised 2 children and minded several other children through the years as a foster parent. I don't find it credible that the twins were such natural heavy sleepers that all the commotion in the apartment that night would not have woken them unless they were sedated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    I've raised 2 children and minded several other children through the years as a foster parent. I don't find it credible that the twins were such natural heavy sleepers that all the commotion in the apartment that night would not have woken them unless they were sedated.

    Once again, no evidence of sedation. No evidence of sedatives in apartment.

    With all due respect, your experience as a parent/guardian is of no bearing to anything; there was a poster earlier in the thread whose experience with her children was the complete opposite to yours, her children very heavy sleepers. Does her experience lend credence to the fact there were no sedatives used?

    It's an easy slur to throw at someone without any proof whatsoever. None, not one iota.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    MoonUnit75 wrote: »
    The suspicion of drug use came from witness statements from the taps friends that the twins never woke up despite all the noise and commotion and being brought out into the open to go to another apartment. Plus the statement from one of the tapas friends to the police that Kate kept checking the twins were breathing and it seemed unusual at the time.
    POLICE hunting for missing Madeleine McCann discovered a syringe in her parents’ bedroom, it was dramatically claimed last night

    In the latest slur against Kate and Gerry McCann, the hypodermic needle was allegedly found in a cupboard at the apartment where their daughter vanished.

    According to reports in the Portuguese press, police are examining the theory that the needle could have been used by Madeleine's parents -both doctors - to administer sedatives to their children to help them sleep.

    Hurtful and unfounded rumours in the Portuguese media claim that detectives are convinced the couple accidentally killed four-year-old Madeleine by giving her an overdose of sedatives.

    Last night a spokeswoman for the couple angrily denied the latest slurs and insisted that the McCanns had never sedated their children.

    She said: "I can categorically say the McCanns did not have syringes or sedatives with them on holiday. They do not use sedatives on their children. This story is absolute nonsense, it is totally untrue".

    The allegations are the latest in a long line of vicious attacks the McCanns have been forced to endure while desperately waiting for news of their daughter.

    But there has been a significant shift in the tone of the attacks in recent days, with a number of Portuguese papers now accusing the McCanns outright of killing their daughter.

    The respected Correio da Manha paper wrote yesterday: Madeleine's parents
    kept a tranquiliser kit in the cupboard of the Ocean Club bedroom".

    The paper went on to claim that weight was being given to the theory of an accidental overdose because the McCanns other children, two-year-old twins
    Sean and Amelie, had not woken up on the night Madeleine vanished 119 days ago, despite the noise and confusion around them.

    The paper also quoted Gerry McCann insisting that the twins were very sound sleepers and tired after an exhausting day playing in the pool.

    The allegations were attributed to a source close to the investigation, but Portuguese police last night refused to comment.

    The police, who are not allowed to speak about the investigation because of Portugal's strict secrecy laws, have always maintained that the McCanns are not and never have been suspects.

    The allegations also clash with evidence provided by British ex-pat Pamela Fenn, who lives in the apartment above the one from which Madeleine disappeared.

    Pamela Fenn

    Mrs Fenn, 81, told the police that two nights before the incident she heard a little girl loudly crying, "Daddy, daddy" in the apartment.

    She said the crying had lasted for some time, but stopped when the McCanns returned to the apartment after dinner.

    This would suggest the children were not being regularly sedated and were, in fact, wide awake after being put to bed.
    http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/4aug7/express-30-08-07.htm

    Seems to me the syringe lie kicked off the speculation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,186 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I've raised 2 children and minded several other children through the years as a foster parent. I don't find it credible that the twins were such natural heavy sleepers that all the commotion in the apartment that night would not have woken them unless they were sedated.

    I have raised two children to adulthood and my experience is you can even pick up a sleeping child and move them to their bed and they don't even wake up, let alone the noise and normal family commotion of a household.

    All the children had been out sailing that day as well as playing in the pool. I have lived in hot climates most of my life and sun, wind and water are in my experience, just about as effective as hospital grade anesthetics when combined.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Once again, no evidence of sedation. No evidence of sedatives in apartment.

    With all due respect, your experience as a parent/guardian is of no bearing to anything; there was a poster earlier in the thread whose experience with her children was the complete opposite to yours, her children very heavy sleepers.
    Considering Maddie complained to Gerry and Kate that neither of them responded to her and or her sibling the night before when they were crying contradicts the heavy sleeping claims. Funny though the children were heavy sleepers after that.
    No evidence of sedatives in the apartment means nothing tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭Rock77


    Considering Maddie complained to Gerry and Kate that neither of them responded her and her sibling the night before when they were crying contradicts the heavy sleeping claims. Funny though the children were heavy sleepers after that.

    Ah come on. You can be a heavy sleeper and still wake during the night from time to time. Maybe the twins are heavy sleepers and Madeline isn’t. There’s a lot of maybe’s there before I would say maybe they drug their kids..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Rock77 wrote: »
    Ah come on. You can be a heavy sleeper and still wake during the night from time to time. Maybe the twins are heavy sleepers and Madeline isn’t. There’s a lot of maybe’s there before I would say maybe they drug their kids..

    We'll have to disagree as I said I don't find it credible that two young children would sleep through the commotion of multiple people walking in and out the apartment ,voices raised some possibly hysterical without the aid of something. Plus Kate's checking of the children's breathing as referenced by other posters here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭MonsterCookie


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    What proof is they didnt?

    well, i could point you to what the German prosecutor has said...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Hopefully this German fella is the guy but as things stand it is doubtful

    Are you telling me that not one person seen him go into the apartment. Take a 3 year old and put her in his camper van ? Not one. Not one witness. All before 10pm which would be the busiest time . I assume she would be screaming and in hysterics . Nobody heard a thing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Hopefully this German fella is the guy but as things stand it is doubtful

    Are you telling me that not one person seen him go into the apartment. Take a 3 year old and put her in his camper van ? Not one. Not one witness. All before 10pm which would be the busiest time . I assume she would be screaming and in hysterics . Nobody heard a thing

    Apparently the McCann children were all heavy sleepers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Apparently the McCann children were all heavy sleepers.

    They weren't when they were crying for their parents a previous night


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭Rock77


    Hopefully this German fella is the guy but as things stand it is doubtful

    Are you telling me that not one person seen him go into the apartment. Take a 3 year old and put her in his camper van ? Not one. Not one witness. All before 10pm which would be the busiest time . I assume she would be screaming and in hysterics . Nobody heard a thing

    The kids were drugged apparently so she wouldn’t have been screaming at all. Which is it lads, drugged or not drugged


Advertisement