Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Madeleine McCann

178101213169

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    walshb wrote: »
    They are responsible for their children’s safety..

    And leaving three very young children alone and unattended is irresponsible...

    Yes, they didn’t abduct then. But their actions allowed someone else to..


    Yes...thanks. None of us knew this. After every rambling, finger pointing, high horse riding holier than thou poster on every single thread about this case. Ad nauseum. We didn't know. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,839 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Babooshka wrote: »
    Yes...thanks. None of us knew this. After every rambling, finger pointing, high horse riding holier than thou poster on every single thread about this case. Ad nauseum. We didn't know. Thanks.

    Great. So you agree with my post, then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    sxt wrote: »
    That was the joint conclusion by both the British and Portuguese investigators involved in this case. This was thier conclusion after years of investigating. That was what they signed off on when they gave their final report to the Public prosecutor

    Have you a link to where the British police came to the conclusion that the parents were involved. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    walshb wrote: »
    Great. So you agree with my post, then?

    I agree that they presented an opportunity to an evil ****. Yes. Does that make you feel all wonderful inside? Enjoy. You're welcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    walshb wrote: »
    They are responsible for their children’s safety..

    And leaving three very young children alone and unattended is irresponsible...

    Out of sight and ear shot. Not unattended in the next room..Out of sight!! Unreachable if anything g bad happened..

    Yes, they didn’t abduct then. But their actions allowed someone else to..

    I am not shaming them. I feel for them. Heartbreaking...But their choices led to the loss of that child.

    And their choice was reckless and completely unnecessary..

    Everyone knows it was irresponsible. What purpose does it serve to obsessively bring it up 13 years later and constantly berate them over, as if it’s a matter of fact that happened to bypass us all? Everyone knows it was irresponsible. No one knows it more than they do. Do you not see the pain etched on Kate’s face? How can people still consistently bash them for something they are paying the ultimate price for, and some do it with such malice. They made a catastrophic error in judgement. Did they deserve to lose their child for it? No. They are victims too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    sxt wrote: »
    Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida told the court that he believed the couple, from Rothley, Leicestershire, were directly involved in Madeleine’s disappearance – a theory he said was shared by Portuguese and British officers working on the case.

    He said: “The conclusion that was arrived at was that Madeleine McCann died at the apartment and the McCann couple simulated the abduction to hide the fact that they had not taken care of their children.

    “There was a tragic accident in the apartment that night and they neglected the care of their children. It was the conclusion of both Portuguese and British police. We have always spoken of a tragic accidental death. There was no homicide.”

    Which British officials were quoted by the Portuguese Police or is it just anecdotal hearsay and nothing official? Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Babooshka wrote: »
    British investigation concluded that the McCanns did it....really???

    They didn’t. But the poster is going to point us now to this report from the British police that they did. Any minute now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    Everyone knows it was irresponsible. What purpose does it serve to obsessively bring it up 13 years later and constantly berate them over, as if it’s a matter of fact that happened to bypass us all? Everyone knows it was irresponsible. No one knows it more than they do. Do you not see the pain etched on Kate’s face? How can people still consistently bash them for something they are paying the ultimate price for, and some do it with such malice. They made a catastrophic error in judgement. Did they deserve to lose their child for it? No. They are victims too.

    That's exactly what I was getting at. It doesn't need to be repeated ad nauseum with such self righteousness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    sxt wrote: »
    Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida told the court that he believed the couple, from Rothley, Leicestershire, were directly involved in Madeleine’s disappearance – a theory he said was shared by Portuguese and British officers working on the case.

    He said: “The conclusion that was arrived at was that Madeleine McCann died at the apartment and the McCann couple simulated the abduction to hide the fact that they had not taken care of their children.

    “There was a tragic accident in the apartment that night and they neglected the care of their children. It was the conclusion of both Portuguese and British police. We have always spoken of a tragic accidental death. There was no homicide.”

    If this is an official report into the investigation then it should be easy for you post a link. Honestly, I can read it myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Calpol is just paracetamol. It would not make anyone "groggy", there is nothing that causes drowsiness in it. I've read that the parents gave the kids "something" to keep them asleep but is this an actual fact or just a theory? If they admitted to giving calpol, well that doesn't imply that at all.

    Not to mention that Kate was a trained anesthesiologist and we are meant to believe that she delivered an overdose of Calpol, (an over the counter pain relief, not a sedative) a dose so high it either severely incapacitated Madeleine or it was fatal. These theories are laughable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,253 ✭✭✭mgbgt1978


    sxt wrote: »
    He was identified, questioned, and his camper van was forensically examined 13 years ago
    mgbgt1978 wrote: »
    Just misunderstanding the Facts so....:rolleyes:.
    Amaral said in 2019 that the Camper Van (I'm not going down the pidgeon english road and saying 'Trailer') had been examined in Germany . He deliberately didn't say when this happened. It has been widely reported that the German police were unable to find anything incriminating in the Camper due to the passage of time. This is because they didn't seize it until late 2018.


    Can you show anything that even hints that this Camper was examined in 2007 ?
    sxt wrote: »
    Of course I can't, but if your being investigated in a high profile case like this.. I have to presume they would be interested in his camper van

    And the vehicles and whereabouts of all other persons of interest in the area at the time


    I wouldn't waste my time arguing with opinions on this Thread.
    However when somebody states something as fact, there has to be proof that this fact is correct.
    The truth is that despite your initial assertion that this Camper was examined 13 years ago, it was first examined by the German Police almost 12 years after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
    I really don't care what you believe, but at least get your facts correct.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    LiquidZeb wrote: »
    I wonder would you be so protective of the McCann's if they were living on a council estate in Bradford and not 2 doctors? I doubt it. I suppose you feel compelled to rush to the defense of your betters for some reason.
    _Brian wrote: »
    This.
    The McCans behaved terribly, possibly illegally abandoning their kids in an unsecure apartment in a strange country to go drinking with their mates.

    The fact that they are Doctors got them a free pass on proper scrutiny over this and lots of people threw them easy money afterwards because surely these decent people could do no wrong.

    Anyone else and the rest of the kids would be taken into care.

    I can’t believe people are still making this fallacious point. The McCanns have been absolutely crucified in the media. And IMO, their background and class has been used against them a lot. There’s reverse snobbery going on a bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭screamer


    No, there are people 'speculating' that they are positive the McCanns did it. And accusing them of doing it at every opportunity. They have the moral low ground.

    I could 'speculate' that you did all manner of crimes.

    But it’s still just speculation, regardless. The problem is your reaction to it........ I personally don’t understand why people get so riled up to villify or protect 2 complete strangers being honest, it’s strange.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Demonique


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Why wouldn’t they have custody of their twins?!?

    Because their negligence meant someone was able to abduct one of their children


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    screamer wrote: »
    But it’s still just speculation, regardless. The problem is your reaction to it........ I personally don’t understand why people get so riled up to villify or protect 2 complete strangers being honest, it’s strange.

    Because even "strangers" deserve basic human decency and the little trolls name calling and the vile things they've said about the McCanns, when they wouldn't even do the same to a stranger on the street...you don't understand why that's not acceptable, just because we're all anonymous and strangers?

    Think they're guilty if you like, but the absolute vitriol posted up by some is just utterly disgusting. And they don't speak about them as if they're "strangers"...they speak about them as if they know them as cold hearted murderers that they know very well. They would treat "strangers" better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Isn't it strange though that the younger twins never woke up at all during the mayhem when it was discovered that Madeleine was missing/gone?

    Drowsy anti histamines administered is my bet. That is not to say the parents killed Madeleine or anything like it, but think about it FGS. The whole thing stinks IMO.

    We can have opinions can't we?

    I await the opprobrium heading my way....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Everyone knows it was irresponsible. What purpose does it serve to obsessively bring it up 13 years later and constantly berate them over, as if it’s a matter of fact that happened to bypass us all? Everyone knows it was irresponsible. No one knows it more than they do. Do you not see the pain etched on Kate’s face? How can people still consistently bash them for something they are paying the ultimate price for, and some do it with such malice. They made a catastrophic error in judgement. Did they deserve to lose their child for it? No. They are victims too.

    Yet the McCanns insist that they thought it was safe. Gerry said that they sought legal advice afterwards and had been assured that what they did was "well within the bounds of reasonable parenting".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 840 ✭✭✭peddlelies


    Looks like it's him. Some closure finally for the McCanns couldn't have been easy with every second person accusing them of hiding something, I'm sure I did myself at one point due to those cadaver dogs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    But sure look, I’ve been around the block enough on these threads to know that there is a considerable cohort who are dedicated to shaming and blaming the parents at all costs, lack of evidence be damned. They have dreamt up a narrative, and will stick to it at all costs. Even if it is this guy, they are so indoctrinated and committed to being “right” that they will insist the parents must have been involved with this guy. Just don’t ask them how or why or when they could have done it. Because you won’t get an answer to that. Just deflection. But it speaks more about the type of people they are than anything else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭2u2me


    Babooshka wrote: »
    Think they're guilty if you like, but the absolute vitriol posted up by some is just utterly disgusting. And they don't speak about them as if they're "strangers"...they speak about them as if they know them as cold hearted murderers that they know very well. They would treat "strangers" better.

    Are you talking about in this thread or somewhere else, I'm thinking I'm reading a different thread to you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭uncleoswald


    screamer wrote: »
    But it’s still just speculation, regardless. The problem is your reaction to it........ I personally don’t understand why people get so riled up to villify or protect 2 complete strangers being honest, it’s strange.
    Speculating is not the same as accusing and vilifying. I'm not riled up but I find your lack of empathy a little weird.

    So if a loved one of yours died and people started accusing you of murder you'd be ok with that? And if people started to tell those accusers to leave you alone you'd tell them not to bother because sure it's no harm?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭screamer


    Babooshka wrote: »
    Because even "strangers" deserve basic human decency and the little trolls name calling and the vile things they've said about the McCanns, when they wouldn't even do the same to a stranger on the street...you don't understand why that's not acceptable, just because we're all anonymous and strangers?

    Think they're guilty if you like, but the absolute vitriol posted up by some is just utterly disgusting. And they don't speak about them as if they're "strangers"...they speak about them as if they know them as cold hearted murderers that they know very well. They would treat "strangers" better.

    Again, it’s only speculation, nothing can or has been proven, and you’re letting yourself get riled up over it.
    I think more to myself when I read posts like this. what basic human decency did Madeline deserve? after all she paid the ultimate price the poor little thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    SlowBlowin wrote: »
    Yet the McCanns insist that they thought it was safe. Gerry said that they sought legal advice afterwards and had been assured that what they did was "well within the bounds of reasonable parenting".

    Are the McCanns everyone? And if they thought it was safe, they soon learned otherwise. I mean, what else is a solicitor (or anyone) going to say to them? Gerry McCann even looking for that assurance speaks volumes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭screamer


    Speculating is not the same as accusing and vilifying. I'm not riled up but I find your lack of empathy a little weird.

    So if a loved one of yours died and people started accusing you of murder you'd be ok with that? And if people started to tell those accusers to leave you alone you'd tell them not to bother because sure it's no harm?

    People will always speculate or gossip, since time began, you won’t change that. My sympathy is with Madeline who I think is very much forgotten about in the keyboard warrior wars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Babooshka


    2u2me wrote: »
    Are you talking about in this thread or somewhere else, I'm thinking I'm reading a different thread to you.

    Many threads. Many many.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭uncleoswald


    screamer wrote: »
    People will always speculate or gossip, since time began, you won’t change that. My sympathy is with Madeline who I think is very much forgotten about in the keyboard warrior wars.
    I didn't know that sympathy was in such limited supply that it couldn't also extend to the parents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    I can’t believe people are still making this fallacious point. The McCanns have been absolutely crucified in the media. And IMO, their background and class has been used against them a lot. There’s reverse snobbery going on a bit.

    It’s just jealously and begrudgery. The cheek of someone with an accent like kate pulling herself up by her bootstraps. And she nabbed herself a doctor on the way. Bloody cheeky bitch thinks she’s better then us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,529 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Demonique wrote: »
    Because their negligence meant someone was able to abduct one of their children

    Yes, they probably dressed her in a short dress too.

    Probably "Asking for it" and the abductor was "only acting on his impulses" in your weird little perverse, warped, victim blaming internet world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    SlowBlowin wrote: »
    Yet the McCanns insist that they thought it was safe. Gerry said that they sought legal advice afterwards and had been assured that what they did was "well within the bounds of reasonable parenting".

    I’m sure they know by now that their actions were completely reckless. I will admit I do at times find them a little proud and lacking in humility, but I’d put that down to them being defensive in the face of what was a swath of universal criticism. But yes, they would have “won over” more people had they held their hands up from the start and admitted they fcuked up. I’ve always held that view.

    But they acted in defence of their actions and people judge them for that, but they also had their other two children to think of there and I’m sure after losing Madeline they didn’t want to lose them too. I find it hard to believe they don’t know by now that what they did was wrong, 13 years later when they are still without their daughter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭screamer


    I didn't know that sympathy was in such limited supply that it couldn't also extend to the parents.

    Sure they’ve plenty of sympathetic randomers to commiserate with them online, I’m sure my lack of it will not affect them in the slightest.


Advertisement