Free Fall thread

The Nal wrote: »

And all this was almost immediately leaked and known. The warnings they received, lying about WMDs, Iraq, kidnappings, torture etc. All happened. We knew about it very quickly. Whistleblowers all over the place. Same as Vietnam, Iran Contra affair etc. Washington is the leakiest city on earth.

Yet a huge conspiracy with x amount of people involved (hundreds or thousands) across x amount of industries and state bodies and countries and...19 years later, not one single leak or credible piece of information.

The Nal wrote: »

Its comedy gold.

Sir,
You claim "I have never seen a explain how the presence of free fall indicates a conspiracy or a controlled demolition."
OK, one's not a "conspiracy theorist" or a "truther", but one doesn't like lies, and in one's discipline of superintending the forensic reporting of marine structural failures, one has always preferred to follow the evidence.
So here is your explanation, and in layman's terms for someone self-evidently quite unburdened by any real understanding of even basic physics, or structures. Please feel free to ask questions at the end.
Pure gravitational acceleration (PGA or free-fall) can only occur when a falling body is imparting none whatsoever of its kinetic energy to any other body. When that occurs in the collapse of a structure, even for a second or so, it is positively irrefutable evidence that the falling element of the structure was unaffected by any upward resistance for that entire period of time.
Today, as far as one knows, the only known technique of instantaneously removing all, or even part of the upward resistance in any syndetic static steel structure involves the pre-planned application of explosive cutting charges.
Therefore, when the upper element of any honestly syndetic structure ( ie. one with all structural components connected appropriately.) attains pure gravitational acceleration, even for a short period ( and, by the way, over 2 seconds is NOT considered a short period in the way of these things!) that event alone effectively 'proves' that the supporting structure must have been entirely absent for the full period of the PGA and, therefore, one must presume that some technique was employed to instantaneously remove that entire substructure. As the only technique known to most of us is the use of H.E cutting charges, then the irrefutable evidence of PGA would seem to point very strongly indeed to demolition as the most likely scenario.
Q.E.D.
One thing is self-evidently certain, and that is that the WTC7 collapse could not simply have been 'natural', as it is quite impossible for any "natural vertical collapse", however initiated, to attain PGA due to the energy that is required to expend in overcoming the upward resistance of the remaining lower structural elements.
Newton's 3 laws have, so far, proven quite irrefutable, and would seem to be an increasingly pesky nuisance to all those non-engineers so naively trying to explain free-fall in the collapse of WTC7.

The Nal wrote: »

So lets say 200 tonnes. 30 people. Thats nearly 7 tonnes each they had to get into the building! And distribute perfectly at the exact points needed.

All secretly.

The Nal wrote: »

Oh sh1t, sorry my bad.

So 15 people means 14 tonnes of thermite each, across 250 floors of buildings.

Amazing that they only needed 15 other conspirators for that sort of operation. It seems very unlikely.

Like, not one security guard asked "hey whats thats, where are you going?" Just 15 people walking about in restricted areas across 3 huge buildings with tonnes of thermite in 3 of the most heavily secured buildings in the world.

Newton's 3 laws have, so far, proven quite irrefutable, and would seem to be an increasingly pesky nuisance to all those non-engineers so naively trying to explain free-fall in the collapse of WTC7.