Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it just me or have SF vanished?

1122123125127128333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,935 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    smurgen wrote: »
    So they days previous to the 77 were less than what actually happened. But on the day of the 77, there would have been deaths occuring on that day not also counted.


    Quite possibly.

    However, if on the day of the 77, there were a whole lot of tests back from Germany at the same time that proved that a lot of deaths over the previous week were actually Covid-19 and not ordinary deaths, you could have had a one-off spike in the statistics.

    That is why unless you are trying to spin, you won’t take one days figure in isolation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭aido79


    smurgen wrote: »
    I'm not having difficulty. What I'm saying in that yesterday's actual deaths were not all reported in yesterdays numbers some are outstanding.

    Yes. That is the way it's been since the start of covid19 deaths being reported.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Quite possibly.

    However, if on the day of the 77, there were a whole lot of tests back from Germany at the same time that proved that a lot of deaths over the previous week were actually Covid-19 and not ordinary deaths, you could have had a one-off spike in the statistics.

    That is why unless you are trying to spin, you won’t take one days figure in isolation.

    A considered response. What I'm getting at is that spin can work pro and against tho. That's why I wouldn't be rushing to downplay 77 deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,852 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    McMurphy wrote: »
    77 deaths population of 5 million
    919 deaths population 60 million

    In fact if we get 77 deaths in a single day, that would give us an even worse daily death toll than Italy has had this far.


    Do the maths yourself.

    Kind of pathetic points scoring this..

    We have "more" deaths than you, so we are bad......?

    Stupid type stuff as well....Kind of like Trump, but the opposite, as in him and his very odd and weird gloating....

    Overall we could be in a whole lot worse a predicament had we not implemented our measures and stuck with them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Mortelaro


    McMurphy wrote: »
    77 deaths population of 5 million
    919 deaths population 60 million

    In fact if we get 77 deaths in a single day, that would give us an even worse daily death toll than Italy has had this far.


    Do the maths yourself.

    One slight problem with your logic there
    Those 77 deaths were not all in one day
    Many of them were from several days ago depending on when they were reported
    That point was made by Dr Holahan yesterday at the briefing
    So nowhere near Italys daily death toll,which by the way only includes hospital deaths
    Unlike ours which includes outside hospitals

    Apples and oranges


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    Can someone answer me this. What do you expect SF or any other opposition party to be doing right now? In my opinion the only three things they can do are

    A) Support the current government in it's decision making

    B) Put forward ideas and motions

    C) Hold the current government accountable and question them on any poor decisions that have been made.

    No opposition party has any powers to enact legislation, make decisions, enforce rules etc etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,935 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    smurgen wrote: »
    A considered response. What I'm getting at is that spin can work pro and against tho. That's why I wouldn't be rushing to downplay 77 deaths.

    I am not giving the 77 deaths at this point any significance good or bad. If in a week's time, the number is 277 deaths, we will know what the 77 signified. Statistics rely on patterns at all times.

    One thing we do know, when the numbers peak, we will have already passed the peak, given the lag in reporting numbers. Whether the numbers have peaked yet, you never know until the next day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,935 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Can someone answer me this. What do you expect SF or any other opposition party to be doing right now? In my opinion the only three things they can do are

    A) Support the current government in it's decision making

    B) Put forward ideas and motions

    C) Hold the current government accountable and question them on any poor decisions that have been made.

    No opposition party has any powers to enact legislation, make decisions, enforce rules etc etc.

    The difference with Sinn Fein is that we can watch what they are and aren't doing as part of government in another jurisdiction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭1641


    Surely, not to be outdone, The SF publicity machine will be announcing that they are releasing all of their balaclava stockpile to the public?

    https://www.thejournal.ie/orange-order-buys-ppe-shipment-5079583-Apr2020/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The difference with Sinn Fein is that we can watch what they are and aren't doing as part of government in another jurisdiction.

    That's not what I asked, but I have become used to you skirting around providing answers. Are you sure you are not a politician yourself? You have many of the necessary traits.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    walshb wrote: »
    Kind of pathetic points scoring this..

    We have "more" deaths than you, so we are bad......?

    Stupid type stuff as well....Kind of like Trump, but the opposite, as in him and his very odd and weird gloating....

    Overall we could be in a whole lot worse a predicament had we not implemented our measures and stuck with them.

    To be honest, this is all getting macabre and pathetic.

    There are some people out there that would love for the situation in Ireland to be worse so that they can get on the blowhorn and get some cheap political point scoring-in via a tweet or such.
    More Irish dead = better for their political 'team'

    As I said, it says a lot more about them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    markodaly wrote: »
    To be honest, this is all getting macabre and pathetic.

    There are some people out there that would love for the situation in Ireland to be worse so that they can get on the blowhorn and get some cheap political point scoring-in via a tweet or such.
    More Irish dead = better for their political 'team'

    As I said, it says a lot more about them.

    So stop engaging that style of discussion. Go back a few posts and answer my question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,935 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Can someone answer me this. What do you expect SF or any other opposition party to be doing right now? In my opinion the only three things they can do are

    A) Support the current government in it's decision making

    B) Put forward ideas and motions

    C) Hold the current government accountable and question them on any poor decisions that have been made.

    No opposition party has any powers to enact legislation, make decisions, enforce rules etc etc.

    Your post is inaccurate in how it describes the current situation.

    You say that "no opposition party has any powers to enact legislation..", when it is the fact that given the Seanad hasn't been formed, no party at all has any powers to enact legislation. In fact, because we have only a caretaker government, there is no government or opposition, there is a lacuna. Ministers don't have to answer PQs, respond to debates etc., the fact that this has happened is down to forbearance on the part of the caretaker government.

    The caretaker government is doing its best in the absence of the normal powers of government to enact legislation. The onus now is on all parties to redouble their efforts to form a government and elect a Taoiseach so that normal decision-making can resume.

    So you ask what can an opposition party do, the answer is there is no opposition party yet, what all parties have is a responsibility to engage in government formation, or stand aside and wait for government to form. Sinn Fein are choosing the latter, but that doesn't give them any role except as a bystander, fence-sitter, and ditch-hurler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    So stop engaging that style of discussion. Go back a few posts and answer my question.

    What question is this now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    walshb wrote: »
    Kind of pathetic points scoring this..

    We have "more" deaths than you, so we are bad......?

    Stupid type stuff as well....Kind of like Trump, but the opposite, as in him and his very odd and weird gloating....

    Overall we could be in a whole lot worse a predicament had we not implemented our measures and stuck with them.

    It's pathetic and goal scoring when we say the numbers aren't great but it's look at how great we are relative to others when we say the numbers are good. I've seen plenty of fine Gael supporters point out other countries numbers in this manner. E.g

    https://twitter.com/Care2much18/status/1252336108144218113?s=19


  • Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    blanch152 wrote: »

    So you ask what can an opposition party do, the answer is there is no opposition party yet, what all parties have is a responsibility to engage in government formation, or stand aside and wait for government to form. Sinn Fein are choosing the latter, but that doesn't give them any role except as a bystander, fence-sitter, and ditch-hurler.

    Is it fair to say that most of our recently elected TDs seem to have decided that they want no part in running this country? :pac:

    This dail is a clown show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    smurgen wrote: »
    It's pathetic and goal scoring when we say the numbers aren't great but it's look at how great we are relative to others when we say the numbers are good. I've seen plenty of fine Gael supporters point out other countries numbers in this manner. E.g

    https://twitter.com/Care2much18/status/1252336108144218113?s=19

    1) How do you know the person behind that tweet is a Fine Gael supporter?
    2) How do you know the person behind the tweet is not a Fine Gael supporter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    markodaly wrote: »
    1) How do you know the person behind that tweet is a Fine Gael supporter?
    2) How do you know the person behind the tweet is not a Fine Gael supporter?

    Surrorts the party line at every stage. Minimising disasters amplifying success. Although I agree with your sentiment, these parts cheerleaders should have their membership posted on their profiles so we can discount their opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    blanch152 wrote: »
    what all parties have is a responsibility to engage in government formation, or stand aside and wait for government to form. Sinn Fein are choosing the latter, but that doesn't give them any role except as a bystander, fence-sitter, and ditch-hurler.

    So the title of this thread makes mention to them 'disappearing' yet you admit yourself all the can do is

    A) "engage in government formation" (which they have tried to do and are still exploring possibilities), but I think all reasonably minded people would agree that it is currently impossible for SF to form a majority or even a minority government.

    Or

    B) "stand aside and wait for government to form"

    When they choose B, you and many others accuse them of disappearing, like they have other options available to them. "Where are SF", "What are SF doing to help with the crisis" "I'm glad SF weren't in government, they've done nothing since the virus emerged". etc etc. Hypocrisy at its finest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    markodaly wrote: »
    What question is this now?

    Good man, play dumb!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    smurgen wrote: »
    Surrorts the party line at every stage. Minimising disasters amplifying success. Although I agree with your sentiment, these parts cheerleaders should have their membership posted on their profiles so we can discount their opinion.

    So, at the end of the day, we should discount everyone's opinion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Good man, play dumb!

    I think you are confusing me with someone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    markodaly wrote: »
    I think you are confusing me with someone else.

    Nope, I'm not. I asked a question 5 posts prior to yours and instead of scrolling back to look at it and provide an answer you decided to ask "what question" even though I had advised you to go back a few posts to see it.

    Blanch is the only one who had the ability to provide a response.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Mortelaro


    smurgen wrote: »
    Surrorts the party line at every stage. Minimising disasters amplifying success. Although I agree with your sentiment, these parts cheerleaders should have their membership posted on their profiles so we can discount their opinion.

    Who's We ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,328 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Nope, I'm not. I asked a question 5 posts prior to yours and instead of scrolling back to look at it and provide an answer you decided to ask "what question" even though I had advised you to go back a few posts to see it.

    Blanch is the only one who had the ability to provide a response.

    So you were talking in general than. OK.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Imagine if before the dust settled on an election MLMD announced she 'relished going into opposition', would that fall under 'not wanting to govern', 'wanting to be a hurler from the ditch', wanting to whinge rather than stepping up etc.? Not to mention knocking back FF on two occasions and repeating the wish to go into opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭Whelo79


    markodaly wrote: »
    So you were talking in general than. OK.

    Can you still not muster up an answer to the question, no?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Mortelaro


    Bowie wrote: »
    Imagine if before the dust settled on an election MLMD announced she 'relished going into opposition', would that fall under 'not wanting to govern', 'wanting to be a hurler from the ditch', wanting to whinge rather than stepping up etc.? Not to mention knocking back FF on two occasions and repeating the wish to go into opposition.

    What's wrong with reacting to the election result in that way?
    Weren't the left wanting their own government
    Sf wanting that left government too but it lacked numbers so wanted other left parties to join them with FF but they said No way

    What exactly was wrong with FG preferring opposition?

    This conversation is a ring a ring a Rosie's with mis representing reality for the sake of giving out at whatever course FG took as no doubt if they came out last February all guns blazing for what they're doing now,the left would similarly complain

    That much is obvious

    Also obvious is the reason SF arent going into government
    The electorate didn't give a mandate for them to be there
    2 of the biggest parties campaigned to keep them out
    Mind you 2 of the 3 also campaigned to keep FG out
    Only difference is,one of them u turned on the FG question which I suppose was their decision in answer to we are where we are


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Mortelaro wrote: »
    What's wrong with reacting to the election result in that way?
    Weren't the left wanting their own government
    Sf wanting that left government too but it lacked numbers so wanted other left parties to join them with FF but they said No way

    What exactly was wrong with FG preferring opposition?

    This conversation is a ring a ring a Rosie's with mis representing reality for the sake of giving out at whatever course FG took as no doubt if they came out last February all guns blazing for what they're doing now,the left would similarly complain

    That much is obvious

    Also obvious is the reason SF arent going into government
    The electorate didn't give a mandate for them to be there
    2 of the biggest parties campaigned to keep them out
    Mind you 2 of the 3 also campaigned to keep FG out
    Only difference is,one of them u turned on the FG question which I suppose was their decision in answer to we are where we are

    Absolutely nothing. You are missing the irony though.
    We've people saying the above about SF for years because they were in opposition. Yet when FG come out and announce how much the relish the idea it's seemingly fine and dandy. I was all for Labour going into opposition rather than supporting FG. The opposition parties play an important role.

    FYI: There are many individual politicians and parties that make up 'the left'. Unlike FF/FG who only differ as to which paymasters they look after.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭tipptom


    Whelo79 wrote: »
    Can someone answer me this. What do you expect SF or any other opposition party to be doing right now? In my opinion the only three things they can do are

    A) Support the current government in it's decision making

    B) Put forward ideas and motions

    C) Hold the current government accountable and question them on any poor decisions that have been made.

    No opposition party has any powers to enact legislation, make decisions, enforce rules etc etc.

    Exactly,you see post after post after post of idiots saying "whats SF doing about the crisis",where is SF during the crisis" etc etc on and on."Where is Mary Loo and why is she hiding with a head flu"? WTF?

    Why would any right thinking person expect SF or FF or any of the other parties to do anything except leave it to the people in power at the moment to flatten it out with the expert advice they are recieving and anybody says anything different has an agenda.

    I believe Harris should have been sacked years ago but even I think he should be left in place to deal with this.

    I'm not sure any of the other party's would have done that much different had they been in power and would they have ignored the advice from the experts to do some things differently in hindsight?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement