Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Curious Case of Violet-Anne Wynne

1…5152545657…99

Comments

  • #1592
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    So why you say it?

    It is relevant when she is robbing money from charities by the way, 100% it is relevant.

    Anyway, any source on that useless comment?

    I was being sarcastic.

    She didn't "rob" anything


  • #1593
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    limnam wrote: »
    I was being sarcastic.

    She didn't "rob" anything

    The useless comment???? still waiting......


  • #1594
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    Not sure how it's relevant to the mistakes been made.

    There not been availability is one thing.

    Purchasing not fit for purpose is another.

    They didn’t purchase not fit for purpose. They returned it with more detailed instructions of what they wanted.


  • #1595
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    The useless comment???? still waiting......

    Source bore :rolleyes:


  • #1596
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    They didn’t purchase not fit for purpose. They returned it with more detailed instructions of what they wanted.


    -- in an audit of the PPE delivered were described as “unsuitable” or “not suitable for use” in clinical or other healthcare settings.
    --

    Not fit for purpose.


  • Advertisement
  • #1597
    Quin_Dub
    Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    limnam wrote: »
    I was being sarcastic.

    She didn't "rob" anything

    She did really - She robbed someone else more deserving of a house in west Clare by taking one from a charity and refusing to pay for it almost from the day she moved in and it took them several years to get her out.

    Years that someone else that wasn't a complete sponger could have had a nice roof over their heads.

    So yes - she did "rob" something.


  • #1598
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    She did really - She robbed someone else more deserving of a house in west Clare by taking one from a charity and refusing to pay for it almost from the day she moved in and it took them several years to get her out.

    Years that someone else that wasn't a complete sponger could have had a nice roof over their heads.

    So yes - she did "rob" something.


    She fell into arrears with a sick husband.

    It's not "robbing" anything


  • #1599
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    -- in an audit of the PPE delivered were described as “unsuitable” or “not suitable for use” in clinical or other healthcare settings.
    --

    Not fit for purpose.

    So were not paid for.


  • #1600
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    So were not paid for.

    Which caused a delay leaving people having to re-use items which was of grave concern which may have led to people being killed of the virus.

    Costly mistakes.


  • #1601
    Donald Trump
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Do they have a sign at door saying "no howys'a allowed in"

    Otherwise I don't see why they wouldn't?


    Not any more unfortunately. They had to take it down a couple of years ago.

    It's kept for safekeeping though in a case beside the book of Kells in the old library. They'll bring it back out when all this PC crap dies down later.


  • Advertisement
  • #1602
    Quin_Dub
    Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    limnam wrote: »
    She fell into arrears with a sick husband.

    It's not "robbing" anything

    No.. No she didn't..

    She stopped paying almost immediately and refused to pay , not a single penny for almost 3 years.

    Her husband was not "sick" when she stopped paying , nor did she have 5 kids.

    She made a deliberate decision to not pay her rent because she knew it would take ages to get her out.

    But you know this as it's been covered here by me and others replying to you saying exactly the same thing since this thread started..

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=112550344&postcount=207

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=112550075&postcount=196


  • #1603
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    People fall on hard times.

    She fell behind in her rent.

    She's declared to give 32ke to the state.

    She said she'd make a donation to charity also.

    Compared to the fraudsters on her card.

    She's doing alright


  • #1604
    Rodney Bathgate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    limnam wrote: »
    People fall on hard times.

    She fell behind in her rent.

    She's declared to give 32ke to the state.

    She said she'd make a donation to charity also.

    Compared to the fraudsters on her card.

    She's doing alright

    Hard times didn’t seem to stop her having more kids while withholding her rent though.


  • #1605
    JohnnyFlash
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    limnam wrote: »
    People fall on hard times.

    She fell behind in her rent.

    She's declared to give 32ke to the state.

    She said she'd make a donation to charity also.

    Compared to the fraudsters on her card.

    She's doing alright

    She refused to pay €63 quid a week when there was multiples of that coming in in social welfare payments. She’s a self-entitled gouger who wanted a house for nothing. She shouldn’t have been put on the ticket, and SF need to drop her like a hot snot. Meanwhile you’re getting all jumpy and tetchy attempting to defend the indefensible.


  • #1606
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Rodney Bathgate wrote: »
    Hard times didn’t seem to stop her having more kids while withholding her rent though.

    Sure and I'd love to know what the falling out was about as we might understand more about what happened there.

    He seemed to fall out with tenured staff of the charity too.

    e.g were they trying to make arrangements to pay x etc.

    Seems communication was broken down.

    Again I don't know enough about her or the situation.

    If we put a financial constraint on having kids, there would be very few of them around.


  • #1607
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    JohnnyFlash wrote: »
    She refused to pay €63 quid a week when there was multiples of that coming in in social welfare payments. She’s a self-entitled gouger who wanted a house for nothing. She shouldn’t have been put on the ticket, and SF need to drop her like a hot snot. Meanwhile you’re getting all jumpy and tetchy attempting to defend the indefensible.

    Relax Jim.

    I've always maintained I'd like to know more about the situation.

    The fact she's declared to give 8k a year back from her wages etc.

    I'm not seeing the self entitled gouger theme.

    Everyone deserves a chance. Even the rotten gougers who were fleecing the state on her card.


  • #1608
    JCX BXC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,540 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    limnam wrote: »
    .

    Everyone deserves a chance. Even the rotten gougers who were fleecing the state on her card.

    A chance? Yeah

    A chance to represent the country? Not a fcuking hope.


  • #1609
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    Sure and I'd love to know what the falling out was about as we might understand more about what happened there.

    He seemed to fall out with tenured staff of the charity too.

    e.g were they trying to make arrangements to pay x etc.

    Seems communication was broken down.

    Again I don't know enough about her or the situation.

    If we put a financial constraint on having kids, there would be very few of them around.

    Communication is a two way street. Every effort seems to have been made to get a response from them.

    “In addition to written warnings, RRI field officers and finance staff repeatedly visited Ms Wynne and her partner. Despite these efforts, the court file shows Ms Wynne and her family stopped paying rent completely in August 2013 as they complained – sometimes via legal correspondence – of problems with the house.

    The file does not appear to refer at any stage to a child’s illness and the hospitalisation of a family member, which Ms Wynne has this week told reporters was the reason for her inability to pay.”

    https://extra.ie/2020/02/16/news/politics/violet-anne-wynne-rent-charity


  • #1610
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    A chance? Yeah

    A chance to represent the country? Not a fcuking hope.

    Why not?

    There was TD's on her card that had fleeced the state.

    Or does it only apply to SF?

    Next you'll be saying you can't go on holidays... :)


  • #1611
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Communication is a two way street. Every effort seems to have been made to get a response from them.

    “In addition to written warnings, RRI field officers and finance staff repeatedly visited Ms Wynne and her partner. Despite these efforts, the court file shows Ms Wynne and her family stopped paying rent completely in August 2013 as they complained – sometimes via legal correspondence – of problems with the house.

    The file does not appear to refer at any stage to a child’s illness and the hospitalisation of a family member, which Ms Wynne has this week told reporters was the reason for her inability to pay.”

    https://extra.ie/2020/02/16/news/politics/violet-anne-wynne-rent-charity

    As far as I know the council couldn't take the house of RRI as it didn't meet standards.

    Might be the problems discussed here.

    I wouldn't be too happy for paying rent for a house not meeting council standards either.

    Nice find.


  • Advertisement
  • #1612
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    As far as I know the council couldn't take the house of RRI as it didn't meet standards.

    Might be the problems discussed here.

    I wouldn't be too happy for paying rent for a house not meeting council standards either.

    Nice find.

    Why stay there for so long if it wasn’t up to standard?


  • #1613
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    limnam wrote: »
    Source bore :rolleyes:


    Shocked you couldn't back it up


    I find it hillarious that people on boards are incapable of admitting when they are talking BS.....


    You need to stop listening to the SF propaganda machine, it aint telling you the truth


  • #1614
    Rodney Bathgate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    limnam wrote: »
    Sure and I'd love to know what the falling out was about as we might understand more about what happened there.

    He seemed to fall out with tenured staff of the charity too.

    e.g were they trying to make arrangements to pay x etc.

    Seems communication was broken down.

    Again I don't know enough about her or the situation.

    If we put a financial constraint on having kids, there would be very few of them around.

    Not paying your rent is prone to cause a ‘falling out’ with the landlord.

    I think most people would prioritise keeping a roof over their heads when they fall on hard times rather than adding to the problem by having more children.


  • #1615
    Donald Trump
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    limnam wrote: »
    As far as I know the council couldn't take the house of RRI as it didn't meet standards.

    Might be the problems discussed here.

    I wouldn't be too happy for paying rent for a house not meeting council standards either.

    Nice find.

    Most private houses wouldn't "meet council standards". Whether rented or owned. Most council houses, if the tenant moves on, even to another council house, aren't up to "council standards" at the end of the tenancy. Which is often why they get boarded up for a few months after one tenant moves out.

    You in a council house yourself perchance? Might that explain your curious predilection towards not living in a house not up to that "standard"?


  • #1616
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Why stay there for so long if it wasn’t up to standard?

    Probably couldn't find anywhere else.

    You're aware of the housing crisis ya?


  • #1617
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Shocked you couldn't back it up


    I find it hillarious that people on boards are incapable of admitting when they are talking BS.....


    You need to stop listening to the SF propaganda machine, it aint telling you the truth

    I've quoted the answer since you asked.

    Try and focus on whats going on.


  • #1618
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    Donald Trump wrote: »

    You in a council house yourself perchance? Might that explain your curious predilection towards not living in a house not up to that "standard"?

    No. Privately owned two professional income family.

    Thanks for your concern though.


  • #1619
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    limnam wrote: »
    No. Privately owned two professional income family.

    Thanks for your concern though.

    so one tds wage and whats himself do again ?

    was it hard to get work with the drugs convictions I wonder ?


  • #1620
    Donald Trump
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    limnam wrote: »
    No. Privately owned two professional income family.

    Thanks for your concern though.


    Do you realise that it is likely that your own house isn't "up to council standard"?


    It might be the nicest house in the country, but there could be one or two little boxes that just aren't ticked.

    Perhaps you have a fabulous expensive Aga range on which you do all your cooking and which heats all the water for house.....but the Council standards maybe say you need a 4 ring gas or electric cooker and either an external oil or gas fired boiler to heat the water.


  • Advertisement
  • #1621
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,360 ✭✭✭limnam


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    so one tds wage and whats himself do again ?

    was it hard to get work with the drugs convictions I wonder ?

    Why do you resort to this nonsensical childish moronic rubbish.

    It's not like SF as a whole and Violet-Anne don't make a balls up of enough things for you to discuss rather than going on like a clueless idiot.


Advertisement
Advertisement