Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part XII - 4,604 in ROI (137 deaths) 998 in NI (56 deaths)(04/04) **Read OP**

1164165167169170323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    frillyleaf wrote: »
    I’m still not sure of the logic of allowing unrestricted travel from epicentres. I’ve asked a few times and haven’t been given an answer apart from “ it was going to get here anyway”. I know that but I think restrictions would help in terms of slowing it down and contact tracing at the start.
    I've read a bit up on the travel restrictions question. Primarily the aversion to doing it is due to the economic and supply chain impact - once one country starts putting in travel restrictions, it forces everyone else to copy them. You end up in this cascade where politicians are always forced to follow the most restrictive country for fear of being seen "not to do enough". Public Health isn't about simply stopping a virus, it's about balancing the actions taken versus the impact of those actions on the wider health and economy of the country.

    The impact of borders being shut worldwide are just enormous. Particularly for a country like Ireland which is hugely dependent on trade, imports and exports. If we ended up in a world where the shutters have come down worldwide, we could just about feed ourselves a basic diet - but a lot of other (critical) things stop entering the country.

    So I can imagine if you're a politician you'd prefer to shut travel to affected areas, but there's a very very severe risk that you can end up in a far worse place as a consequence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    I dont have that number. waffle merchants


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭CitizenFloor


    The people asking the question about ICU at the media conference, need to hand in their journalists badges.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    ITman88 wrote: »
    The US is a federal state and each state has its own governance.

    I can’t figure out why Trump is mentioned so much here, he’s fairly irrelevant

    Eh he`s the ****ing President of the USA. Millions of American people take everything he says, no matter how full of lies or off the wall it may be, as gospel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Why is it likely? The US has more ICU beds per person, more ventilators (and the ability to make more) and despite what people who dont live here think, those without insurance WILL be treated.

    Each state is pretty much like it's own country and does not need trump to take action.

    I dont like Trump either, but some on here are almost wishing that america goes to **** just to prove a point that he is a dick.

    More ICU beds per person than who?
    They will do worse because of their complete lack of co-ordination in response.

    Yes each state has control but a crisis like this requires federal action and co-ordination. Leadership is needed, trump is attacking governors from various states when he doesn't like what they say. That's hardly a good thing.
    ITman88 wrote: »
    The US is a federal state and each state has its own governance.

    I can’t figure out why Trump is mentioned so much here, he’s fairly irrelevant

    You mentioned Trump first and the message above is in reply to my response to your message... why the surprise :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭lillycakes2


    Why cant they tell us how many people are in ICU with Covid 19 in Ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭Osborne


    Why aren't the journos pushing for a straight answer on ICU numbers?

    Maybe I'm being dense, but I still don't know if the figures given are numbers from the beginning or currently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    drop in both cases & deaths(R.i.P)

    Hopefully the measures will start to take affect.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've read a bit up on the travel restrictions question. Primarily the aversion to doing it is due to the economic and supply chain impact - once one country starts putting in travel restrictions, it forces everyone else to copy them. You end up in this cascade where politicians are always forced to follow the most restrictive country for fear of being seen "not to do enough". Public Health isn't about simply stopping a virus, it's about balancing the actions taken versus the impact of those actions on the wider health and economy of the country.

    The impact of borders being shut worldwide are just enormous. Particularly for a country like Ireland which is hugely dependent on trade, imports and exports. If we ended up in a world where the shutters have come down worldwide, we could just about feed ourselves a basic diet - but a lot of other (critical) things stop entering the country.

    So I can imagine if you're a politician you'd prefer to shut travel to affected areas, but there's a very very severe risk that you can end up in a far worse place as a consequence.

    And I would think that the number of people coming into Ireland is now so small now as to be not worth this measure being taken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    solid numbers. hope Big T gets back on the horse soon and we can put this thing to bed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Yeah, my state is doing a pretty good job so far of flattening the curve and has had restrictions in place for weeks now. Some states have barely any cases. New York is an epicentre and is not representative of the entire country. Even there they are coping OK so far and have put in thousands of extra beds and resources.

    New York is doing terribly

    Low on PPE, ventilators and staff. It's going to be one of the worst calamities ever to befall the state


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    fin12 wrote: »

    Jesus Christ and their markets are still carrying on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    Osborne wrote: »
    Why aren't the journos pushing for a straight answer on ICU numbers?

    Maybe I'm being dense, but I still don't know if the figures given are numbers from the beginning or currently.

    You are being dense to be honest. It’s been clarified multiple times


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    RiP to the 14 people who have died


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    froog wrote: »
    solid numbers. hope Big T gets back on the horse soon and we can put this thing to bed.

    I hope Holohan makes a full recovery so he's one day able to face an inquiry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭Osborne


    domrush wrote: »
    You are being dense to be honest. It’s been clarified multiple times

    And the answer is?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Why is it likely? The US has more ICU beds per person, more ventilators (and the ability to make more) and despite what people who dont live here think, those without insurance WILL be treated.

    Each state is pretty much like it's own country and does not need trump to take action.

    I dont like Trump either, but some on here are almost wishing that america goes to **** just to prove a point that he is a dick.

    Many people taking the same attitude with the UK too.

    They can't see the irony of thinking Trump/BoJo are horrible people, yet they are wishing for large death totals in these countries so they can be somehow proven correct in their assertions... quite perverse really! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    Osborne wrote: »
    And the answer is?

    It’s the number of people admitted since the start . It is not the current number of people in ICU


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,456 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Shn99 wrote: »
    Education minister still determined to see state exams for students go ahead as normal
    https://www.newstalk.com/news/mchugh-state-exams-planned-993123?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1585757798

    He has to say that. If he said exams may not go ahead, students would just not do a tap and not bother continuing lessons.

    Although tbh, I definitely do not see the JC going ahead, but the LC could go ahead in a much more staggered and spaced approach. With no JC students doing exams, their is a lot more spacing, room, but still left with the problem of the SEC staffing centres, social distancing, etc.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Site Banned Posts: 27 Peruvian Flake


    Vast majority of the 126 are still In ICU


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭CitizenFloor


    THANK YOU GEORGE!


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,209 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Osborne wrote: »
    Why aren't the journos pushing for a straight answer on ICU numbers?

    Maybe I'm being dense, but I still don't know if the figures given are numbers from the beginning or currently.

    Since the beginning. This has been clarified already multiple times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    i'd say the angelus is getting record viewing numbers recently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Osborne wrote: »
    And the answer is?
    Admitted but that many if not all are still there as people seem to spend a long time in ICU internationally.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 452 ✭✭Logan Roy


    Vast majority of the 126 are still In ICU

    Source?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,148 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Since the beginning. This has been clarified already multiple times.

    No it hasn't, HSE and HSPC were saying originally it was the total for the day - so they have been changing the definition and one saying one thing, the other saying another


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    Marsden35 wrote: »
    We're passed a million already, given that China and Iran have lied about their figures. China is easily 10 times higher in cases and deaths. As is Iran. Some estimate Iran is at least 20 times worse than official figures.

    I reckon China wanted this, send of their people to infect others around the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Admitted but that many if not all are still there as people seem to spend a long time in ICU internationally.


    That was not said, and as morbid as it sounds, deaths will reduce the number in ICU.

    An HIQA report today said the median time was 7 days in ICU


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Jesus Christ and their markets are still carrying on.

    I literally can’t read anymore about this f*cked up virus. Everyday it’s something worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,097 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Since the beginning. This has been clarified already multiple times.

    Clarify again please I’m only getting in on this conversation now and can’t be arsed going back over the thread.
    126- deaths?
    Still at 126 as stays in icu are long or what?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement