Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part XII - 4,604 in ROI (137 deaths) 998 in NI (56 deaths)(04/04) **Read OP**

1162163165167168323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,402 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    212 new cases

    Good.

    Experts say the deaths will continue at a very high rate for the next 2 weeks - horrible, but the new cases total is the one to watch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    14 further deaths; total 85
    212 new cases; total 3,447


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Lower cases but what's the number worth with the reduction in testing?

    Absolutely nothing.

    The death figures as bad as they are aren't spinning out of control though which as harsh as it sounds is a positive.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,939 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    1huge1 wrote: »
    212 new cases = a 6.6% increase, lowest so far I believe.

    Not much point in looking at %'s, positively, when the testing system is in disarray/is so behind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Good.

    Experts say the deaths will continue at a very high rate for the next 2 weeks - horrible, but the new cases total is the one to watch.


    New cases is the one not to watch, it is meaningless with the testing regime that we have.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Good.

    Experts say the deaths will continue at a very high rate for the next 2 weeks - horrible, but the new cases total is the one to watch.

    Its due to a lack of testing. ICU and deaths more reflective atm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    Jasus 126 people in ICU. Unfortunately there will be many more deaths this week.

    Gotta keep positive though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    ITman88 wrote: »
    I was making a point about worse case models being incorrect.

    No fake news, you must be a trump supporter.

    ? How did you come to that conclusion?
    He has handled this situation extremely badly, The USA will most likely come out of this worse than every other country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,402 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    wadacrack wrote: »
    Its due to a lack of testing. ICU and deaths more reflective atm

    One would expect new cases to be dropping though, given the draconian restrictions - the testing is something of a side issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    ricero wrote: »
    Jasus 126 people in ICU. Unfortunately there will be many more deaths this week.

    Gotta keep positive though.

    When did they say there is 126 people currently in the icu?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,754 ✭✭✭SleetAndSnow


    I personally am ignoring the new case numbers due to the amount of problems with testing at the minute. I am focusing more so on the ICU admissions and new deaths, which seems to be constant enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Lower cases but what's the number worth with the reduction in testing?

    Welll, as was mentioned yesterday, they’ve increased the proportion of positive tests from 6% to 15%, so while the testing is less it’s more targeted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    DOCARCH wrote: »
    Not much point in looking at %'s, positively, when the testing system is in disarray/is so behind.
    So disappointed then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey




  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    New cases is the one not to watch, it is meaningless with the testing regime that we have.

    Agree, it presumably meant something until a couple of days ago, but now not worth really paying attention to unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,753 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    1500 tests a day due to reagent issues worldwide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    ITman88 wrote: »
    The current deaths from Italy sound insane, but it’s nothing unusual for March in Italy.
    62000 deaths in March a number of years ago, when we see the number of deaths from this March we can than accurately see the rise in deaths.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2020-03-31/italy-s-mild-flu-season-may-solve-mystery-of-coronavirus-deaths

    Do you have a link to a source that says there was ever 62,000 deaths in Italy in one month from flu. Because it doesnt sound true. 500,000 people worlwide die from flu in a whole year, and youre saying more than 10% of them died in one month in just Italy one year.
    And it is completely unusual for MArch in Italy, otherwise the country would not be on lockdown

    This article seems to assume Italy is the only place experiencing a high mortality rate. Spain, the UK, Benelux, NYC all appear to be on similar trajectory if they are not already there. I dont understand why so many people are trying really hard to still compare this to flu, the numbers coming out of Italy, and much of Europe for that matter, are shocking no matter what way you look at it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    domrush wrote: »
    When did they say there is 126 people currently in the icu?
    That came out this morning I believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    ricero wrote: »
    Jasus 126 people in ICU. Unfortunately there will be many more deaths this week.

    Gotta keep positive though.

    That’s since the beginning.
    There is not currently 126 people in ICU


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    fullstop wrote: »
    Welll, as was mentioned yesterday, they’ve increased the proportion of positive tests from 6% to 15%, so while the testing is less it’s more targeted.

    It seems they're not getting to everyone who even fits the new criteria, so the numbers aren't a great reflection of how things are still.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That came out this morning I believe.

    There was 124 people admitted in total as of yesterday, there was not 124 people currently in the ICU. This has been confirmed by the HSE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    unnamed sources said, pity the story is unverifiable.
    Most Italian commentary is.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Good.

    Experts say the deaths will continue at a very high rate for the next 2 weeks - horrible, but the new cases total is the one to watch.

    It really isn`t. The figure to watch is new daily deaths /ICU rates.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Strazdas wrote: »
    One would expect new cases to be dropping though, given the draconian restrictions - the testing is something of a side issue.
    fullstop wrote: »
    Welll, as was mentioned yesterday, they’ve increased the proportion of positive tests from 6% to 15%, so while the testing is less it’s more targeted.

    But isn't the problem that if the tests have dropped dramatically, the new cases must also drop, in which case it is no longer possible to secure a positive view from the drop in percentages of new cases as we can't decipher whether it is the more focussed test, or lack of tests?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    That’s since the beginning.
    There is not currently 126 people in ICU

    Was just going to ask this.
    If the 126 are currently in ICU or is it the number admitted since this began.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 876 ✭✭✭ITman88


    wakka12 wrote: »
    This article seems to assume Italy is the only place experiencing a high mortality rate. Spain, the UK, Benelux, NYC all appear to be on similar trajectory if they are not already there. I dont understand why so many people are trying really hard to still compare this to flu, the numbers coming out of Italy, and much of Europe for that matter, are shocking no matter what way you look at it

    You’re right the numbers are shocking.

    And they were shocking for a number of years now.

    It’s comparing death rates to the flu, not the virus itself.

    The virus is much more potent than the common flu


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭domrush


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Was just going to ask this.
    If the 126 are currently in ICU or is it the number admitted since this began.

    It’s since the beginning. This was confirmed by the HSE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Blanco100


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    That’s since the beginning.
    There is not currently 126 people in ICU

    are you sure? I think it means there are currently 126 people in ICU.

    as per worldometer its 103 people critical.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    ? How did you come to that conclusion?
    He has handled this situation extremely badly, The USA will most likely come out of this worse than every other country.

    Why is it likely? The US has more ICU beds per person, more ventilators (and the ability to make more) and despite what people who dont live here think, those without insurance WILL be treated.

    Each state is pretty much like it's own country and does not need trump to take action.

    I dont like Trump either, but some on here are almost wishing that america goes to **** just to prove a point that he is a dick.


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Strazdas wrote: »
    Good.

    Experts say the deaths will continue at a very high rate for the next 2 weeks - horrible, but the new cases total is the one to watch.
    Unfortunately it's meaningless without details of how many negative results there were (ie we need to know how many tests in total reflect these figures). If they are processing less because of limited testing kits it's not necessarily "good"

    When you overlay projections that we are still a couple of weeks (possibly more) away from hitting the peak we can, unfortunately, expect further increases in those testing positive. That's also ignoring all of those who have it but do not qualify for testing


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement