Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid-19 Part IX - 785 cases ROI (3 deaths) 108 in NI (1 death) (20 March) *Read OP*

1297298300302303325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,116 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    At what rate?

    30% a day but don't let that get in the way of your close the borders narrative


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    At what rate?

    A lot recently, almost 200 new cases today, approaching 1000 now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,071 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Xertz wrote: »
    The tests aren't 100% accurate and couldn't be. They're useful and inactive but that's all. People are getting diagnosed with COVID-19 systems in quite a few countries based on symptoms who've come back with negative tests and then subsequently turn out to actually have it.

    They're only as good as they can be. That's not some kind of conspiracy theory, but you will get a % of false negatives in this kind of testing if they're just a one-off test.

    The majority of those who are coming forward with symptoms they suspect are COVID-19 and test as negative are likely to be suffering from normal colds, flus and other random resp infections etc.

    All I'm saying is if you do have symptoms self-isolate anyway. It's a nasty virus and it needs to be kept under control.

    If you've symptoms stay indoors regardless until they're fully gone.

    If you test negative in the 1st week but get worse in the 2nd week of self isolation (2 weeks - 14 days) then is a 2nd test done?

    The more I am reading about it the more confused I am getting :o


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    threeball wrote: »
    If that's true there's something seriously wrong there. It's not replicated anywhere else. Not even a suggestion

    Italian society is characterised by multi-generational living under the one roof. They are being absolutely hammered as a consequence of this (infected younger members of families are passing it on to their elders).

    https://www.wired.com/story/why-the-coronavirus-hit-italy-so-hard/amp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mmclo


    Murts-Rig wrote: »
    The US is riddled with it. In a few days they will get hit with the exponential back log what has been building up. Then, 10 - 14 days later, the death toll will start ratcheting up accordingly

    Just as well Trump blocked all our flights!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Woodsie1


    Indeed Sir. But perhaps worst of all is the total absence of comment from our so-called media on this. What are these journalists being paid to do? The only thing they seem worried about is the northerners not having closed their schools and pubs the same time we did.

    All the while there's thousands of people from all over the World emptying into Dublin Airport!

    Money!!

    Its all about the money.

    From journalists to politicians every one of them has finances on the brain...the rest of us are worried about each other while these cretins are only interested in making money off this(media hype) or saving their money(elected politicians).
    No doubt the longer this goes on the more Joe Soap is going to have to pay for it...Leo and his ilk wont suffer a cent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,071 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Do people here think Coronavirus will be with us indefinitely for the rest of our lives even with a vaccine?

    16,000 die annually from the Flu in Italy. That's 300 a week.

    1000s still die of cancer, 1000s still die of AIDS, usually in poor countries.

    I think some people who think once a vaccine will be introduced and we'll all be saved need to think again. It will certainly reduce the numbers of deaths but it still will be another crappy illness we'll have to put up with for the rest of out lives that may kill us.

    :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Xertz


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    If you test negative in the 1st week but get worse in the 2nd week of self isolation (2 weeks - 14 days) then is a 2nd test done?

    The more I am reading about it the more confused I am getting :o

    I'm honestly not sure, but if you test negative, and you have symptoms you should really continue to self isolate until it can be proven you don't have COVID-19.

    Perhaps someone could clarify what the protocol is with the HSE at the moment.

    It would seem logical that if the symptoms match, you assume the person is infected until at least a 2nd test proves otherwise.

    The availability of tests (globally) has been challenging due to the speed and scale of this thing.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Just curious, do you have travel figures?
    Just check Dub Airport arrivals website.
    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Post is still going on, post travels in the belly of commercial airlines.
    The airlines get paid for that.
    If the airlines cancel a flight they have to pay compensation, so if nobody turns up, they gain financially flying an empty airline. So just give a source saying these flights are full or infected people.

    Yes of course I can give a source saying these flights are full of infected people because that data has all been collected by our advanced quarantine and screening customs....

    Dublin Airport is busy every day. Just pop up yourself and take a look at the people emptying from flights from everywhere you can think of.

    This stuff isn't Quantum physics nor does it need detailed graphs and analysis. A pair of eyes in the head of a person with an IQ of 70+ is more than enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Woodsie1


    nc6000 wrote: »
    That's a stupid stupid comment. Should we have shut the country down weeks ago and stopped people who live here coming back home?

    Yours is a stupid comment...we cant stop our own citizens coming home but we can stop everyone else.
    Much easier dealing with our own people coming home


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    wakka12 wrote: »
    A lot recently, almost 200 new cases today, approaching 1000 now

    That's interesting. I'll have to look into Israel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭SharpshooterTom


    QUOTE=ThomasFlynn;112911045]The USA has a population 5-6 times of many countries in Europe. By definition it should have 5-6 times the number of infected cases. If you look at number of cases per million the USA is on 79, whereas Spain is 545, Italy 886, Germany 267 etc.

    Trump will be blamed for this no matter what, and absolutely he deserves some criticism, but the US aren't doing any worse than some countries in Europe, I'd argue they're doing better than the UK with 75 million now under lockdown, closing schools much earlier. Their mortality rate is also quite good for its population so far. He didn't engage in nonsense herding like Boris did. If Trump deserves blame so do a lot other world leaders therefore.

    And anyone who thinks if a democrat were in charge and would've avoided the stock market collapsing, a recession and huge job losses are no more than a partisan hack. That doesn't mean Trump is the right man for the crisis right now, far from it, I'm not confident in him either.


    The reason that the US is about to get reamed is because they have this pathological liar as their leader. This is what he posted TWO WEEKS AGO


    So last year 37,000 Americans died from the common Flu. It averages between 27,000 and 70,000 per year. Nothing is shut down, life & the economy go on. At this moment there are 546 confirmed cases of CoronaVirus, with 22 deaths. Think about that!
    2:47 pm · 9 Mar 2020·Twitter for iPhoneDonald J. Trump
    @realDonaldTrump

    Yeah he's an idiot, but Bolsonaro also made similar comments and Bojo inacted herding along with saying people will have to put with their loved ones dying.

    What he'll be judged on is how effectively he can flatten the curve and whether his stimulus package works. Trumps only one man, there's some smart people in his circle now like Dr.Fauci and Dr.Birx who are the ones really in charge of some of this now.

    As I say anyone who really thinks a Democrat would've stopped the US from going into a recession or preventing Coronavirus coming to the US are nothing short of partisan hacks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,424 ✭✭✭nc6000


    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    fritzelly wrote: »
    30% a day but don't let that get in the way of your close the borders narrative

    So you think keeping borders open and not trying to limit the spread is the correct course of action in the face of a highly contagious viral pandemic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭Xertz


    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.

    It's mostly because the Germans seem to only categorise a death by COVID-19 as such if it was exclusively caused by COVID-19. If the patient had comorbidities which technically may have caused their death, and COVID-19 is just a contributing factor, then it seemingly wasn't recorded as a death by COVID-19.

    There are all sorts of discrepancies and differences in how different countries are recording things.

    It's not a coverup or lies, rather it's just how the data's being presented.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    [QUOTE=Leo and his ilk wont suffer a cent[/QUOTE]

    Financially, no. But I believe Leo and Simon Coveney have the best of the country at heart and I think any and all deaths, they will feel guilty for and it will affect them, as it will all of us.
    I don't think they are heartless politicians.
    Leo's speech on Paddy's day, I couldn't do without tearing up.
    Simon Coveney did seem genuinely rattled and shocked giving press conferences/interviews earlier on.
    And no I didn't vote for them, they done a horrid job in government.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Germany has a history of keeping deaths secret.

    So have the uk


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.

    Yes lies. The true death toll has to be far higher than that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    https://vitaliyhayda.s3.amazonaws.com/coronavirus2.html
    If current growth persists there will be over 1 million cases worldwide by 31st March
    And almost 100 million by the end of April


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭V8 Interceptor


    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.

    Apparently they use different criteria for determining cause of death. In other words if someone already had a condition, then contracted the virus and died they might put down the original condition plus complications as the cause of death. At least that's what I heard although could be wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,712 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.

    They minimised the problem earlier and people did what they were asked to do, i.e. not go outside and congregate in groups unnecessarily.

    Britain, meanwhile, had a government that was saying sure it's grand, let 60% of the population catch it miraculously we'll get "Heard Immunity" somehow.

    It was only when it was pointed out that around 250,000 people could die that they changed tac.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,116 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    So you think keeping borders open and not trying to limit the spread is the correct course of action in the face of a highly contagious viral pandemic?

    Doesn't matter the 30% infection rate increase is fairly standard across all countries. Even Madagascar now has infections


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,116 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.

    Germany records the deaths differently in a way - if you have coronavirus but that exacerbates an underlying condition that kills you then that condition is the reason for the death and not coronavirus, similarly if you get pneumonia and die from it then that is the cause of death

    Will see if I can find the pneumonia report for 19/20 compared to the same period 18/19 - the 19/20 figures are way higher


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Woodsie1


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Financially, no. But I believe Leo and Simon Coveney have the best of the country at heart and I think any and all deaths, they will feel guilty for and it will affect them, as it will all of us.
    I don't think they are heartless politicians.
    Leo's speech on Paddy's day, I couldn't do without tearing up.
    Simon Coveney did seem genuinely rattled and shocked giving press conferences/interviews earlier on.
    And no I didn't vote for them, they done a horrid job in government.

    I admire your optimism in them.

    That speech was a horrible Churchill rip off for social media likes and clicks and Coveney is a cold and calculated as they come.

    Id actually rather Coveney in charge because hed make the difficult decisions without worrying about his media profile(IMHO of course)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭Bruce2008


    The more you test the more will show as haveing it... there are way more with the virus in the UK and Ireland than the figures show... unfortunately its the number of dead compared to the actual population and compare it to the first few weeks of the first death... its then you may see a comparison or hopefully not see a comparasion between us and other countries...
    nc6000 wrote: »
    Can anyone suggest a reason for the relatively small number of deaths in Germany compared to their number of confirmed positives and the size of their population?

    Germany currently has 22,213 recorded positives and 84 deaths while the UK has had 233 deaths from 5,067 cases.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Woodsie1


    Tony EH wrote: »
    They minimised the problem earlier and people did what they were asked to do, i.e. not go outside and congregate in groups unnecessarily.

    Britain, meanwhile, had a government that was saying sure it's grand, let 60% of the population catch it miraculously we'll get "Heard Immunity" somehow.

    It was only when it was pointed out that around 250,000 people could die that they changed tac.

    Every country is going for herd immunity,only thing the Brits did wrong is overload the NHS by not delaying it and "flattening the curve"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Yeah he's an idiot, but Bolsonaro also made similar comments and Bojo inacted herding along with saying people will have to put with their loved ones dying.

    What he'll be judged on is how effectively he can flatten the curve and whether his stimulus package works. Trumps only one man, there's some smart people in his circle now like Dr.Fauci and Dr.Birx who are the ones really in charge of some of this now.

    As I say anyone who really thinks a Democrat would've stopped the US from going into a recession or preventing Coronavirus coming to the US are nothing short of partisan hacks.

    I imagine just not actively avoiding taking action or indeed attempting to seriously offer a message of unity instead of "you're a terrible reporter".

    Sure the economy was always screwed from this and people would die. However the US response was horrific. They didn't have testing kits (working ones) till well after everyone else. They are still struggling to test with LA only testing those requiring hospital treatment at this point so their numbers are definitely miles off. They have had elected officials attempting to minimise how dangerous this is including Trump (though he has stopped others have continued). Many took the message of just a flu from Trump and have run with it.

    Never mind he has started telling people there is a cure ready to go. What sort of effect will that have on any idiot who believes him?

    And hey. He took praise for all the good of the stock market so he is tied to it. This includes tweeting looking for credit on one of the bounce back days in the middle of all of this.

    People are not saying a democrat would have stopped all of this but the US may have been able to give a coherent response instead of this shambles where only some state/city politicians have been able to pull together serious defenses against the virua.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Tony EH wrote: »
    They minimised the problem earlier and people did what they were asked to do, i.e. not go outside and congregate in groups unnecessarily.

    Britain, meanwhile, had a government that was saying sure it's grand, let 60% of the population catch it miraculously we'll get "Heard Immunity" somehow.

    It was only when it was pointed out that around 250,000 people could die that they changed tac.

    That makes no sense, Germany has 4 times as many positive cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    At what rate?

    looks like 1.25 rate increase.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    USA just overtook Italy new case total +7,686


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement