Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid-19 Part IX - 785 cases ROI (3 deaths) 108 in NI (1 death) (20 March) *Read OP*

14849515354325

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    Once public opinion goes that way. Leo is a populist, he'll do whatever he thinks makes him look good.

    This should be a pinned post. I concur


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Boggles wrote: »
    It's their projection.

    No it isn't. It is their worst case scenario. Not their most likely.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    Is there a bit of a head cold going around too?

    I am sneezing, blowing the nose and am tired. I have noticed my coworkers have similar symptoms. Nobody is coughing though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    If we believe what's coming out of the UK? 10-12 weeks until the peak.
    It's hard to believe an awful lot coming out of the UK. Until Monday last their "brilliant" plan was the way to go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    Not more of this Herd Immunity bolloxollogy...

    Up to 20% will need hospitalisation. 5%+ will need ICU treatment.

    It will swamp the health system and mean those with other life threatening illnesses that are not Covid-19 will be impacted. Some fatally. More health workers will get it and be put out of commission.

    People will be scared and won't go to work. People will stay at home and look after sick relatives.

    The economy will collapse anyway.

    There is a reason the British rowed back on Herd Immunity.

    The choice we have is take the pain now or eke it out and destroy the fabric of our society.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    Bob24 wrote: »
    Given the economic consequences which are already at play and the much worse ones which are in the way, 75 million euros is small change. But I assume this is supply isn't ellastic and also 15 euros is the current cost just for the swab (not the rest of the logistics around mass testing). So the equation probably isn't just a matter of 15 euros multiplied by population to be tested.

    I'm sure there are other costs, as you say. I was only doing back of a paper napkin rough calculation tbh...

    Still it is worth looking into surely?

    You could double or treble that figure, and it might still easily be a drop in the ocean compared to what will happen to our economy if this thing drags on indefinitely with no vaccine ready!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 245 ✭✭Syncpolice


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    Wasn't that roughly the UK's plan

    And they're dropping it slowly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Blueshoe wrote: »
    This should be a pinned post. I concur

    If you think Leo is populist, have a look across the benches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,824 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    For the vast majority of people the 'cure' will be way worse than the disease.

    Hundreds of thousands on the dole queues, tax receipts down the toilet and investments into critical services will have to be drastically slashed. The coming recession will kill way more people than the virus - just over a longer period and without the newspaper headlines.

    People over 65 could have been quarantined without any major effect on the economy.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    We may start to see the Cheltenham spike by the weekend.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,213 ✭✭✭utyh2ikcq9z76b


    If you think Leo is populist, have a look across the benches.

    Social welfare will be getting a massive rise then as everyone will be unemployed :p


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 26,064 Mod ✭✭✭✭Loughc


    We may start to see the Cheltenham spike by the weekend.

    Is there not a 14 day incubation period, we could be still a week behind seeing that spike if any.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    If you think Leo is populist, have a look across the benches.

    Almost all politicans are populists. That's how they get elected. Tell people what they want to hear them backtrack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    I'm sure there are other costs, as you say. I was only doing back of a paper napkin rough calculation tbh...

    Still it is worth looking into surely?

    You could double or treble that figure, and it might still easily be a drop in the ocean compared to what will happen to our economy if this thing drags on indefinitely with no vaccine ready!

    Yes couldn't agree more. If it has a significant impact in controlling the epidemic (which it seems it would based one Asian experiences) even 10 times that figure still is small change v.s. completely blocking the economy for several weeks with strict lockdowns as many continental European countries are now having to do.

    But to get the full benefit of massive testing, it has to be associated to measures making sure detected cases stay in strict quarantines (firm instructions given to them and punishment for non-compliance) as well as agressive contact tracking for each detected case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    I think I’ll listen to the experts instead

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭davedanon


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    Hold the presses! Put this person in charge, they know what to do!!!!


    I can just picture you sitting at the bar, yellowing pint of plain in front of you, as you deliver that pearl of wisdom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Humberto Salazar


    For the vast majority of people the 'cure' will be way worse than the disease.

    Hundreds of thousands on the dole queues, tax receipts down the toilet and investments into critical services will have to be drastically slashed. The coming recession will kill way more people than the virus - just over a longer period and without the newspaper headlines.

    People over 65 could have been quarantined without any major effect on the economy.

    The economic repercussions of this virus will last well after the last microbe is stamped out. Whether by accident or design, we're about to see a huge economic reset. Things will not be the same once this is over. Where that brings us, I do not know. In my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    josip wrote: »
    sZlNMmV.png

    Maybe she should go sell the coverage to skysports. Get that lovely ppv money....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,761 ✭✭✭threeball


    What is the form of the €750bn package annouced by the EU. Is this more money fed in to a banking system never to be seen again or does it go to government bonds.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    For the vast majority of people the 'cure' will be way worse than the disease.

    Hundreds of thousands on the dole queues, tax receipts down the toilet and investments into critical services will have to be drastically slashed. The coming recession will kill way more people than the virus - just over a longer period and without the newspaper headlines.

    People over 65 could have been quarantined without any major effect on the economy.

    Why are the British rowing back on Herd Immunity if it is "so perfect"?

    Perhaps because it will destroy the NHS and lead to the economy collapsing anyway?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Loughc wrote: »
    Is there not a 14 day incubation period, we could be still a week behind seeing that spike if any.

    Average incubation period is around 5 days.

    Cheltenham is a week long event and there is a lag on testing and results etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    jobeenfitz wrote: »
    I think when we start posting about "feelings" and especially other people's feelings we are just scaremongering, not saying your deliberately doing this but same effect.

    What if I posted that I had a feeling or I know someone working in a hospital that has a feeling that 25% of the population will die?

    Yes, you are right. Apologies. The opinion of those in ICU who think it's just starting to get busy now isn't any kind of solid evidence of anything. Your right, feelings aren't hard facts. I'll remember that in future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭davedanon


    Blueshoe wrote: »
    Almost all politicans are populists. That's how they get elected. Tell people what they want to hear them backtrack.

    No, they're not.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Blueshoe wrote: »
    Is there a bit of a head cold going around too?

    I am sneezing, blowing the nose and am tired. I have noticed my coworkers have similar symptoms. Nobody is coughing though

    There absolutely are the same old bugs out there. People get sick from other things too and will continue to do so. Another reason to mind your health as best you can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,710 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Simplistic rubbish. Shutting down an economy for a virus that is a minor illness for the vast majority of people is economic and social suicide. That is where the most hardship for most people will stem from, not the virus itself. The resources should have been focused on protecting the vulnerable.

    Another expert that's been listening to the eejit Johnson. The idiot Johnson has even already changed tack.

    Do you think several countries across the board are shutting down industries lightly? Cop on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    So whats the plan for those northern Italian town that have no new cases ?

    They'll still need to be lockeddown .... otherwise it just all starts up again.

    Like I said, the only way lockdowns work are if they are done untill the wide availability of a vaccine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    McWilliams saying on pat Kenny show that there is 750 billion available to hand to euro folk to spend in order to keep the economies moving. People need to spend and not hoard . Helicopter money. Hong Kong did it successfully. The Us considering it. The European Central bank gave the green light to dish it out.
    Up to Paschal now.


  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Kaysen Fat Podiatrist


    If the economy can't deal with being shut down for a while in the interest of people's health, perhaps the problem is with the economic system.

    The laborious trawling through inane drivel is worth it for a great post like this. Well said.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,761 ✭✭✭threeball


    The economic repercussions of this virus will last well after the last microbe is stamped out. Whether by accident or design, we're about to see a huge economic reset. Things will not be the same once this is over. Where that brings us, I do not know. In my opinion.

    It will bounce back quicker than you think. The whole world is affected, its not like all the money is funneling towards certain areas. People are staying where they are an honkering down. Once the worst passes the appetite will grow again quickly. Flights might be restricted but that is no bad theing. We have far too much frivolous travel.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement