Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid-19 Part VIII - 292 cases ROI (2 deaths) 62 in NI (as of 17th March) *Read OP*

1182183185187188322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,775 ✭✭✭threeball


    Italy 2,158 dead out of 27,980 infected. 7.7% mortality rate.

    7.7% lads scary stuff
    More than 70% of those who have died were men

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/17/this-is-like-a-war-view-from-italys-coronavirus-frontline

    Thats a percentage of those that needed attention or made themselves known. Not a percentage of those that had it and shook it off at home or never even knew. Plus their health system became overwhelmed early


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭jamesf85


    Italy 2,158 dead out of 27,980 infected. 7.7% mortality rate.

    7.7% lads scary stuff
    More than 70% of those who have died were men

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/17/this-is-like-a-war-view-from-italys-coronavirus-frontline

    It's more than 27,980 infected. In a place with a population density like northern Italy, there's probably well over 500,000 people infected with it now considering it's been there for 2 months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,444 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?
    something like 28% of their population is over 60.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,029 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?

    Italy has the oldest population in the world or Europe.

    They greet people different - kissing etc,

    I read somewhere that large % of men smoke - no idea how accurate that is.

    There are 66millioin people - in reality only a small % have been tested, i.e. the very sick - while a high % probably have it but not tested.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    The UK goverment were given a report that if they continued down the herd immunity route it would cost 250,000 lives. No wonder they have changed approach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭Lord Trollington


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.

    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,775 ✭✭✭threeball


    Where is the evidence that some of the Asian countries have even left the so-called "containment phase"?

    From what I am reading and watching, they are all still very aggressively testing, contact tracing and continuing to severely restrict movement of people!

    This "phased approach" that we've heard so much about on this side of the world, seems like nonsense to me. Why would you stop trying to aggressively test and contain this thing? The Asians are leading the way, and that's exactly what they seem to be doing!

    They will soon have to see the number of cases rise again or never be rid of it. This hasn't even kicked off in places like South Africa yet so when it does it will just take one traveller from there to reinfect China. They can't do quarantine forever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,329 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?

    There are a number of theories : lots of old people, families usually living together in big numbers, the Italian habit of hugging and kissing everyone.

    There's a fear too the virus may have been running riot in the country before anyone even noticed it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭PCeeeee


    Fire away if the little red book is primed.

    Mao?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭jamesf85


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.

    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?

    Its the only thing they can do. That or shut off from the outside world for a year or two.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭CinemaGuy45


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.

    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?

    I think you have it right.

    All the jobs losses in hospitality and retail are going to be a long lasting scar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭NapoleonInRags


    Strazdas wrote: »
    There are a number of theories : lots of old people, families usually living together in big numbers, the Italian habit of hugging and kissing everyone.

    There's a fear too the virus may have been running riot in the country before anyone even noticed it.

    None of those explain the mortality rate in fairness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?
    In my opinion it could be for 2 reasons.

    The first is it got into nursing homes at the beginning, average age of death is 80 which supports this.

    The second one is that its already widespread in italy with 100s of thousands of people having it but very few actually have been tested so this would explain the thousand or so that have died.

    I'm hoping for the second scenario myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    My wife is just back from our local SuperValu.

    Very busy, families with kids and no one observing adequate social distancing. It's no use staying inside with our families if our supermarkets are petrie dishes!

    I contacted them on FB about it and they responded saying they'd be back to me.

    Just finished watching Otto e mezzo, a daily primetime-like show on Italian TV. Number 1 message was social distancing. It is working as seen by leveling off of new cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    So communism!


    I know communism sounds great on paper but it does'nt work either.
    I'll also add i don't have a solution either.

    Capitalism

    Communism

    Catholicism

    Veganism

    Islamism

    Bolloxism

    In theory all these work, the problem with all "isms" is the problem of "bigness"

    Small is beautiful, its a great read


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,939 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    The UK goverment were given a report that if they continued down the herd immunity route it would cost 250,000 lives. No wonder they have changed approach.

    Let’s be real, though. It’s not that they didn’t think anyone would die with their inital response. It is simply that the number they got back was bigger than they had hoped. They were willing to let a significant number of people die. Just not a quarter of a million.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,775 ✭✭✭threeball


    Ace2007 wrote: »
    Italy has the oldest population in the world or Europe.

    They greet people different - kissing etc,

    I read somewhere that large % of men smoke - no idea how accurate that is.

    There are 66millioin people - in reality only a small % have been tested, i.e. the very sick - while a high % probably have it but not tested.

    The vast majority of Italians are crammed into the north of Italy also. Its extremely urbanised with cities running in to cities. Kinda like the UK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?
    My thoughts - A lot of very old people, an overwhelmed health system and that Italians didn't seem to take it too seriously at first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭pH


    threeball wrote: »
    Yes but the UK made a balls of it as they had no controls. We put in a system to speed it up or slow it down early. They didn't and still haven't, they just haven't see the effects yet. Todays numbers could be interesting though. We acted early and can now let it work its way through the population whilst protecting the old and vunerable. We won't see a lockdown unless the numbers start to spike and so everyone going to work is likely to see a mild case.

    If we don't do that we risk it coming back once we start the airlines again.

    If you read the imperial college epidemiology I posted you would understand why what you just posted is not correct. The UK abandoned mitigation not because they made a balls of it, but because data from Italy and elsewhere showed that their health service would not be able to cope.
    graph.jpg

    This graph shows their analysis, the blue curve is their most serious attempt at mitigation and it goes on until August this year.

    Anywhere where the blue curve is above that red line on the bottom is health service overload (and as you can see it's not 10% over it's 10 times overloaded) and represents hundreds of thousands of deaths, bluntly - it's a blood bath.

    Ireland has done nothing special, if we go for a mitigation strategy then we too will overload our health system massively (a factor of 10 at least) and there will be tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of deaths.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,329 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    None of those explain the mortality rate in fairness.

    It could definitely explain numbers of infections anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    My wife is just back from our local SuperValu.

    Very busy, families with kids and no one observing adequate social distancing. It's no use staying inside with our families if our supermarkets are petrie dishes!

    I contacted them on FB about it and they responded saying they'd be back to me.

    Just finished watching Otto e mezzo, a daily primetime-like show on Italian TV. Number 1 message was social distancing. It is working as seen by leveling off of new cases.

    That boils my blood.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭Mysteriouschic


    Bill Gates predicted this outbreak few years ago no one listened interesting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭PCeeeee


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Italians didn't seem to take it too seriously at first.

    Sadly I think this is the case. We need to learn from them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?

    I would imagine there's a large number of additional cases that haven't been able to get tests and are riding it out at home.

    I would also imagine that the decisions forced upon medical staff to not treat patients due to an excess of cases has resulted in extra deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭jamesf85


    Lord TSC wrote: »
    Let’s be real, though. It’s not that they didn’t think anyone would die with their inital response. It is simply that the number they got back was bigger than they had hoped. They were willing to let a significant number of people die. Just not a quarter of a million.

    No one is willing to let people die.

    No matter what route you take there's going to be casualties.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.


    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?

    What you didn't mention was the lack of ramping up of ventilators. There is nowhere near what will be required when the ****e really hits the fan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    recyclebin wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the fatality rate in Italy is so high compared to everywhere else?

    https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/16/opinions/south-korea-italy-coronavirus-survivability-sepkowitz/index.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.

    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?

    I suspect this is the plan. A full lockdown of the country is not affordable and won't happen.

    Schools will likely be closed until September.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭Mervyn Skidmore


    It seems to me what Ireland is attempting to do is keep cases to a minimum for a number of weeks so a lockdown may or may not be necessary depending on how numbers develop in coming days/weeks.

    Ramp up the recruitment of health care staff to record levels..
    Ramp up bed numbers and equipment.

    Slowly ease off on restrictions and slowly get back to normal knowing that we have the beds, equipment and staff to deal with the potential numbers of infected.

    Let the virus run its course using effective treatments and extra health resources to deal with it whilst everything more or less back to normal in terms of businesses schools etc?

    Am I right in my analysis of what their game plan may be ?
    That's my understanding too.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement