Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Coronavirus Part V - 34 cases in ROI, 16 in NI (as of 10 March) *Read warnings in OP*

1310311313315316328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    The government are only barely starting to react to this, but when it does, wouldn't it be wise to coordinate with the Stormont government as well? While covid-19 is a problem shared with the whole of Europe, this is particularly the case for neighbors, particularly when we have a hope of screening people coming onto the island of Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭Tootsie_1


    Wibbs wrote: »
    They should. My local pharmacist is already. Bumped into her yesterday and she mentioned they were getting masks and hand sanitiser, but only one each per customer and existing customers have preference over randomers. She told me the last fortnight has been a bit daft, with the occasional individual being insane and asking to buy whole boxes of gloves, hand wash and masks and a couple had screaming fits when they were told no. She told them to head off and had to threaten ringing the Guards on them. Apparently the latest thing they've been hit by is people trying to stock up on paracetamol.

    Paracetamol will be going short from the manufacturers as a lot of ingredients come out of China and India ... so it could be hard to get once supplies here run low


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,339 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Scotty # wrote: »
    or until we put the country under lockdown.

    And how long do we put the country in lockdown
    How do we stop the virus coming back after lockdown as other countries will still have cases. If we do it for a period how do we get the food we import. How do we pay people. How many jobs will be left


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    So I'm in hospital in the Midlands not a case of it.... But no visitors allowed not even off duty staff to visit me who are nurses.. crazy stuff

    Prevention far better than cure, they are doing the right thing, for a hospital especially.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    The horse has bolted now, but for future outbreaks, perhaps the WHO should be funded by doner nations to have warehouses of essential virus-fighting materiel in-storage and a corps of trained nurses, virologists and doctors for rapid-response to initial outbreak in whatever country.

    It's an expensive proposition, but it's preferable to what's unfolding now.

    If nations can spend billions maintaining armed forces, they can do so for an international medical army to protect global health.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Steve F


    Stupid question

    I assume this cant be stopped until we find a vaccine?

    Forgot to say on my other post.Vaccine's don't stop viruses in their tracks they reduce the number of people contracting them
    The seasonal 'flu vaccine is only 50-60% effective
    When they eventually release one for Covid19 we won't be completely "out of the woods" That's the huge mistake we could make in the aftermath of all this.

    "We have a vaccine...it's all over" :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    So I'm in hospital in the Midlands not a case of it.... But no visitors allowed not even off duty staff to visit me who are nurses.. crazy stuff

    Yes it would be much better for there to be an outbreak there and for a floundering response to then be delivered.

    Do people not actually understand how viruses spread or are they just pretending? This entire outbreak has given me good reason to question the intelligence of the general population.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    touts wrote: »
    Agree.

    And I was shocked at the disgraceful scenes from Cheltenham on the news last night. Tens of thousands of half pissed gamblers crammed in together, celebrating a few horses running around a field. Gamblers is probably the key word there. They are gambling with the health of the nation all for a bit of craic.

    If many cases are traced back to people going to Cheltenham then it will be the end of the Horse Racing industry. It will be hard to justify pumping
    tens of millions of taxpayers money into their hobby after they give the two fingers to the public. When cuts inevitably come to government budgets to compensate for the Coronavirus recession then there will be a public demand for the horse industry to be first on the chopping block.

    60k at Cheltenham each day, The Tube carries 60k every hour or so. Should the Tube be shut down??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Maybe supermarkets need to start rationing?

    There was someone on the radio from a pharmacy the other day and they are only allowing 2 hand sanitisers per customer. Amazed this isn't happening in other places.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Cilldara_2000


    Either a vaccine or the kind of ruthless methods employed by the Chinese.

    We won't have the first for well over a year.

    Luke O'Neill on Pat Kenny programme there this morning. He seems to be more confident about a vaccine in September based on the number of teams working on it, how the all want to be first so there's a race between them, and the funding that has been available to them.

    No doubt we can completely ignore this particular expert because the responsible experts are in scare-the-public-into-compliance mode. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,420 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    And how long do we put the country in lockdown
    How do we stop the virus coming back after lockdown as other countries will still have cases. If we do it for a period how do we get the food we import. How do we pay people. How many jobs will be left

    19 questions and not one question mark.

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭otnomart


    France has nearly 1800 cases and French citizens are not allowed to travel in a number of Countries.
    At the moment: Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, India, El Salvador.
    Vietnam has not a ban but is discouraging travel from France
    Nepal is no longer issuing Visa to travellers from France
    Other Countries have not banned travel from France but are imposing a quarantine on arrival
    https://www.bfmtv.com/international/acces-interdit-quarantaine-ces-pays-quiimposent-des-restrictions-aux-francais-en-raison-du-coronavirus-1872894.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    And how long do we put the country in lockdown
    How do we stop the virus coming back after lockdown as other countries will still have cases. If we do it for a period how do we get the food we import. How do we pay people. How many jobs will be left

    You can lockdown early and save many lives.
    You can lockdown when the sh*t hits the fan after CV really takes hold.

    Either way the economy tanks and a similar amount of jobs are lost.

    This is not rocket science.

    You don't have to do a total lockdown.

    Closing schools for example will lead to few if any job losses if remote schooling is set up properly. Likewise those working from home generally.

    When you lockdown, you still keep essential services running - in fact a lockdown helps keep these services running, as healthcare professionals are not swamped with people getting coronavirus because they went to school or went socialising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭sudzs


    Do we have any idea how many tests the HSE have actually carried out??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    Boggles wrote: »
    19 questions and not one question mark.

    :)

    Seems reasonable as there won't be any answer forthcoming from those in authority


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,630 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    leahyl wrote: »
    There was someone on the radio from a pharmacy the other day and they are only allowing 2 hand sanitisers per customer. Amazed this isn't happening in other places.

    Ordinary soap is fine.
    Don't get obsessed about hand sanitizers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,420 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Luke O'Neill on Pat Kenny programme there this morning. He seems to be more confident about a vaccine in September based on the number of teams working on it, how the all want to be first so there's a race between them, and the funding that has been available to them.

    No doubt we can completely ignore this particular expert because the responsible experts are in scare-the-public-into-compliance mode. :rolleyes:

    China will trial it next month, which means they are all ready injecting humans.

    Trials of treatments are underway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,475 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    Yes it would be much better for there to be an outbreak there and for a floundering response to then be delivered.

    Do people not actually understand how viruses spread or are they just pretending? This entire outbreak has given me good reason to question the intelligence of the general population.

    Collective intelligence of the human species is barely above that of monkeys.
    Only for a few exceptional geniuses we’ll still be in caves scratching our balls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    A vaccine by September would be best-case-scenario. Fingers crossed they can get it done and it's not rolled-out on a for-profit basis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 567 ✭✭✭tillyfilly


    I'm in the office at work and some people are clearly sick,should I start wearing my back up mask and gloves?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    The numbers are scary, but the logic behind them is correct
    I applaud her attempt at giving people a wake-up call before it's too late

    It's a worst case scenario.

    It's not taking into account that this is a cumulative stat - this is over the next 18 months, in which case new treatments and hopefully a vaccine will be available - not to mention the likely slowdown of spread in the summer heat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Xertz wrote: »
    I’m starting to go from just being concerned to feeling this whole thing is far too close to home and seemingly has no end in sight.

    I’ve relatives who are elderly and others who’ve lung issues and I even am getting a bit paranoid about this as I’m getting a tickle in my throat today and just didn’t leave the house and worked from home.


    I took on a piece of research that involves fieldwork which I basically can’t safely do. So that’s scrapped for now and again I’m being told I’m taking it too seriously.

    And to make matters really bad there seem to be no end in sight for months or possibly even into 2021.

    I honestly think I’ll have to just go walk on a beach tomorrow, far away from people coughing or I’ll go cracked! I don’t want to pick anything up pass anything on. So I’m just going to keep away from places with people and clear my head.

    If this is the “new normal” I’ll need a lot of walks on the beach and some very chilled out music.

    Walking on the beach is perfect. Especially in a good breeze. Go !


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭Stevieluvsye


    Luke O'Neill on Pat Kenny programme there this morning. He seems to be more confident about a vaccine in September based on the number of teams working on it, how the all want to be first so there's a race between them, and the funding that has been available to them.

    No doubt we can completely ignore this particular expert because the responsible experts are in scare-the-public-into-compliance mode. :rolleyes:

    We'll all be dead by then, according to some posters


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    Drumpot wrote: »
    If I remember correct from Dr Aylwards conference a few weeks ago, he suggested that at the start death rates are high because

    - populations do not really know how to react , how to be careful and what the symptoms are so don’t know when to self isolate or go get medical help
    - more vulnerable people die quicker/sooner
    - governments and hospitals/healthcare have not dealt with it so are not fully prepared

    And basically the opposite happens as everyone comes to terms with it and learns what has to be done.

    Yeah my assumption would be similar but that only me applying everyday logic to a situation where it may not apply.

    I’d imagine the death rate will be high at the start as it’ll take out the low hanging fruit (apologies for the insensitive term)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Ordinary soap is fine.
    Don't get obsessed about hand sanitizers.

    Yes, I know that but I imagine people want them for when they are out and about - not at home. Soap isn't much use if you are on the go - you'd have to have access to toilet facilities in order to wash your hands.

    Soap is obviously perfectly fine at home.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Woah. Hold on.

    If you’re self isolating then wtf are you going to the shops for!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    otnomart wrote: »
    At least one of the UK cases is related to travel in Australia.
    This is in addition to the UK case originated in Singapore (the businessman who then travel to the sky resort in France)
    "One England sequence clusters distantly with Australian sequences. These may be related by travel history."

    https://twitter.com/nextstrain/status/1237516085785702406

    I read up a little on Spanish flu yesterday. The main spreaders were soldiers travelling during world war 1. The Spanish flu eased when world war one came to an end.


    This Covid-19 - tourists are the main spreaders. At this stage and I hate to say it the boarders should be closed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 industry accountant


    tillyfilly wrote: »
    I'm in the office at work and some people are clearly sick,should I start wearing my back up mask and gloves?

    My boss was in Italy over the weekend for a nice relaxing break away and came back into work yesterday!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Woah. Hold on.

    If you’re self isolating then wtf are you going to the shops for!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,782 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    And how long do we put the country in lockdown
    How do we stop the virus coming back after lockdown as other countries will still have cases. If we do it for a period how do we get the food we import. How do we pay people. How many jobs will be left

    I would guestimate it will take a minimum of 6 months. It will cause a major recession and many many job loses.

    The alternative is to follow Italy into the abyss. Hundreds dying PER DAY and no room in hospitals for new cases. Lockdown is the lesser of two evils I think.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement