Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

14849515354334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭ihatethesea


    User8011 wrote: »
    Sorry if it has already been asked and I’ve missed it but what’s everyone learning for contract and company.. the pressure is on.

    For contract im concentrating:
    Offer/Acceptance
    Consideration
    Mistake*/Misrep
    Remedies
    Terms/Exemption Clauses
    Discharge

    Any big ones im missing ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    For contract im concentrating:
    Offer/Acceptance
    Consideration
    Mistake*/Misrep
    Remedies
    Terms/Exemption Clauses
    Discharge

    Any big ones im missing ?

    Consumer Protection, big big topic!!! Examiner loves it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭ihatethesea


    Consumer Protection, big big topic!!! Examiner loves it!

    Oh **** ya, i actually had that one as well, that should be enough?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭godfather2


    Louis Litt wrote: »
    Equity

    In rescission, is it only UI that comes up?

    Do you mean undue influence by UI?
    Apologies if that's a stupid question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Reya10


    Equity

    Can anyone please explain what we need to know about the Brussels Convention/Jurisdiction of Courts Act 1998 in relation to Mareva injunctions? My manual doesn't say anything about it but I've just read in an examiners report that it was a really important point for a PQ on mareva that most people missed


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭godfather2


    Reya10 wrote: »
    Equity

    Can anyone please explain what we need to know about the Brussels Convention/Jurisdiction of Courts Act 1998 in relation to Mareva injunctions? My manual doesn't say anything about it but I've just read in an examiners report that it was a really important point for a PQ on mareva that most people missed

    I think it's transnational litigation? An agreement, whereby orders can be enforced, actions started etc in other jurisdictions. If a plaintiff in Spain wants to litigate against a party in ireland but is unable to serve papers, they can do so through the irish courts and vice versa. Effectively international force given to mareva injunction. So assets in another jurisdiction can be frozen to protect right of recovery. Obviously will only apply to signatories of the convention.

    Hoping someone else can confirm if I am on the right track. Didn't even consider this would be an angle so thanks for the heads up.

    Could you send me a copy of that question please, not come across it. Have some notes on it I can dig out. Think the other name is laguno, or luguno convention.2007?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Reya10


    godfather2 wrote: »
    I think it's transnational litigation? An agreement, whereby orders can be enforced, actions started etc in other jurisdictions. If a plaintiff in Spain wants to litigate against a party in ireland but is unable to serve papers, they can do so through the irish courts and vice versa. Effectively international force given to mareva injunction. So assets in another jurisdiction can be frozen to protect right of recovery. Obviously will only apply to signatories of the convention.

    Hoping someone else can confirm if I am on the right track. Didn't even consider this would be an angle so thanks for the heads up.

    Could you send me a copy of that question please, not come across it. Have some notes on it I can dig out. Think the other name is laguno, or luguno convention.2007?


    Cheers for that- Q1 October 2007, it might be a bit out of date as I can see NBN mention 2012 act? Send me your email in a pm and I'll send it over!

    If it helps anyone else the examiner said:

    'In order to address this question on mareva injunctions, students needed to address whether or not the Irish courts had jurisdiction to consider such an application, having regard to the Jurisdiction of Courts and Enforcement of Judgments Act 1998. It is surprising how many students failed to consider and/or understand the importance of this in relation to this question. Other than that, students showed a good overall knowledge of the standards required by the Courts of this and other jurisdictions in order to obtain such an injunction.'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Louis Litt


    godfather2 wrote: »
    Do you mean undue influence by UI?
    Apologies if that's a stupid question.

    Yeah, Undue Infulence. I know the chapter on Rescission also includes Misrep, Mistake and Improvidence but i'm not sure if they have been asked before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 Caroline Hamblyn


    Hi would anyone have past exam papers for equity for 2017 and 2018 please? Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Worried that splitting my time between Equity and Company will have me failing both :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    Worried that splitting my time between Equity and Company will have me failing both :(

    I realised yesterday evening my notes for shareholder protection were totally off the mark, I had nothing on quasi-partnerships. Spent the whole evening re-writing them and lost about half the day’s study time. Dreading it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 User8011


    Worried that splitting my time between Equity and Company will have me failing both :(

    I’m the exact same re company and contract, I’m wondering if I’m better focusing on one and winging the second rather than failing both


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Jeremiah25


    Worried that splitting my time between Equity and Company will have me failing both :(

    Imagine having contract throw into the mix too!! Busy weekend ahead!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    User8011 wrote: »
    I’m the exact same re company and contract, I’m wondering if I’m better focusing on one and winging the second rather than failing both

    Go for gold!
    Jeremiah25 wrote: »
    Imagine having contract throw into the mix too!! Busy weekend ahead!

    Fair play to you, hope you can pull it off!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Michelle3339


    What are people covering for company?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    What are people covering for company?

    Companies Act - Main Changes
    LTD v DAC
    Summary Approval Procedure
    Corporate Authority
    SLP
    Directors
    Restrictions
    Shareholders Rights
    Minority Protection
    Share Transfer
    Borrowing
    Receivership
    Realisation of Assets
    Winding up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    What are people covering for company?

    Directors
    Fraudulent and Reckless Trading
    Restriction, D/Q
    Corporate Borrowing
    SLP
    Shareholder’s Rights and Oppression
    Share Transfer
    Corporate Authority
    Liquidation
    Realisation of Corporate Assets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Greentea12


    Does anybody have the Equity paper from last sitting? Or even just know what topics came up exactly?? Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Also one of the law school predictions are:

    Q1. LTD v DAC
    Q2. Corporate Authority
    Q3. Summary Approval Procedure
    Q4. Minority Protection + Winding Up
    Q5. Directors + Conflicts of Interest
    Q6. Corporate Borrowing
    Q7. Receivership
    Q8. Realisation of Assets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 BlackhallPlz


    Does anyone know what kind of a marker Company is?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    Also one of the law school predictions are:

    Q1. LTD v DAC
    Q2. Corporate Authority
    Q3. Summary Approval Procedure
    Q4. Minority Protection + Winding Up
    Q5. Directors + Conflicts of Interest
    Q6. Corporate Borrowing
    Q7. Receivership
    Q8. Realisation of Assets

    Do you have anything on SAP/ LTD v DAC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Do you have anything on SAP/ LTD v DAC?

    PM me your email


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭CiaranS93


    I have typed company notes for th 5 main topics if anyone is stuck ðŸ‘


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    Greentea12 wrote: »
    Does anybody have the Equity paper from last sitting? Or even just know what topics came up exactly?? Thanks!

    Interlocutory injunction, quistclose trust, charitable trusts/cy-pres, estoppel, tracing, strong v bird, Hastings bass, trustees duties...

    That’s all I can remember anyway if I’m right but pretty certain!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 Lcork23


    What are people covering for Property?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 tommyq94


    Does anyone have any of the law schools predictions for Equity?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭ahhhhhFE1s


    Lcork23 wrote: »
    What are people covering for Property?

    1. Succession
    S117 Application
    Formalities
    Spousal Rights
    Intestacy
    Construction
    2. Licences & Rights of Residence
    3. Co-Ownership
    4. Adverse Possession
    5. Easements
    6. Family Property
    7. Finding
    8. Landlord and Tenant
    Residential Tenancies Act
    Withholding Consent
    Deasy’s Act
    Walsh v Lonsdale

    Contemplating adding another topic but don't want to if I don't have to.. Maybe Land Registration??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭L.E.D


    Hey!!
    Anyone have a topics that are most likely NOT gonna come up for equity, really want to focus on some that I can be sure isn't a waste of time.

    Sat criminal, but hadnt given enough study time for the topics for the 4 part que (contempt of court etc) so had very bad answers for them and looking to avoid that if possible!

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Reya10


    Hi would anyone have past exam papers for equity for 2017 and 2018 please? Thanks

    I have them if you send me your email


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 Lcork23


    ahhhhhFE1s wrote: »
    1. Succession
    S117 Application
    Formalities
    Spousal Rights
    Intestacy
    Construction
    2. Licences & Rights of Residence
    3. Co-Ownership
    4. Adverse Possession
    5. Easements
    6. Family Property
    7. Finding
    8. Landlord and Tenant
    Residential Tenancies Act
    Withholding Consent
    Deasy’s Act
    Walsh v Lonsdale

    Contemplating adding another topic but don't want to if I don't have to.. Maybe Land Registration??



    I am doing the same topics to you but I decided not to do Landlord and Tenant and instead I am doing Registered and Unregistered land preparing it as a essay but I don't know.

    I am debating between Family Property and Mortgages! Don't know what to do!!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement