Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1…4243454748…334

Comments

  • #1322
    Molly347
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6 ✭Molly347


    Property (Succession)

    Does anyone know the outcome of In bonis McCullagh where he wrote cancelled on the back of the will? I cant seem to find the result online - was the will revoked?


  • #1323
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    For Criminal, what offences did people put down for Q2, the Adam & Emma problem q?


  • #1324
    rightytighty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    For Criminal, what offences did people put down for Q2, the Adam & Emma problem q?

    Potential Criminal Damage for forcible entry, assault for his hand on her mouth, burglary for trespass w/ intent to commit crime, s5 NFOATP Threat to kill, assault causing harm for striking her face, rape, aggravated sexual assault for threat with knife to remove clothes, rape under s3 for oral rape, false imprisonment s15 NFOATP


  • #1325
    the baby bull elephant
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    rightytighty wrote: »
    I thought it was ok, I got 5 handy enough. For Liam the drug user in Q5, was it an insanity defence? Intoxication not open as his intention not disputed?

    Is it not intoxication is available due to murder being a crime of specific intent?


  • #1326
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    rightytighty wrote: »
    Potential Criminal Damage for forcible entry, assault for his hand on her mouth, burglary for trespass w/ intent to commit crime, s5 NFOATP Threat to kill, assault causing harm for striking her face, rape, aggravated sexual assault for threat with knife to remove clothes, rape under s3 for oral rape, false imprisonment s15 NFOATP

    Phew okay I put nearly all of those down too! A lot going on in that q


  • Advertisement
  • #1327
    lawstudentirl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 30 ✭lawstudentirl


    Criminal paper didn’t go well for me at all... but time to focus on the rest I suppose!


  • #1328
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    Phew okay I put nearly all of those down too! A lot going on in that q

    I put down aggravated burglary if it can be proved he entered with the knife on him!


  • #1329
    Lovestolisten
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lovestolisten


    the baby bull elephant wrote: »
    Is it not intoxication is available due to murder being a crime of specific intent?

    Majewski I think is the big one in specific and basic intent, using intoxication as a possible defence


  • #1330
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    nmurphy1441 wrote: »
    I put down aggravated burglary if it can be proved he entered with the knife on him!

    Ah that's smart, didn't think of that!!

    Also what did people discuss for Part A of Q1, ie Kevin shooting and killing Elaine 'by accident'?

    I'm just so paranoid I've barked up the wrong tree with some q's :eek:


  • #1331
    Lovestolisten
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lovestolisten


    Lovestolisten wrote: »
    Majewski I think is the big one in specific and basic intent, using intoxication as a possible defence

    If he’s charged with Murder under section 4 he can run with Intoxication, Manslaughter no intoxication because recklessness is an element of the crime.. unless his intoxication was not self induced (spiked etc..)


  • Advertisement
  • #1332
    rightytighty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    nmurphy1441 wrote: »
    I put down aggravated burglary if it can be proved he entered with the knife on him!

    Ah yes same, not looking good for Adam!

    What did people have for question 4? I didn’t even have time for the fourth part as I had to start my fifth question.. I had the below:

    1) unlawful use of computer, deception, theft, false accounting

    2) possession of a syringe, assault with a syringe, would-be robbery but arrival of gardai made it attempt

    3) criminal damage, public disorder, threatening behaviour, burglary (??? Trespasser once asked to leave and committed criminal damage thereafter)


  • #1333
    Lovestolisten
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lovestolisten


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    Ah that's smart, didn't think of that!!

    Also what did people discuss for Part A of Q1, ie Kevin shooting and killing Elaine 'by accident'?

    I'm just so paranoid I've barked up the wrong tree with some q's :eek:

    Criminal negligent/ Criminal and Dangerous act manslaughter


  • #1334
    ihatethesea
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭ihatethesea


    I had three good answers two bad for criminal- any chance of passing ??


  • #1335
    user115
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭user115


    What is a basic layout on an answer on judicial review? what topics would you cover?


  • #1336
    Breacnua
    Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭Breacnua


    ihatethesea wrote: »
    I had three good answers two bad for criminal- any chance of passing ??

    yes, keep the faith


  • #1337
    rightytighty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    the baby bull elephant wrote: »
    Is it not intoxication is available due to murder being a crime of specific intent?

    Yeah it is but I said that because he didn’t dispute intending to kill it wouldn’t be viable, not even sure that’s correct it’s just what I said

    I think (hope) once you make a point with relevant law and back it up you should be fine??? Hopefully!!


  • #1338
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    user115 wrote: »
    What is a basic layout on an answer on judicial review? what topics would you cover?

    Judicial review is Locus Standi, Effects of Unconstitutionality, Justiciability, Mootness etc I think, I've only covered the first two


  • #1339
    Supermax1988
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    ihatethesea wrote: »
    I had three good answers two bad for criminal- any chance of passing ??

    Yeah. He is a very fair marker. I had pretty much the same when I sat Criminal. Once you get five answers down you always have a chance.


  • #1340
    Bex20
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11 ✭Bex20


    Any one have any predictions for Company?

    Starting to panic I don't have enough done.


  • #1341
    lawgrad15
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭lawgrad15


    the baby bull elephant wrote: »
    Is it not intoxication is available due to murder being a crime of specific intent?

    I said intoxication - yes murder being specific intent.
    It was similar in ways to Celyn Eadon case which was decided before Christmas.


  • Advertisement
  • #1342
    user115
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭user115


    iamanengine wrote: »
    Judicial review is Locus Standi, Effects of Unconstitutionality, Justiciability, Mootness etc I think, I've only covered the first two

    I don't have time to do it so just gonna cover first 3, justiciavility you will have covered under SOP so you should be grand for it, really really hoping it will be a nice exam.


  • #1343
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    rightytighty wrote: »
    Ah yes same, not looking good for Adam!

    What did people have for question 4? I didn’t even have time for the fourth part as I had to start my fifth question.. I had the below:

    1) unlawful use of computer, deception, theft, false accounting

    2) possession of a syringe, assault with a syringe, would-be robbery but arrival of gardai made it attempt

    3) criminal damage, public disorder, threatening behaviour, burglary (??? Trespasser once asked to leave and committed criminal damage thereafter)

    1) Same but didn’t say false accounting

    2) Same but said it was a robbery as he got possession of the wallet

    3) Just put criminal damage for this one

    4) incitement to commit rape


  • #1344
    user115
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭user115


    Bex20 wrote: »
    Any one have any predictions for Company?

    Starting to panic I don't have enough done.

    Company from what I remember always:

    2 q on directors duties (def 1 for sure anyway)

    1 q on charges

    1 q on limited liability or some of that intro stuff

    1 q on shareholders in some form either their protection or share transfer, protection up last time so maybe share transfer but 100% on that, see yourself, company is actually fine once you know core topics above

    I could be wrong but I don't think examinership or receivership was up last time so know both very well id say highly like may be up but def check last sitting paper, that's just all from memory


  • #1345
    Supermax1988
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    ihatethesea wrote: »
    I had three good answers two bad for criminal- any chance of passing ??

    Yeah. He is a very fair marker. I had pretty much the same when I sat Criminal. Once you get five answers down you always have a chance.


  • #1346
    TCPIP
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭TCPIP


    Anyone sit the exam in Neptune? How was it handled?


  • #1347
    bobbyness
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭bobbyness


    Hi All. First time using this forum. If anyone has up to date exam grids for fe1s (Preferably need contract and tort for upcoming exam)

    Anyone who has any and would be willing to share with me, send me a PM - It'd be much appreciated! (And if you have contract or tort this time round I'll get you a pre-exam coffee!)

    Thanks for any help!


  • #1348
    rightytighty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭rightytighty


    TCPIP wrote: »
    Anyone sit the exam in Neptune? How was it handled?

    Much more chill than red cow, doesn’t feel like half as big a deal and there’s nowhere near as much panic etc


  • #1349
    eLawGirl
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 ✭eLawGirl


    TCPIP wrote: »
    Anyone sit the exam in Neptune? How was it handled?

    Very well, lovely invigilators, only issue was the hall was freezing


  • #1350
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    Anyone on here attempt Q8 on the criminal paper?


  • Advertisement
  • #1351
    Hamerzan Sickles
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Hamerzan Sickles


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    Ah that's smart, didn't think of that!!

    Also what did people discuss for Part A of Q1, ie Kevin shooting and killing Elaine 'by accident'?

    I'm just so paranoid I've barked up the wrong tree with some q's :eek:

    I said novus actus interveniens, with Elaine as the victim possibly breaking the chain of causation for the criminal act [attempted suicide]. But it was a toss up between that and unlawful and dangerous manslaughter, I just didn't think any of the cases were of the same applicability there.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement