Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus Fleet/Routes Discussion

1290291293295296324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Flew with Aerlingus to and from Miami and I have to say even as a very nervous flyer it was great. Bigger planes then normally fly the route, A330 - 302, so loads of space to lie down etc. Good bit of turbulence on the way back due to the tail wind but felt safe and comfortable the whole time.

    Interesting as well flew with American Airlines during the trip also going to S/America and on take off and landing the do not ask you to open up the window blind, any reason why this is the norm for European airlines and not for AA?
    European law versus US law?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Delta seem to insist on the window blinds open.

    US in general has a more lax approach, bags under seats at exit rows etc. Large headphones etc are not an issue at take off/landing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Mr.S wrote: »
    Is that an issue with European carriers? I never seen them ask people to take them off for take off / landing

    Aer Lingus do, they're often questioned about it via their social media platforms and never appear able to give a straight answer which does them no favours.

    I can understand the reasoning, sound cancelling headphones at crucial stages of flight isn't the best idea and they also tend to be quite heavy with thick wiring which could easily become a projectile or obstruction within the cabin in the event of an emergency.

    Unfortunately Aer Lingus have never made it clear via their website or when asked directly and some people (with far too much time of their hands) just won't accept any of their answers, apparently listening to their music is far more important to aircraft safety!

    Just look at this ridiculous exchange;

    https://twitter.com/JonnyCosgrove/status/1230774161414316037

    Click to expand the conversation.

    I bet the social media team just wanted to tell him to get a life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭Third_Echelon


    Delta seem to insist on the window blinds open.

    US in general has a more lax approach, bags under seats at exit rows etc. Large headphones etc are not an issue at take off/landing

    Can’t really agree with that. Fly quite a bit with Alaska and Southwest in the US and they are quite strict on exit row passengers with bags etc. Always have to go up into the overhead for takeoff and landing. Headphones they go over ear is only really a thing with Aer Lingus for some reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Aer Lingus do, they're often questioned about it via their social media platforms and never appear able to give a straight answer which does them no favours.

    I can understand the reasoning, sound cancelling headphones at crucial stages of flight isn't the best idea and they also tend to be quite heavy with thick wiring which could easily become a projectile or obstruction within the cabin in the event of an emergency.

    Unfortunately Aer Lingus have never made it clear via their website or when asked directly and some people (with far too much time of their hands) just won't accept any of their answers, apparently listening to their music is far more important to aircraft safety!

    Just look at this ridiculous exchange;

    https://twitter.com/JonnyCosgrove/status/1230774161414316037

    Click to expand the conversation.

    I bet the social media team just wanted to tell him to get a life.

    None of that reasoning really works - there have been fully wireless over ear headphones for many years that wouldn’t cause any physical problems. In addition, there have been in-ear ones that have had noise cancellation for a while too, yet those are fine?

    That all said, I kept my over ear headphones on on my last flight to SFO, so maybe they’ve dropped this silly idea.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,166 ✭✭✭trellheim


    That all said, I kept my over ear headphones on on my last flight to SFO, so maybe they’ve dropped this silly idea.

    They have not let me assure you.

    EI verbally tell people to remove muff-style headphones but allow earbuds for taxi takeoff and landing , they are draconian on this. However it is listed nowhere on their website or Cara magazine (or didnt at my last readthrough ) , which in other respects matches the safety brief correctly.



    Ryanair depends on who you get in cabin crew but if I recall it is the same for safety brief anyway after that they are not too worried.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    I wear my wireless earbuds from the moment I arrive at the airport w the minute I arrive at the far side (mostly so I don't have to engage with the people around me) but I have no problem taking them out for the couple of minutes it takes to do the safety briefing even though I've heard it a thousand times before.
    I already know my nearest emergency exit and I've already worked out who I need to take down to get to it... :)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    trellheim wrote: »
    They have not let me assure you.

    EI verbally tell people to remove muff-style headphones but allow earbuds for taxi takeoff and landing , they are draconian on this. However it is listed nowhere on their website or Cara magazine (or didnt at my last readthrough ) , which in other respects matches the safety brief correctly.



    Ryanair depends on who you get in cabin crew but if I recall it is the same for safety brief anyway after that they are not too worried.

    A friend told me it’s also EI procedure to do something like 3 random checks on PEDs to make sure they’re in flight mode, as in the Cabin crew are supposed to asked random passengers to hand over their phone or display it in such a way that the crew member can clearly see it’s in flight mode. I bet none of you have seen this and it’s because the crew themselves feel it ridiculous and far to invasive but were they to do their job exactly to the book that’s what they should do as part of their cabin secure checks.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    One point to remember is that the inflight magazine does not have a comprehensive list of all the safety regs of the airlines
    (does it have refuelling during boarding procedures?)

    Regardless of whether we agree with this policy, it is an instruction given by a representative of the captain. Part of buying the tickets is agreeing to comply with all instructions from crew.


    As an aside, if your headphones are wireless Im going to assume they use Bluetooth?
    Which isn't permitted according to the in-flight magazine (which I last checked in December)
    So pulling out the magazine to argue may not be a great idea!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    trellheim wrote: »
    They have not let me assure you.

    EI verbally tell people to remove muff-style headphones but allow earbuds for taxi takeoff and landing , they are draconian on this. However it is listed nowhere on their website or Cara magazine (or didnt at my last readthrough ) , which in other respects matches the safety brief correctly.



    Ryanair depends on who you get in cabin crew but if I recall it is the same for safety brief anyway after that they are not too worried.

    I wonder if it’s because the last time I flew it was business class? They definitely saw me wearing the headphones and said nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Tenger wrote: »
    As an aside, if your headphones are wireless Im going to assume they use Bluetooth?
    Which isn't permitted according to the in-flight magazine (which I last checked in December)
    So pulling out the magazine to argue may not be a great idea!!

    Unless something has changed very recently the magazine refers to MiniDisc players. I wonder whether any of those have been seen on an EI flight in the last five years :)

    FWIW, my own pet peeve is the fact that EI do not allow iPads during taxi/takeoff/landing. They're fine on FR, and indeed every other airline I use regularly.

    I really wish we could have some global standard for what is and is not considered safe in the cabin – but I guess that's a pipe dream.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    MJohnston wrote: »
    I wonder if it’s because the last time I flew it was business class? They definitely saw me wearing the headphones and said nothing.

    There is no restriction in Business as the risk factor was demened negligible for risk of the window seat getting passed the aisle seats with headphones in the way - there was a difference for 3X3 or 2X4X2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    LRD's first revenue service planned for Tuesday 03/03 as;

    EIN158 DUB0950-1120LHR 32Q EI-LRD
    EIN159 LHR1215-1345DUB 32Q EI-LRD

    It then positions on Wednesday 04/03 to operate its first transatlantic crossing as;

    EIN990 DUB0955-1045SNN 32Q EI-LRD
    EIN1AC SNN1200-1425BOS 32Q EI-LRD

    EI-LRA will take the honours on Wednesday of operating the EI380/381 SNN-LHR-SNN service, after arriving that morning from JFK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,385 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    MJohnston wrote: »
    None of that reasoning really works - there have been fully wireless over ear headphones for many years that wouldn’t cause any physical problems. In addition, there have been in-ear ones that have had noise cancellation for a while too, yet those are fine?

    That all said, I kept my over ear headphones on on my last flight to SFO, so maybe they’ve dropped this silly idea.


    People should be able to hear announcements. if you are flying on an 11 hour flight it is not a significant inconvenience nor unreasonable in any way to take off the headphones for 2 minutes taking off and landing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 377 ✭✭Shamrockj


    EI-EIM first flight is 119 DUB-IAD 12.40 on 12th of March


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 377 ✭✭alancostello


    A7-AEH (potential future EI-EIK) is now en route DOH-DUB https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/a7-aeh#2400bc24


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    People should be able to hear announcements. if you are flying on an 11 hour flight it is not a significant inconvenience nor unreasonable in any way to take off the headphones for 2 minutes taking off and landing.

    I agree apart from the 2 minutes - it’s closer to ten times that when you include taxi time and preparation for landing.

    Scoot does not allow headphones of any kind during this period.

    I flew SIN-IPH last year and was allowed to use my headphones for about fifteen minutes.

    FWIW, and at the risk of some thread drift, I have to say that, safety demo notwithstanding, I tend to tune the PA out because much of the time it is used for unimportant things like scratch cards and perfumes that are exclusive to Aer Lingus. I can’t be the only one who does this — it’d be interesting to study whether customers would pay more attention (and thus safety would be improved) with fewer announcements. Less is more etc.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Noxegon wrote: »
    I agree apart from the 2 minutes - it’s closer to ten times that when you include taxi time and preparation for landing.

    Scoot does not allow headphones of any kind during this period.

    I flew SIN-IPH last year and was allowed to use my headphones for about fifteen minutes.

    FWIW, and at the risk of some thread drift, I have to say that, safety demo notwithstanding, I tend to tune the PA out because much of the time it is used for unimportant things like scratch cards and perfumes that are exclusive to Aer Lingus. I can’t be the only one who does this — it’d be interesting to study whether customers would pay more attention (and thus safety would be improved) with fewer announcements. Less is more etc.

    I absolutely agree re: shorter, concise only safety related PAs but EI most certainly don’t sell scratch cards lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Locker10a wrote: »
    I absolutely agree re: shorter, concise only safety related PAs but EI most certainly don’t sell scratch cards lol


    I was trying to video the water cannon salute after arriving into MIA on EI's inaugural service and it was ruined by incessant ramblings of the purser on the PA.



    Non stop talking from the moment we vacated the runway and was still waffling when we stopped at the gate... Would not shut up, first world problems eh lol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    All this talk about the headphones.....the rules are in Annex 6. IIRC the rule says something along the lines of "the operator shall ensure all passengers hear and understand the evacuation procedures".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    HTCOne wrote: »
    All this talk about the headphones.....the rules are in Annex 6. IIRC the rule says something along the lines of "the operator shall ensure all passengers hear and understand the evacuation procedures".

    Are you sure about that?

    I thought Annex 6 leaves it to the operator to establish their procedures for such.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    People should be able to hear announcements. if you are flying on an 11 hour flight it is not a significant inconvenience nor unreasonable in any way to take off the headphones for 2 minutes taking off and landing.

    Great - so then why are in-earphones still allowed?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Honestly lads, if you want to feed this back to EI then complete your “voice of the guest” survey when/if you receive it. It’s the only thing EI listen to.
    Twitter or giving the cabin crew a hard time will not change anything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Locker10a wrote: »
    Honestly lads, if you want to feed this back to EI then complete your “voice of the guest” survey when/if you receive it. It’s the only thing EI listen to.
    Twitter or giving the cabin crew a hard time will not change anything

    I'm not doing either of those things, I'm just trying to understand the policy as it doesn't make any sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,166 ✭✭✭trellheim


    I agree it does not.

    Airlines have no problem with "You must not smoke in the jacks" or some variant thereof during safety announcements , same with "tray tables must be up during taxi takeoff and landing"

    headphones they are completely all over the shop


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭Flesh Gorden


    I remember either reading or being told that if anything were to go wrong in flight, it's in the first 10 and the final 10mins of that flight.

    In other words if the thing were to crash land or drop from the sky on takeoff and require you to be fully aware of what's about to happen.

    Aer Lingus are definitely sticklers for compliance, especially when sat closer to the back or front of the plane.

    Ryanair, it's only been with the Polish crews, who I've seen enforce it and with full compliance from those I could see around me.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I remember either reading or being told that if anything were to go wrong in flight, it's in the first 10 and the final 10mins of that flight.

    In other words if the thing were to crash land or drop from the sky on takeoff and require you to be fully aware of what's about to happen.
    .

    This is correct


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 377 ✭✭Shamrockj


    All headphones / earphones must be removed for the demo. Over the head ones / noise cancelling must be removed for take off and landing.
    1 you cant hear announcements.
    2 you wouldn't be able to brace properly as it had a band over your head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,724 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Shamrockj wrote: »
    All headphones / earphones must be removed for the demo. Over the head ones / noise cancelling must be removed for take off and landing.
    1 you cant hear announcements.
    2 you wouldn't be able to brace properly as it had a band over your head.

    But this isn't what happens! In-ear phones are specifically announced as being fine on Aer Lingus flights, and nobody is asked to remove any type of head or ear phone in business class, it seems.

    Like I said, it's a rule that makes absolutely no sense. Either everyone needs to be able to hear announcements, and so the rule should apply to all head or ear phones and all cabin classes, or it doesn't really matter and they should drop it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    MJohnston wrote: »
    But this isn't what happens! In-ear phones are specifically announced as being fine on Aer Lingus flights, and nobody is asked to remove any type of head or ear phone in business class, it seems.

    Like I said, it's a rule that makes absolutely no sense. Either everyone needs to be able to hear announcements, and so the rule should apply to all head or ear phones and all cabin classes, or it doesn't really matter and they should drop it.

    I’m struggling with your logic here.

    Surely wearing over ear headphones increase the risk of not hearing emergency announcements during the riskiest part she of the journey (take off and landing)?

    In my experience of wearing in-ear buds you can still hear that an announcement is being made, but noise cancelling headphones could mean that they’re not heard?

    To be quite honest it is coming across from your posts that you know better.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement