Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MHRV when contractor won't agree to an airtightness level

  • 17-02-2020 4:18pm
    #1
    Blisterman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,459 ✭✭✭


    Looking at having an existing property completely gutted and rebuilt with new wall and attic insulation, new concrete floor slab as well as a two storey extension.

    The design is based around having Mechanical Heat Recovery Ventilation throughout the entire house, primarily for indoor air quality and comfort with saving money on heating a secondary concern.

    It's been out to tender, and the contractor I'm most happy on going with has put the caveat that, since it's an existing house, they don't believe they will achieve the specified air tightness of 2 m3/hr/m2, and that they will not agree to any specified level.

    I'm hoping that it will still be a reasonably air tight build. What I'm wondering is, am I wasting my time proceeding with a MHRV system? Will it still provide a good indoor air quality?


Comments

  • #2
    MicktheMan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭MicktheMan


    Blisterman wrote: »

    It's been out to tender, and the contractor I'm most happy on going with has put the caveat that, since it's an existing house, they don't believe they will achieve the specified air tightness of 2 m3/hr/m2, and that they will not agree to any specified level.
    :eek::eek:
    This would be of major concern to me and a major red flag. If the contractor cannot achieve a decent level of airtightness after a complete gut or indeed agree to any minimum level then I wouldn't choose that contractor. Period.

    MVHR requires a decent level of airtightness so "hoping" to achieve reasonable airtightness is, imo, v risky. Keep looking, good contractors are out there. 2 m3/hr/m2 is readily achievable if you know what you're doing.


  • #3
    ec_pc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 449 ✭✭ec_pc


    In my experience, some builders have not moved with the times and do not fully understand how to make a house effectively airtight or else they are perhaps too lazy to pay such attention to detail.

    Keeping a very close (daily) eye on the builder is they way I achieved a high level of airtightness and I queried absolutely everything. I suppose I did test the builders patience at times, but it's my money and my house!


  • #4
    BryanF
    Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 10,143 Mod ✭✭✭✭BryanF


    It depends on how extensive the renovations are.

    1. Op were design drawings and spec prepared?
    2. What did the builder price from drawings & spec or Bill of quantities?
    3. Was there a tender clarification meeting to discuss your concerns and ask how the Preformance criteria could be achieved?


Advertisement