Why some people think 9/11 was an inside job

Steel molten has not been reported by any individual, according to NIST. It boggles my mind to allow people to lie like this. A list of credible people and names is provided in the link, but is ignored by the official; study.,

It's stuff like this that makes me question the official narrative. The fact that no one spoke with any of these people proves that the official narrative is untrue. 

Although I've known for a long time that NIST lies about what people say, I am glad to find a site that offers the whole story about molten steel, complete with footnotes. As a matter of fact, it shows a pattern of avoiding evidence that disputes NIST's claims.

It was apparent to other agencies, cleaning workers, engineers and architects, and firemen that what they saw was melted steel. The only agency that doesn't seem to understand what was said is NIST. Considering what they did with NIST study of building seven, there is clearly a pattern of deceit 

FEMA and a major contractor's architect photographed the melted steel on 9/11. There is ample evidence in mainstream media that this occurred.

FEMA examined a few strange steel pieces that started melting. This is what you would expect if nanothermite composites were used to melt steel.

Presented here as a mainstream explanation.https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

In their explanation, they suggest a high concentration of sulfur causing this. Steel melting in a fire situation would have been impossible even on 9/11.

Elemental sulfur, found in explosives and nanothermites, lowers the melting point of steel. However, how the sulfur in elementary form reached the steel and melted it remains a mystery. Here, FEMA admits not having a source explanation for sulfur. Ask it to be further investigated. Of course, NIST ignored the fact that anyone mentioned steel melting.

Can you please explain how alleged Israeli students filled rooms with huge boxes from floor to ceiling? How did they get them inside (go as you suggest)?

Nobody ever reported truckloads of boxes being unloaded at site and moved through the WTC lobbies? Not knowing how something done is irrelevent. No one would be aware of this if they were not online.

Some PNAC people some some hired intelligence criminals inside the towers to plant some chemical composites on steel and leave is not hard as you think. If security working under the assumption they are genuine and no reason to doubt this pre 9/11 anything possible.

Personally the chemical nanothermite is best explantaion for what happened at towers. The controlled demolition chemical type of work requires less manpower and less time. A laboratory-produced type of nanothermite was deployed here, based on all the signatures left behind in dust. 

The noise given off by explosives at building seven would be 130 db range, which would be heard blocks away, according to NIST.

NIST in another one of its obvious lies claims no noise was ever heard on video or by any eyewitness on site.

Hmmm, really want this then here's the actual video of a CBS reporter and his cameraman recording the building collapse.

Can clearly hear a loud explosion and its echo in the background and then Penthouse drops from the roof. There was clearly a loud noise in the 130db range, so it is interesting why NIST denies that.Lies are astounding since we have actual media video which shows they lied. 

Listen between 0 and 1 seconds.

An investigation of the Twin Towers revealed that nanothermite was used in conjunction with fire to bring them down.

Building seven evidence that was the implosion of the building and removal of columns to bring it down. Building seven is not a silent event at all. I have shown with the video from CBS 

After the collapse, different agencies in mainstream not connected at all discovered unique and very rare anomalies. As a result of the deal in different fields, they were not aware of how it would affect the overall event.

A group led by RJ Lee discovered and commented on the discovery of millions of iron microspheres in dust from the WTC that far exceed all other iron microspheres found elsewhere. Despite the fact that all mainstream studies, including NIST one, only find fires reaching 900 degrees inside the towers before the collapse, this is a smoking gun that heat inside the towers reached 1500 degrees and higher. Because steel is an alloy, the iron couldn't have come from it because it is a mixture of different things.

There is some concrete evidence that something else was used to bring the towers down. Red/grey chips were discovered in WTC dust, so it can be concluded that the towers were brought down with something else. There is evidence that the truther community is on to something when RJ Lee discovered a unique product of thermite reaction.

Additionally, a completely different agency, FEMA, discovered steel that had been severely damaged and melted down. This is yet another proof that something other than fire was involved here. You can't melt steel in any building due to the lack of heat produced by burning materials. In addition, the fact that they found this and said that some elementary sulfur was attacking the steel without knowing where it came from is more evidence that something foreign was put in there to cause a collapse.

In addition, there was some melting taking place before the second tower collapsed, as red/liquid was leaking out of the windows. In light of the video itself, it is evident that there was no buckling of the trusses that caused the collapse, but rather some of the structural steel inside was melting down, causing the building to collapse structurally.

As a result of all the concrete turning to dust before it reaches the ground, this collapse must have been caused by a lot of heat and pressure. Considering that the red/grey chip released some kind of gas, I think it explains that steel was pushed horizontally and cracked up like a peeled banana when it was finalized?

It made sense that nano-thermite would be used in the attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11 since all media attention was focused on it, so there's no way you're going to have bombs going off everywhere while media cameras are too concentrated on it.

Still, some anomalies point to something else happening. There is no reason for you and others to consider this as serious, as you think it would be impossible to conduct this secretly without anyone knowing.

You forgot FEMA already mentioned here that steel had melted and that mixture must run off somewhere in the building fire. Seeing liquid pour out of the window shows there was melting going on.

It seems that debunkers don't have that mindset - oh yeah, there was red/yellow liquid pouring from the second tower's window, and FEMA found steel had melted within this tower - could there possibly be the same red hot yellow hot mixture pouring from that tower?

If you are looking for evidence of the nanothermite look for certain signatures.

: All red/grey chips contain nano aluminum and nano iron oxide and other materials. The science behind it is solid.

:Melting processes and Iron microspheres spheres are all byproducts of thermite reactions.

Were there byproducts found in the dust?

As you are aware, a mainstream study conducted by RJ Lee discovered an unusual anomaly of almost 6 percent of the dust covering Manhattan on 9/11 containing iron microspheres. The only conclusion they came to was that it was caused by a high-temperature event. The first byproduct of thermite reaction has been confirmed by mainstream study and not by truthers. 

In 2001, we were dealing with some revolutionary new materials. Nanothermite super thermite is known more today, but back then it was relatively unknown. I don't think Professor Harrit from Danish university fully knows how it was all made, some things about the mixture he couldn't figure out and would need more study. Regardless, aluminum oxide would blow off anyway if it appeared as if it were a powder or aerosol. Stuff went everywhere after the towers collapsed. Harrit experiments uncovered a gas unexplainable. Could it be some kind of byproduct?

Lets look at evidence Penthouse collapsed. According to NIST the collapse has moved sideways to the right with red lines.

How can floors collapsing in that way not break windows? Steel frame basically collapsing. The north face of building seven is undisturbed by all this happening inside the building on the media video?This is all pointing to one thing: truthers are right that the collapse began at the bottom, and that windows cracked when columns were moved out of the way. It is pure fantasy to say that steel frame and floors fell first, and then hollow shell of building fell next in final stage. No evidence of that whatsoever media photographs and video on that day show it. Just like NIST not understanding freefall happened at building seven.